Forums > Critique > Fun and Games > Scale of ( 1 - 100 ) on the person above you!

Photographer

dd photography

Posts: 944

San Diego, California, US

goneferal:

100+
h-y-y-y-uge fan!

Jan 16 15 01:01 pm Link

Photographer

waynes world pics

Posts: 832

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

dd photography wrote:
goneferal:

100+
h-y-y-y-uge fan!

100,simply outstanding work and beautiful models!

Jan 16 15 01:41 pm Link

Photographer

Dontez Akins

Posts: 345

Atlanta, Georgia, US

70

Jan 16 15 03:17 pm Link

Photographer

BIP

Posts: 3748

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Dontez Akins wrote:
70

69

Jan 17 15 12:58 pm Link

Model

Elesha Eden

Posts: 588

London, England, United Kingdom

wowzer port
98
x

Jan 17 15 01:45 pm Link

Model

Severiana

Posts: 36

Lacey, Washington, US

101!  Your gorgeous!

Jan 17 15 03:37 pm Link

Photographer

Dontez Akins

Posts: 345

Atlanta, Georgia, US

85

Jan 17 15 03:43 pm Link

Photographer

BIP

Posts: 3748

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Dontez Akins wrote:
85

69

Jan 20 15 03:05 am Link

Photographer

Garry k

Posts: 30131

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

77

Jan 20 15 03:22 am Link

Photographer

Allen Carbon

Posts: 1532

Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

Edit: oops i did this wrong haha it's too late
70

Jan 20 15 03:34 am Link

Photographer

BIP

Posts: 3748

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Garry k wrote:
77

52

Jan 20 15 03:36 am Link

Photographer

Dontez Akins

Posts: 345

Atlanta, Georgia, US

70

Jan 21 15 01:37 pm Link

Photographer

Allen Carbon

Posts: 1532

Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

Dontez Akins wrote:
70

80

Jan 22 15 03:43 am Link

Model

Karajane P Chapman

Posts: 27

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Allen Carbon wrote:
80

40, but only because I can't actually see the model. I like the actual image though.

Jan 22 15 04:40 pm Link

Photographer

PPP Photo

Posts: 204

Naples, Campania, Italy

70

very nice outdoors...and you should dare more into funny stuff... don't take it too serious smile

Jan 28 15 05:02 am Link

Model

Syrena Fury

Posts: 177

Palm Bay, Florida, US

86

I like how you play with the light and contrast to darker images. I just did a shoot experimenting with shadows and contouring, so your port sticks out to me in that respect. Nice overall composition.

Jan 28 15 12:26 pm Link

Photographer

Barely StL

Posts: 1281

Saint Louis, Missouri, US

Syrena Fury wrote:
86

I like how you play with the light and contrast to darker images. I just did a shoot experimenting with shadows and contouring, so your port sticks out to me in that respect. Nice overall composition.

76

Your modeling is better than the photography in several of your photos.

Jan 29 15 01:54 pm Link

Photographer

Dontez Akins

Posts: 345

Atlanta, Georgia, US

90 I like the dark mood of your images

Jan 30 15 06:23 pm Link

Photographer

BIP

Posts: 3748

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Dontez Akins wrote:
90 I like the dark mood of your images

61

Jan 30 15 11:23 pm Link

Photographer

Dontez Akins

Posts: 345

Atlanta, Georgia, US

59

Jan 31 15 06:59 am Link

Photographer

BIP

Posts: 3748

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Dontez Akins wrote:
59

12

Jan 31 15 01:00 pm Link

Photographer

Dontez Akins

Posts: 345

Atlanta, Georgia, US

Lmao

Jan 31 15 02:54 pm Link

Model

Sammie Cartwright

Posts: 665

New York, New York, US

Dontez Akins wrote:
Lmao

85 - sexy, editorial, exotic and vibrant

Jan 31 15 02:55 pm Link

Artist/Painter

MainePaintah

Posts: 1892

Saco, Maine, US

Sammie Cartwright wrote:

85 - sexy, editorial, exotic and vibrant

95- Great in so many ways!

