Photographer
Matre
Posts: 39
Murphy, North Carolina, US
What is the difference ... really? In short, I've been a commercial photographer for longer than most of you have been alive. We used only TFP. TFP can mean one of a few things, but they are all pretty equal: Time for Photos, Trade for Photos, Time for Prints, Trade for Prints, Time for Pictures, or Trade for Pictures. Is that not what we are still doing? It's the images we trade. Back when we were printing on photo paper, we didn't say TFPPP (trade for pictures on photo paper). We are still trading for photos or pictures but they are often delivered on a different medium. Why drop the "P" and include the medium? Is there one missing: TFW (time for web)? We are still trading for photos (or pictures) for time and it does not matter what medium they are delivered on. If someone agreed to TFCD, will they be happy getting a blank CD? It doesn't refer to photos; it only refers to a CD. And what happens when HD Blu-Ray disks makes it into the market? Will we then need to add TFHDBRD? That's not too glowingly absurd, is it. Whatever medium the photos are delivered on, it's the photos that are important ... not the carrier. So why not simplifying things and revert to the tried and true, plain ole: TFP? It's simple and everyone in this industry should know what it refers to. IMHO. So, would you like to do a TFP shoot with me?
Model
Nat has a username
Posts: 3590
Oakland, California, US
Could also just mean "barter". Trade for "x". Don't overthink things, causes headaches
Photographer
Matre
Posts: 39
Murphy, North Carolina, US
A Raw Muse wrote: Trade for "x". Tradng for "x" could leave it wide open. But most, I believe, trade for "p" photos.
Photographer
Cherrystone
Posts: 37171
Columbus, Ohio, US
Through Elizabeths Eyes wrote: And thru 12 inches of snow whilst walking to school.
Model
Nat has a username
Posts: 3590
Oakland, California, US
Matre wrote: Tradng for "x" could leave it wide open. But most, I believe, trade for "p" photos. That's the point; all parties involved in a particular shoot can decide what "x" to barter for. For model A she may want a new print for her book, for model B she may prefer photography lessons in exchange for shoot time, for model C... If you only want to enter into trade for print agreements, and that works for you and models you work with, perfect. You found a system that works for you.
Photographer
i c e c o l d
Posts: 8610
Fort Myers, Florida, US
Cherrystone wrote: And thru 12 inches of snow whilst walking to school. Barefooted...
Photographer
Shane Noir
Posts: 2332
Los Angeles, California, US
A Raw Muse wrote: Could also just mean "barter". Trade for "x". Don't overthink things, causes headaches Asking for TFX would probably get me slapped.
Photographer
PashaPhoto
Posts: 9726
Brooklyn, New York, US
i c e c o l d wrote: Barefooted... all while fighting off vicious, yet incredibly nibble footed and well styled, gangs
Photographer
Cherrystone
Posts: 37171
Columbus, Ohio, US
PashaPhoto wrote: all while fighting off vicious, yet incredibly nibble footed and well styled, gangs
Riff!!! Damn man where did you find THAT one? Got one of Rita Moreno dancing too?
Model
Nat has a username
Posts: 3590
Oakland, California, US
Shane Noir wrote: Asking for TFX would probably get me slapped. *runs*
Photographer
PashaPhoto
Posts: 9726
Brooklyn, New York, US
Cherrystone wrote: Riff!!! Damn man where did you find THAT one? Got one of Rita Moreno dancing too?
Photographer
KSBPHOTOSdotCOM
Posts: 112
Borroloola, Northern Territory, Australia
i c e c o l d wrote: Barefooted... barefoot, 12 inches of snow uphill both ways in the triple-digit heat of the desert sun!
Photographer
MisterC
Posts: 15162
Portland, Oregon, US
KSBPHOTOSdotCOM wrote: barefoot, 12 inches of snow uphill both ways in the triple-digit heat of the desert sun! And when we got home our parents beat us, then forced us to do chores like mowing Nebraska.
Photographer
Through Elizabeths Eyes
Posts: 4916
Yelm, Washington, US
MisterC wrote: And when we got home our parents beat us, then forced us to do chores like mowing Nebraska. Seriously though, OP. TF* means just that. We're willing to barter. I may not do TFP with you (or TFImages, regardless of medium) because I don't feel you'll benefit me, or having images from you would benefit me, but I might be willing to do TFOilChange or TFRum.
Photographer
Matre
Posts: 39
Murphy, North Carolina, US
MisterC wrote: but I might be willing to do TFRum. I hadn't thought of that: I'll do TFR But in none (I may have missed it) of these responses was directed to TFCD or TFDVD. Those seem to be absurd ones if they are referring to images, or acceptable if they are referring to music or music.
