This thread was locked on 2013-04-20 14:42:48
Forums > Model Colloquy > Models: Use Colour Image On Profile

Model

Damianne

Posts: 15978

Austin, Texas, US

Ken Marcus Studios wrote:

Wow . . . . between this and your opinion on models breasts, is there anything else the modeling world should do to make you happy?

Will you be my manager?
I'm much too stupid to figure out how to market myself.

*bats eyes*

Jan 29 13 11:05 am Link

Model

Jordan Bunniie

Posts: 1755

Salt Lake City, Utah, US

Jeffrey M Fletcher wrote:

It's all the messaging that slows it down for me. When is this site going to add a shopping cart to put the models in when you want to order one?

lol

Jan 29 13 11:09 am Link

Model

Alabaster Crowley

Posts: 8283

Tucson, Arizona, US

Photographers: use image of model on profile

Jan 29 13 12:23 pm Link

Model

Christinare

Posts: 116

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, US

Alabaster Crowley wrote:
Photographers: use image of model on profile

His avatar is obviously capturing the emotional anguish of dropping your camera in the snow. It's a very beautiful and moving piece, and is showcasing his range as a photographer!

Jan 29 13 12:32 pm Link

Model

MelissaAnn

Posts: 3971

Seattle, Washington, US

Skin color is affected by lighting, processing, tanning, white balance, etc, so a single color image is not necessarily an accurate representation of a models true skin color.   

Besides that, anyone who is seriously considering hiring a model would take the time to look at their entire portfolio. Gauging skin color based on one tiny avatar image is not a smart decision.

Jan 29 13 12:48 pm Link

Digital Artist

ShuttingDown

Posts: 68

Crystal Lake, Illinois, US

Just a quick message to photographers who state to models that they should use a colour shot on their profile main image because it allows the photographer to see the skin colour without viewing the whole portfolio, should actually use the word "color" instead.

Jan 29 13 01:07 pm Link

Model

Damianne

Posts: 15978

Austin, Texas, US

RickyArt wrote:
Just a quick message to photographers who state to models that they should use a colour shot on their profile main image because it allows the photographer to see the skin colour without viewing the whole portfolio, should actually use the word "color" instead.

You don't know where they're from.
My computer is still set all Canada.

Jan 29 13 02:00 pm Link

Photographer

Hero Foto

Posts: 989

Phoenix, Arizona, US

does umpa lumpa day glow orange count as a color?

Jan 29 13 02:06 pm Link

Digital Artist

ShuttingDown

Posts: 68

Crystal Lake, Illinois, US

Sorry, my attempt at making a ludicrous response to the original ludicrous post seems to have failed.

Jan 29 13 02:06 pm Link

Model

Damianne

Posts: 15978

Austin, Texas, US

RickyArt wrote:
Sorry, my attempt at making a ludicrous response to the original ludicrous post seems to have failed.

https://moviecarpet.com/iwave/images/15/o-philip-kaufman-s-invasion-of-the-body-snatchers-and-the-enduring-power-of-the-scream.jpg

Jan 29 13 02:10 pm Link

Photographer

Rays Fine Art

Posts: 7504

New York, New York, US

Jim McSmith wrote:
Just a quick message to models to say they should use a colour shot on their profile main image because it allows the photographer to see the skin colour without viewing the whole portfolio. Thanks.

1- Given that color, as the model receives it in the pictures she gets from the photographer might be all over the place, how could you possibly know what the skin color is from any one picture.

2- Further given that an avatar is intended to attract, not inform, why would you rely on an avatar to make an informed decision?

3- And further given that you've been here for four years, where did you get the blind courage to post an instruction to models in the model colloquoy?

Jan 29 13 02:15 pm Link

Photographer

Wolfy4u

Posts: 1103

Grand Junction, Colorado, US

Am I the only photographer who often adds saturation and uses color balance to make the skin tones where I want them?
Also, out of 750,000 members on MM, wonder how many have calibrated monitors? :-)

(I doubt it)

Unless the OP never uses post, adding a bit of tan is a no brainer.

Jan 29 13 02:21 pm Link

Photographer

Robb Mann

Posts: 12327

Baltimore, Maryland, US

All photographers should use selective coloring extensively in their portfolios. It shows models you can be arty, and are a photoshop god all at the same time.

Jan 29 13 02:29 pm Link

Digital Artist

ShuttingDown

Posts: 68

Crystal Lake, Illinois, US

Wolfy4u wrote:
Also, out of 750,000 members on MM, wonder how many have calibrated monitors? :-)

At least one smile I am very picky about color spaces and calibration.

Jan 29 13 02:30 pm Link

Model

CRIMSON REIGN

Posts: 842

Baltimore, Maryland, US

Anna Kl wrote:
agreed with above - models want to put up great shots that they feel grab the attention of potentials to work with, whether that is BW or color

+1

Jan 29 13 05:54 pm Link

Photographer

KMP

Posts: 4834

Houston, Texas, US

Kent Art Photography wrote:
I'm not sure a photographer with a picture of a camera as his own avatar shoud be lecturing models on their avatars............

