Forums > General Industry > What is 'web content'?

Model

Emily Carrington

Posts: 1160

Portland, Arkansas, US

I see several models & photographers saying they want to shoot 'web content'.   Can someone clarify this term, please?

Jun 04 09 04:25 am Link

Retoucher

StaciC

Posts: 3128

Swansea, Illinois, US

content which will appear on the web?
tongue

Jun 04 09 04:26 am Link

Model

Emily Carrington

Posts: 1160

Portland, Arkansas, US

SCRetouching wrote:
content which will appear on the web?

Haha, okay... but is it like stock, just for web use?  I know it seems kinda obvious, but I guess for me it's not registering.  For example, I am familiar with "adult content" and wanted to clarify if this was or wasn't the same thing as "web content", or if it could be.

Jun 04 09 04:27 am Link

Photographer

ArtiztikFoto

Posts: 265

Saginaw, Michigan, US

As a "web content" provider, I am familiar with web site design but consider graphic arts and photography and retouching to be my strongest areas of talent. If someone needs visual images for a web site, I can photograph their required subjects, (models, products, locations) and then optimize those photos for use on their web site. Web content would be ANY visual appearing on ANY web site. I have shot for online fashion catalogs, items for sale on Ebay, homes for real estate agents and models for paid web sites. All of these would be web content.

Jun 04 09 04:38 am Link

Photographer

DevotedCreatives Studio

Posts: 691

London, England, United Kingdom

Web content, refers to content generated specifically to add to a web site.

Either to update a collection for online sale or to promote recent activity.

Jun 04 09 04:40 am Link

Model

adrian louise

Posts: 385

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US

well when i say web content i mean a set of photos to be submitted to a paysite, such as godsgirls/inkygirls/zivity... it's almost always adult in nature, but sometimes only implied nudity. =]

Jun 04 09 04:41 am Link

Photographer

LagunaBeachBikini

Posts: 567

Laguna Beach, California, US

Emily Carrington wrote:
I see several models & photographers saying they want to shoot 'web content'.   Can someone clarify this term, please?

When a photographer talks about shooting web content it means all the photos and video clips that members are paying to access on paysites.

Jun 04 09 04:42 am Link

Photographer

DevotedCreatives Studio

Posts: 691

London, England, United Kingdom

Amazing Productions wrote:

When a photographer talks about shooting web content it means all the photos and video clips that members are paying to access on paysites.

And then there's this.

Content for Pay sites (often adult content) is also referred to as "web content".

Jun 04 09 04:51 am Link

Photographer

lightonpixels

Posts: 1786

New York, New York, US

99 times out of 100, "web content" means porn.  Before everyone goes batshit, yes, there are exceptions.  But generally it's porn.

Jun 04 09 06:06 am Link

Photographer

Fashion Photographer

Posts: 14388

London, England, United Kingdom

It's a euphemism for porn. Technically speaking, it doesn't mean porn. However, just like when you call a girl curvy, she thinks you are calling her fat, so too if you ask someone to shoot web content with you, they think you want to shoot pics of them masturbating

Jun 04 09 06:11 am Link

Model

The Wendy Variety

Posts: 371

Tempe, Arizona, US

Davepit wrote:
It's a euphemism for porn. Technically speaking, it doesn't mean porn. However, just like when you call a girl curvy, she thinks you are calling her fat, so too if you ask someone to shoot web content with you, they think you want to shoot pics of them masturbating

I always take curvy as a compliment. Maybe your should say "slim and very curvy" instead. =p

Jun 04 09 06:15 am Link

Retoucher

Creative Professional

Posts: 16

Cleveland, Ohio, US

Generally the term Web Content means materials catered to web only. We use the term Web Content often in the Web Designer / Web Development world.

However, since the market your involved in, I would venture to say that perhaps the posters above might be accurate in saying the term used as Web Content, is probably describing material that is adult nature used for the web.

good luck

Jun 04 09 08:00 am Link

Model

Janice Marie Foote

Posts: 11483

Whenever I've seen models say they'll trade for web content, they most always mean
web content that will end up on their pay site.

Addendum:
Also web content that will mostly end up on pay sites model is on.

Jun 04 09 08:09 am Link

Photographer

Chili

Posts: 5146

Brooklyn, New York, US

generally GWCs who find a model that has an "adult/porn paysite" who either dont want to or cant afford to pay her whatever her hourly rate is for such work (often hustler spread (not legs but lips) or solo masturbation or even G/G or B/G) will offer to shoot her "web content" for "TFP" and (hopefully) provide her with a license release (for perpetuity?) to use those images/content on her website

additionally GWCs or men in general will cast for "POV" shoots with "no model release/not for distribution" where they are the "B" in the B/G shoot...its allegedly a technical way around soliciting a prostitute by virtue of it being filmed...i leave it to the MM legal photographers to debate the constitutionality of such alleged shoots as not falling under "solicitation for prostitution"

Jun 04 09 08:54 am Link

Photographer

Skydancer Photos

Posts: 22196

Santa Cruz, California, US

adrian louise wrote:
well when i say web content i mean a set of photos to be submitted to a paysite, such as godsgirls/inkygirls/zivity... it's almost always adult in nature, but sometimes only implied nudity. =]

In the context of what Emily is asking about, I'd say this is the most likely answer.

