Model
Theresa H
Posts: 64
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
just for fun because im really bored. rate the person's portfolio above you from 1-10 1 - boy you really need A Lot of work 10 - wow. you got it going on!! and the rest writes itself. Take Care, Theresa
Model
Katie Ellis
Posts: 276
Chicago, Illinois, US
Theresa H wrote: just for fun because im really bored. rate the person's portfolio above you from 1-10 1 - boy you really need A Lot of work 10 - wow. you got it going on!! and the rest writes itself. Take Care, Theresa I'd say 7. You've got a GREAT look, however in a lot of your images, you give off the same expression. I'd like to see more expressions, and I feel you're capable of doing so!
Photographer
Eboh Ajeroh
Posts: 1455
Washington, District of Columbia, US
Pete H wrote: 7.5 Pete = 3 OK...I'm joking. Your work is nice. I'd say 7.9
Photographer
DRP Photography
Posts: 246
Nevada City, California, US
eboh- you get a 10! very well done. very inspirational... DRP
Photographer
Pete Harasty
Posts: 1165
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
Eboh Ajeroh Photography wrote:
Pete = 3 Eboh 2.9 OK...I'm joking. Your work is nice. I'd say 7.9
Photographer
Alejandro Llauro
Posts: 884
New York, New York, US
DRP Photography wrote: eboh- you get a 10! very well done. very inspirational... DRP DRP great composition amazing locations and very nicely done nudes i say an 8.5
Photographer
Andrew Attah
Posts: 1699
London, England, United Kingdom
Alejandro Llauro wrote: DRP great composition amazing locations and very nicely done nudes i say an 8.5 6.5/10 I kinda feel as though the bottom two rows are letting you down. The stuff at the top is good times, but the bottom two are pulling you down. Remember, don't rate mine as a fashion/beauty portfolio, as it's not! www.andrewattah.com
Photographer
DaVinci Pro Photography
Posts: 264
Orlando, Florida, US
NSE Films wrote:
6.5/10 I kinda feel as though the bottom two rows are letting you down. The stuff at the top is good times, but the bottom two are pulling you down. Remember, don't rate mine as a fashion/beauty portfolio, as it's not! www.andrewattah.com Overall not bad although I feel your lighting is at times a bit flat score 6.5/10
Model
cheryllynnh
Posts: 1815
Flint, Michigan, US
DaVinci Pro Photography wrote: Overall not bad although I feel your lighting is at times a bit flat score 6.5/10 DaVinci 8.5 Your lighting rocks and your headshots are killer - beautiful work - wish I lived near you!
Photographer
BobbyGPhoto
Posts: 1599
Houston, Texas, US
Cheryllynnh 6 I think if you replaced some of the top 2 rows it would improve your port greatly. Some of those images appear as sanpshots and are not indicative of your overall look
Model
Carrie_K
Posts: 10053
Orlando, Florida, US
Bobby G Your pics on the first couple pages are nice a crisp. The last page has some lesser quality. I'd suggest maybe taking some of the less focused shots out. You have creative and sexy glamour work. I bet you'd do well in other areas as well. For lack of diveristy, I have to give you a 7. Nice work though.
Photographer
BobbyGPhoto
Posts: 1599
Houston, Texas, US
Carrie_K wrote: Bobby G Your pics on the first couple pages are nice a crisp. The last page has some lesser quality. I'd suggest maybe taking some of the less focused shots out. You have creative and sexy glamour work. I bet you'd do well in other areas as well. For lack of diveristy, I have to give you a 7. Nice work though. Which ones are you referring are "less focused"?? so I know which ones to consider...
Model
Carrie_K
Posts: 10053
Orlando, Florida, US
Bobby G wrote:
Which ones are you referring are "less focused"?? so I know which ones to consider... PM
Photographer
Anthony B
Posts: 1084
Yardley, Pennsylvania, US
Carrie_K Great diversity and larger than life expressions = 9.0
Model
Aleks Hayward
Posts: 227
London, England, United Kingdom
i'd say an 8. It's really diverse. My favourites are the more gothy ones and a few pics in there are gorgeous. Don't like the glamour ones too much with the pink mini but opinions aren't subjective =]
Photographer
Awesome Photos
Posts: 208
Santa Maria, California, US
I'll give you 6. You have a good future.