Model
Kozmina
Posts: 6536
Bakersfield, California, US
A Raw Muse wrote: That's the point; all parties involved in a particular shoot can decide what "x" to barter for. For model A she may want a new print for her book, for model B she may prefer photography lessons in exchange for shoot time, for model C... If you only want to enter into trade for print agreements, and that works for you and models you work with, perfect. You found a system that works for you. +1
Photographer
Through Elizabeths Eyes
Posts: 4916
Yelm, Washington, US
Matre wrote: I hadn't thought of that: I'll do TFR But in none (I may have missed it) of these responses was directed to TFCD or TFDVD. Those seem to be absurd ones if they are referring to images, or acceptable if they are referring to music or music. TFCD is common because it gives you a place to store the images. I still have a large handful of CDs from when I first started modeling. You're not going to send every model a USB thumb drive, and not every photographer has a website with hosting or knows enough to be able to do online proofs or send large images. Though, the more experienced I got as a model, and the higher quality of photographers I worked with, the less and less I received CDs, and more and more frequently I did/do receive images through email, gallery download, dropbox, etc. Numerous reasons, some valid, some not. Also, I've done TFRum a few times, and it always leaves everyone happy.
Photographer
Odin Photo
Posts: 1462
Salt Lake City, Utah, US
Matre wrote: Whatever medium the photos are delivered on, it's the photos that are important ... not the carrier. I disagree. A very large number of models on MM and other modeling sites have never had a physical portfolio. It is very largely web based. I am fairly certain there are models that would feel ripped off if they were handed fabulous images that were printed on the best Ilford papers available. What are they going to do with it? I think this is just photographers stating what the model can expect. Full disclosure almost always leads to better working relationships and defining the medium on which the images are delivered is important to many. Regarding TFCD vs TFDVD, if a photographer buys DVDs to deliver images on, it may help the model who has only a CD drive in her computer to know that she should ask specifically for a CD of images as opposed to a DVD.
Photographer
Matre
Posts: 39
Murphy, North Carolina, US
Through Elizabeths Eyes wrote: TFCD is common because it gives you a place to store the images. I still have a large handful of CDs from when I first started modeling. You're not going to send every model a USB thumb drive, and not every photographer has a website with hosting or knows enough to be able to do online proofs or send large images. Though, the more experienced I got as a model, and the higher quality of photographers I worked with, the less and less I received CDs, and more and more frequently I did/do receive images through email, gallery download, dropbox, etc. Numerous reasons, some valid, some not. Also, I've done TFRum a few times, and it always leaves everyone happy. But it's got to be smooth rum. My point about the TFCD or TFDVD is that we have switched from the actual trade to what will hold the trade. Unless you're going to trade blank CDs, the TFCD refers to the carrier medium. But chances are that the trade will consist of images, photographs, etc., which would then be more correct to say TFP "and I'll give them to you on a DVD … oh, you only have a CD, which OS are you using?" I agree it's all semantics. But probably over 90% of the trades are of images. 100% of mine have been, so maybe I'm just missing out.
Photographer
Matre
Posts: 39
Murphy, North Carolina, US
Odin Photo wrote: I disagree. A very large number of models on MM and other modeling sites have never had a physical portfolio. It is very largely web based. I am fairly certain there are models that would feel ripped off if they were handed fabulous images that were printed on the best Ilford papers available. What are they going to do with it? I think this is just photographers stating what the model can expect. Full disclosure almost always leads to better working relationships and defining the medium on which the images are delivered is important to many. Regarding TFCD vs TFDVD, if a photographer buys DVDs to deliver images on, it may help the model who has only a CD drive in her computer to know that she should ask specifically for a CD of images as opposed to a DVD. I respect your disagreement, but just slightly less than to disagree with it. Are you saying if a model gets invited to a talent call that she will ask those interviewing her to pull up her web page? Even many models who carry iPads have printed portfolios in tow, if only because what the call is for: print or broadcast. A successful model needs to be prepared for anything. An iPad, or similar device, transmits light, while a printed portfolio reflects light. If the job were for print, I'd want to see the printed portfolio. And of course, the model release should clearly specify what will be the pay or trade, and that is signed before the shoot begins. As I said in my previous response, besides having a CD or DVD player, the media needs to be formatted for the correct operating system; though a slightly less problem as it was a few years ago. I'm not trying to change the world, as you are welcomed and encouraged to do whatever you feel is best.
Photographer
Rick Dupuis Photography
Posts: 6825
Truro, Nova Scotia, Canada
MisterC wrote: And when we got home our parents beat us, then forced us to do chores like mowing Nebraska. and they made us go out and get the branch they were going to beat us with.
Photographer
A-M-P
Posts: 18465
Orlando, Florida, US
TFP is an Internet slang so there is no right or wrong terminilogy. Also TFP meant time for prints not time for photos. Which is why if they are given a CD instead of prints now they just call it TFCD or whatever.
Model
Damianne
Posts: 15978
Austin, Texas, US
I just say TF*. Trade for whatever the fuck method you want to send me images, because I really don't care that much.
Photographer
Jerry Nemeth
Posts: 33355
Dearborn, Michigan, US
Cherrystone wrote: And thru 12 inches of snow whilst walking to school. I remember that.
