Forums > General Industry > Phone Selfies

Model

Samonster X

Posts: 40

West Covina, California, US

Phone selfies in a portfolio on Model Mayhem....


How do you feel about this when you see them?

Would anyone use them to your advantage and book them for your portfolio anyway?

Or would anyone not take that user seriously and move onto the next MM account?

Comment away.

Aug 22 14 07:42 pm Link

Model

Jccny

Posts: 26

Brooklyn, New York, US

My opinion is that they're fine to find non-paid testing and photo projects. As far as any paid professional work goes, no. "Selfies" are hardly professional and anyone trying to get paid to be a professional should at least have some previous work in their portfolio to show their skill and experience.

It's insulting when a model only wants to do paid work and they've been absolutely no time into their career, besides taking selfies.

Aug 22 14 09:08 pm Link

Photographer

Mortonovich

Posts: 6209

San Diego, California, US

Aside from one to show a current look w/o MU .....

They are dumb as fuck.

Aug 23 14 08:38 am Link

Photographer

Jim Shibley

Posts: 3309

Phoenix, Arizona, US

I'd say selfies are OK until you have better. If you have a good image why not use it?

Aug 23 14 08:42 am Link

Artist/Painter

JJMiller

Posts: 807

Buffalo, New York, US

As long as they are not making selfie-type faces I don't mind. I don't really like heavily post produced pro images, they lie- I'd prefer a mug shot.

Aug 23 14 08:45 am Link

Photographer

Garry k

Posts: 30129

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

I am fine with them if they are done well

http://www.wmagazine.com/video/fashion- … supermodel

I think a lot of young models do them to learn their best angles and expressions

Aug 23 14 08:46 am Link

Photographer

Looknsee Photography

Posts: 26342

Portland, Oregon, US

A photo is a photo.

The quality of an image can be assessed on two measures:  the aesthetic and the technical.

Many photographers strive for the technical, using expensive equipment & years of honing their technical skills.  To many, the technical becomes very important.

However, I personally believe that the aesthetic measures are far more important than the technical.  I'd rather look at an interesting picture from a cheap camera (like a smartphone) than a boring picture from the most expensive camera in the world.

So, if you've got an exciting, spontaneous, enthusiastic, well composed selfie -- I wanna see it.  If you've got a boring, dull image of you standing in front of your bathroom mirror with lousy bathroom light -- I've seen it, and I don't need to see more.

Note:  I expect most photographers here won't like seeing selfies in portfolios, because selfies mean that the model didn't work with a photographer.

Aug 23 14 08:50 am Link

Photographer

Kent Art Photography

Posts: 3588

Ashford, England, United Kingdom

Perfectly acceptable.  In fact, I think MM should stipulate that every model portfolio should have at least one recent selfie.

Aug 23 14 08:50 am Link

Photographer

Art of the nude

Posts: 12067

Grand Rapids, Michigan, US

Samonster  Rose wrote:
Phone selfies in a portfolio on Model Mayhem....


How do you feel about this when you see them?

Would anyone use them to your advantage and book them for your portfolio anyway?

Or would anyone not take that user seriously and move onto the next MM account?

Comment away.

Samonster  Rose wrote:
Phone selfies in a portfolio on Model Mayhem....


How do you feel about this when you see them?

Would anyone use them to your advantage and book them for your portfolio anyway?

Or would anyone not take that user seriously and move onto the next MM account?

Comment away.

I wouldn't take them seriously as far as previous experience.  Certainly if they said "very experienced" and wanted payment, such pictures would be a negative.

But, a novice, with a "selfie" that was in focus, and hadn't been run through filters or photoshopped; I don't see that as terribly negative.

Aug 23 14 08:52 am Link

Model

Victoria Ellis

Posts: 129

San Diego, California, US

Selfies have their place, but I don't think they belong in my portfolio. I pretty regularly post selfies on my linked photo blog. That way clients can see them and outtakes from my shoots with no risk of me being judged as unprofessional. It's all about context.

Aug 23 14 08:55 am Link

Photographer

Art of the nude

Posts: 12067

Grand Rapids, Michigan, US

Looknsee Photography wrote:
A photo is a photo.

The quality of an image can be assessed on two measures:  the aesthetic and the technical.

Many photographers strive for the technical, using expensive equipment & years of honing their technical skills.  To many, the technical becomes very important.

However, I personally believe that the aesthetic measures are far more important than the technical.  I'd rather look at an interesting picture from a cheap camera (like a smartphone) than a boring picture from the most expensive camera in the world.

