|
Jun 14 12 05:41 am Link Not well. Jun 14 12 05:47 am Link Not a fan i'm sorry to say. Your portfolio is full of creativity and class and this just doesn't measure up for me. Jun 14 12 05:53 am Link You have some quality images in your portfolio, this is not among them. Jun 14 12 06:07 am Link I fel like the body paint deserves better. Overall it's being controversial just for the sake of it? Jun 14 12 06:13 am Link Jeffrey M Fletcher wrote: Like a slap in the face with a wet fish. Jun 14 12 07:45 am Link doesnt shock me, but i find it quite ludicrous. Jun 14 12 07:51 am Link Your other work is much more sophisticated. This picture is a bit trite. Jun 14 12 07:53 am Link Jeffrey M Fletcher wrote: Confucious say, the path of the Gi Jesus is beset on all sides by the iniquities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. And he will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy his tao brothers. And you will know he is the Gi Lord when he lay his vengeance upon thee Jun 14 12 07:55 am Link Love it! But.... you needed to have the hands and feet pinned to the model's flesh (shopped not literally of course) with the droplets of blood coming from her skin. How could you have missed that? My faith is wavering (see what I did there?). Jun 14 12 07:57 am Link Geoff Jones wrote: Lmao Jun 14 12 07:59 am Link im not sure i understand it, the god the hulk? Jun 14 12 08:04 am Link Are you looking to take over for Warren? I don't like it. It feels like you're trying to say something, but I have no idea what it is. Jun 14 12 08:12 am Link Is it something from Jersey Shore? Jun 14 12 08:12 am Link Perhaps it's an odd color test Jun 14 12 08:13 am Link based on your profile, your portfolio, the definition of "art", and the fact that I have done controversial religious themes many times [as a photographer and as a galleried multimedia artist], no shakes here. I still have not gotten over that work from years ago, "Piss Christ". It pretty much supersedes most controversial religious art I have seen. I do have one note: the white might have been better on Jesus left. Historically, the right hand means life in religious symbolism. But at his crucifixion, it was the thief on his left that found forgiveness and salvation. the thief on the right most likely dropped off into the abyss [black]. depends on how you want to play the color significance.white=purity, blue= heaven, brass= judgement, silver= redemption, red= sacrifice, purple= royalty, yada yada yada when it comes to Judaism color themes. Jun 14 12 08:14 am Link DG at studio47 wrote: That was definitely bizarre. Jun 14 12 08:19 am Link I would delete from port. I'm all for controversial pics (especially if they piss off the Church!) but it's just a bad photo and detracts from the quality. Jun 14 12 08:21 am Link Jun 14 12 08:22 am Link DG at studio47 wrote: ? Jun 14 12 08:24 am Link Jeffrey M Fletcher wrote: No. Just. No. To everything about this image. Sorry. Jun 14 12 08:25 am Link I don't like the photo. Jun 14 12 08:27 am Link Jeffrey M Fletcher wrote: It doesn't; it misses. Jun 14 12 08:31 am Link this is part of my comment on the image in the OP's portfolio. "note: everyone knows that Jesus was "special forces", not regular army. in literature, the breasts are the sustenance of life, while the loins are the source of life. Christ's body, in this image, mark both of those sources. fundamental Christians see Jesus as both of these ideals, through his life and death and resurrection. so..............????" I can do this observation, signs and symbols thing all day long, every day. ultimately, art is meant to invoke an emotion, a response. under that definition, the image is "art". if it is not your cup of tea, NEXT! best wishes! Jun 14 12 08:37 am Link My first impression is that you could have used the energy in almost any other way... just a waste of time. Jun 14 12 08:38 am Link Warren's shoes are hard to fill  But as he had many misses...so, IMO is this one.Jun 14 12 08:51 am Link Now I have to know who Warren is. Jun 14 12 08:52 am Link Why isn't there a little Jesus on the cross that Jesus is wearing? Timeshift? Jun 14 12 08:56 am Link "piss-Christ" was better Jun 14 12 08:59 am Link Not well, its a bit forced Jun 14 12 09:05 am Link It's tacky compared to the rest of your work. Jun 14 12 09:08 am Link KonstantKarma wrote: He was a member of MM but very recently had his profile removed after posting a particularly controversial photo in the forums Jun 14 12 09:11 am Link Jeffrey M Fletcher wrote: Not so well. Mediocre at best. What if I did the same with NoBama? Jun 14 12 09:11 am Link CMartinPhotography wrote: Perfectly said. Jun 14 12 09:13 am Link Kendradeanne wrote: Oh. Jun 14 12 09:15 am Link Kendradeanne wrote: Can you describe the photo? I'm dying of curiosity. Jun 14 12 09:18 am Link  Moderator Note!Hi Folks, Let's respect the OP and stay on topic. No need to discuss other members in this thread. Thanks. Jun 14 12 09:22 am Link DevilMayCare Photo wrote: Nope Jun 14 12 09:23 am Link The image to me is weak. I like the contrast of textures and components, but the lighting is flat and the model isn't projecting tension, she's kind of just standing there. It would be improved if she were standing on her toes, so she had to fight a bit for balance. It would bring more energy. The idea is sound, but for me it needs more dynamic posing, more directional lighting and a tighter crop. Jun 14 12 09:23 am Link MKPhoto wrote: Do not mention Warren, Barbie and Ken are watching! Jun 14 12 11:41 am Link |
