Goldie117 wrote:
I've never seen them & I don't want to. I'm with ya - it's creepy as hell. What the heck is wrong w/ those parents?

The sites were pretty bad, one of them had "bath time" scenes on the FRONT page! Yargh.

Stephanie Skye wrote:

The sites were pretty bad, one of them had "bath time" scenes on the FRONT page! Yargh.

Yuck! I gotta wonder what these parents were thinking...Actually I'm not sure if I want to know

Stephanie Skye wrote:
Here's the first link I clicked on (I've not looked through the site, but seriously, wtf at the opening page?)

http://www.olyamodel.com/index.htm

Trust me... Do NOT look through the rest of that site, I think I'm fucking scarred now. Wronkled bedsheets and kiddie porn... Awesome.

Stephanie Skye wrote:
Here's the first link I clicked on (I've not looked through the site, but seriously, wtf at the opening page?)

http://www.olyamodel.com/index.htm

Thats discusting and the parents should be shot.

Kristen Jeanne wrote:

Trust me... Do NOT look through the rest of that site, I think I'm fucking scarred now. Wronkled bedsheets and kiddie porn... Awesome.

Too late, curiousity makes you look even though you know you're not going to like it. I feel sick now. The parents, photographers and members should all be shot, its vile. Apparently legal though, fucked up.

Stephanie Skye wrote:
Here's the first link I clicked on (I've not looked through the site, but seriously, wtf at the opening page?)

http://www.olyamodel.com/index.htm

Wow... I feel bad for even looking at this site, it should be titled kiddie porn, these kids are gunna have issues

JadeDRed wrote:

Too late, curiousity makes you look even though you know you're not going to like it. I feel sick now. The parents, photographers and members should all be shot, its vile. Apparently legal though, fucked up.

Ugh, I know... Just think how that little girl (and all the others) are going to turn out when they're older? Christ, I hope Child Services can do something and get them out of there soon, before they're perma-fucked.

Stephanie Skye wrote:
Here's the first link I clicked on (I've not looked through the site, but seriously, wtf at the opening page?)

http://www.olyamodel.com/index.htm

first off
ewwwwwwwww
thats nasty

blah*
i need a mint

i think we can all agree her next big shoot is for SG

TheRattlesnake wrote:
The parents need their asses kicked!!!

I can help with that

Kristen Jeanne wrote:

Ugh, I know... Just think how that little girl (and all the others) are going to turn out when they're older? Christ, I hope Child Services can do something and get them out of there soon, before they're perma-fucked.

Going by the name, I would pretty much guarantee that these kids are not American. They're very likely from an eastern European country where the laws are much more lax - that's where most of this stuff comes from. (Coincidentally, it's also where a huge number of fashion and glamour models come from now, too...hmmm.)

OpalRae wrote:
I only cringe to think what is on the "members" section.

:groan: omfg... I didn't even think of that

*shudders*

Stephanie Skye wrote:
Oh, but it's not technically kiddie porn, not at all. There have been numerous requests to yahoo and google to remove this stuff but they can't because it's not violating any laws.

Typically, and laws vary by state and municipality within a state, it takes photography+eroticism to equal a violation of law.  There are nudism sites on the Internet that have children and adults of all ages fully nude - but there is no erotic content (or erotic intent) so it is legal.  On the other hand, these images with an underage girl would, I think, be prosecutable anywhere because the poses are VERY erotic in nature.

In my state, you can be prosecuted if you so much as have an underage girl in long jean pants in an erotic pose with her crotch area showing - EVEN THOUGH she is fully covered by jeans material.  At least that is what the local sheriff and district attorney have agreed upon, publicly.

I think our conservatives here go TOO far in the wrong direction and have made photographers here too paranoid to even consider working with teen girls at all.  There has to be a way to sanely balance the issues involved.  After all, almost ALL modeling involves making those people photographed (male or female) look attractive and sexy.  Isn't that what modeling is all about?  Otherwise we're talking Sears-style family portraiture, after all!

But yeah, websites such as the one given portraying underage girls in a highly erotic manner are pretty lame.  If merely intended for providing tuition for college down the road, at least do the web site in an authentic, model-style way, not in the way a porn site would!

Kristen Jeanne wrote:
EDIT: Tony beat me to it

muahahah

Kristen Jeanne wrote:
On this site only exclusive Nonude photos of Olya Child Super Model. All images protected by copyright of "Child Models Agency" company!

Quality and ethics are guaranteed! We shall answer any questions and offers - [email protected]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I took the email out since I'm not sure if I can put up here. Think we should email them though and ask WTF?!

EDIT: Tony beat me to it

The only way to know for sure is to join.

Metro_Glamour wrote:

Typically, and laws vary by state and municipality within a state, it takes photography+eroticism to equal a violation of law.  There are nudism sites on the Internet that have children and adults of all ages fully nude - but there is no erotic content (or erotic intent) so it is legal.  On the other hand, these images with an underage girl would, I think, be prosecutable anywhere because the poses are VERY erotic in nature.

In my state, you can be prosecuted if you so much as have an underage girl in long jean pants in an erotic pose with her crotch area showing - EVEN THOUGH she is fully covered by jeans material.  At least that is what the local sheriff and district attorney have agreed upon, publicly.

I think our conservatives here go TOO far in the wrong direction and have made photographers here too paranoid to even consider working with teen girls at all.  There has to be a way to sanely balance the issues involved.  After all, almost ALL modeling involves making those people photographed (male or female) look attractive and sexy.  Isn't that what modeling is all about?  Otherwise we're talking Sears-style family portraiture, after all!

It's a European run website.

K -- O wrote:
I had to quickly close the screen!  Those parents should be shot (and the company owner)!

my grandmum kept a shotgun in the closet just in case any hoodlums try to rob her

you could borrow it if ya want

OpalRae wrote:

The only way to know for sure is to join.

Bleh! I'm down for taking one for the team... But um, not that.

OpalRae wrote:
I've run across websites for "boy lovers" that won't get shut down for the simple fact that they are not American and are European based.

i bet evin Europeans fid this bad

Stephanie Skye wrote:
Here's the first link I clicked on (I've not looked through the site, but seriously, wtf at the opening page?)

http://www.olyamodel.com/index.htm

OMG! I feel so gross right now.
WTF?