Forums > Off-Topic Discussion > Women that are faithful and a sexual deviant??

Photographer

Mad Hatter Imagery

Posts: 1669

Buffalo, New York, US

Jan 26 13 10:15 pm Link

Photographer

ontherocks

Posts: 23575

Salem, Oregon, US

i think people who need variety shouldn't enter into exclusive relationships to begin with or should at least discuss it with their partner to see if they're ok with an open relationship. no point in making yourself or the other person miserable. if you're a horny beast then be a horny beast. just don't try to pretend you're not.

i think you can have someone who is an excellent lover and faithful. but better make sure her needs are getting met (and those needs may not always involve sex although the dating advice i've read says women leave because of bad sex) or someone else might start meeting those needs. some of it has to do with opportunity and temptation. some people are just magnets for attention or are in careers where there's lots of opportunity to tangle with new people (actors working on location come to mind).

i also think maybe there's this thing where if you're in a relationship with someone maybe you don't want to even try to cross certain lines whereas if it were a fling with someone you just met what have you got to lose? women say they are all for honest communication but i haven't really found that they want to hear about certain things.

Jan 26 13 10:28 pm Link

Model

Damianne

Posts: 15978

Austin, Texas, US

I think you're using your own ideas about "right" and "wrong" as it applies to sexuality to decide that someone that does one will do anything inside of that group.


Being vanilla in the sack doesn't mean you're more likely to be faithful.
Being more open to exploration doesn't mean you're more likely to cheat.


I'm a little offended by the implications, like if I like a little light choking or don't mind exploring a partner's fantasies, I'm a liar and a cheater.

Ugh, or even that if someone has had limited partners they're going to be shit in bed.

Seriously, your entire OP is completely insulting.

Jan 26 13 10:33 pm Link

Photographer

jesse paulk

Posts: 3712

Phoenix, Arizona, US

Mad Hatter Imagery wrote:
Is there an inverse relationship between women that are faithful, and those that can and are willing to fulfill a guy's every fantasy? lol. It seems like the only women that any guys say are good in bed and frisky and creative are the ones that they fully expect have cheated on them. And those of women that are quite boring and under experienced sexually, and have no strong desire to be more sexual are the ones that are generally completely faithful. Are there too many women that are the best of both worlds, or are we talking total mutual exclusivity?

open up to the idea that your idea of what sex, cheating, faithfulness and relationships are might not be the same as what others believe.

Jan 26 13 10:35 pm Link

Photographer

jesse paulk

Posts: 3712

Phoenix, Arizona, US

Damianne wrote:
Seriously, your entire OP is completely insulting.

yeah pretty much

Jan 26 13 10:36 pm Link

Photographer

jesse paulk

Posts: 3712

Phoenix, Arizona, US

also, what guys think

is generally stupid, especially regarding what makes a "good women"

and especially when you define "good women" as women that can fulfill men's fantasies

well now i'm thoroughly disgusted

Jan 26 13 10:38 pm Link

Photographer

DougBPhoto

Posts: 39248

Portland, Oregon, US

Damianne wrote:
Seriously, your entire OP is completely insulting.

About the only thing not insulting in the OP was the time stamp.

Jan 26 13 10:40 pm Link

Photographer

jesse paulk

Posts: 3712

Phoenix, Arizona, US

https://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m7hdnhCatS1rbiq54o1_400.jpg

Jan 26 13 10:44 pm Link

Model

Damianne

Posts: 15978

Austin, Texas, US

DougBPhoto wrote:

About the only thing not insulting in the OP was the time stamp.

No, I really didn't need to be reminded this kind of bullshit meanders around the world at 10 pm on a saturday.

Jan 26 13 10:45 pm Link

Photographer

Cherrystone

Posts: 37171

Columbus, Ohio, US

Mad Hatter Imagery wrote:
It seems like the only women that any guys say are good in bed and frisky and creative are the ones that they fully expect have cheated on them.

Horseshit

My wife could've turned John Holmes eyeballs backwards.....did not cheat.

What can we expect your next troll to be about?