Snicker hhheheehehehe

Jan 29 13 06:19 pm Link

Photographer

KMP

Posts: 4834

Houston, Texas, US

Jim McSmith wrote:
Models are tanning less these days than they once did. Those in colder environments are typically very pale unless they make efforts to tan properly. If they had a colour shot on the avatar that would speed up the search a bit. B/W doesn't help if you're a colour shooter seeking a tanned model.

Seems you are more concerned about being inconvenienced....
Color means FUCK ALL.. with the ability change it in PS and that monitors don't necessarily show the same colors from one to another..   This is pretty much a waste of time..smile

Jan 29 13 06:25 pm Link

Photographer

Tonic Dog Studios

Posts: 12527

Minneapolis, Minnesota, US

I shoot models with hooters.  Can you models please place these prominently in your avi.  As close to my monitor as you can, please.

/sarc (?)

Jan 29 13 06:27 pm Link

Photographer

Tonic Dog Studios

Posts: 12527

Minneapolis, Minnesota, US

Damianne wrote:

My computer is still set all Canada.

Still using those metric letters?

Jan 29 13 06:28 pm Link

Photographer

Harbor Images

Posts: 8

Fullerton, California, US

Kent Art Photography wrote:
I'm not sure a photographer with a picture of a camera as his own avatar shoud be lecturing models on their avatars.

An avatar is a shop window, it has to grab the viewer's attention and encourage the viewer to click through to the portfolio.  An avatar which shows skin colour might not be an attention grabber.

this.

Jan 29 13 06:31 pm Link

Photographer

Tonic Dog Studios

Posts: 12527

Minneapolis, Minnesota, US

Actually, a long time ago I suggested MM use a Two-Avatar system. 

The standard we use today, plus an optional(?) close-up image.  This is where models could put a face pic so that if people are searching for certain features not already filterable in the search functionality (eg, must have unibrow and big lips), we don't have to click through to every single port trying to find out what the model really looks like.

Be honest, some avis are kewl when embiggened but worthless to browse by.  Especially when the model only fills up 5% of the image space.

Whatevs.  You models just keep being awesome!

Jan 29 13 06:36 pm Link

Model

Mary Geraldine

Posts: 1697

Valdese, North Carolina, US

You and tanning.

Here's a tip for you. Let people be who THEY ARE or who THEY WANT to be.
Your opinion is not always the right one.

For example, telling an alternative model with tattoos she needs to "tan up" before you shoot with her is terrible advice for several reasons. For one, it limits the amount of alt work she will receive if she "tans up" as lighter skin is desirable in that field. It also is detrimental to the life of a tattoo & causes premature blurring/fading. If you don't like the way a model looks, don't work with her.

Easy peasy.
Nice & easy.
Light & breezy.
& that's it.

Jan 29 13 06:41 pm Link

Model

Nikki Magnusson

Posts: 6844

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

Kent Art Photography wrote:
I'm not sure a photographer with a picture of a camera as his own avatar shoud be lecturing models on their avatars.

An avatar is a shop window, it has to grab the viewer's attention and encourage the viewer to click through to the portfolio.  An avatar which shows skin colour might not be an attention grabber.

it is a colour image though...lol..https://a4.ec-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/44/f21faa4715f3480285c74d593899a371/l.gif

Jan 29 13 06:41 pm Link

Photographer

Viator Defessus Photos

Posts: 1259

Houston, Texas, US

Nikki Magnusson wrote:

it is a colour image though...lol..https://a4.ec-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/44/f21faa4715f3480285c74d593899a371/l.gif

It's a color image...

Of a black and grey camera.... in a white substance. The only thing that's colorful is the reflection off the lens.

Jan 29 13 09:42 pm Link

Model

Jen B

Posts: 4474

Phoenix, Arizona, US

Jim McSmith wrote:
Just a quick message to models to say they should use a colour shot on their profile main image because it allows the photographer to see the skin colour without viewing the whole portfolio. Thanks.

I posted a self shot polaroid the other week and just put up a cellphone candid shot in my profile tonight. I like the self shot because it shows with no make up and I like the cellphone shot because it shows my current size.

I'm sure they are not 'good' but they are what I have that is not a photographer shot.
Jen

Jan 29 13 09:45 pm Link

Model

Jen B

Posts: 4474

Phoenix, Arizona, US

delete....

Oh dear goodness!

I see, we have a "you ought do this as I rule the world..." kind of poster. Okey!

Jan 29 13 09:50 pm Link

Photographer

Michael Broughton

Posts: 2288

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Jim McSmith wrote:
Many photographers don't shoot black and white. When searching profiles I look for tanned models but if the avatar is in b/w I then need to view the whole portfolio which wastes time and slows down the search process.

jim's right! why should he waste a split second clicking on an avatar to get to a model's port when he can judge her based on nothing but a single tiny colour photo? you should all be naked in your avatars too, for jim! to hell with what you think will benefit you the most, you should be focusing on what will make life easier for jim, and only jim!

