Forums >
General Industry >
Taping your photoshoots, ethical?
Do you videotape your photoshoots? I know a person that tapes them (he only shoots adult stuff...if you get my point...ehm) and then resells the video. Of course, he doesn't give the models any profits off of the videos (sadly)... But do you think its 'ethical'. The models KNOW They are being taped..they don't mind it.... and do you videotape? Or would you? Under what circumstances (ie: If the person was a minor, etc) Just curious.. Sun May 28 05 06:14 am Link I would video tape. May 28 05 06:41 am Link First a question, are the models being paid and signing releases for the images created? If they are being paid for the shoot, know they are being filmed on video while shooting as long as they sign a release that includes the video and they don't have any complaints. I do not see anything unethical about it. In that situation while I would not do it that way really it is not that different than behind the scenes clips being included on a DVD or sold seperately. The model or actor is being paid for the primary project and the photographer is making some extra money off of the shoot. May 28 05 11:44 am Link Posted by Sun Karma: They know they're being photographed. They don't mind. May 28 05 12:50 pm Link Posted by Sun Karma: sounds ethical if they are "ok" with it, but it also sounds just plain stupid! Why allow someone to make more profit off of you and not ask for a cut...bad business practice. After you have signed a release, and depending on the terms, some photographers will cut you a small % of profits. I think it is tacky when they don't even throw you a bone... May 28 05 01:58 pm Link I video tape and use stills from video for reference to paintings sometimes, but that is probably something different. May 28 05 03:10 pm Link Posted by Angel Tara: That is why I am asking if its ethical. The girls know they are being taped...its not in the release that the video will be sold for profit- in fact, the video isn't mentioned in the release the models signed. So the photographer is keeping all the dough. (hypothetical situation). May 28 05 03:43 pm Link Posted by Sun Karma: Posted by Angel Tara: That is why I am asking if its ethical. The girls know they are being taped...its not in the release that the video will be sold for profit- in fact, the video isn't mentioned in the release the models signed. So the photographer is keeping all the dough. (hypothetical situation). Since "the video isn't mentioned int the release" it sounds like an attorney could score a big payday with it! May 28 05 04:07 pm Link Selling the video without knowledge is wrong. Taping if they are aware of the process, then fine. Not sure if there is a difference between release for pictures and video. Someone else who is smart can answer. May 28 05 04:12 pm Link I videotape pretty much ALL of my shoots. Even the non porn ones. This serves multiple purposes for me. 1. Reference to how I achieved certain looks I want to recreate. 2. Legal out in the event I get a stupid model who attempts to accuse me of something that never happened. 3. Training of new staff, also gives them an idea of what goes on. A BTS type thing if you will. 4. I love watching the behind the scenes working thing. Like watching the very first shoot that I ever did for my first website. Great memories there. May 28 05 07:21 pm Link Posted by Sun Karma: Posted by Angel Tara: That is why I am asking if its ethical. The girls know they are being taped...its not in the release that the video will be sold for profit- in fact, the video isn't mentioned in the release the models signed. So the photographer is keeping all the dough. (hypothetical situation). If he isn't being up frount about selling the video then it's not ethical. May 28 05 07:43 pm Link I probably never will. 1. I can hardly stand to have someone looking over my shoulder when I shoot. Shooting and thinking about the video recording going on would be worse. 2. Some of the models I've shot with have had limits of what they wish to have exposed to the camera, although they're more casual with me personally in getting to the pose. If I happened to videotape them showing what they don't want to show, that would be a violation of our trust. 