Jan 26 13 10:48 pm Link

Model

Misty R H

Posts: 471

Anaheim, California, US

Being faithful and being with one person for the long haul doesn't have to equate to being "vanilla" in the sack as someone said.  When you are with someone that you know loves you (even with all of your faults) and understands you and communicates with you things in bed can be great. This is because this is the type of relationship where you can ask this trusted person to do anything.  This trusted person knows what you like and how to please you.

You don't have to worry about impressing this person. There is no performance anxiety. This can be very liberating because you can truly be yourself.

Variety doesn't have to mean being with different people. There are different ways to have variety with the same person.

Jan 26 13 10:50 pm Link

Photographer

Eyesso

Posts: 1218

Orlando, Florida, US

I think I have the best of both worlds with my wife.  I don't want anything more, and neither does she.  Imagine that.

Jan 26 13 10:51 pm Link

Model

IDiivil

Posts: 4615

Los Angeles, California, US

I'm freaky in bed and faithful :

Jan 26 13 11:00 pm Link

Photographer

jesse paulk

Posts: 3712

Phoenix, Arizona, US

IDiivil wrote:
I'm freaky in bed and faithful :

Jan 26 13 11:09 pm Link

Model

IDiivil

Posts: 4615

Los Angeles, California, US

jesse paulk wrote:

nerdy in bed maybe, i've seen photos. :p

Nerdy in bed in that I'm just every video game fantasy girl ever ;P

Well, the ones with the small tits anyways.

Jan 26 13 11:13 pm Link

Photographer

Vector 38

Posts: 8296

Austin, Texas, US

Damianne to Mad Hatter wrote:
I think you're using your own ideas about "right" and "wrong" as it applies to ...

Mad Hatter's got a long string of threads using that very modus operandi ...

Jan 26 13 11:28 pm Link

Model

hygvhgvkhy

Posts: 2092

Chicago, Illinois, US

Mad Hatter Imagery wrote:
Is there an inverse relationship between women that are faithful, and those that can and are willing to fulfill a guy's every fantasy? lol. It seems like the only women that any guys say are good in bed and frisky and creative are the ones that they fully expect have cheated on them. And those of women that are quite boring and under experienced sexually, and have no strong desire to be more sexual are the ones that are generally completely faithful. Are there too many women that are the best of both worlds, or are we talking total mutual exclusivity?

If you're saying you don't think a woman can be freaky and faithful, it's not true.

That's all I'm sayin:P

Oh, and it's my birthdaaaay!(:post:)

Jan 26 13 11:38 pm Link

Photographer

Art of the nude

Posts: 12067

Grand Rapids, Michigan, US

Presley ONeil wrote:
If you're saying you don't think a woman can be freaky and faithful, it's not true.

That's all I'm sayin:P

Oh, and it's my birthdaaaay!(:post:)

Happy birthday.

And, you may have missed the memo but you aren't allowed to be aware of sex until you're 18.

Jan 26 13 11:44 pm Link

Photographer

jesse paulk

Posts: 3712

Phoenix, Arizona, US

AND FUCK IT MM SUCKS

Jan 26 13 11:45 pm Link

Model

hygvhgvkhy

Posts: 2092

Chicago, Illinois, US

Art of the nude wrote:

Happy birthday.

And, you may have missed the memo but you aren't allowed to be aware of sex until you're 18.

Lmao, I know. I didn't miss the memo. All I said was it wasn't true, I never said how I knew(:

Jan 26 13 11:46 pm Link

Model

Jules NYC

Posts: 21617

New York, New York, US

Madonna Whore Complex
Look it up.

PS I could be wrong, but I remember looking at your profile and seeing it listed as female at one point in time.

Did you switch genders to ask a bunch of offensive questions you always wanted to know?

Jan 27 13 12:01 am Link

Photographer

Jeffrey M Fletcher

Posts: 4861

Asheville, North Carolina, US

Op, I hope you realize that men can also be "quite boring and under experienced sexually". You probably also realize that those men who operate under a strategy of trying to find "faithful" women who's sexual philosophy is that they exist only to "fulfill a guy's every fantasy" are very likely to be both of the former.

