Posted by area291: 
There is certain confusion as to what can and what can't be enforced.  While the confidentiality notice itself might not be enforced, information contained could be considered proprietary and release of such might be viewed as cause to do harm. 

Nope.

The email was sent to someone who has a First Amendment right to communicate with others about it. The First Amendment protects people, not just the media. The original poster has as much right to disclose the email as CNN would if it were sent to them.

No NDA was signed, so the individual who received the email is free to share any information or communication they were party to since they haven't signed away any of their rights.

If the information was proprietary, it shouldn't have been sent to a third party.

They just have to make sure that their intent is not to damage the reputation of the person who sent the email.

Area, you give good modeling agency info, but not good legal advice.

Furthermore, should I slip up and disagree in public on any forum I will put myself in the time out box for a duration of 72 hours to contemplate my stupidity, this will be followed by a public apology.

Posted by area291: 
...It's easy to interpret the law from a surface level and how things wouldn't stand to reason from that view.  But legal sharks go much deeper and will drag that surface matter and those to the bottom with them....

You're right!  AT THE SURFACE LEVEL the 'Confidentiality Statement' may appear to be a binding legal document, but when you go deeper legal sharks, legal fish, legal minnows, (and even the kid with the bamboo fishing rod that's not even in the water) will easily see that the whole thing is chum.  It can be chewed up, torn to shreds, and easily discarded.

There is no court case that has set precedance or law that can be found that proves otherwise.

One of the fundamental laws in the U.S. Statute of Frauds makes it very clear that BOTH parties must AGREE to the terms of confidentiality BEFORE the information is to be divulged.  The same laws carry down to other forms of contracts and disclosure.

Click here or click here for one of many articles about Non-Disclosure agreeements and their uses.

  From what I could gather, Russ is the lowlife and Dawn simply goes along with whatever he says, almost as though she's being held captive.  She always impressed me as being a sweet person.  I'm glad they dumped me last spring and that my name is no longer associated with them.   

hmmmmm, most shrinks will agree that the passive agressive cowardly personality often marries a pitbull to carry out their dirty work. 

A victim is someone who is kidnapped, held against their will, raped at gunpoint  etc....not someone who choses a rabid pitbull as the family pet and then looks the other way as it mauls the neighbors. 

Posted by XtremeArtists: 
Really, there is no reason to let the terrorists win by making us afraid.

No, the terrorists win when you're dead.