Photographer
Rich Meade
Posts: 1302
Atlanta, Georgia, US
Anthony B wrote:
Your lighting is pretty simple... it doesn't have any thing special to it. composition wise you are ok, but again, nothing mind blowing. your model selection leaves a lot to be desired. and your nudes, come off as very amateur, and show no sophistication. I recommend experimenting more with your lighting, do some research and study what you like in photography and try to incorporate it into your work. you have a good technical base, you just need to stretch. 4
Model
BeatnikDiva
Posts: 14859
Fayetteville, Arkansas, US
Model
Torttunaattori
Posts: 320
Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland
overall, I like your compositions. 6.5.
Photographer
nevar
Posts: 14670
Fort Smith, Arkansas, US
Torttu Doris wrote: overall, I like your compositions. 6.5. While the photography seems to be proficient, the portfolio is marred with some really amateur post work and a real lack of inspiration. 6.5
Photographer
Minx & Fox
Posts: 19067
Palm Springs, California, US
nevar wrote: While the photography seems to be proficient, the portfolio is marred with some really amateur post work and a real lack of inspiration. 6.5 1 Just awful. Tee, you know what I think about your work, so I'll let someone else do you. Hehe
Photographer
scrymettet
Posts: 33239
Quebec, Quebec, Canada
Burlap Rats wrote: 1 Just awful. Tee, you know what I think about your work, so I'll let someone else do you. Hehe muaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah proceed
Photographer
nevar
Posts: 14670
Fort Smith, Arkansas, US
scrymettet wrote: muaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah wrong kinda hole for me proceed what the shit is this here shit?
Photographer
scrymettet
Posts: 33239
Quebec, Quebec, Canada
nevar wrote: what the shit is this here shit? scrymettet wrote: muaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah wrong kinda hole for me proceed dunno who's the mad mod who dropped that thread here. but it is SF2 : no bewbies,no bacon, no sexual innuendo,no randomness that have to be corrected. Nice edit by the way
Photographer
nevar
Posts: 14670
Fort Smith, Arkansas, US
did I just try to "like" your comment.... fuck you facebook
Photographer
scrymettet
Posts: 33239
Quebec, Quebec, Canada
nevar wrote: did I just try to "like" your comment.... fuck you facebook :bows: plus side, poking fun at Iris is always entertaining
Photographer
- Phil H -
Posts: 26552
Mildenhall, England, United Kingdom
scrymettet wrote: dunno who's the mad mod who dropped that thread here. but it is SF2 : no bewbies,no bacon, no sexual innuendo,no randomness that have to be corrected. Nice edit by the way As far as I can tell this wasn't dropped here by a Mod, least not anytime recently, it's just a resurrected Zombie, though if it continues attracting "rating" posts it will likely need moving to critique.
Photographer
scrymettet
Posts: 33239
Quebec, Quebec, Canada
- Phil H - wrote: ... though if it continues attracting "rating" posts it will likely need moving to critique. sounds like a plan
Photographer
Minx & Fox
Posts: 19067
Palm Springs, California, US
I'm just going to ball in a corner over here.
Photographer
- Phil H -
Posts: 26552
Mildenhall, England, United Kingdom
Burlap Rats wrote: I'm just going to ball in a corner over here. *Watches as a large kitten baps the ball in the corner, clean across the room.*
Photographer
Minx & Fox
Posts: 19067
Palm Springs, California, US
- Phil H - wrote: *Watches as a large kitten baps the ball in the corner, clean across the room.*
Photographer
scrymettet
Posts: 33239
Quebec, Quebec, Canada
Burlap Rats wrote: I'm just going to ball in a corner over here. *scratches behind the ears*
Photographer
MesmerEyes Photography
Posts: 3102
Galveston, Texas, US
WTF is this. I give diva a 10 for the zombie and people just go on rating ports. Lol.
Photographer
CauponaVenereae
Posts: 66
Troup, Texas, US
MesmerEyes Photography wrote: I give the person above me a 15. Naw. They suck. I'll givem a five max.
Photographer
Minx & Fox
Posts: 19067
Palm Springs, California, US
scrymettet wrote: *scratches behind the ears* Moo.
Photographer
scrymettet
Posts: 33239
Quebec, Quebec, Canada
Minx & Fox wrote: Moo. would speaking about milking be considered as crass talk ? *ponders*
Photographer
Art Silva
Posts: 10064
Santa Barbara, California, US
i'd say 6 doggy biscuits
|