Jan 27 13 05:07 am Link

Model

Damianne

Posts: 15978

Austin, Texas, US

Jeffrey M Fletcher wrote:
Op, I hope you realize that men can also be "quite boring and under experienced sexually". You probably also realize that those men who operate under a strategy of trying to find "faithful" women who's sexual philosophy is that they exist only to "fulfill a guy's every fantasy" are very likely to be both of the former.

From personal experience I can tell you men can be any kind of experience sexually and boring in bed.
Being good in bed is about paying attention to what pleases your partner, and being comfortable enough with yourself and your partner to be open and nonjudgemental enough that everyone feels comfortable talking about what they want.
There are no fixall tricks to being awesome in bed.
Mostly it's about rapport and paying attention to one another.

Jan 27 13 05:18 am Link

Photographer

Jeffrey M Fletcher

Posts: 4861

Asheville, North Carolina, US

Damianne wrote:

From personal experience I can tell you men can be any kind of experience sexually and boring in bed.
Being good in bed is about paying attention to what pleases your partner, and being comfortable enough with yourself and your partner to be open and nonjudgemental enough that everyone feels comfortable talking about what they want.
There are no fixall tricks to being awesome in bed.
Mostly it's about rapport and paying attention to one another.

No argument with the idea that either sex can be quite experienced in numbers and of limited interest.

I do think though that rapport, attentiveness, comfort etc., are qualities that can be developed and improved through experience as well. It depends on the goals.

Jan 27 13 05:25 am Link

Photographer

SPRINGHEEL

Posts: 38224

Detroit, Michigan, US

https://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l249/SPRINGHEEL69/1239788582_robin-batman-rollin.gif

Jan 27 13 05:29 am Link

Model

Damianne

Posts: 15978

Austin, Texas, US

Jeffrey M Fletcher wrote:

No argument with the idea that either sex can be quite experienced in numbers and of limited interest.

I do think though that rapport, attentiveness, comfort etc., are qualities that can be developed and improved through experience as well. It depends on the goals.

Only because not being a complete idiot and/or asshole are things that one develops through life experience.

Jan 27 13 05:36 am Link

Photographer

PR Zone

Posts: 897

London, England, United Kingdom

Mad Hatter Imagery wrote:
...Is there an inverse relationship between women that are faithful, and those that can and are willing to fulfill a guy's every fantasy?

It's an interesting question - and works for both sexes/orientations
Unfortunately,  we'll never know for 2 reasons:-

1) affairs are illicit - so we'll never have stats

2) the definition of infidelity changes from person to person

I guess what you're really asking is the same as "Do people with huge appetite - and an insatiable need to experience different flavours - spend a lifetime eating in the same restaurant?"

Jan 27 13 05:47 am Link

Photographer

In Balance Photography

Posts: 3378

Boston, Massachusetts, US

Mad Hatter Imagery wrote:
Is there an inverse relationship between women that are faithful, and those that can and are willing to fulfill a guy's every fantasy? lol. It seems like the only women that any guys say are good in bed and frisky and creative are the ones that they fully expect have cheated on them. And those of women that are quite boring and under experienced sexually, and have no strong desire to be more sexual are the ones that are generally completely faithful. Are there too many women that are the best of both worlds, or are we talking total mutual exclusivity?

Stereotyping is for optimizing junk mail, not for figuring out relationships. Once you figure out that each person on this planet is unique, you will find answers to your questions.

Jan 27 13 05:47 am Link

Photographer

B R U N E S C I

Posts: 25319

Bath, England, United Kingdom

Damianne wrote:
Seriously, your entire OP is completely insulting.

Pretty much sums it up.

A whole shedload of incorrect assumptions, wrong thinking and puerile extrapolations there!

I bet the OP thinks that women who wear "sexy" clothes or shoot nudes or erotica are "easy" and/or "asking for it" too... neutral




Just my $0.02

Ciao
Stefano

www.stefanobrunesci.com

Jan 27 13 06:07 am Link

Photographer

Jeffrey M Fletcher

Posts: 4861

Asheville, North Carolina, US

Damianne wrote:

Only because not being a complete idiot and/or asshole are things that one develops through life experience.

"Not being a complete idiot and/or asshole" certainly seems like a good place to start. It does seem to me to be a rather low bar or meager portion from my experience but I've certainly no argument with it.

