Elle Gilbert wrote:
Hmm... let's bump this up for you...

What's your verdict on me?

I like your look and as your port stands now, I would put you in the 60% chance category.  That is actually a good percentage from me.  I would also say you could bump yourself up 10-20 points if you had a full frontal bikini style pic in your port.  You do have this profile, but it still could hide things:

Alyssa Jayne wrote:
I'd love to know how I could improve, other than adding more photos. They're coming. Thanks!

For the most part, your photos only have the one look which is not conducive to bikini calendars.  You also have nothing in your port that shows your figure.  Variety is the key.  The more you show you can do, the more you can be offered.

Miss Eva Marie  wrote:
I'd like to hear

When do you want to schedule (j/k).  I love your look and would put you in the 80ish percent category.

This is the style of pic I look for when I am narrowing down models:

Memorabilia Advertising wrote:
When do you want to schedule (j/k).  I love your look and would put you in the 80ish percent category.

This is the style of pic I look for when I am narrowing down models:

Why thank you

I'm glad you like that picture! It's one of my favorite ones in my port, there's hardly any retouch on it and it's a totally real smile. I've been told by many to delete it, I'm glad that it fufills something that photographers look for when trying to book a model!

Heather Smythe wrote:
What do you think? I could always use suggestions!

You are very attractive, but I don't even look at models until they are at least 18 years old.

-Cait- wrote:
What do you think about me, please?

Nice girl next door face, but without a swimwear/lingerie full body picture, I have no idea what your figure is, and can't give you a %

Jeneva Jones wrote:
What do you think about me?

I don't really see you as a traditional swimwear model.

C A T H Y     wrote:
me???

I need to see a full body, swimwear/lingerie style picture to rate you.

Emily Maddison wrote:
Let me know

Very attractive young lady, but I don't look at models until they are at least 18.

Hannah Lynne wrote:
Whatcha think?

Your tattoos are very limiting with what I can do with you.  Because of that, I would put you in the 10-15% category.  Without them, I would rate you higher.

Just Danielle wrote:
I'd love to know thankyouplease xx

I can't really see you in my projects.

Lauren Leigh - Model wrote:
Me?

For my style, I would have to "tone you down" a bit, but would rate you in the 60-70% chance at being published with me.

Trinity  Peterson wrote:
ok

I love your look and your port has what I need to see.  I would put you in the 80-85% chance at being published with me.  To bad I didn't have time when I was in Tampa last week.

Katina S wrote:
I'm game, what do you think?

The tattoo on the back of the leg would limit us a little, which would lower your odds to 60% (which is still a great rating from me).

TarynEmilia wrote:
Me?

Right now I would put you in the 30-40% range.  What is holding back that rating is the fact that you don't have any bikini/lingerie style pictures that fully show your body.  You have this which is close, but I always get nervous not seeing a midriff:

NeonPixxi wrote:
me?

You are not really a traditional bikini model.  When the models are as slender as yourself, I am limited in poses that I can do.  Your percentage would also be based on your hair color/style at that time.

Taking all of that into account, if you would come with a more traditional look on the hair, I would put you in the 20-25% chance category.