Photographer
Becks
Posts: 31817
Rochester, New York, US
Or is OT completely dead right now? What's up with that? And i swear...half of MM is in the brig! *grumbles* what was the point of my early release if no one's ON, dammit?
Model
Manda Something
Posts: 3131
Laurel, Mississippi, US
Could also possibly be because of lunch time? Hell i dunno..Maybe you are right
Photographer
Profile Closed
Posts: 5808
Niceville, Florida, US
never be a fish out of water...Bring your own.
Photographer
Becks
Posts: 31817
Rochester, New York, US
ResoL101 wrote: never be a fish out of water...Bring your own. thank you, fortune cookie
Photographer
Becks
Posts: 31817
Rochester, New York, US
Manda Something wrote: Could also possibly be because of lunch time? Hell i dunno..Maybe you are right maybe. i'm used to it being so much more lively!
Model
Manda Something
Posts: 3131
Laurel, Mississippi, US
Photos By Becks wrote:
thank you, fortune cookie
Model
Manda Something
Posts: 3131
Laurel, Mississippi, US
Photos By Becks wrote: maybe. i'm used to it being so much more lively! I've noticed it to be more lively before 10 and after 5 God i need a life
Model
CagedGypsy
Posts: 23953
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, US
it's usually slow around this time. And one guy was brigged for just beng a flat out asshole towards me.
Photographer
Becks
Posts: 31817
Rochester, New York, US
Manda Something wrote:
I've noticed it to be more lively before 10 and after 5 God i need a life you and me both. but it's deader than usual. like half of the usuals arent posting because of the change or are brigged. hey! did you ever happen to notice that there's an actual written rule about bumping old threads? I swear there wasn't! Now there is.. That's going to drive me crazy until I find out whether it's new or not.
Photographer
K E E L I N G
Posts: 39894
Peoria, Illinois, US
Glad to see your out Becks! How could the Forums be boring when you're in em?
Photographer
Becks
Posts: 31817
Rochester, New York, US
CagedGypsy wrote: it's usually slow around this time. And one guy was brigged for just beng a flat out asshole towards me. who'd be an asshole to you? *prepares to form an army*
Model
TanyaDal
Posts: 332
CagedGypsy wrote: it's usually slow around this time. And one guy was brigged for just beng a flat out asshole towards me. he got brigged, yay
Photographer
Becks
Posts: 31817
Rochester, New York, US
Chris Keeling wrote: Glad to see your out Becks! How could the Forums be boring when you're in em? i'm the curse of OT.
Model
CagedGypsy
Posts: 23953
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, US
Photos By Becks wrote:
you and me both. but it's deader than usual. like half of the usuals arent posting because of the change or are brigged. hey! did you ever happen to notice that there's an actual written rule about bumping old threads? I swear there wasn't! Now there is.. That's going to drive me crazy until I find out whether it's new or not. were they really old threads? Did you bump them just to bump them? It could be construed as spamming.
Model
CagedGypsy
Posts: 23953
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, US
Photographer
K E E L I N G
Posts: 39894
Peoria, Illinois, US
Photos By Becks wrote:
you and me both. but it's deader than usual. like half of the usuals arent posting because of the change or are brigged. hey! did you ever happen to notice that there's an actual written rule about bumping old threads? I swear there wasn't! Now there is.. That's going to drive me crazy until I find out whether it's new or not. It's about halfway down the Forum Rules: Bump old topics for no reason: And we will bump you to the brig. (You like that? Huh? That was clever, huh?)
Photographer
Becks
Posts: 31817
Rochester, New York, US
CagedGypsy wrote:
were they really old threads? Did you bump them just to bump them? It could be construed as spamming. oh, i know what i did was naughty. I just didn't know there was an actual factual exact written rule about it. Now there is. I just want to know if I have my very own rule
Photographer
K E E L I N G
Posts: 39894
Peoria, Illinois, US
CagedGypsy wrote: it's usually slow around this time. And one guy was brigged for just beng a flat out asshole towards me. Link? I wanna see!
Photographer
Becks
Posts: 31817
Rochester, New York, US
Chris Keeling wrote:
It's about halfway down the Forum Rules: Bump old topics for no reason: And we will bump you to the brig. (You like that? Huh? That was clever, huh?) I meant before. I know there's one now. I just want to know whether it's new or not.
Photographer
K E E L I N G
Posts: 39894
Peoria, Illinois, US
Photos By Becks wrote:
I meant before. I know there's one now. I just want to know whether it's new or not. It's not new. I remember seeing at least a form of it back when I first joined.
Model
TanyaDal
Posts: 332
Photos By Becks wrote:
I meant before. I know there's one now. I just want to know whether it's new or not. nah it's always been a rule, same thing happened when someone bumped all of tripods threads to create crap
Photographer
Ed Stringbourne
Posts: 16319
Kansas City, Missouri, US
Photos By Becks wrote: Or is OT completely dead right now? What's up with that? And i swear...half of MM is in the brig! *grumbles* what was the point of my early release if no one's ON, dammit? Quick, make some drama to keep everyone's attention focussed. I've just been talking about exactly this.
Photographer
Becks
Posts: 31817
Rochester, New York, US
Chris Keeling wrote:
It's not new. I remember seeing at least a form of it back when I first joined. okiedoke. now, back to the original topic. what was it again?
Photographer
Becks
Posts: 31817
Rochester, New York, US
Ed Stringbourne wrote:
Quick, make some drama to keep everyone's attention focussed. I've just been talking about exactly this.
Model
CagedGypsy
Posts: 23953
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, US
Photographer
Pat Thielen
Posts: 16800
Hastings, Minnesota, US
Photos By Becks wrote:
you and me both. but it's deader than usual. like half of the usuals arent posting because of the change or are brigged. hey! did you ever happen to notice that there's an actual written rule about bumping old threads? I swear there wasn't! Now there is.. That's going to drive me crazy until I find out whether it's new or not. Nope -- That's a new one (Probably written especially for you). You can see in this thread where the older rules were posted (and these were the rules just before they were changed after the last bit of madness): https://www.modelmayhem.com/p.php?thread_id=217745 Just scroll down to see the rules if you're curious.
Photographer
Profile Closed
Posts: 5808
Niceville, Florida, US
Photos By Becks wrote:
thank you, fortune cookie Control your rage...or your rage will control you...(lmao)
Photographer
Becks
Posts: 31817
Rochester, New York, US
Pat Thielen wrote:
Nope -- That's a new one (Probably written especially for you). You can see in this thread where the older rules were posted (and these were the rules just before they were changed after the last bit of madness): https://www.modelmayhem.com/p.php?thread_id=217745 Just scroll down to see the rules if you're curious. I don't see the list of Forum rules there, though, and that's where they put the new(or old, whichever it is) bumping rule.
Model
CagedGypsy
Posts: 23953
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, US
Chris Keeling wrote:
Wow! Yea, I don't know where this person got the impression that I thought I was all that. I've never portrayed myself in that manner. Modeling is not always about a certain look. It almost felt too personal too.
Photographer
Becks
Posts: 31817
Rochester, New York, US
CagedGypsy wrote:
Yea, I don't know where this person got the impression that I thought I was all that. I've never portrayed myself in that manner. Modeling is not always about a certain look. It almost felt too personal too. that was retarded. he sounded like a complete douchebag.
Photographer
Becks
Posts: 31817
Rochester, New York, US
Photos By Becks wrote:
I don't see the list of Forum rules there, though, and that's where they put the new(or old, whichever it is) bumping rule. hey! i reread and saw the forum rules listed. No bumpage rule, you were right.
|