Kemmie T x10 wrote:
Post a pic that you think is haute, and I'll tell you why its not!!!!!!!


****this is mainly for model ports********



Happy Halloween!!!!

here you go!

Jessyka Ann wrote:

here you go!

Eh. I could see somethin happenin, but the quality of the image is rather low.

Rhiannon Davis wrote:
this thread is arrogant at best. no thanks.

If you had any idea, you would realize how bass akwrds u sound.

Thanks for the laughs!

EDIT- I just looked at your profile, and I realized you may not have caught on....... The thread title is a play off of a song titled "this is why I'm hot". Look it up.

Rhiannon Davis wrote:
(33) Lists: Rules: Good, clean lists only please. Breaking any of the following rules is grounds for list deletion and may result in your profile being removed from MM.

    * No lists to degrade or insult other people or photos
    * No "private part" collection lists (breasts, genitals and buttocks)
    * No sexual list names (i.e. "The things I would do...")



You should read the rules sometime... I think the first asterisk applies to this thread? Yes... Yes it does. You only created this thread so that you could insult people. That is rude and, yes, arrogant. So you're welcome for the laughs, but they are in vain.

bass akwards.... hahaha you're silly.

yeah, im not socially inept, but thanks. my reply still stands.

FYI, this isn't a list.

Miss Sheena Murray wrote:
lol... Let me get this clear, you want people to post the picture that they believe is hot so you can tag them down a few pegs?

This is the abuse and humiliation thread apparently.

Rhiannon Davis wrote:
(33) Lists: Rules: Good, clean lists only please. Breaking any of the following rules is grounds for list deletion and may result in your profile being removed from MM.

    * No lists to degrade or insult other people or photos
    * No "private part" collection lists (breasts, genitals and buttocks)
    * No sexual list names (i.e. "The things I would do...")



You should read the rules sometime... I think the first asterisk applies to this thread? Yes... Yes it does. You only created this thread so that you could insult people. That is rude and, yes, arrogant. So you're welcome for the laughs, but they are in vain.

bass akwards.... hahaha you're silly.

yeah, im not socially inept, but thanks. my reply still stands.

um...this is a THREAD, not a list, so it can't apply

Jonathan Kane wrote:

This is the abuse and humiliation thread apparently.

That's what I get from it. hahahaha hilarious.

Rhiannon Davis wrote:
(33) Lists: Rules: Good, clean lists only please. Breaking any of the following rules is grounds for list deletion and may result in your profile being removed from MM.

    * No lists to degrade or insult other people or photos
    * No "private part" collection lists (breasts, genitals and buttocks)
    * No sexual list names (i.e. "The things I would do...")



You should read the rules sometime... I think the first asterisk applies to this thread? Yes... Yes it does. You only created this thread so that you could insult people. That is rude and, yes, arrogant. So you're welcome for the laughs, but they are in vain.

bass akwards.... hahaha you're silly.

yeah, im not socially inept, but thanks. my reply still stands.

I'm sorry, is this a LIST as in the lists that people have on their port?? Or is this a thread?

Hmmm. Might want 2 reread those rules.

Nice try tho.

Miss Sheena Murray wrote:
lol... Let me get this clear, you want people to post the picture that they believe is hot so you can tag them down a few pegs?

I'm sure if I was trying to do that it would be more entertaining 4 you. But no.

Kemmie T x10 wrote:

I'm sure if I was trying to do that it would be more entertaining 4 you. But no.

So, what are you trying to do? Because based on your subject title, that is what it seems like. And it's seemingly not just my interpretation. Please clarify for the masses.   I'm just curious, so let's not get snippy.

miki kierulf wrote:
im not trying to take the OP's side here or anything, it's simply, post or dont.

if you dont want to hear something negative, then back away.

this is her critique thread and she has the right to say what she thinks. whether it be positive or not.

I think the issue is, whether or not someone is attempting to be nasty just because and whether the intention is to actually give a critique that is beneficial to anyone.  *shrugs* I dunno.

Miss Sheena Murray wrote:
I think the issue is, whether or not someone is attempting to be nasty just because and whether the intention is to actually give a critique that is beneficial to anyone.  *shrugs* I dunno.

Sheena's  haute ..

Tomi Hawk wrote:

Sheena's  haute ..

tee hee.. muah! ♥

/end thread-jacking

Miss Sheena Murray wrote:

So, what are you trying to do? Because based on your subject title, that is what it seems like. And it's seemingly not just my interpretation. Please clarify for the masses.   I'm just curious, so let's not get snippy.

Sigh, I normally post an example in my critiques- I don't kno what I was thinking when I didn't do one 4this thread.


So here it goes. Here's a pic that I think is great.



BUT, its not that great because the shadow is rather distracting.


See?? Now really, how bad was that?


I'm not sure where th "I'm the shit, and my pics are the shit, so post your pic that you think is shit so I can insult the shit out of you so you can feel like shit and you're gonna wanna jump off a building into a pile of shit.

