mick payton wrote:

Can i see somple examples of your favourite images somewhere? It's always interesting to see how peoples choices reflect.

I just killed my website.  I thought it was too expensive, but looking around, maybe that was a bad idea.  I'm working on it, but, by the time I get it up again, I will have forgotten your request.

David Park Photography wrote:
I'd be curious of your opinion.

Give MM some time here.  I can't view your portfolio.  502 bad gateway problems.  You may have to wait till I get home.  sorry.

Charles West wrote:

Your portfolio starts out stellar, gets average, then falls apart.  Just edit out some crap and you'll have nothing to worry about. 

The crap is way lower down in your portfolio.  Just because you can post more doesn't mean you should post more.

I'll give you a 0% if you edit your portfolio. 
20% if you don't.

Thank you for your critique. Thankfully my work is ordered newest to oldest so your critique confirmed what I thought of the newer work. Sometimes you just have to let it go so from 76 shots down to 26; and I am eye-ing the last 6 with a predators intent.
(with a tip of the hat) Thank you very much.
-KevintheVerbose

Charles West wrote:

Yup.  100% GWC.

And I am Still Better Than You

DarkNamelessOne wrote:
I was wondering where your thread went. Even went and looked in the locked log to see if they closed it down.



DNO

Me too.  I thought I had bothered the powers that be, and it got locked.  No such luck, I guess.

David Park Photography wrote:
I'd be curious of your opinion.

Not a GWC.

RL_11214 wrote:
Go ahead with me.

I am aware this is only your opinion.

I am in no way a gwc because I am actually into cameras and photography as an endeavor.

The most used definition for gwc seems to be a guy who uses the camera as a pretext for meeting women for dating. It seems to have morphed into meaning a bad photographer.

All the same, go ahead, I will not react, regardless.

Your feelings are correct. 
Not a GWC.

Jim Gupta-Carlson wrote:
I hope i'm a guy with big camera:)

0% GWC.

Phalon1973 wrote:
Hit me!

80% GWC.

Jim Mack         Maine wrote:
And I am Still Better Than You

Whu-ev-uh.  I'm sure you sell hundreds of the work in your portfolio.  Right?


If all else fails and you feel like crying...

Studio AE wrote:
Where do I rate? Curious

Thanks

I can clearly tell you're trying very hard not to be, and it does show.  You do have some that'll qualify.

Some shots are very nice!  It'll be interesting to see how you progress.

Only around 10%-15% GWC.  Nothing to worry about.

John Corvera wrote:
Me

NRGP wrote:
Sure go ahead. I have a feeling I already know

Nope.  Not a GWC.

Bob Cassady wrote:
I might regret pointing this out, but...I think you missed me in 502-land.

Hit me, band :-)

Sorry about that. 

Mostly, not a GWC.  Some GWC images, though.  Only around 10%

For the purpose of this thread, 20% or less shouldn't worry anyone.

Wizafir wrote:
I am not sure how I would do here since I consider myself more of a Photoshop artist than a photographer. But I have to start with a digital image even if it is with a crappy camera and no lighting equipment.

OT: Have you done any wet plate collodion work?

Never even thought of doing any wet plate work.  I barely have the patience for the three processes I usually work with.  Not to say I'd never try it.  I'd love to!  But, It'll have to be in the future.

I'm pushing more into three and four color gum dichromate work.

David Gaze wrote:
I'm always looking to improve

You have some work that is quite nice indeed, however, you are currently a GWC. 
Around 70%

Charles West wrote:
You have some work that is quite nice indeed, however, you are currently a GWC. 
Around 70%

What's the separation line?  What do I can?  BTW, thanks for your time

PANHEAD PHOTOGRAPHY  wrote:
OK take a look would love to know

Not currently a GWC.

Studio506 wrote:
let me know

Without the couple, wedding, etc. shots, yes, you're a GWC.

JSchro Photo wrote:
If you're still doing this take a gander at my stuff and see what you think.

Nope.  Not remotely a GWC.

Shelby Alexander Images wrote:
OK, I've been waiting for this one.  Let's go!

Inexperience is more your problem.  You'll get better. 

Not a GWC.