Forums > Off-Topic Discussion > Keira Knightley refuses Photoshop Boob Job

Photographer

digital Artform

Posts: 49326

Los Angeles, California, US

https://www.nydailynews.com/img/2008/07/28/alg_keiraknightley_3.jpg

She's had it happen before, but not this time.

http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2008/ … eme-1.html

clarification

Keira Knightley's bosom was enhanced in photos for 2004's 'King Arthur.' (pictured above)

She is refusing it in her current movie, The Dutchess.

https://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h186/KeiraFan/small-27.jpg

Jul 28 08 06:31 am Link

Model

Miss Dion

Posts: 3369

London, England, United Kingdom

the original kind of looks better

Jul 28 08 06:37 am Link

Model

kristenvictoria

Posts: 2324

i think retouch looks better but i understand where shes coming from

Jul 28 08 06:38 am Link

Photographer

Talan M

Posts: 517

BUSHKILL, Pennsylvania, US

Is it me or does the retouched look cross-eyed?

Jul 28 08 06:41 am Link

Model

Christy in LA

Posts: 263

Los Angeles, California, US

I get a boob-job---its called , "GAFFER'S TAPE"

Jul 28 08 06:42 am Link

Model

Mz Machina

Posts: 1754

Chicago, Illinois, US

I like the original , it looks  "real". I can appreciate her attempts to be recognized as an artist aside from her cup size....

Jul 28 08 06:45 am Link

Photographer

Uncle Tim Orden

Posts: 730

Makawao, Hawaii, US

WEll, IMHO the breast enlargment isn't the issue... The image is soooo much stronger, worked in post. (Good work)

Movies ARE an illusion, after all.

Jul 28 08 06:53 am Link

Photographer

digital Artform

Posts: 49326

Los Angeles, California, US

clarification

Keira Knightley's bosom was enhanced in photos for 2004's 'King Arthur.' (pictured above)

She is refusing it in her current movie, The Dutchess.

https://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h186/KeiraFan/small-27.jpg

Jul 28 08 07:01 am Link

Model

Dcz

Posts: 429

Melvindale, Michigan, US

I think Keira Knightley is the one of the most beautiful women on earth. Who needs tits when you have a face like that?

Jul 28 08 07:08 am Link

Model

Miss Dion

Posts: 3369

London, England, United Kingdom

was she enhanced in Pirates?
http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/200 … 900147.jpg
looks slightly bigger compared to Duchess....

Jul 28 08 07:12 am Link

Photographer

digital Artform

Posts: 49326

Los Angeles, California, US

Muarw wrote:
was she enhanced in Pirates?
http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/200 … 900147.jpg
looks slightly bigger compared to Duchess....

https://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/05/pirates-of-the-caribbean-pirates-of-the-caribbean-keira-knightley-9900147.jpg

That dark, distinct cleavage line looks questionable, now that you mention it.

Jul 28 08 07:14 am Link

Photographer

GW Burns

Posts: 564

Sarasota, Florida, US

We are a world fixated on breasts arent we?  Still never understood why it is permissable to see a mans breasts (nipples) but not a womans?  Keira has smaller breasts then some men, so it isnt a size issue.  Freud would have a field day on this subject for sure.

Jul 28 08 08:30 am Link

Photographer

Helen Tran

Posts: 270

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Oh darn, no boobs? How am I going to watch a movie now?

Jul 28 08 08:32 am Link

Photographer

Mike Fiction

Posts: 496

Columbus, Ohio, US

Good for her - She's beautiful the way she is.

Jul 28 08 08:33 am Link

Model

Janice Marie Foote

Posts: 11483

Mike Fiction wrote:
Good for her - She's beautiful the way she is.

Agreed!!!

Jul 28 08 08:51 am Link

Model

Ivy Jo

Posts: 2188

Amarillo, Texas, US

Muarw wrote:
was she enhanced in Pirates?
http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/200 … 900147.jpg
looks slightly bigger compared to Duchess....

If no ones said it yet, direct from the special features in pirates 2: yes they were increased in 1 with makeup and PS, but not in 2 or 3.

Jul 28 08 09:54 am Link

Photographer

Sleepy Weasel

Posts: 4839

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

Good for her! I absolutely love her and her small boobs.  It's part of what makes her so cute.

Jul 28 08 10:02 am Link

Model

-Nicole-

Posts: 19211

Madison, Wisconsin, US

It's so sad that someone feels the need to photoshop boobs on her. She's gorgeous and a talented actress. Guess it's not enough.

Didn't they airbrush boobs on her for PotC?

Jul 28 08 10:04 am Link

Photographer

David Scott

Posts: 5617

Marion, Iowa, US

You know... if the pictures weren't posted side-by-side like that, I probably wouldn't have even noticed.

Jul 28 08 10:04 am Link

Photographer

Farenell Photography

Posts: 18832

Albany, New York, US

digital Artform wrote:
Keira Knightley's bosom was enhanced in photos for 2004's 'King Arthur.' (pictured above)

She is refusing it in her current movie, The Dutchess.

Wasn't she a virtual unknown in 2004?

