Snarly Old Photographer wrote:
Some breast enhancements look fine with clothes on.  However, I have yet to see a boob job that looks natural when in the nude.  Have you?

Yes many,   some you have to take some care and planning,   but yes many are fine..

Malin_ wrote:
Isn't it about time MM gets a Perv Forum where photographers can post their thoughts on fake boobs, bushes, pink bits and other crap that does not in the least pertain to models and modeling?

Thanks.

That is a very good idea.  Thanks for your input.

Snarly Old Photographer wrote:
Just wanting to stimulate some healthy discussion.

Epic Failure

Everyone has their own views and outlook on implants.

This thread is likely to be locked when it gets out of hand, as most of these generally do.

Snarly Old Photographer wrote:
Just wanting to stimulate some healthy discussion.

Mission Impossible !!!
Get out now while u still can

Malin_ wrote:
Isn't it about time MM gets a Perv Forum where photographers can post their thoughts on fake boobs, bushes, pink bits and other crap that does not in the least pertain to models and modeling?

Thanks.

This.

Malin_ wrote:
Isn't it about time MM gets a Perv Forum where photographers can post their thoughts on fake boobs, bushes, pink bits and other crap that does not in the least pertain to models and modeling?

Thanks.

Admittedly, there are many people who veiw those parts in a purely sexual conotation,  but not every one does. Shape, form, lines etc. are very much a part of beauty and modeling. You say you don't shoot nudes, that's fine, your choice. You have fabric covering you. But even then, you want that fabric to look good. You can't have much of a career in modeling if your wardrobe always makes you look like sh*t.

When a model does not have that fabric to hide behind, there isn't much they can do to alter their look. Augmentation, body hair, peircings, tattoos, hair color and length, that's about it. All of which get into MM discussions. As do wardrobe and make up for the clothed model. Discussing those things does not make them a perv any more than it would you a person with a foot fetish because you discussed shoes.

PTPhotoUT wrote:

. . . Discussing those things does not make them a perv any more than it would you a person with a foot fetish because you discussed shoes.

Very well put.

marissa charles wrote:
This.

True, but it wouldn't be near so interesting to read without the inevitable conflict

Snarly Old Photographer wrote:
Some breast enhancements look fine with clothes on.  However, I have yet to see a boob job that looks natural when in the nude.  Have you?

They're Fake. Nuff said

Snarly Old Photographer wrote:
However, I have yet to see a boob job that looks natural when in the nude.  Have you?

I work in strip clubs. I see a lot of implants, and yes, I've encountered a few that were very convincing.

The best one I have ever seen was done overseas, paid for by the girl's "sugar daddy," and cost something like $12,000 or $15,000. You could not tell they were implants. They looked like natural, small C-cup breasts.

Snarly Old Photographer wrote:
Just wanting to stimulate some healthy discussion.

This..NEVER happens on MM..ever

Malin_ wrote:
Isn't it about time MM gets a Perv Forum where photographers can post their thoughts on fake boobs, bushes, pink bits and other crap that does not in the least pertain to models and modeling?

Thanks.

You don't think fake boobs at all pertains to modeling? Why do models get them? why don't some photographers not like to shoot them? Some of us "pervs" don't even like to look at them but we do anyway-it's our cross to bear. Please photographers, don't have thoughts on models looks, the models don't like it.

Snarly Old Photographer wrote:
Maybe I would change my mind if I could see something like that.  I thought America had the best health care system in the world.  Why do our women have to travel overseas to have good work done?

The World Health Organisation ranks the US way down at #37

The rankings are 10 years old though.

http://www.photius.com/rankings/healthranks.html

Malin_ wrote:
Isn't it about time MM gets a Perv Forum where photographers can post their thoughts on fake boobs, bushes, pink bits and other crap that does not in the least pertain to models and modeling?

Thanks.

Yay for the Perv Forum!

Snarly Old Photographer wrote:
Maybe I would change my mind if I could see something like that.  I thought America had the best health care system in the world.  Why do our women have to travel overseas to have good work done?

It's significantly less expensive to have surgery done overseas. Even when you factor in the plane tickets, you will be saving approximately 50% for cosmetic procedures. Since we're talking about breast augmentation in this thread, this procedure costs approximately $2,800 at Bumrungrad Hospital, which is one of the top hospitals in Thailand.

The facilities are comparable to the best hospitals in the U.S., and the doctors have American education and work experience.

Malin_ wrote:
Isn't it about time MM gets a Perv Forum where photographers can post their thoughts on fake boobs, bushes, pink bits and other crap that does not in the least pertain to models and modeling?

Thanks.

I am very glad PTPhotoUT responded to your ignorant post because I was going to be a LOT less polite with my response. I do not even shoot art nudes and I HATE breast augmentations that look unnatural in a very NON-SEXUAL way.

It is moronic to me for someone to change their body by putting plastic, silicone, collagen, etc. into it or cutting stuff away with surgery just to change their look. It is fickle IMHO unless it is a porn star or adult entertainer who is getting big money because of it- though I have to admit, as a male and former athlete, I do recognize that what society wants men to look like is a LOT easier to obtain naturally than what a woman is supposed to look like.

In short, don't assume that because the OP was complaining about "fake boobs" that he was thinking sexually about it JUST BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE YOU ASSUMED IT WAS GOING.

Snarly Old Photographer wrote:
Some breast enhancements look fine with clothes on.  However, I have yet to see a boob job that looks natural when in the nude.  Have you?

But if we have seen nude natural-looking ones, we probably wouldn't know they were fake and couldn't tell you either way

Snarly Old Photographer wrote:
Some breast enhancements look fine with clothes on.  However, I have yet to see a boob job that looks natural when in the nude.  Have you?

Yes.

Snarly Old Photographer wrote:

That is a very good idea.  Thanks for your input.

Go easy on her, she's 99 frickin years old

marissa charles wrote:
This.

and she's 109...  WTF?

and Yes, I hate fake boobs

Snarly Old Photographer wrote:
Maybe I would change my mind if I could see something like that.  I thought America had the best health care system in the world.  Why do our women have to travel overseas to have good work done?

OMG I just stopped laughing from this. That is some funny shit.

I hope it wasn't meant to be serious.