Forums > Photography Talk > hard as hell imaging trivia

Photographer

Halcyon 7174 NYC

Posts: 20109

New York, New York, US

QUERY: Name a means of recording a focused image onto film besides a lens, a pinhole or a laser.

Jul 01 05 10:38 am Link

Photographer

Jack D Trute

Posts: 4558

New York, New York, US

Does a projector count as a laser?

Jul 01 05 10:42 am Link

Photographer

Halcyon 7174 NYC

Posts: 20109

New York, New York, US

Posted by Jack D Trute: 
Does a projector count as a laser?

Does the projector work without a lens?

besides a lens, a pinhole or a laser

Jul 01 05 11:57 am Link

Photographer

4C 41 42

Posts: 11093

Nashville, Tennessee, US

Radiation.  An x-ray is an example.

Jul 01 05 12:01 pm Link

Photographer

alexwh

Posts: 3104

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

How does a plain photogram figure in your equation?
Alex

Jul 01 05 12:02 pm Link

Photographer

alexwh

Posts: 3104

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Furthermore when you place a flower or an object on a flat bed scanner the image of the flower or object is recorded by a series of long CCDs which also have little plastic lenses embedded. Your question sort of implied one lens.

Jul 01 05 12:05 pm Link

Photographer

Halcyon 7174 NYC

Posts: 20109

New York, New York, US

Posted by alexwh: 
How does a plain photogram figure in your equation?
Alex

That's one.

PHOTOGRAM
1 POINT - ALEX

Jul 01 05 01:35 pm Link

Photographer

Halcyon 7174 NYC

Posts: 20109

New York, New York, US

Posted by LarryB: 
Radiation.  An x-ray is an example.

That's two.

PARTICLE RADIATION
1 POINT - LARRY

Jul 01 05 01:36 pm Link

Photographer

Halcyon 7174 NYC

Posts: 20109

New York, New York, US

Posted by alexwh: 
Furthermore when you place a flower or an object on a flat bed scanner the image of the flower or object is recorded by a series of long CCDs which also have little plastic lenses embedded. Your question sort of implied one lens. 

CCDs don't count and my question said "a lens," so meaning not any kind of lens.

recording a focused image onto film

Jul 01 05 01:37 pm Link

Photographer

Ed Nazarko

Posts: 121

Lebanon, New Jersey, US

zone plate

slit

magnetic field for focusing electromagnetic radiation

photon sieve

Jul 01 05 01:42 pm Link

Photographer

Halcyon 7174 NYC

Posts: 20109

New York, New York, US

Posted by Ed Nazarko: 
zone plate

slit

That's still the same principles as a pinhole camera.

magnetic field for focusing electromagnetic radiation

Ooh, good!

That's three.

MAGNETIC FIELD
1 POINT - ED

Yeah, you could actually use a planet or star's magnetic field as a lens for even the visible spectrum.

photon sieve

I think that still uses a lens... ?

Jul 01 05 02:29 pm Link

Photographer

Marcus J. Ranum

Posts: 3247

MORRISDALE, Pennsylvania, US

A knife

A contact print

An ink jet

[I know, I'm stretching it...]

mjr.

Jul 01 05 02:33 pm Link

Photographer

Halcyon 7174 NYC

Posts: 20109

New York, New York, US

Hehe, yeah.

A normal inkjet?

Jul 01 05 03:06 pm Link

Photographer

Justin N Lane

Posts: 1720

Brooklyn, New York, US

are we talking first generation capture or subsequent reproduction?

Jul 02 05 12:46 am Link

Photographer

Aaron_H

Posts: 1355

Ann Arbor, Michigan, US

Posted by Ched: 

Posted by alexwh: 
How does a plain photogram figure in your equation?
Alex

That's one.

PHOTOGRAM
1 POINT - ALEX

but you said a focused image. minus one point alex and minus two points ched for incorrectly awarding a point.


Jul 02 05 05:04 am Link

Photographer

Halcyon 7174 NYC

Posts: 20109

New York, New York, US

Focused doesn't have to be from a lens. A photogram can have sharp edges. A direct sunlight imprint of a bicycle wheel or a pair of hands, for instance. It's clear enough to tell what it is, even if it's only two shades. If the photogram is out the radation is as well because they're doing the same thing.

Jul 02 05 05:19 am Link

Photographer

Halcyon 7174 NYC

Posts: 20109

New York, New York, US

Posted by Justin N Lane: 
are we talking first generation capture or subsequent reproduction?

Capture of an image on a reactive material.

Jul 02 05 05:20 am Link

Photographer

XtremeArtists

Posts: 9122

https://www.shroud.com/tinyface.gif

Devine intervention?

