Robert Randall wrote:
The little girl with the buffalo kills me.

+1

Really impressive works!

Scribbler wrote:
Few more images on his website. Also, paid tutorials are available too.

I had a very strange reaction to his web site, kinda wish I hadn't seen it. I clicked on one of the galleries and started looking through the images and was left feeling he is a 50 percenter. Some of the images, like the buffalo, are exquisite, but a lot of them are terrible. The lighting doesn't match, colors are off and hard cuts abound. Makes me wonder how s/he was able to pull off the good ones.

Oh well.

Robert Randall wrote:

I had a very strange reaction to his web site, kinda wish I hadn't seen it. I clicked on one of the galleries and started looking through the images and was left feeling he is a 50 percenter. Some of the images, like the buffalo, are exquisite, but a lot of them are terrible. The lighting doesn't match, colors are off and hard cuts abound. Makes me wonder how s/he was able to pull off the good ones.

Oh well.

I don't know if I'd go as high as 50%, maybe 20%.  Lots of light direction issues, color mismatched, perspective and scaling problems.
Some good ideas, but I think it's more about volume than quality.  I laughed about the side bar saying to send your ideas in to be made.  I wonder if you get paid if an idea is used.

Ken Marcus Studios wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/photos/bizarre-im … slideshow/

Enjoy !


KM

+1
this is SO awesome, even if it's a bit raw here and there. I suspect many omissions were intentionally neglected even. definitely great stuff for inspirations.

reminds me the totally different performance, but roughly similar ideas, by KaterinaPlotnikova