Jul 28 08 10:06 am Link

Photographer

Farenell Photography

Posts: 18832

Albany, New York, US

*double posted*

Jul 28 08 10:06 am Link

Model

Ivy Jo

Posts: 2188

Amarillo, Texas, US

Farenell Photography wrote:

Wasn't she a virtual unknown in 2004?

No, Pirates 1 was out in 2003. And there was stuff before that, I forget what though.

Jul 28 08 10:08 am Link

Photographer

BronxTies

Posts: 146

New York, New York, US

Thanks for keeping me "abreast" of such an important topic.....lol smile

Jul 28 08 10:11 am Link

Photographer

slave to the lens

Posts: 9078

Woodland Hills, California, US

I think her first big role was as Padme's handmaiden in Star Wars I. She bore a striking resemblace to Natalie portman.

Jul 28 08 10:15 am Link

Model

Fleur du Mal

Posts: 1437

Derby, England, United Kingdom

LuxxxNoir wrote:
I like the original , it looks  "real". I can appreciate her attempts to be recognized as an artist aside from her cup size....

Yeah ... unfortunately she can't act for shit, so that's never going to happen ...

Jul 28 08 10:18 am Link

Model

Ivy Jo

Posts: 2188

Amarillo, Texas, US

Fleur du Mal wrote:

Yeah ... unfortunately she can't act for shit, so that's never going to happen ...

I have to disagree with you on that, She did great in Domino.

Jul 28 08 10:20 am Link

Model

Fleur du Mal

Posts: 1437

Derby, England, United Kingdom

Ivy Bressler wrote:

I have to disagree with you on that, She did great in Domino.

Refused to watch it on the grounds that she was so bad in Pirates (all three) that I'm not convinced she can carry a movie as a lead

Jul 28 08 10:23 am Link

Photographer

slave to the lens

Posts: 9078

Woodland Hills, California, US

Fleur du Mal wrote:

Yeah ... unfortunately she can't act for shit, so that's never going to happen ...

... and yet Renee Zelwiger and Keanu Reeves soldier on, perpetually butchering the craft.

Jul 28 08 10:24 am Link

Model

Ivy Jo

Posts: 2188

Amarillo, Texas, US

Fleur du Mal wrote:

Refused to watch it on the grounds that she was so bad in Pirates (all three) that I'm not convinced she can carry a movie as a lead

Eh, who needs her when Johny Depps there?

Jul 28 08 10:28 am Link

Model

Fleur du Mal

Posts: 1437

Derby, England, United Kingdom

slave to the lens wrote:

... and yet Renee Zelwiger and Keanu Reeves soldier on, perpetually butchering the craft.

Unfortunately people with no talent will always get to places they don't deserve to be - it's the way of the world.

Jul 28 08 10:29 am Link

Model

Fleur du Mal

Posts: 1437

Derby, England, United Kingdom

Ivy Bressler wrote:

Eh, who needs her when Johny Depps there?

Good point!

Jul 28 08 10:29 am Link

Model

Trinette

Posts: 1612

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US

Well, regardless of her acting ability...which really isn't in debate here, I think it's quite noble of her to do this. 

I hope little girls dreaming of boob jobs before they even have them see some of this and realize that being different really makes you who you are.

I'm amused that being different these days basically means being yourself. 

Kinda fucked, eh?

Jul 28 08 10:29 am Link

Photographer

VisualRamblings

Posts: 1951

Denver, Colorado, US

She don't need a damn boob job. Nobody needs a damn boob job - Nobody!

Jul 28 08 10:33 am Link

Photographer

B Browder Photo

Posts: 14635

Charleston, South Carolina, US

Good for her.  Shes beautiful.

Jul 28 08 10:34 am Link

Model

loikhgdr hhgrdfvnj

Posts: 72

Gibson, Iowa, US

I love her acting ability, and isn't that why we go and see movies? For the plot and the acting?? Or maybe it's just me that you really only watch porn movies for the tits and ass idea.
So I say good for her and all the women who have said the same before me, and the men too. I have a smaller chest and I hate when people photoshop them, try to add things in or just won't work with me cause of the size of something.
Kudos to all of you!

Jul 28 08 10:38 am Link

Model

Rachel Dashae

Posts: 1239

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, US

Go her. She's gorgeous anyways.

Jul 28 08 12:39 pm Link

Model

Tia

Posts: 7932

Honolulu, Hawaii, US

Mike Fiction wrote:
Good for her - She's beautiful the way she is.

Exactly.

Jul 28 08 12:43 pm Link

Photographer

Mgaphoto

Posts: 4982

San Diego, California, US

she is pretty

Jul 28 08 12:45 pm Link

Model

Tia

Posts: 7932

Honolulu, Hawaii, US

Ivy Bressler wrote:
I have to disagree with you on that, She did great in Domino.

Yes, she did smile.

Jul 28 08 12:45 pm Link

Photographer

Laurence Moan

Posts: 7844

Huntington Beach, California, US

Fleur du Mal wrote:

Yeah ... unfortunately she can't act for shit, so that's never going to happen ...

Oooo I beg to differ. Girl may not have boobs but she's got chops. Pirates is not a fair assessment as it was rather cartoonish in nature as compared to a drama. Keira has done quite well for someone so young and will only get better.

Jul 28 08 12:52 pm Link