So, if you've got an exciting, spontaneous, enthusiastic, well composed selfie -- I wanna see it.  If you've got a boring, dull image of you standing in front of your bathroom mirror with lousy bathroom light -- I've seen it, and I don't need to see more.

Note:  I expect most photographers here won't like seeing selfies in portfolios, because selfies mean that the model didn't work with a photographer.

I think this has a lot of merit, but misses the simple point; a "clean" unmanipulated" Selfie tells me a lot more about the models skin, and eyes, than some massively manipulated "senior picture" or an image from a "glamour studio."

Aug 23 14 08:55 am Link

Photographer

Paolo D Photography

Posts: 11502

San Francisco, California, US

Mortonovich wrote:
Aside from one to show a current look w/o MU .....

They are dumb as fuck.

This.
And it depends on the type of 'selfie'.
Bathroom mirror and car seat belts are the worst.

I assume most models with multiple selfies in their port are no longer shooting or not interested in shooting with anyone but themselves. They contribute little to the community.
So I pass them by.

Selfies aren't / shouldn't be allowed in model portfolios.
Its not hard to find a friend to take a crappy picture of you. In my opinion it makes a huge statement about the effort one is willing to take to simply hand the phone/camera to your friend and pose in front of a wall vs. Just an arms length duckface head shot.

Aug 23 14 09:05 am Link

Photographer

Light Wave Photos

Posts: 302

MacMurdo - permanent station of the US, Sector claimed by New Zealand, Antarctica

A good photographer and make up artist can change the looks of a model dramatically. A selfie is a real photo. I see nothing wrong with a model posting them.

Aug 23 14 09:19 am Link

Photographer

The Spaces Between

Posts: 723

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Kent Art Photography wrote:
Perfectly acceptable.  In fact, I think MM should stipulate that every model portfolio should have at least one recent selfie.

I agree.  A quick snap to show the current look/hair, etc. of the model is quite useful in fact.

Aug 23 14 11:10 am Link

Photographer

Ken Marcus Studios

Posts: 9421

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

If you are a celebrity, then people really like them

If you are not . . . . does anybody even care about others selfies?

Most people are too self-centered and only care about their own selfies.

Aug 23 14 11:25 am Link

Photographer

Good Egg Productions

Posts: 16713

Orlando, Florida, US

One.  Sure.
Two...  Maybe if it shows something that the first doesn't.


12?  Stupid.

12 out of the 15 you're allowed to have?  Tells me the model is not very serious about modeling.

Aug 23 14 11:25 am Link

Photographer

Good Egg Productions

Posts: 16713

Orlando, Florida, US

Jccny wrote:
My opinion is that they're fine to find non-paid testing and photo projects. As far as any paid professional work goes, no. "Selfies" are hardly professional and anyone trying to get paid to be a professional should at least have some previous work in their portfolio to show their skill and experience.

It's insulting when a model only wants to do paid work and they've been absolutely no time into their career, besides taking selfies.

Perhaps you should have one.

Just so that we know what you look like.
You do not currently fulfill the minimum requirements to have a MM account.

Aug 23 14 11:26 am Link

Photographer

Jay Leavitt

Posts: 6745

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

Looknsee Photography wrote:
A photo is a photo.

I am working with a model in 2 weeks. All I have seen of her is a couple selfies on FB --- one of the prettiest girls I have ever seen in my life.

I'm thankful she posted those selfies.

Aug 23 14 11:41 am Link

Photographer

Abbitt Photography

Posts: 13564

Washington, Utah, US

Everyone starts somewhere.  While selfies are generally not as good as photos taken by a knowledgeable photographer, they are better than nothing.  I've worked with a few newbie models based on what I saw of them in selfies they had.

Aug 23 14 11:53 am Link

Photographer

FIFTYONE PHOTOGRAPHY

Posts: 6597

Uniontown, Pennsylvania, US

Samonster  Rose wrote:
Phone selfies in a portfolio on Model Mayhem....


How do you feel about this when you see them?

Would anyone use them to your advantage and book them for your portfolio anyway?

Or would anyone not take that user seriously and move onto the next MM account?

Comment away.

They're actually against the site rules

Model Requirements

Show Us Your Face


Your portfolio must show your face clearly. Some headless nudes or whatever are cool, but we need to know what you look like.

Show Us All of You

Please include at least 1 full length body shot.

No Selfies

Seriously. No selfies.


...albeit some do sneak in, I personally believe they do not belong here on MM.

Aug 23 14 11:57 am Link

Photographer

DELETED-ACCOUNT_

Posts: 10303

Los Angeles, California, US

Depends on the number of selfies, the purpose, and the attitude of the person displaying them.