Jan 31 15 03:05 pm Link

Model

Shirin Brigitte

Posts: 379

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

70 - I love your landscape paintings

Feb 03 15 08:48 am Link

Photographer

Laura Elizabeth Photo

Posts: 2253

Rochester, New York, US

65

Feb 03 15 09:59 am Link

Model

Syrena Fury

Posts: 177

Palm Bay, Florida, US

68. Beautiful portraits and nicely done, but I'm one for a bit more versatility. The collages throw it off for me.

But portraits seem to be your speciality so that works too. smile

Feb 03 15 10:29 am Link

Photographer

BIP

Posts: 3748

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Syrena Fury wrote:
68. Beautiful portraits and nicely done, but I'm one for a bit more versatility. The collages throw it off for me.

But portraits seem to be your speciality so that works too. smile

60

Feb 03 15 07:03 pm Link

Photographer

Garry k

Posts: 30131

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

BIP wrote:

60

70

basing this a lot on the quality of your new avatar

Feb 03 15 09:04 pm Link

Photographer

Garry k

Posts: 30131

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Feb 03 15 09:04 pm Link

Photographer

Garry k

Posts: 30131

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Dang - triple post

My apologies

Feb 03 15 09:04 pm Link

Photographer

Laura Elizabeth Photo

Posts: 2253

Rochester, New York, US

70 overall I think.

Feb 04 15 08:28 am Link

Photographer

Yevgeniya Fedorov

Posts: 46

Forest Hills, New York, US

95 ... amazing work smile love it

Feb 04 15 05:02 pm Link

Photographer

PPP Photo

Posts: 204

Naples, Campania, Italy

85

love your portraits...looks like you want to go deep inside the people you shoot

Feb 04 15 11:47 pm Link

Photographer

PhotoACR

Posts: 352

Los Angeles, California, US

85. More photojournalism and reportage with conceptual takes

Feb 05 15 10:51 pm Link

Photographer

BIP

Posts: 3748

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

PhotoACR wrote:
85. More photojournalism and reportage with conceptual takes

20 images are mostly exposed well
Everything else is poor

Feb 06 15 09:43 pm Link

Photographer

PhotoACR

Posts: 352

Los Angeles, California, US

BIP wrote:
20 images are mostly exposed well
Everything else is poor

Hi BIP, If you are responding to the MM port above me, my giving him an 85 has nothing to do with the technicals. It is more for the style the artist is going for which is different from what you or I go for. The artist seems to going more for conceptuals, reportage and narratives and I am giving the artist credit for that. Now, if that comment was intended for me all I can say is I am sorry you do not see value in my craft. Cheers -

Feb 06 15 10:44 pm Link

Photographer

BIP

Posts: 3748

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

PhotoACR wrote:

Hi BIP, If you are responding to the MM port above me, my giving him an 85 has nothing to do with the technicals. It is more for the style the artist is going for which is different from what you or I go for. The artist seems to going more for conceptuals, reportage and narratives and I am giving the artist credit for that. Now, if that comment was intended for me all I can say is I am sorry you do not see value in my craft. Cheers -

Photo acr
I was referring to your work
The only thing I could find positive to say is that they are mostly exposed well
Lots of the nudes have a blur over them which is distracting
The lighting is flat or poorly thought out the posing seems random and does not show the best of the models
The nudity seems gratuitous and almost degrading ( I personally don't have a problem with the actual nudity)
The is just nothing I like about your work
But that's just my opinion

Feb 08 15 02:35 am Link

Photographer

PhotoACR

Posts: 352

Los Angeles, California, US

Ok

Feb 08 15 10:03 am Link

Photographer

Amul La La

Posts: 885

London, England, United Kingdom

PhotoACR wrote:
Ok

Admittedly not particularly fond of you're style or you're intent, stark reservations about you're use of light, ModLs for the most part seem more like mannequins etc.

25-35

Feb 09 15 05:57 pm Link