Photographer
Peter Schroeder
Posts: 3453
New York, New York, US
Matre wrote: TFP can mean one of a few things, but they are all pretty equal: Time for Photos, Trade for Photos, Time for Prints, Trade for Prints, Time for Pictures, or Trade Hummm...? forgetting the GWC's TFP - Trade for Pussy
Photographer
TRPn Pics
Posts: 10435
Silver Springs Shores, Florida, US
Peter Schroeder wrote: Hummm...? forgetting the GWC's TFP - Trade for Pussy This would been sooo much better if your avi was that of a cat.
Photographer
RalphNevins Photography
Posts: 473
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Rick Dupuis Photography wrote: and they made us go out and get the branch they were going to beat us with. Luxury
Photographer
Optix
Posts: 225
Boston, Massachusetts, US
Don't take it personal, but it seems like a long rant about semantics... The bottom line is that bartering, not monetary compensation, is the intent. The whole point about using acronyms, is to cut back on the amount of text, hence you implicitly answered your own dilemna. Long lines of text (like my response) are annoying. I would be more concerned about the lack of creativity when writing comments or critiques. "I like your expression" or "great pose" is something that I would write about. As a side note, I do not think that anyone expects blank CDs.
Artist/Painter
MainePaintah
Posts: 1892
Saco, Maine, US
Hey, don't forget us artists on MM. I always TFP or TFD. TFP= Trade for painting TFD= Trade for drawing
Photographer
Optix
Posts: 225
Boston, Massachusetts, US
A-M-P wrote: TFP is an Internet slang so there is no right or wrong terminilogy. Also TFP meant time for prints not time for photos. Which is why if they are given a CD instead of prints now they just call it TFCD or whatever. Exactly. Before the internet, when photography was a more exclusive business, people dealt with prints. No one ever traded their negatives, unless it was a trade for $$$, hence prints of negatives (not the fairly recent internet files) was the end result.
Photographer
AgX
Posts: 2851
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US
RalphNevins Photography wrote: Luxury I was waiting (hoping) for someone to bring that one.
Model
Koryn
Posts: 39496
Boston, Massachusetts, US
I always preferred receiving web-size images via email after trade shoots. I have some prints of work I've done in the past, because I frame and keep them for myself. They are not particularly beneficial as a self-promotion tool for models who network primarily online. I used to organize and attend assorted networking events, and still did not need to have a print portfolio, because I had a website, comp cards, and everyone at the events had Iphones, and would happily view the online portfolios. When I wanted a print of something, I would generally request that a print-size file be sent to my email address, and I would pay to print it myself.
Photographer
BRC Photos
Posts: 150
Alcoa, Tennessee, US
I personally like to let the model know exactly what they are getting from me, whether it is prints, a DVD, or anything else.
Photographer
Enfire Photography
Posts: 1488
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US
ShivaKitty wrote: I always preferred receiving web-size images via email after trade shoots. I have some prints of work I've done in the past, because I frame and keep them for myself. They are not particularly beneficial as a self-promotion tool for models who network primarily online. I used to organize and attend assorted networking events, and still did not need to have a print portfolio, because I had a website, comp cards, and everyone at the events had Iphones, and would happily view the online portfolios. When I wanted a print of something, I would generally request that a print-size file be sent to my email address, and I would pay to print it myself. model me agrees with shiva
Model
P I X I E
Posts: 35440
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
ShivaKitty wrote: I always preferred receiving web-size images via email after trade shoots. I have some prints of work I've done in the past, because I frame and keep them for myself. They are not particularly beneficial as a self-promotion tool for models who network primarily online. I used to organize and attend assorted networking events, and still did not need to have a print portfolio, because I had a website, comp cards, and everyone at the events had Iphones, and would happily view the online portfolios. When I wanted a print of something, I would generally request that a print-size file be sent to my email address, and I would pay to print it myself. Yep.
Model
Isserley
Posts: 1650
Gent, East Flanders, Belgium
ShivaKitty wrote: I always preferred receiving web-size images via email after trade shoots. I have some prints of work I've done in the past, because I frame and keep them for myself. They are not particularly beneficial as a self-promotion tool for models who network primarily online. I used to organize and attend assorted networking events, and still did not need to have a print portfolio, because I had a website, comp cards, and everyone at the events had Iphones, and would happily view the online portfolios. When I wanted a print of something, I would generally request that a print-size file be sent to my email address, and I would pay to print it myself. It's the same for me
Photographer
Peter Schroeder
Posts: 3453
New York, New York, US
Peter Schroeder wrote: Hummm...? forgetting the GWC's TFP - Trade for Pussy TRPn Pics wrote: This would been sooo much better if your avi was that of a cat. here ya go... lol
Photographer
New Dawn Photography
Posts: 3015
San Ramon, California, US
Rick Dupuis Photography wrote: and they made us go out and get the branch they were going to beat us with. ...and we liked it!
|