One or two?  Used to show how you look without all the glitz and glamour?  Fine, actually encouraged.  14...of you right before you head out to the club?  Unnecessary. 

Also, if you're new I think it's highly unrealistic to expect you to have anything else.  Some people on this site just have issues and will shit on you for having even one selfie...so just expect that.  But, if you've got a bunch of cell-phone selfies and you're walking around with your nose turned up at everyone else, or expecting to be paid (or even worse, soliciting paid work) then you're probably not going to be well-received.

Aug 23 14 12:16 pm Link

Photographer

AndysPrints

Posts: 533

Falls Church, Virginia, US

There are duck faced selfies and then there are self portraits.

I find selfies to be tremendously helpful in seeing what a model looks like in real life. If the model doesn't have one in her portfolio, I usually ask for one before I book her. So many times models pics are so over photoshopped that when the model shows up, she doesn't look like her portfolio.

Then I just have to send her home and we both waste each others time. I want to see a real life depiction of what I'm booking.

Aug 23 14 12:28 pm Link

Model

Samonster X

Posts: 40

West Covina, California, US

Alot of good insight from all of you. Though for me, personally, I wouldn't upload a selfie to my portfolio on MM. That's what my Facebook and Instagram are for, along with more of my modeling work. I know that many photographers do not have a Facebook or Instagram, but I think anyone would gladly email their current look.
I wouldnt want to break the rules on MM. smile

Thank you for all your opinions! 

Xo

Aug 23 14 01:06 pm Link

Model

JadeDRed

Posts: 5620

London, England, United Kingdom

I have loads of selfies in my portfolios, some with timers, some handheld, some with mobile devices.

They are good for filling in gaps in the portfolio, trying out ideas and keeping up to date with appearance changes like hair styles.

Aug 23 14 03:18 pm Link

Photographer

Art of the nude

Posts: 12067

Grand Rapids, Michigan, US

JadeDRed wrote:
I have loads of selfies in my portfolios, some with timers, some handheld, some with mobile devices.

They are good for filling in gaps in the portfolio, trying out ideas and keeping up to date with appearance changes like hair styles.

Didn't look at yours, so there's no chance of me being accused of "unsolicited critique."

But, sometimes, "selfies" are not "selfies."   They are "self portraits", which is something else entirely.  From what I know of you, in general, I suspect that you have something more along those lines.

Aug 23 14 06:38 pm Link

Photographer

L O C U T U S

Posts: 1746

Bangor, Maine, US

if it is all they have, its all they have.

Aug 23 14 11:57 pm Link

Photographer

Looknsee Photography

Posts: 26342

Portland, Oregon, US

Looknsee Photography wrote:
A photo is a photo.

-JAY- wrote:
I am working with a model in 2 weeks. All I have seen of her is a couple selfies on FB --- one of the prettiest girls I have ever seen in my life.

I'm thankful she posted those selfies.

I'm a photographer of the nude & a communication hub for the local photographic community.  I'm moderately well known.  On occasion, I get a "wanna photograph me?" query from a stranger, and most of the time, these requests don't interest me or they fall apart long before we nail down a date & time.  No biggie.

I did get one request from a young woman a few years ago, and all she had to show me was a cellphone snapshot taken in a bar.  She was wearing a cute party dress, and she had a dazzling smile.  So, I offered her a TF* arrangement, and she agreed.

We had a great time together.  I wish I could show you that poor-quality cellphone image, but it isn't mine, and I can't find it anyway.  But here are some of the images we made together, at her first photoshoot ever, let alone her first nude photoshoot:

https://www.looknseephoto.com/oregon/2008/ar01/ar01d_0178col700.jpg

https://www.looknseephoto.com/oregon/2008/ar01/ar01d_0144seph700.jpg
(I hope this image doesn't get me into trouble -- if it is objectionable, let me know & I'll post a link instead).


She went on to have a few more sessions, moved to L.A., and fulfilled her objective of becoming an adult film star.  She had an MM profile for a while, but I can't find it.

Aug 24 14 10:42 am Link

Photographer

Demeter Photography

Posts: 550

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Samonster  Rose wrote:
Phone selfies in a portfolio on Model Mayhem....


How do you feel about this when you see them?

Would anyone use them to your advantage and book them for your portfolio anyway?

Or would anyone not take that user seriously and move onto the next MM account?

Comment away.

