|
#1, #2, #3 or none?  open for opinions, tips, and suggestions, thank you! I'm not crazy for the last two in all honesty but its all the photag gave me to work with out of all the other shots  lol but I need a sitting pose! http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d75/S … LLERRR.jpg http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d75/S … e12_lo.jpg http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d75/S … e13_lo.jpg Dec 09 12 10:08 am Link And a happy thank you in advance shot of me at the mall for those who are taking their time out to reply  thank youuuuu! http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d75/S … /__429.jpg Dec 09 12 10:08 am Link i like #2 the best Dec 09 12 10:09 am Link Photo 1 You have all the space behind you but have lost your foot Photo 2 Interesting But would love to see your beautiful eyes [Arch that back, lower shoulder toward camera for long looking neck] Photo 3 Not so much, pose not flattering Photo 4 Think long fingers Hair band on wrist Those eyes need to be in focus Merry Christmas and Happy New Year Dec 09 12 12:17 pm Link Argh, I'm afraid it's one of those cases where it's "none of them". I love #1 - but it's a shame the photographer cut off your foot in the shot. Dec 09 12 12:29 pm Link model emily wrote: Agreed! Dec 09 12 12:39 pm Link #1: Terrible composition (the photographer's fault, not yours). Your body is dead-center (lots of dead space to your back) and your foot is chopped off. That's a bummer; this could have been a great shot. #2: Nice use of light, but you're kinda gray. And I wish you weren't wearing those sunglasses. #3: See above. Interesting pose. #4: Terrible snapshot. Badly lighted, out of focus, noisy, badly composed. None of them are up to your port's current standards. Dec 09 12 04:11 pm Link Damn number one was gorgeous. Sucks they cropped it out  Maybe if its cropped in a little tighter it can be salvageable.Dec 09 12 04:19 pm Link I like the first one but it looks like the photographer sneezed when he hit the shutter, it's badly framed... You look amazing in the shot tho but to bad the photographer screwed it up! Dec 09 12 04:37 pm Link #1 is the best pose, but the foot being cut-off is a no no. 2 and 3 show off your legs really well too. Dec 09 12 04:40 pm Link agree with others about #1 like #2 as well. Dec 09 12 04:48 pm Link keep one even w/ the cut off foot...fashion shots in magazines seem to ignore rules of cropping...cutting off limbs at joints, weird crops, etc. It's the best of the 3 you posted...wish the foot weren't cropped as well.. Dec 10 12 08:03 am Link THanks for much guys!!! I'm using #1 in that case. I'm taking a chance! Thank you Dec 14 12 01:02 pm Link Keep #1, maybe crop it into a square, and maybe cut off your foot even more. The others don't show you off enough, so don't keep them. Dec 14 12 01:12 pm Link First one is best but he cut your foot off. Dec 14 12 01:15 pm Link #1 Your left Foot is half chopped off, So no on that #2 and #3 are good but #2 is the best Dec 14 12 02:39 pm Link model emily wrote: yup... Dec 14 12 02:51 pm Link Nikki Magnusson wrote: Agreed Dec 14 12 03:00 pm Link I agree with everyone else. Number 1 is great but the foot was cut off, I'm sure it can be salvaged with a cool crop though. I also like number 2 but I think it feels like you're not well lit or too dark, kind of like it lost detail in your dress Dec 14 12 04:39 pm Link model emily wrote: +2 Dec 14 12 07:08 pm Link Samantha Emme wrote: My thoughts too - crop it close to the back and the feet won't be such an issue. Dec 14 12 11:35 pm Link |