Jul 02 05 07:51 am Link

Photographer

Hugh Jorgen

Posts: 2850

Ashland, Oregon, US

Posted by XtremeArtists: 
https://www.shroud.com/tinyface.gif

Devine intervention?

ROTFLMASSOFF
Ok im goin to bed!!

Jul 02 05 07:59 am Link

Photographer

David Klein

Posts: 207

Brooklyn, New York, US

Posted by XtremeArtists: 
https://www.shroud.com/tinyface.gif

Devine intervention?

most scientists agree carbon dating proves this is not an image from the time of christ....

but no one knows what it is or how it was done for sure...

thirteeth century... pretty amazing

David

Jul 02 05 08:23 am Link

Photographer

David Klein

Posts: 207

Brooklyn, New York, US

oh and in answer to the first question... images have been placed on film by telepathy or something like telepathic image projection...

but it might be a hoax


D

Jul 02 05 08:25 am Link

Photographer

Justin N Lane

Posts: 1720

Brooklyn, New York, US

Painting directly on photopaper or  sheet film with developer in room light...

Etching plate metal for printmaking...

Also heat sensitive media such as thermal label printing (where the paper is impregnated with heat sensitive ink)...

I suppose the crt monitor I'm staring at right now falls into the radiation category- but other materials that flouresce... you didn't say the image had to be induring

Jul 02 05 10:11 am Link

Photographer

SayCheeZ!

Posts: 20636

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

Posted by XtremeArtists: 
https://www.shroud.com/tinyface.gif
Devine intervention?

Ya better give Xtreme at least 10 points for that one... after all, you DON'T want to Mess with Devine intervention!

Jul 02 05 10:22 am Link

Photographer

Halcyon 7174 NYC

Posts: 20109

New York, New York, US

Posted by Justin N Lane: 
you didn't say the image had to be induring

I'm sorry you're having trouble with this. On FILM, dammit! It has to be recorded and useable. You have to be able to use the technology to get an image without using a manufactured lens, a laser, or pinhole techniques.

Jul 02 05 12:45 pm Link

Photographer

Halcyon 7174 NYC

Posts: 20109

New York, New York, US

Posted by SayCheeZ!: 
Ya better give Xtreme at least 10 points for that one... after all, you DON'T want to Mess with Devine intervention!

No hoaxes, imaging technologies. One point for a right answer, no points off for guesses.

What is this? Three people want to play the game, everyone else just wants to beat the system?

There are at least three techniques that haven't been mentioned yet.

Jul 02 05 12:48 pm Link

Photographer

SayCheeZ!

Posts: 20636

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

RADAR - can create fairly accurate images of items in sky (such as cloud formations or aircraft).  It's not just used for nailing speeders anymore!

SONAR - Kinda works like radar, except uses sound waves for underwater use.  Is used for imaging sunken ships and underwater landscapes.

THERMOGRAPHY - Accuratly shows variations in heat... great for finding fires that are behind walls, or problem areas on expensive engines.

RADIO MAPPING AND TELEMETRY - might fall under electromagnetic category.  An array of antennas are spread out over a wide area and pointed toward the heavens to pinpoint and map out astronomical beings.  When an array is properly placed, the whole earth can considered one large satellite dish...  great for catching those "My Mother The Car" reruns that are now appearing on Venus.

Jul 02 05 01:51 pm Link

Photographer

XtremeArtists

Posts: 9122

Posted by David Klein: 

Posted by XtremeArtists: 
https://www.shroud.com/tinyface.gif
Devine intervention?

most scientists agree carbon dating proves this is not an image from the time of christ....

but no one knows what it is or how it was done for sure...

POLAROID IMAGE TRANSFER

Jul 02 05 02:11 pm Link

Photographer

Halcyon 7174 NYC

Posts: 20109

New York, New York, US

Posted by SayCheeZ!: 
RADAR - can create fairly accurate images of items in sky (such as cloud formations or aircraft).  It's not just used for nailing speeders anymore!

SONAR - Kinda works like radar, except uses sound waves for underwater use.  Is used for imaging sunken ships and underwater landscapes.

THERMOGRAPHY - Accuratly shows variations in heat... great for finding fires that are behind walls, or problem areas on expensive engines.

RADIO MAPPING AND TELEMETRY - might fall under electromagnetic category.  An array of antennas are spread out over a wide area and pointed toward the heavens to pinpoint and map out astronomical beings.  When an array is properly placed, the whole earth can considered one large satellite dish...  great for catching those "My Mother The Car" reruns that are now appearing on Venus.

Particle emissions (radiation) was already used.

SONAR
1 POINT - SAYCHEEZ!