To me, no excuse.  It screams somebody who isn't serious and either created a profile thinking mm was another myspace, Instagram, Facebook type site or it's someone who wants to say 'I'm a model' and have people tell her she is pretty.  I say she because I've yet to see male models ever deploy selfies.

Aug 24 14 10:49 am Link

Photographer

Garry k

Posts: 30129

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Demeter Photography wrote:

To me, no excuse.  It screams somebody who isn't serious and either created a profile thinking mm was another myspace, Instagram, Facebook type site or it's someone who wants to say 'I'm a model' and have people tell her she is pretty.  I say she because I've yet to see male models ever deploy selfies.

or it could be some 16 year old future supermodel who hasn't done a real shoot yet

Aug 24 14 11:12 am Link

Photographer

Kent Art Photography

Posts: 3588

Ashford, England, United Kingdom

Locutus wrote:
if it is all they have, its all they have.

Quite right.  An experienced person should be able to see past any shortcomings in a photograph to the person beyond.

Aug 24 14 11:13 am Link

Photographer

Demeter Photography

Posts: 550

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Garry k wrote:
or it could be some 16 year old future supermodel who hasn't done a real shoot yet

There are a hundred better options than a cell phone selfie.

Not the least of which is have a friend, mom, dad whatever snap 3 or 4 pics of you.

Aug 24 14 11:19 am Link

Clothing Designer

GRMACK

Posts: 5436

Bakersfield, California, US

Likely part of the Youtube and cell phone generation.  They grew up with it, and probably why things like some older photographer's work doesn't impress them and visa versa.  Heck, some Youtube generationals don't even watch TV, or even a big screen TV, and bury their noses in their phones or tablets.

Wedding I attended had cell phone snappers all over the place uploading to the couple's Cloud site that appeared on the big screen in the hall.  The DJ was running the uploading show and maybe part of his hiring too.  Some shots off some phones were pretty good on the screen.  No pro photographer was there, just the invites who all had a phone to play with.  The couple had a bunch of photos off their setup.

Seems more of a shifting demographics or generational thing to me.  I wouldn't be surprised if even more move to the cellnet than off the "oldsters" internet and less quality images becoming acceptable due to bandwidth loading than one would expect to see had it been a normal print or some large megapixel and Photoshop'd image.

imho, of course.

Aug 24 14 11:30 am Link

Photographer

Joe Wow Photos

Posts: 657

Dayton, Ohio, US

I've found selfies are decent enough to show the models face, features, body etc... but a porfolio full of selfies also shows that the "Model" hasn't bothered to show up to anyone's studio so far and will be a higher flake rate for booking, so don't bet on their reliability.

Aug 24 14 11:47 am Link

Photographer

CNP Photography

Posts: 2579

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Demeter Photography wrote:
There are a hundred better options than a cell phone selfie.

Not the least of which is have a friend, mom, dad whatever snap 3 or 4 pics of you.

This. If a person can't find a friend or relative who'll spend a half hour taking a few reasonably nice photos of them, then they have some other issues in their life that they perhaps should be addressing.

Aug 24 14 12:28 pm Link

Photographer

Mortonovich

Posts: 6209

San Diego, California, US

lol  lol

https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xfp1/t1.0-9/10606319_10204654746473318_1213776958622467776_n.jpg

Aug 24 14 07:03 pm Link

Photographer

Wilde One

Posts: 2373

Santa Monica, California, US

Maybe an abduction victim, posting a cry for help.

Help, I've been abducted by my lack of style.

Aug 24 14 08:01 pm Link

Photographer

mophotoart

Posts: 2118

Wichita, Kansas, US

not worth more than this reply....you want paid based on this?

Aug 24 14 08:17 pm Link

Photographer

Quay Lude

Posts: 6386

Madison, Wisconsin, US

JadeDRed wrote:
I have loads of selfies in my portfolios, some with timers, some handheld, some with mobile devices.

They are good for filling in gaps in the portfolio, trying out ideas and keeping up to date with appearance changes like hair styles.

Selfies can say more and show more than crap photographer shots. But, if your selfies suck, then don't post them. Don't post them. Don't post them.

Don't post them.

I love good selfies.

Aug 24 14 08:18 pm Link

Photographer

Varton

Posts: 2755

New York, New York, US

I came across on some selfies being better in quality then some photographer shots.
I am fine with them being on ports as long as they don't look like hooker ads like found sometime on craigslist.

Aug 24 14 08:40 pm Link

Photographer

Steve Korn

Posts: 390

Seattle, Washington, US

As said above, only to show how you look currently, hair length, color, minimal make-up etc...and only one.

Aug 24 14 08:54 pm Link