Jan 27 13 06:30 am Link

Photographer

Orca Bay Images

Posts: 33877

Arcata, California, US

Mad Hatter Imagery wrote:
It seems like the only women that any guys say are good in bed and frisky and creative are the ones that they fully expect have cheated on them. And those of women that are quite boring and under experienced sexually, and have no strong desire to be more sexual are the ones that are generally completely faithful.

"Any guys?" Speak for yourself.

The only two ways to explain this OP:
1) You're a virgin who knows nothing of women in bed
or
2) you're married and this is your way of telling us that your wife is either boring as hell in bed or she's fucking around on you.

Jan 27 13 06:46 am Link

Model

BeatnikDiva

Posts: 14859

Fayetteville, Arkansas, US

Orca Bay Images wrote:

"Any guys?" Speak for yourself.

The only two ways to explain this OP:
1) You're a virgin who knows nothing of women in bed
or
2) you're married and this is your way of telling us that your wife is either boring as hell in bed or she's fucking around on you.

or C)  All of the above.

Jan 27 13 06:54 am Link

Model

Jules NYC

Posts: 21617

New York, New York, US

SPRINGHEEL  wrote:
https://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l249/SPRINGHEEL69/1239788582_robin-batman-rollin.gif

Lmao!!

Jan 27 13 08:25 am Link

Photographer

udor

Posts: 25255

New York, New York, US

Mad Hatter Imagery wrote:
Are there too many women that are the best of both worlds, or are we talking total mutual exclusivity?

I had the fortune to have been blessed with great relationships including marriages that lasted for years and all had to offer a multitude of experiences and willingness to experiment for fun and pleasure...

But... I think in any case, you are lucky if you find a partner that is great and matches you in many aspects... and still... those relationships may sooner or later crumble... but enjoy the greatness of the experience... that's just my experience and humble opinion.

Jan 27 13 08:32 am Link

Photographer

udor

Posts: 25255

New York, New York, US

Orca Bay Images wrote:
The only two ways to explain this OP:
1) You're a virgin who knows nothing of women in bed
or
2) you're married and this is your way of telling us that your wife is either boring as hell in bed or she's fucking around on you.

Two guys are talking about their married sex life.

So, the first guy is asking: "So..., tell me... how is your wife in bed?"

Where the second guy replies with a shoulder shrug: "I don't know... some say so, and others say so..."

                                                                   big_smile

Jan 27 13 08:34 am Link

Photographer

Chris Rifkin

Posts: 25581

Tampa, Florida, US

Vector 38 wrote:

Mad Hatter's got a long string of threads using that very modus operandi ...

Yep....
Was about to post the same thing

Jan 27 13 08:54 am Link

Photographer

Chris Rifkin

Posts: 25581

Tampa, Florida, US

SPRINGHEEL  wrote:
https://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l249/SPRINGHEEL69/1239788582_robin-batman-rollin.gif

10/10

Jan 27 13 08:55 am Link

Model

Russian Katarina

Posts: 1413

London, England, United Kingdom

Mad Hatter Imagery wrote:
Is there an inverse relationship between women that are faithful, and those that can and are willing to fulfill a guy's every fantasy? lol. It seems like the only women that any guys say are good in bed and frisky and creative are the ones that they fully expect have cheated on them. And those of women that are quite boring and under experienced sexually, and have no strong desire to be more sexual are the ones that are generally completely faithful. Are there too many women that are the best of both worlds, or are we talking total mutual exclusivity?

I have no desire to "fulfill a guy's every fantasy" - I do enjoy fulfilling my husband's fantasies, though. I've been faithfully married for ten years and find that being "frisky and creative" and having an active sex life is a vital part of any happy marriage.

Why would that be mutually exclusive?

Jan 27 13 09:51 am Link

Photographer

Mad Hatter Imagery

Posts: 1669

Buffalo, New York, US

Eyesso wrote:
I think I have the best of both worlds with my wife.  I don't want anything more, and neither does she.  Imagine that.

Lucky fellow. smile

Jan 28 13 09:37 am Link

Photographer

Mad Hatter Imagery

Posts: 1669

Buffalo, New York, US

IDiivil wrote:
I'm freaky in bed and faithful :

Jan 28 13 09:39 am Link