F Stop Photography wrote:
Hey Kemmie, why don't YOU post any image from your port and I will tell you why it isn't haute? How's that sound? Is turnabout fair play? ;^)

Now why would I not do that!? Tell you what, you pic one that you don't think is haute, and tell me why.

Kemmie T x10 wrote:

Now why would I not do that!? Tell you what, you pic one that you don't think is haute, and tell me why.

Sorry Kemmie, I went through your entire port with a fine toothed comb and can't find ANYTHING that remotely resembles haute. Psuedo glam, psuedo artistic, yes. Haute? Ummmm nope, sorry! And you have the "hutzpa" to critique anyone else???

F Stop Photography wrote:

Sorry Kemmie, I went through your entire port with a fine toothed comb and can't find ANYTHING that remotely resembles haute. Psuedo glam, psuedo artistic, yes. Haute? Ummmm nope, sorry! And you have the "hutzpa" to critique anyone else???

Good eye! Funny, I NEVER said my entire port was haute- the whole point of the thread is to post the one pic that's your best pic, and if I don't agree (my opinion), I'll tell you why.

YOU asked me 2post a pic so you could do the same- you attempted to do some underhanded shit, and it didn't work.

If you still want to go with that, fine. If u can recall your previous post, here you go.........

Kemmie T x10 wrote:

Sigh, I normally post an example in my critiques- I don't kno what I was thinking when I didn't do one 4this thread.


So here it goes. Here's a pic that I think is great.



BUT, its not that great because the shadow is rather distracting.


See?? Now really, how bad was that?


I'm not sure where th "I'm the shit, and my pics are the shit, so post your pic that you think is shit so I can insult the shit out of you so you can feel like shit and you're gonna wanna jump off a building into a pile of shit.

Honestly dear, I really dont care.  I saw the subject line and was curious about your motive.  Thought it didn't hold any substance. But this is after MM. *shrugs again*

Kemmie T x10 wrote:
Good eye! Funny, I NEVER said my entire port was haute- the whole point of the thread is to post the one pic that's your best pic, and if I don't agree (my opinion), I'll tell you why.

YOU asked me 2post a pic so you could do the same- you attempted to do some underhanded shit, and it didn't work.

If you still want to go with that, fine. If u can recall your previous post, here you go.........

Kemmie, there's no point to ripping that image OR your port to shreds, piece by piece. I was giving you a little taste of your own medicine, not pleasant is it? Underhanded shit? No, not really.

Just letting you know that you're living in a glass house and have the brass ones to think you can toss stones! Pee on anyone foolish enough to play your game, but I'm done with it---and you! Regards! ;^)

F Stop Photography wrote:

Kemmie, there's no point to ripping that image OR your port to shreds, piece by piece. I was giving you a little taste of your own medicine, not pleasant is it? Underhanded shit? No, not really.

Just letting you know that you're living in a glass house and have the brass ones to think you can toss stones! Pee on anyone foolish enough to play your game, but I'm done with it---and you! Regards! ;^)

How in the hell did you do that??! Lmao you're bananas, and I'm sorry you wasted your time. Now if you don't like it, leave. End of story.

Sheena Murray  wrote:

Honestly dear, I really dont care.  I saw the subject line and was curious about your motive.  Thought it didn't hold any substance. But this is after MM. *shrugs again*

Understood. Thanks 4 stopping by.


and just a note, the next person that posts in the this critique thread will be critiqued.

Rachie N wrote:

Haute? Not?

Honestly, haute. I love the contrast of the shot. The whole beautiful woman in a beautiful dress, lying in the dirt. I get you.

Kemmie T x10 wrote:

Honestly, haute. I love the contrast of the shot. The whole beautiful woman in a beautiful dress, lying in the dirt. I get you.

Aw thanks girl! That's exactly the concept we were going for!!!

Rachie N wrote:

Aw thanks girl! That's exactly the concept we were going for!!!

No problem!!!!!! I love it when things just flow!!!!!

Lauren A Farrington wrote:
I think it's really funny how much drama this thread has stirred up...

I must say, the port is rather spicy. The only two that didn't burn me with hotness is the dog one (cause your other quads are wayy more hauter) and this one.

Kemmie T x10 wrote:

I must say, the port is rather spicy. The only two that didn't burn me with hotness is the dog one (cause your other quads are wayy more hauter) and this one.

Oh, I wasn't asking for a critique (to be honest, I was scared, haha) but thank you. :]

Lauren A Farrington wrote:

Oh, I wasn't asking for a critique (to be honest, I was scared, haha) but thank you. :]

Scared?! and just a note, the next person that posts in the this critique thread will be critiqued. I tried 2 avoid that from happening  and just a note, the next person that posts in the this critique thread will be critiqued.. I guess maybe u didn't see the note before you posted?  and just a note, the next person that posts in the this critique thread will be critiqued. idk.

Bob Jones Photography wrote:
[img]http://  farm4.static.flickr.com/3058/2952838583_1999f1caa1.jpg[/img]

The last one is pretty haute. The other two are not so much. Just kind of plain.

Kemmie T x10 wrote:

The last one is pretty haute. The other two are not so much. Just kind of plain.

Bump (to those you get it. Those who don't, piss off.)