Forums >
General Industry >
What Does A Photographer Look Like?
Well there are two looks: The digital photographer: Short, but unkept hair, needs a bath, cig and a bit over weight (also under 30) The "Real Photographer": Long unkept hair, thin, nervous and keeps checking pockets in their bush jacket, red nose from drinking, stains from Polaroids on their hands and wearing their Rolex Exploer ll..... Real photographers do not wear barets unless they shoot glam. and then they are not real photographers anyway Jun 11 05 09:10 pm Link Posted by Thomas Oed: Posted by Lemi: Posted by Monsante Bey: Posted by Lemi: Posted by Monsante Bey: Posted by Lemi: Why??? In my experience, yes, a lot of it is. There was a photographer that wanted to work with me who was about 26, and engaged. He invited me up to check out him and his fiance's gallery and the whole time, he was flirting with me in front of her, trying to get me to stay the night, since I live about an hour away >_< Yea, his fiancee did not look too happy. As far as I know...they're not together anymore. So, just one experience? No, it wasn't just one experience, but that one takes the cake. Especially after I found out he had an Asian fetish. Younger photographers tend to think that I'll want to hang out with them afterwards or they'll want to take me on a date or something, and it's hard to draw the line when someone is around the same age as you. But hey, eveyrone has to start somewhere, right? Relating your experience with this guy to his age is absolutely absurd... you think he's gonna be any less of a wierdo when he's 40?!? Well, in my experiences with younger photographers, most of them wanted to have some sort of social contact with me afterwards, while the older ones I have worked with are very professional. Or maybe they're just better at hiding it? Ok, all joking aside, the one time I did accept a social invitation from a photographer, a year later, we're still together and doing very well. I'm not saying all younger photographers are horrible to work with, just that with some of the one's I happened to work with, they expect me to want to hang out with them and party or something. Jun 11 05 10:41 pm Link Hmmm... You know, there's nothing wrong with being friends. I'm friends with a few models. One thing that we have to remember in this business is that we are HUMAN first. Jun 11 05 10:48 pm Link Posted by Joe K. Perez: How did you know my line? Seriously, I have said that to many photographers, and I discovered...it actually works pretty damn well. Jun 12 05 04:13 am Link Posted by Lapis: i'm turning 32 in july...am i an exception? and i'm not a pro artist... man 32 IS old...i gotta start hitting the gym again. Jun 12 05 04:34 am Link sorry...by pro artist I don't mean an artist who actually makes MONEY by their art...I mean someone who is driven by their art and has had it as a core part of their identity for a significant part of their life. As for the rest, I am speaking from personal taste, but I will look at your port now and give you a private assessment...IMHO, of course. Jun 12 05 04:39 am Link yaaay! Posted by Lapis: Jun 12 05 04:41 am Link Posted by edrickguerrero photography: Posted by Lapis: Such a good point that people lose...professional means this is what you do, not "how you make money" although wouldn't that be nice? Jun 12 05 05:00 am Link I had to weigh in on this one. What does a photographer look like? Does it matter? What does his work look like, thats the question you should ask. I have been a professional photographer over 20 years and am in my early 40's. But as an artist I have to keep up with current trends in fashion etc. Now being married I think sometimes gives me a little more validity than a 20 something guy, who is single. But I still feel the main issue is their work. Since the advent of the digital SLR everyone who can turn a camera on thinks they are a pro photographer, but I'd like to see them in my darkroom do anything. Don't get me wrong, in the studio I shoot digital, but having the knowldege and background of shooting film and knowing the process and knowing how to treat models with respect and dignity is more importatnt than what a photographer looks like, don't you think? Oh and by the way, my self portrait is on my website and this profile if anyone is curious! Baronestudio.com Jun 13 05 08:30 am Link nope. don't look a photographer to me. (lol) Jun 13 05 01:57 pm Link Posted by Doug Swinskey: i was wondering what the hell you meant Jun 13 05 05:42 pm Link Posted by BlacklistVisual: ill believe that; ive only been shooting for 3 years and it's never involved people, so adding the human element threw me for a loop especially because its so unforgiving [even in digital]. Jun 13 05 05:46 pm Link |