*note: This is a method of taking electronic data and running it through a computer to various outputs. No further use of this process will be accepted as a answer.

Jul 02 05 02:39 pm Link

Photographer

Halcyon 7174 NYC

Posts: 20109

New York, New York, US

POLAROID IMAGE TRANSFER
1 POINT - XTREMEARTISTS

Jul 02 05 02:41 pm Link

Photographer

XtremeArtists

Posts: 9122



In 1970 Ernie Gehr made a movie called "History" without a lens on the camera...

but it wasn't focused...

Jul 02 05 03:02 pm Link

Photographer

Justin N Lane

Posts: 1720

Brooklyn, New York, US

on film eh?

polaroid transfer is out then, because you are moving a developed image to a non-reactive substrate tongue

Jul 02 05 03:19 pm Link

Photographer

Halcyon 7174 NYC

Posts: 20109

New York, New York, US

Posted by Justin N Lane: 
on film eh?

polaroid transfer is out then, because you are moving a developed image to a non-reactive substrate tongue

... hmm ...

*shrug*

You could still be creative with it by using a large sheet of transfer paper and smaller developed images to create a collage of some sort. Or double expose the transfer? I think you can call it film, though not technically. It's a manufactured analog recording medium at least.

Other opinions on that one?

Jul 02 05 03:28 pm Link

Photographer

XtremeArtists

Posts: 9122

Posted by Justin N Lane: 
on film eh?

polaroid transfer is out then, because you are moving a developed image to a non-reactive substrate tongue

Well if you take POLAROID TRANSFER away, I want DEVINE INTERVENTION added!

lol

Justin, just curious, why is the self portrait on your port a mirror image? Why not flip it in photoshop?

Jul 02 05 03:29 pm Link

Photographer

Justin N Lane

Posts: 1720

Brooklyn, New York, US

Posted by Ched: 

Posted by Justin N Lane: 
on film eh?

polaroid transfer is out then, because you are moving a developed image to a non-reactive substrate tongue

... hmm ...

*shrug*

You could still be creative with it by using a large sheet of transfer paper and smaller developed images to create a collage of some sort. Or double expose the transfer? I think you can call it film, though not technically. It's a manufactured analog recording medium at least.

Other opinions on that one?

the polaroid itself is the film... the paper you transferring it to (usually an archival cotton rag) is just absorbing the dyes... but... if you were to do gum bichromate or cyanotype that would count because you are chemically sensitizing the paper... though it's just a contact print or photogram that still needs a traditional method of exposure...so I don't know if this would count above and beyond those methods


for a while in the mid 90's kodak and xerox were trying to develop a film based on electo-magnetic particals that would form images after exposure to light much the same way a copy machine or laser printer electrostatically charges it's drum.  I think they realized this was a pretty pointless idea.

forget divine intervention- I'm in the psychic projection camp!

Jul 02 05 03:56 pm Link

Photographer

Justin N Lane

Posts: 1720

Brooklyn, New York, US

Posted by XtremeArtists: 

Posted by Justin N Lane: 

Justin, just curious, why is the self portrait on your port a mirror image? Why not flip it in photoshop?

didn't feel like lying- I mean, it is what is it, a shot in a mirror tongue

Jul 02 05 03:58 pm Link

Photographer

XtremeArtists

Posts: 9122

Posted by Justin N Lane: 

Posted by XtremeArtists: 

Justin, just curious, why is the self portrait on your port a mirror image? Why not flip it in photoshop?

didn't feel like lying- I mean, it is what is it, a shot in a mirror tongue

OK Stieglitz...

;-)

Jul 02 05 04:01 pm Link

Photographer

alexwh

Posts: 3104

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

In photography when you flip a mirror image, or simply flip an image the correct term is flopping.

Alex

Jul 02 05 05:03 pm Link

Photographer

XtremeArtists

Posts: 9122

Posted by alexwh: 
In photography when you flip a mirror image, or simply flip an image the correct term is flopping.
Alex

Hmmm..that's a new one to me I think...It's been over 10 years since I worked with paste up of camera ready art. Maybe we used the term then and I forgot...

Photoshop refers to it as flipping though...

Jul 02 05 06:04 pm Link

Photographer

alexwh

Posts: 3104

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Flopping is the term used by photo editors, graphic designers, art directors and press people in the magazine industry.

Perhaps Ched can explain to us the difference between solarization and the Sabattier effect.

Jul 02 05 07:32 pm Link

Photographer

Halcyon 7174 NYC

Posts: 20109

New York, New York, US

Posted by alexwh: 
Perhaps Ched can explain to us the difference between solarization and the Sabattier effect.

No clue.

Jul 02 05 10:44 pm Link