Jun 04 09 08:56 am Link

Photographer

PYPI FASHION

Posts: 36332

San Francisco, California, US

No answer you get here will be more accurate than the one provided by the person who said that to you.

Jun 04 09 09:15 am Link

Photographer

Jeff Cohn

Posts: 3850

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US

I've heard it to mean both paysite material (godsgirls, zivity, SG, etc) and online catalogue/product for clothing stores and such. its just a very general term and isn't clearly defined.

However to those people out there with online stores that think " I need to take pictures of my products for my site" it's a useful term to have in the list of things you do.

Jun 04 09 10:01 am Link

Photographer

JA Sanchez

Posts: 6830

Miami, Florida, US

Usually the term refers to adding images to pay sites, or sometimes free sites hoping to make the trasition to pay site. The images are almost always glamour, bondage, fetish, art nudes or erotica.

Jun 04 09 10:05 am Link

Photographer

Ray Holyer

Posts: 2000

Yeah, porn.

Jun 04 09 10:08 am Link

Photographer

Digitoxin

Posts: 13456

Denver, Colorado, US

lightonpixels wrote:
99 times out of 100, "web content" means porn.  Before everyone goes batshit, yes, there are exceptions.  But generally it's porn.

+1

Jun 04 09 05:14 pm Link

Photographer

Northwest Fashion

Posts: 13

Seattle, Washington, US

When I edit a photo I save it at 8x12 at 600 dpi.  I also will save it as a 600x900 pixel ratio at 72 dpi.  The 72dpi is for web content (MM, OMP, Their website, whatever they wish online) but if they try to print it it will be so pixelated that it will look horrible.  Sometimes I shoot just for my printed portfolio and sometimes just for my online portfolios.  Sometimes models hire me to submit photos online to whatever.  Whether its used for my portfolios or so they can email a photo it is all considered web content.  It doesn't mean porn (but I suppose it could).  It simply means filler for an online something.

Jun 04 09 05:22 pm Link

Model

Mayanlee

Posts: 3560

New City, New York, US

lightonpixels wrote:
99 times out of 100, "web content" means porn.  Before everyone goes batshit, yes, there are exceptions.  But generally it's porn.

In the context of MM, perhaps.

Large content providers like Time Inc Content Solutions or MSN would have an issue with that.

Web content includes anything that is produced for web publication, including articles, blogs, layouts, games, images .... anything you see on your computer screen that resides on a website.

Jun 04 09 05:37 pm Link

Photographer

dklee studio photo

Posts: 2587

Richmond, Virginia, US

Chili wrote:
generally GWCs who find a model that has an "adult/porn paysite" who either dont want to or cant afford to pay her whatever her hourly rate is for such work (often hustler spread (not legs but lips) or solo masturbation or even G/G or B/G) will offer to shoot her "web content" for "TFP" and (hopefully) provide her with a license release (for perpetuity?) to use those images/content on her website

additionally GWCs or men in general will cast for "POV" shoots with "no model release/not for distribution" where they are the "B" in the B/G shoot...its allegedly a technical way around soliciting a prostitute by virtue of it being filmed...i leave it to the MM legal photographers to debate the constitutionality of such alleged shoots as not falling under "solicitation for prostitution"

wait?? really?  so if i had gone to the now defunk CL section that had adult casting, i could hire a prostitute, and if i film it for "web work" it is not illegal?

Jun 04 09 05:44 pm Link

Photographer

Jaysen R Lee

Posts: 548

Anaheim, California, US

PYPI FASHION wrote:
No answer you get here will be more accurate than the one provided by the person who said that to you.

Absolutely.  Just ask.  If I ask for web content, it will NOT be for porn.  I want to use some images for my website and do not necessarily want to use stock photos.  Reason being, I've seen the same photo appear on dating sites or "maximize your love life" type of ads.  Ick.

Jun 05 09 12:09 am Link

Photographer

AusModels

Posts: 298

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Emily Carrington wrote:
I see several models & photographers saying they want to shoot 'web content'.   Can someone clarify this term, please?

In a lot of cases, Web Content means Content which is made available for the Web through Content Providers, or Brokers.

Owners, or Webmasters of Adult Sites purchase this "Content" to keep their Sites updated. Some lead people to believe it is their own Content, others allow people to believe it is their own Content.

The product is available through Brokers such as Photorama and Scarlet Content, to name just a couple.

A great many Australian Photographers, who have work published in the Men's Magazines, provide Content to the Brokers, which are often the "Non Published" portions of their shoots. In some cases they have a "First Publication" agreement with the Magazines and send all the images from their shoots to the Brokers, after the works have been published.

*** CAUTION: 18+ ***

The following link will give you an idea of one of these Image Brokers. http://www.scarlettcontent.net

It is, in all probability, Adult related.

Jun 05 09 12:26 am Link

Photographer

AusModels

Posts: 298

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Chili wrote:
generally GWCs who find a model that has an "adult/porn paysite" who either dont want to or cant afford to pay her whatever her hourly rate is for such work (often hustler spread (not legs but lips) or solo masturbation or even G/G or B/G) will offer to shoot her "web content" for "TFP" and (hopefully) provide her with a license release (for perpetuity?) to use those images/content on her website

A great many Photographers do work like this also. They don't do it TFP, as it is a legitimate way to produce "Content" for Trade.

Jun 05 09 12:32 am Link