Yum Yum Photo wrote:
I was published December 2012 Italian vogue through Photovogue. I also sold a fashion print to the fashion editor of british vogue by winning a showing through them.

I am the person withe chickens. The site is not necessarily to aid fashion photographers but good photographers.

Yay,

Well done!

Yum Yum Photo wrote:
They have given me some great exposure and I am running with it. And I will try to support them however I can.

-chris

No need for a veiled apology just because some people are absolutely clueless. Congratulations on your success and best wishes for much, much more.

Yum Yum Photo wrote:
I was published December 2012 Italian vogue through Photovogue. I also sold a fashion print to the fashion editor of british vogue by winning a showing through them.

I am the person withe chickens. The site is not necessarily to aid fashion photographers but good photographers.

Congrats for making it work for you. Smart.

Yum Yum Photo wrote:
Published on the site.... Thats great... Watch for the initiatives.... One day you might be published by them in the magazine .... you got to be in it to win it....

thanks you  yum yum  will keep that in mind.

Yum Yum Photo wrote:
Like that shot..... I like how it goes on and on........

-Chris

Thank you *ma'am*, I took that on the maiden voyage with my new Fuji x100, that was about the 10th shot taken with it. That camera is amazing, you'll see a phone booth and two people at the end of the "tunnel" when looking at the original photo (high res).  The detail this camera picks up at a distance is astonishing, though not really shown in this online example. 

It's pretty cool for someone like me to get anything published anywhere other than their own FB or Tumblr :-)

Yum Yum Photo wrote:
I am a Mam.... LOL.....

The photo is great to why not?  I does feel good. Its nice for someone to verify a picture you yourself like too..... Do you do alot architectural photography???

Ha ha and fixed as they say.  Pardon my error, ma'am :-)

I'm very new to landscape and architecture photography.  I knew I was on to something when I saw this but I'm much more comfortable with people and I know when I have taken a great shot of a person, but when it comes to architecture, landscape or even still life I often scratch my head wondering if the shot is any good.  I've been doing much more of it lately just to get a better feel for it.

Yum Yum Photo wrote:
Some people have a gift with architecture.....It is not easy.... I know some people who are really good at it.... They are very patient people....

I think maybe you should explore it more......

-Chris

Thanks for the encouragement.  I've been studying up lately and taking many more architectural type shots, i think I'll get there eventually.

Yum Yum Photo wrote:
Nice pictures! If you make picture of the day you can make the magazine once in a while they feature three photographers under new talent...... But they dont tell you. You have to get the magazine and check it or you have to be lucky and someone will tell you.
-Chris

ORLY

Yum Yum Photo wrote:
Nice pictures! If you make picture of the day you can make the magazine once in a while they feature three photographers under new talent...... But they don't tell you. You have to get the magazine and check it or you have to be lucky and someone will tell you.
-Chris

That's what I was afraid of. I didn't even know I made the second PoD until another photographer told me...so anyone have a subscription to the magazine? LOL!

Yum Yum Photo wrote:
Oh Really.... yes. LOL.

Check Barnes and Nobel or ask someone from Europe to check......

My picture was used to illustrate an article I was lucky someone contacted me for high res file then I would have never known.

That's what I'd figure would happen. the files we upload to the site are so small it would be hard to make a great looking full page.

studio36uk wrote:
I am forever amused by those around here [MM] who poo-pah, and often actively discourage, the marking of images by the actual copyright owner / photographer. Then what you are fighting are the various on-line publishers like this that brand the very same images in their own name sometimes, going beyond even a brand name, even marking them with a clearly false copyright notice.

1) It smacks of false attribution, a clear violation of moral rights where they are available [ALL of Europe];

and

2) Even in respect of the US it is a dodgy proposition, doing what they are doing, because it clearly amounts to false statement of origin in breach of the Lanham Act and violates, on the face of it, various other laws including the US Copyright Act [@ 17 USC 512]

Studio36

You make a good point. In fact, one of the requirements is that any image submitted bears no copyright mark from the photographer.  Accordingly, I have always sent them very low res, small images sans watermark.

V Laroche wrote:
http://www.vogue.it/en/photovogue/

It's a website where you upload your photos and Vogue stamps them with a logo. I have been noticing more images stamped with the Vogue logo on models' and photographers' MM portfolios lately. This is quite silly since I could photocopy one of my hermit crabs, upload the image to this hosting site, and have it stamped with the Vogue logo. I feel bad for the models who put these up on their ports-- they obviously believe the photog got their photo published in Vogue! I feel so embarrassed for them and feel bad that they were misled by unscrupulous photographers.

So I made this thread to be a white knight. NOW YOU KNOW.

Also, feel free to upload amusing photos and then post them here with the Vogue logo on them. I think this has opportunities for LOLs.

Hmmm.. sounds like you don't know what you're talking about. It's not Vogue Italia you have a problem with it's the models who say they are being published when they aren't.
Do YOU have any images on VI?
Thinking logically, you really are pointing the finger at the wrong people.

R Michael Walker wrote:
A show in Milan has resulted from the site. Here's the invite: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid … =1&theater

Congrats

V Laroche wrote:
http://www.vogue.it/en/photovogue/

It's a website where you upload your photos and Vogue stamps them with a logo. I have been noticing more images stamped with the Vogue logo on models' and photographers' MM portfolios lately. This is quite silly since I could photocopy one of my hermit crabs, upload the image to this hosting site, and have it stamped with the Vogue logo. I feel bad for the models who put these up on their ports-- they obviously believe the photog got their photo published in Vogue! I feel so embarrassed for them and feel bad that they were misled by unscrupulous photographers.

So I made this thread to be a white knight. NOW YOU KNOW.

Also, feel free to upload amusing photos and then post them here with the Vogue logo on them. I think this has opportunities for LOLs.

being that I have had one chosen but submitted alot it is still a very nice thing to be able to have one viewed on Vogue Italia. Please dont feel sorry for me I feel my port here on MM speaks for itself and I know it isn't in the magazine but feel Vogue Italia has some amazing work on its sight.  BTW they dont just stamp photos with their logo they are chosen for use on the sight

R Michael Walker wrote:
New show in Milan of the best of Photo Vogue. http://www.vogue.it/en/people-are-talki … ue-opening

awesome! congrats! (assuming you were in it since they featured so many of yours as pic of the day, which I saw well before I knew you were on MM)