Forums >
Photography Talk >
canon 5d m3 recall?
Apr 12 12 12:34 pm Link I can't see how they would recall the cameras over a firmware issue. They might delay new shipments and update them at the factory before sending them out. It would seem that they could deal with cameras in the field by doing a firmware upgrade. Perhaps there is more to the story. Apr 12 12 01:47 pm Link ei Total Productions wrote: a good bit more to the story Apr 12 12 02:49 pm Link ei Total Productions wrote: Maxximages wrote: Thank you for the link. There is a lot of chatter and a lot of comments, but still no official information. It does affirm that something is definitely going on. The question remains, what? Apr 12 12 02:56 pm Link The most logical speculation I've seen is that they want to drop new CD's into the boxes before they get to customers, for a known issue with DPP. There's no known hardware issue with cameras in the field. Apr 12 12 03:02 pm Link Leggy Mountbatten wrote: As incredulous as it may seem, I feel that is the most logical reason. Apr 12 12 03:21 pm Link Leggy Mountbatten wrote: That is certainly possible. I have read about issues though. Even in the thread that was posted above there was an issue. I haven't heard about many widespread issues though. Apr 12 12 03:41 pm Link It's not unheard of for a manufacture to recall a product based on packaging, usually it's when a misprint or the like opens them up to some liability but not always. Apr 12 12 03:47 pm Link Some people will admit there is something wrong while others will never admit anything wrong with it, not matter how much proof you put in front of them. It is all the users.. They either imagining thing or making things up. Anyway. From company's point of view. Why would they want to send a large packaging box vs sending user CD directly (which is cheaper)? Unless of course there is something that the user can't do it at home and it requires some twisting/configuration to the hardware itself. Apr 12 12 03:48 pm Link ei Total Productions wrote: Yeah, exactly. If something is going on, it seems at this point that it's not really a "recall," which would imply that people who own this camera would be sending theirs back to Canon. With so many now in the field, if there was a real issue, I think we'd have heard about it by now. The IS issue with the 200 f/2 IS seems like a firmware fix. Apr 12 12 04:08 pm Link ChanStudio - OtherSide wrote: That is why I think that anything is possible, but right now, it is all just speculation. I, really and truly, have no idea why this is happening. I am sure, in time, we will find out. Apr 12 12 04:13 pm Link Jonathan Ocab wrote: Slightly off the subject of the OP but actually if you download the DPP updates from Canon you can install it if you already have the registry entries in Windows from the original CD installer. These entries can be found online, meaning you can apply them to the Windows registry without the install media. It is a bit of a hassle, but good to know if you lose your install media. The update package is a full set of software. Apr 12 12 05:43 pm Link Hope they update the firmware to fix that stupid preview/ zoom buttons. Apr 12 12 07:27 pm Link I don't believe there will be a recall. I would think its more a delay in shipping and the a firmware update for a very specific type of use (certain lenses). The focus system on the 5d3 is more difficult to learn and harder for people to use from the 5d m2. I think that is confusing some people. Apr 12 12 09:50 pm Link K E S L E R wrote: That would be nice. I'm messed on both of my cameras now. It's really annoying. Apr 12 12 10:02 pm Link At least Canon has product in the pipeline to recall... Apr 13 12 02:43 am Link ChanStudio - OtherSide wrote: Maybe because, for them, there is nothing wrong? Apr 13 12 04:03 am Link Canon USA have issued an product advisory notice for the 5d3 now it seems light from the LCD can affect the exposure in dark environments. Apr 13 12 01:16 pm Link Brian Woods wrote: Then it sounds like the word "recall" was correct. I doubt that this is something they can fix in the field. It also explains why they stopped all shipments. Apr 13 12 01:21 pm Link Phil Drinkwater wrote: Yeap.. Nothing wrong... Apr 13 12 02:14 pm Link Canon seems to have learned their lesson from the 1D III fiasco and is aggressively handling what seems, to me, to be an extremely minor issue. Apr 13 12 04:23 pm Link Leggy Mountbatten wrote: My sense is that it is a minor problem, but still a problem, none the less. I doubt that it affects many people. The problem is that the Internet has a habit of making small problems large problems. Apr 13 12 04:26 pm Link ei Total Productions wrote: i'm confused. The LCD is on the outside of the camera. The AE sensor is on the inside. How is it even possible that the light from the LCD is able to affect the sensor without using a minimum of two 45 degree mirrors or two prisms or a light pipe? Apr 13 12 04:42 pm Link ei Total Productions wrote: AVD AlphaDuctions wrote: I wondered the same thing. The answer is: "I dunno, but