Forums >
Photography Talk >
Elinchrom Ranger RX
Who has one. Who likes it. Who would have been happier with an Innovatronix/Vagabond/Calumet Travel-Pak. Oct 25 07 06:06 pm Link Bump. No one likes the Ranger/Ranger Speed? Another thing. Would most here prefer an assymetrical 2 head battery pack or a symmetrical one and why? Oct 26 07 10:19 am Link GG-Deluxe wrote: If I knew what it was, I could offer an opinion. Oct 26 07 10:22 am Link I've just got the RX Speed AS and it all looks good so far. I'll be giving it a proper workout over the next month or so. I am happy enough with all of my Elinchrom lights, so I don't expect anything less from the Ranger gear. Oct 26 07 10:25 am Link www.elinchrom.com Look under Battery Packs. 3 models: 1. Ranger 2. Ranger Speed 3. Ranger Speed AS (asymmetrical) Reasonably light weight battery pack and head system. Oct 26 07 10:25 am Link The Rusty Horse wrote: What Watt Seconds are you getting from the lights at full power - ie what are the ratios. I only know the total is 1100 Ws. Oct 26 07 10:26 am Link GG-Deluxe wrote: It's a 66/33% off-set. (I suppose the other 1% just sort of sits in the middle somewhere!!). Oct 26 07 10:28 am Link The Vagabond has AC outlets. You can plug ANYTHING into them. Isn't the Ranger proprietary--you can only connect a Elinchrom head? Might be a problem. I can run my iPhone/iPod with speakers out on location and my strobes!! Oct 26 07 10:31 am Link The Rusty Horse wrote: Would you have gotten the symmetrical one if you could do it again? What makes the AS better? Oct 26 07 10:35 am Link GG-Deluxe wrote: I may add the symmetrical at some point, but the AS suits the way I work - I've never been one for symmetry! It was easier for me to find a controlled way to boost the 33% side than to try and 'unbalance' the symmetrical set. Oct 26 07 10:58 am Link When using 2 heads with a Ranger 1100J pack if it is symmetic it split in half 550J per head. But for asymmetric pack it depends what ratios you set it , you can have one at 700J the other head 400J. Oct 26 07 11:09 am Link Gaylord Hill wrote: It's only a problem if you need AC on location. For those of us that don't, converting DC to AC is a waste - it's cleaner to run a dedicated DC setup. Oct 26 07 11:19 am Link The battery pack is great water proof, but because of the cost (£1195 or $2449 US dollar in UK!!)for a Ranger battery pack, Profoto cost even more. Also you only get 140 flashes for small one, big one only 250 flashes!! $2654 dollar for 250 flashes!! I am ordering a PURE SINE WAVES petrol driven power pack, it only cost (£425 or $871 US dollar) in gives you 2000 W of electricity for 5 hours!!! You can have as many flashes with you monoblock as you like in 5 hours!! When it runs out just add Gas (put some petrol in) ALL battery pack got limited life cycles, one also need to find out how much is the replacement battery! FOR PURE SINE wave invertors & power pack check it out www.batterymegastore.co.uk click on accessory, you will see the petrol driven power pack. If it rain I don't use studio light outdoor!! Oct 26 07 11:24 am Link I was always more of a fan of the Red Ranger myself. Oct 26 07 11:26 am Link Emily Fine Again wrote: I like the Power Ranger, great cartoon Oct 26 07 11:33 am Link La Image inc wrote: *high fives* Oct 26 07 11:33 am Link La Image inc wrote: 10 kg setup (pack + battery + head) vs 21 kg generator (not including lights). A setup that'll fit into a shoulder case vs a generator that you'd need both hands to carry (again, not including lights). Oct 26 07 11:35 am Link BlindMike wrote: Ooo I forgot about that Oct 26 07 11:54 am Link La Image inc wrote: Thanks. But is that in the specs released by Elinchrom or just an educated guess about the power in each head? Oct 26 07 03:03 pm Link GG-Deluxe wrote: All the specs are on the Elinchrom website: http://www.elinchrom.com/ Oct 26 07 03:08 pm Link I couldnt see the output in Ws for 66/33 2:1 output. It just says 2:1, 66%:33% and that the maximum is 1100 Ws down to the lowest setting. Does this mean you can use 1 head at 1100 Ws? Using both heads, what is the maximum