Forums >
Model Colloquy >
Models: Use Colour Image On Profile
Ken Marcus Studios wrote: Will you be my manager? Jan 29 13 11:05 am Link Jeffrey M Fletcher wrote: Jan 29 13 11:09 am Link Photographers: use image of model on profile Jan 29 13 12:23 pm Link Alabaster Crowley wrote: His avatar is obviously capturing the emotional anguish of dropping your camera in the snow. It's a very beautiful and moving piece, and is showcasing his range as a photographer! Jan 29 13 12:32 pm Link Skin color is affected by lighting, processing, tanning, white balance, etc, so a single color image is not necessarily an accurate representation of a models true skin color. Besides that, anyone who is seriously considering hiring a model would take the time to look at their entire portfolio. Gauging skin color based on one tiny avatar image is not a smart decision. Jan 29 13 12:48 pm Link Just a quick message to photographers who state to models that they should use a colour shot on their profile main image because it allows the photographer to see the skin colour without viewing the whole portfolio, should actually use the word "color" instead. Jan 29 13 01:07 pm Link RickyArt wrote: You don't know where they're from. Jan 29 13 02:00 pm Link does umpa lumpa day glow orange count as a color? Jan 29 13 02:06 pm Link Sorry, my attempt at making a ludicrous response to the original ludicrous post seems to have failed. Jan 29 13 02:06 pm Link RickyArt wrote: Jan 29 13 02:10 pm Link Jim McSmith wrote: 1- Given that color, as the model receives it in the pictures she gets from the photographer might be all over the place, how could you possibly know what the skin color is from any one picture. Jan 29 13 02:15 pm Link Am I the only photographer who often adds saturation and uses color balance to make the skin tones where I want them? Also, out of 750,000 members on MM, wonder how many have calibrated monitors? :-) (I doubt it) Unless the OP never uses post, adding a bit of tan is a no brainer. Jan 29 13 02:21 pm Link All photographers should use selective coloring extensively in their portfolios. It shows models you can be arty, and are a photoshop god all at the same time. Jan 29 13 02:29 pm Link Wolfy4u wrote: At least one I am very picky about color spaces and calibration. Jan 29 13 02:30 pm Link Anna Kl wrote: +1 Jan 29 13 05:54 pm Link Kent Art Photography wrote: Snicker hhheheehehehe Jan 29 13 06:19 pm Link Jim McSmith wrote: Seems you are more concerned about being inconvenienced.... Jan 29 13 06:25 pm Link I shoot models with hooters. Can you models please place these prominently in your avi. As close to my monitor as you can, please. /sarc (?) Jan 29 13 06:27 pm Link Damianne wrote: Still using those metric letters? Jan 29 13 06:28 pm Link Kent Art Photography wrote: this. Jan 29 13 06:31 pm Link Actually, a long time ago I suggested MM use a Two-Avatar system. The standard we use today, plus an optional(?) close-up image. This is where models could put a face pic so that if people are searching for certain features not already filterable in the search functionality (eg, must have unibrow and big lips), we don't have to click through to every single port trying to find out what the model really looks like. Be honest, some avis are kewl when embiggened but worthless to browse by. Especially when the model only fills up 5% of the image space. Whatevs. You models just keep being awesome! Jan 29 13 06:36 pm Link You and tanning. Here's a tip for you. Let people be who THEY ARE or who THEY WANT to be. Your opinion is not always the right one. For example, telling an alternative model with tattoos she needs to "tan up" before you shoot with her is terrible advice for several reasons. For one, it limits the amount of alt work she will receive if she "tans up" as lighter skin is desirable in that field. It also is detrimental to the life of a tattoo & causes premature blurring/fading. If you don't like the way a model looks, don't work with her. Easy peasy. Nice & easy. Light & breezy. & that's it. Jan 29 13 06:41 pm Link Kent Art Photography wrote: it is a colour image though...lol.. Jan 29 13 06:41 pm Link Nikki Magnusson wrote: It's a color image... Jan 29 13 09:42 pm Link Jim McSmith wrote: I posted a self shot polaroid the other week and just put up a cellphone candid shot in my profile tonight. I like the self shot because it shows with no make up and I like the cellphone shot because it shows my current size. Jan 29 13 09:45 pm Link delete.... Oh dear goodness! I see, we have a "you ought do this as I rule the world..." kind of poster. Okey! Jan 29 13 09:50 pm Link Jim McSmith wrote: jim's right! why should he waste a split second clicking on an avatar to get to a model's port when he can judge her based on nothing but a single tiny colour photo? you should all be naked in your avatars too, for jim! to hell with what you think will benefit you the most, you should be focusing on what will make life easier for jim, and only jim! Mary Geraldine wrote: you'll never experience the privilege of being in jim's port with that attitude. Jan 30 13 12:22 am Link This is when it seems like he's a troll . Jan 30 13 12:31 am Link Alabaster Crowley wrote: I like where you're coming from with this, but I don't think it's really comparable unless you post it in the photography forum. Jan 30 13 12:41 am Link Jojo West wrote: ...and the OP is making it perfectly clear that he only offers film, digital is a waste of time. Jan 30 13 01:22 am Link I was having a crappy day at work, then I decided to go back and read all the OP's threads, lol, I'm still sitting here laughing. Jan 30 13 08:24 am Link Jim McSmith wrote: So...let me get this straight. Jan 30 13 08:32 am Link NicoleNudes wrote: Yeah, but the pot and kettle are both tanned. Jan 30 13 08:36 am Link DivaEroticus wrote: Oh there's also a new one that says models should take make-up classes so he doesn't have to hire an MUA. Jan 30 13 08:39 am Link I always like to go look at the portfolios of the photographers that go into the model forum and tell them what they should be doing. The same goes for models that do that in the Photography Talk. Jan 30 13 08:46 am Link @Jojo West. Oh my, you're correct about their being yet another "instructional" thread. Was hoping you were joking Jan 30 13 10:25 am Link Jojo West wrote: Oh no - I just saw that thread title, decided it was utterly stupid and to ignore it... Jan 30 13 11:02 am Link Blue Ash Film Group wrote: Hahaha, I see what you did there. Funny enough, I do the same thing and then I decide how badly I want to troll the OP, or even if I want to troll them at all Jan 30 13 11:10 am Link [Deleted.] I don't really have words for the OP. Just... click the port, man. Jan 31 13 01:05 am Link Kent Art Photography wrote: HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Amen. Jan 31 13 04:56 pm Link |