Forums > Critique > Hi Key

Photographer

stokesfoto

Posts: 36

Minneapolis, Minnesota, US

What do you guys think of this shot?

C & C appreciated

https://modelmayhem.com/pics/20050711/4 … 00257e.jpg

Jul 13 05 10:16 pm Link

Photographer

Columbus Photo

Posts: 2318

Columbus, Georgia, US

Her face and hair are blown out.  I'd call it overexposed instead of high-key.  This would be more high-key but it would have been better if she was white and had a fair complexion.

https://www.paulsportraits.com/fashion/lexi/050516C-18.jpg

Jul 13 05 10:22 pm Link

Photographer

alexwh

Posts: 3104

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Your face crop.

There are some unwritten rules that seem to be correct and specifically once you are aware of them. If you crop the face you crop just above the eybrows or just below the mouth. Anything on either side will look strange. If you crop arms you crop them between shoulder and elbow. After that you have to include the hands or you think some sort of amputee is involved. When you crop legs you must crop above knee and halway up. After that you must include foot. If you cut out feet the pic will look strange.

Jul 13 05 10:29 pm Link

Photographer

XtremeArtists

Posts: 9122

The hair cutting through her eye looks like a scratch. I would Photoshop it out.

Jul 13 05 10:36 pm Link

Photographer

stokesfoto

Posts: 36

Minneapolis, Minnesota, US

Posted by Paul Ferrara: 
Her face and hair are blown out.  I'd call it overexposed instead of high-key.  This would be more high-key but it would have been better if she was white and had a fair complexion.

https://www.paulsportraits.com/fashion/lexi/050516C-18.jpg

[/quote

Hey Paul!

I actually edited this in raw and it tells me if the highlights were blown.  It may not look like it because it is very light, but the highlights aren't blown - the detail is there.  (I admit that my use of the term "high key" is a bit loose, though.)

Nice shot by the way.

Thanks for the look and comments!

Jul 13 05 10:41 pm Link

Photographer

stokesfoto

Posts: 36

Minneapolis, Minnesota, US

Posted by alexwh: 
Your face crop.

There are some unwritten rules that seem to be correct and specifically once you are aware of them. If you crop the face you crop just above the eybrows or just below the mouth. Anything on either side will look strange. If you crop arms you crop them between shoulder and elbow. After that you have to include the hands or you think some sort of amputee is involved. When you crop legs you must crop above knee and halway up. After that you must include foot. If you cut out feet the pic will look strange.

Alex -

Points on crop well taken.  Thanks for an extremely useful post.  I am taking notes!

Jul 13 05 10:44 pm Link

Photographer

alexwh

Posts: 3104

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Paul is that a true white background on your model? I would bet it isn't. You must have performed some photoshop magic to close crop it. That was the term we used to use before Photoshop came into being. Is this the term still being used?

Jul 13 05 10:45 pm Link

Photographer

XtremeArtists

Posts: 9122

The BKG isn't white. It is about 2% black.

EDIT: Also, Paul is correct, the hair and face are blown out in sections. Must have happened after the file was opened.

Jul 13 05 10:46 pm Link

Photographer

stokesfoto

Posts: 36

Minneapolis, Minnesota, US

Posted by XtremeArtists: 
The BKG isn't white. It is about 2% black.

EDIT: Also, Paul is correct, the hair and face are blown out in sections. Must have happened after the file was opened.

You guys are absolutely right - I just went back and checked - the histogram doesn't lie.  I think I most have done a bit of curve tweaking after the file was opened.  I learned something today.

Thanks guys!

Jul 13 05 10:57 pm Link

Photographer

Columbus Photo

Posts: 2318

Columbus, Georgia, US

Posted by alexwh: 
Paul is that a true white background on your model? I would bet it isn't.

Yep, true white.  Superior arctic white paper and two lights on it.

Paul

Jul 14 05 05:46 am Link