Ws on the head with the most power? And what is with the proprietary flash sync system? Has anyone used PWs with this or the Hensel Porty successfully? Oct 26 07 03:18 pm Link Have it, love it. RX Speed AS. Power ratios are 66/33 as said before. I prefer this because the B channel can dial down a bit lower in power when needed, when used on its own. If you don't want that, then get a non-AS and use 2 Freelite S and 1 Freelite A head. This way, you can use both S heads for symmetrical output, out use 1 of each, and the A head will create the 66/33 ratio for you. Nice trick, yeah? Cheers, Thomas Oct 26 07 03:28 pm Link i've had the ranger AS pack for maybe 2 years now... 1 head + ringflash... couldn't live without it for outdoor location shoots... and i currently only have 1 pack + 1 head AC powered studio lights because i use the ranger in studio as well... bought as a kit and came with an extra battery so i never run out of power... 500 full power flashes... and pocket wizards work perfectly with it... after you buy the elinchrom pocket wizard cord... which is pricier than the standard cord for my profoto... Oct 26 07 03:32 pm Link meant to say i have the ranger RX speed non-AS... 50/50 output... obviously :-) Oct 26 07 03:38 pm Link GG-Deluxe wrote: Well it's 726J on one head & 374J on the other. Oct 26 07 03:46 pm Link GG-Deluxe wrote: You can use 1 head at full power, meaning 1100w/s. Oct 26 07 03:49 pm Link Oooo no edit button!! 2:1 ratio is approx 726J on one head & 374J the other. If it is 50/50 then will be half each. The pack only got 1100J, so you either fire it at max as you say 1100J one head or split it to diff ratio. Oct 26 07 03:50 pm Link That strikes me as a not so powerful lighting combo. I really like it - but come on - Vagabond II can power 4 640Ws AB1600s for over 100 flashes. Is there any way to use PWs with it? Oct 26 07 03:50 pm Link I see someone posted you can use PWs with it. Whats the battery life on these things (ie how many cycles of full to no charge) Do you need to plug them in all the time like the Vagabond? Any people using Vagabond and the Ranger and prefer one system over the other? Oct 26 07 03:54 pm Link GG-Deluxe wrote: I think Elinchrom use a radio syn device call Skyport or Sky...something, if that's what you mean by PWs Oct 26 07 03:59 pm Link La Image inc wrote: Thanks - the answer is hidden above - You can buy a sync cord - Elinchrom Sync standard to mono 1/8" plug. Oct 26 07 04:16 pm Link GG-Deluxe wrote: If you know all this, why start the thread? It can turn into another prosumer vs professional lighting argument and weee, we can all go round in circles. Oct 26 07 06:29 pm Link No, its not about starting a war. I know that the Elinchrom has digital selection of power, great color consistency, warning beep every recycle etc. But there are some other issues that affect photographers on location such as Power per head Cost Cost of spare tubes Ability to dial in whatever power you want on each head Not having to cry when your pack gets stolen or broken Ability to use monolights on AC That said, I am still interested in the Ranger Speed series. Here is an interesting post from another forum on a topic about power pack options. The poster wrote: "I would first look into monolights that can be managed remotely. 1) Cables leading back to a power pack limits placement 2) Proprietary battery packs for power packs are just absurd. They bundle off the shelf technology, obscure what it is, and sell it at silly prices. By assembling the battery pack yourself, you can use a better charger and decide specifically on the power/weight you want. The $50 sealed lead acid batteries generally available are state-of-the art. These can be replaced every year or two, with the size adjusted as needed. My ideal for flexible location lighting is a self-contained monolight with a small battery pack. Place it anywhere and go. Bring one. Add another and have three. Whatever. The idea of running cables to a power pack dates from the mid twentieth century. Still fine in the studio, but what's the point." Oct 27 07 05:16 am Link |