Mary Geraldine wrote:
You and tanning.

Here's a tip for you. Let people be who THEY ARE or who THEY WANT to be.
Your opinion is not always the right one.

For example, telling an alternative model with tattoos she needs to "tan up" before you shoot with her is terrible advice for several reasons. For one, it limits the amount of alt work she will receive if she "tans up" as lighter skin is desirable in that field. It also is detrimental to the life of a tattoo & causes premature blurring/fading. If you don't like the way a model looks, don't work with her.

Easy peasy.
Nice & easy.
Light & breezy.
& that's it.

you'll never experience the privilege of being in jim's port with that attitude.

Jan 30 13 12:22 am Link

Model

Kade Massey

Posts: 52

San Diego, California, US

This is when it seems like he's a troll .

Jan 30 13 12:31 am Link

Model

Wynd Mulysa

Posts: 8619

Berkeley, California, US

Alabaster Crowley wrote:
Photographers: use image of model on profile

I like where you're coming from with this, but I don't think it's really comparable unless you post it in the photography forum.

Jan 30 13 12:41 am Link

Photographer

LightWriting

Posts: 401

Long Beach, California, US

Jojo West wrote:

Lol

+1

That camera avatar really makes me want to bring him some more inanimate objects for him to photograph.

...and the OP is making it perfectly clear that he only offers film, digital is a waste of time.

Jan 30 13 01:22 am Link

Model

JWest

Posts: 1000

Asheville, North Carolina, US

I was having a crappy day at work, then I decided to go back and read all the OP's threads, lol, I'm still sitting here laughing. smile

Jan 30 13 08:24 am Link

Model

BeatnikDiva

Posts: 14859

Fayetteville, Arkansas, US

Jim McSmith wrote:
Models are tanning less these days than they once did. Those in colder environments are typically very pale unless they make efforts to tan properly. If they had a colour shot on the avatar that would speed up the search a bit. B/W doesn't help if you're a colour shooter seeking a tanned model.

So...let me get this straight.

First, we models need color shots for our avatars.  Now we need to tan.  And another thread says to not get bewb jobs.

Can you not control your own life, so you feel the need to project that onto others?

Jan 30 13 08:32 am Link

Model

BeatnikDiva

Posts: 14859

Fayetteville, Arkansas, US

NicoleNudes wrote:

Same thing might be said about models searching for photographer when they don't have an actual picture of their work as their avatar.

It works both ways.

Pot meet kettle.

Yeah, but the pot and kettle are both tanned.

Jan 30 13 08:36 am Link

Model

JWest

Posts: 1000

Asheville, North Carolina, US

DivaEroticus wrote:

So...let me get this straight.

First, we models need color shots for our avatars.  Now we need to tan.  And another thread says to not get bewb jobs.

Can you not control your own life, so you feel the need to project that onto others?

Oh there's also a new one that says models should take make-up classes so he doesn't have to hire an MUA.

Jan 30 13 08:39 am Link

Photographer

Blue Ash Film Group

Posts: 10343

Cincinnati, Ohio, US

I always like to go look at the portfolios of the photographers that go into the model forum and tell them what they should be doing. The same goes for models that do that in the Photography Talk.

Jan 30 13 08:46 am Link

Digital Artist

ShuttingDown

Posts: 68

Crystal Lake, Illinois, US

@Jojo West. Oh my, you're correct about their being yet another "instructional" thread.  Was hoping you were joking smile

Jan 30 13 10:25 am Link

Photographer

RKD Photographic

Posts: 3265

Iserlohn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Jojo West wrote:

Oh there's also a new one that says models should take make-up classes so he doesn't have to hire an MUA.

Oh no - I just saw that thread title, decided it was utterly stupid and to ignore it...

But.... now you've told me the OP was the poster, I just have to go and look - that'll be another 30 minutes of my life I'm never going to see again...

Jan 30 13 11:02 am Link

Model

JWest

Posts: 1000

Asheville, North Carolina, US

Blue Ash Film Group wrote:
I always like to go look at the portfolios of the photographers that go into the model forum and tell them what they should be doing. The same goes for models that do that in the Photography Talk.

Hahaha, I see what you did there. Funny enough, I do the same thing and then I decide how badly I want to troll the OP, or even if I want to troll them at all smile

Jan 30 13 11:10 am Link

Photographer

HO Photo

Posts: 575

Los Angeles, California, US

[Deleted.]

I don't really have words for the OP. Just... click the port, man.

Jan 31 13 01:05 am Link

Model

Goodbye4

Posts: 2532

Los Angeles, California, US

Kent Art Photography wrote:
I'm not sure a photographer with a picture of a camera as his own avatar shoud be lecturing models on their avatars.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Amen.

Jan 31 13 04:56 pm Link