3. If I have enough suspicion to want to videotape a shoot, I'll just not shoot and move on to another situation that I'm more comfortable with. May 28 05 10:27 pm Link Well written Justin. May 28 05 10:32 pm Link Posted by Sun Karma: If the model is getting a cut of the video sales then hell yeah it's ethical, but if they are not getting paid to be videoed then they should sue. May 29 05 06:00 am Link I think it is a good idea to videotape the shoot and watch it afterwards. It helps the model and photographer see how to improve the next time around. May 29 05 07:07 am Link Posted by Alexandra Paris: Actually, some of the girls do indeed get paid. When they take them onto the bus or hotel room, anywhere where it's a "private" dwelling, they shell out cash, get ID's, MRF's are signed, the whole ball of wax. I respect GGW because here in 2005 if a girl is stupid enough to get on cam for them for free, KNOWING that they'll be in the commercial 6 months after, then that's THIER fault. It's not like they didn't know. That excuse in itself is tired. it's like saying "Well, I didn't know they were going to make money off of me when I flashed my tits and screamed out GIRLS GONE WILD, WOOOOO!!!! After I put on the tank top that said Girls Gone Wild on the front of it, with matching hat." lol May 29 05 08:27 am Link If they are drunk when they do this, they really can't make an informed decision. Posted by Monsante Bey: Posted by Alexandra Paris: Actually, some of the girls do indeed get paid. When they take them onto the bus or hotel room, anywhere where it's a "private" dwelling, they shell out cash, get ID's, MRF's are signed, the whole ball of wax. I respect GGW because here in 2005 if a girl is stupid enough to get on cam for them for free, KNOWING that they'll be in the commercial 6 months after, then that's THIER fault. It's not like they didn't know. That excuse in itself is tired. it's like saying "Well, I didn't know they were going to make money off of me when I flashed my tits and screamed out GIRLS GONE WILD, WOOOOO!!!! After I put on the tank top that said Girls Gone Wild on the front of it, with matching hat." lol May 29 05 08:29 am Link Posted by XtremeArtists ®: That's a tired and lame excuse too, seeing how GGW hosts events at clubs and people are told BEFOREHAND that they will be on camera. Girl in court says, "But your honor, I was drunk." Club owner says "Your honor, we had the appropriate signs posted that GGW was hosting the event and would be filming. We checked ID's at the door, verifying that everyone in the club was at least 21 years of age." The judge says "Plaintiff, did you willingly show your breasts when the camera was put in your face after you bought your own alcoholic beverages?" Girls says "Yes, but..." Judge says "Yes, but nothing. Case dismissed." May 29 05 08:44 am Link Mosante, I'm inclined to agree with you, if and when the girl's are 21 and over. Now 18 and under is another story...Many girls that age lack the common sense and street smarts to be able to make an informed decision regarding the GGW types of shoots. May 29 05 08:58 am Link You know, even at 18 you should have enough common sense to know NOT to do something stupid... Then again, we all have our growing pains lol May 29 05 09:03 am Link LOL! Yeah, growing pains are a b*%ch! It's a part of the learning proccess, but I just hate to see impressionable (semi) underage girls get taken for fools. Now once you have had one of those types of experiences, particularly 21 and over, you better develop some an eagle eye for BS pretty quick or you're asking to be bamboozled! May 29 05 09:17 am Link Posted by Sun Karma: I think using the term "of course" immediately implies that this person is unethical from the start. Therefore, he should be avoided. May 29 05 11:19 am Link Posted by Martin Williams: *Sits back and Laughs at Martin* Duuuuude you do porno... he he he. And you are absolutly correct its about communication. Empowering people by giving them a choice. May 29 05 04:37 pm Link Posted by Martin Williams: *Sits back and Laughs at Martin* Duuuuude you do porno... he he he. And you are absolutly correct its about communication. Empowering people by giving them a choice. May 29 05 04:38 pm Link Posted by XtremeArtists ®: It's skirting the edge. They are sober when they agree to go to GGW event and be filmed, knowing what happens. Are they sober when they engage in actions they later regret, probablyt not. Contracts signed while drunk may be considered invalid, but I don't think oversettping your personal limits because you were foolish enough to get too drunk when you knew you were on camera is much to stand on. May 29 05 04:48 pm Link Can i video tape if they are not drunk? May 29 05 05:00 pm Link It would be more fun if they are drunk. May 30 05 02:43 am Link |