it is!" Apr 13 12 04:48 pm Link ei Total Productions wrote: ei Total Productions wrote: I wondered the same thing. The answer is: "I dunno, but it is!" the more I think about it, absent periscopes and other spy devices, the only way for light to get there is via a 2-step error Apr 13 12 04:55 pm Link This one also came out about a possible difference between newer and original versions of the 5D mk3, concerning the cover on the top LCD http://www.canonrumors.com/2012/04/cano … +Rumors%29 Apr 13 12 05:32 pm Link I got my 5D III yesterday and I have to say i’m not in love with it. But what is causing me problems (besides it not being compatible with much of anything) is that I can not get a critical sharp focus. I will get a focus lock but when I process the image and zoom in on the eyeball (where I got the focus lock) it’s soft. I can shoot the same lens on different bodies (not 5d III’s) and get sharp focus. I’ve entered the lens serial numbers into the 5DIII and that compensation adjustment doesn’t work either. Doesn’t matter if i’m using the 61pt, 15pt, or 9pt focus. This is just a personal gripe but for me the camera is really unrealistic to shoot fashion with until the battery grip is released. The demo I used from Canon came with a battery grip so i assumed it was already out. Between those problems and Lightroom 4 being a total POS shooting has become a total frustration Apr 13 12 05:37 pm Link Hmm, no focus issues here. There is a 50 page pdf on using the focus system. Yes 50 pages. Apr 13 12 05:44 pm Link Orcatek Photography wrote: I know. I’ve been using the 61pt on 1DS for a long time, but still i have gone through the manual it over and over. If you google "5dIII focus problems” or variations of it you will see there are a lot of people having the same problem and many of them also shoot the 1dIII or IV and know how to use the AF system. You can’t tell unless you print the photo large format or zoom in but it is soft. Apr 13 12 06:10 pm Link Orcatek Photography wrote: faltered wrote: The 1DS series uses a less sophisticated 45 point autofocus system, not 61 point. Apr 13 12 07:41 pm Link Orcatek Photography wrote: faltered wrote: Interesting. I did as you suggested and searched the web for "5dIII focus problems" and found a single photographer complaining on the Canon Rumors forum about having difficulty at a wedding with his brand new 5D Mk III. Apparently he didn't like the answers, because he quit the forum. Apr 13 12 07:41 pm Link Leggy Mountbatten wrote: Orcatek Photography wrote: Interesting. I did as you suggested and searched the web for "5dIII focus problems" and found a single photographer complaining on the Canon Rumors forum about having difficulty at a wedding with his brand new 5D Mk III. Apparently he didn't like the answers, because he quit the forum. http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index. … ic=5122.15 Apr 13 12 07:51 pm Link Orcatek Photography wrote: faltered wrote: Leggy Mountbatten wrote: What you are describing frustrates me more than anything else around here. Wheter it is Canon, NIkon, Sony, Hassy, or whoever, one person has a problem, compalins and suddenly it becomes widespread. It doesn't matter that the manufacturer finds nothing, no reliable site or testing source confirms it, because someone complains there has to be a problem. Apr 13 12 07:51 pm Link faltered wrote: Is this happening with small apertures? Apr 13 12 08:02 pm Link faltered wrote: That was the guy to took his toys and ran home that I was talking about. faltered wrote: I never accused anybody of lying. So yeah, a single post on Tumblr. And? faltered wrote: This one was a guy who had some questions about it. Still no smoking gun that I can see. faltered wrote: That thread had nothing whatsoever about a focusing issue. Did you actually look at any of these? Or were you lazy and just assume that these had some relevant information? faltered wrote: It's amusing being talked down to by somebody who needs to follow his own advice. The image I posted was the first page of results I got. I can tell from the links you posted that you didn't really find much of anything, either. Apr 13 12 08:09 pm Link Apr 15 12 11:09 am Link LOL, on: For example I tried to shoot the full moon tonight in Japan. My 1D4 would have had no problem getting this shot, but my 5D Mark III could not deliver a single shot in focus. I tried mirror lock-up and shooting with a remote on a tripod to eliminate camera shake but still couldn’t get a single in focus shot. I used to get these shot handheld with my 1D4. So this confirms for me that focus problems of the 5DIII are real. Apr 15 12 04:35 pm Link This still going on? I thought it is decided that there is absolutely no issue with 5DIII? The 5DIII is perfect and it is the best camera Canon ever produced? http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/ … id=C126149 Apr 15 12 04:47 pm Link ChanStudio - OtherSide wrote: Canon needs you!!! Apr 15 12 04:52 pm Link DOUGLASFOTOS wrote: They do.. They will love me for sure.. Apr 15 12 04:57 pm Link |