Photographer
highStrangeness
Posts: 2485
Carmichael, California, US
Art Silva Photography wrote: Yeah but these are Clearly Nude, nothing implied about it, just the naughty bits are hidden. Lets not go down that "implied" definition road please, there is a thread floating around about that at the moment. Agreed. I don't care much for the definition of "implied" anyway. To me it's fairly simple.
Photographer
MesmerEyes Photography
Posts: 3102
Galveston, Texas, US
Art Silva Photography wrote: Yeah but these are Clearly Nude, nothing implied about it, just the naughty bits are hidden. Lets not go down that "implied" definition road please, there is a thread floating around about that at the moment. I agree, but the I think the thread you are referring to was a thread about implied modeling not implied nudes. Some people just didn't understand or couldn't read the OP so it got moved to general industry from OT. We know return you to your irregularly scheduled programmatic of bewbs. Nicole, we still need to set those beautiful boobies free from that controlling and mean bra so they can dance and shake as much as they want to.
Photographer
highStrangeness
Posts: 2485
Carmichael, California, US
MesmerEyes Photography wrote: I agree, but the I think the thread you are referring to was a thread about implied modeling not implied nudes. Some people just didn't understand or couldn't read the OP so it got moved to general industry from OT. Consider the source.
Photographer
Art Silva
Posts: 10064
Santa Barbara, California, US
MesmerEyes Photography wrote: I agree, but the I think the thread you are referring to was a thread about implied modeling not implied nudes. Some people just didn't understand or couldn't read the OP so it got moved to general industry from OT. We know return you to your irregularly scheduled programmatic of bewbs. Nicole, we still need to set those beautiful boobies free from that controlling and mean bra so they can dance and shake as much as they want to. Yeah that discussion got slightly derailed but I agree As far as Nichole's newbies, keep on shaking 'em girl!
Photographer
HO Photo
Posts: 575
Los Angeles, California, US
The post. The video. The OP. All of it. Delightful.
Model
Nicole Nu
Posts: 3981
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Vintagevista wrote: Pretty much "best legally possible avatar" 2013 *standing ovation*
Model
Nicole Nu
Posts: 3981
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Because bewbs are needed on this page as well
Model
Nicole Nu
Posts: 3981
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
You're welcome
Photographer
scrymettet
Posts: 33239
Quebec, Quebec, Canada
NicoleNudes wrote: You're welcome
everybody need a little gif of your bewbs as a gift to World peace
Photographer
Vintagevista
Posts: 11804
Sun City, California, US
*faints away*
Photographer
Art Silva
Posts: 10064
Santa Barbara, California, US
NicoleNudes wrote: Because bewbs are needed on this page as well
NicoleNudes wrote: You're welcome
"They're Real and They're Spectacular" ~Terri Hatcher's character on Seinfeld
Photographer
Lohkee
Posts: 14028
Maricopa, Arizona, US
NicoleNudes wrote:
Nice boobs, but you should really have a belly dancer teach you how to do a shoulder shimmy.
Model
Nicole Nu
Posts: 3981
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Lohkee wrote: Nice boobs, but you should really have a belly dancer teach you how to do a shoulder shimmy. Haha womp womp. Way to find the one bad thing in a thread full of awesome. Party pooper
Photographer
MesmerEyes Photography
Posts: 3102
Galveston, Texas, US
NicoleNudes wrote: Haha womp womp. Way to find the one bad thing in a thread full of awesome. Party pooper There absolutely nothing wrong with anything in this thread.
Photographer
highStrangeness
Posts: 2485
Carmichael, California, US
MesmerEyes Photography wrote: There absolutely nothing wrong with anything in this thread. At least one half of the human race is completely smitten by breasts. The other half wouldn't know what to do without them.
Photographer
Vintagevista
Posts: 11804
Sun City, California, US
Ya know - almost every forum has a thread to tow locked at the top - so everyone sees it. SF - 2 does not have a thread at the top. It Should - just saying.
Photographer
highStrangeness
Posts: 2485
Carmichael, California, US
Vintagevista wrote: Ya know - almost every forum has a thread to tow locked at the top - so everyone sees it. SF - 2 does not have a thread at the top. It Should - just saying. I've noticed that... This thread deserves to be on the front forum page.
Model
Nicole Nu
Posts: 3981
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
aspergianLens wrote: I've noticed that... This thread deserves to be on the front forum page. Hells yeah. IMMORTALIZE MA BOOBIES!
Photographer
Cosplay Creatives
Posts: 10714
Syowa - permanent station of Japan, Sector claimed by Norway, Antarctica
I've stopped fapping so I could post. *resumes fapping*
Photographer
highStrangeness
Posts: 2485
Carmichael, California, US
NicoleNudes wrote: Hells yeah. IMMORTALIZE MA BOOBIES!
I already think they're immoral... er, I mean... immortal.
Model
Nicole Nu
Posts: 3981
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
aspergianLens wrote: I already think they're immoral... er, I mean... immortal.
Balls, I totally spelt that wrong didn't I? I sounded it out in my head and everything!
Photographer
MesmerEyes Photography
Posts: 3102
Galveston, Texas, US
Vintagevista wrote: Ya know - almost every forum has a thread to tow locked at the top - so everyone sees it. SF - 2 does not have a thread at the top. It Should - just saying. You mean a sticky. I think this thread is pretty sticky already.
Photographer
highStrangeness
Posts: 2485
Carmichael, California, US
NicoleNudes wrote: Balls, I totally spelt that wrong didn't I? I sounded it out in my head and everything! Spelled what wrong? "Immortalize" is how it's spelled. As for "immoral", I was just referring to the things that large breasts can do to men (and some women)... If you use them for evil instead of good, then it's definitely immoral.
Photographer
MesmerEyes Photography
Posts: 3102
Galveston, Texas, US
Gryph wrote: I've stopped fapping so I could post. *resumes fapping* Exhibit "A"
Photographer
highStrangeness
Posts: 2485
Carmichael, California, US
MesmerEyes Photography wrote: Exhibit "A" Or "exhibitionist A".
Photographer
MesmerEyes Photography
Posts: 3102
Galveston, Texas, US
aspergianLens wrote: Or "exhibitionist A". You mean "exhibitionist ehhh".
Photographer
highStrangeness
Posts: 2485
Carmichael, California, US
MesmerEyes Photography wrote: You mean "exhibitionist ehhh". I don't want to know! Gryph already got his ass banned on the "official" tinychat chat room. And when I mean he got his ass banned I mean it literally : he showed his ass and got his video banned for a while.
Photographer
MesmerEyes Photography
Posts: 3102
Galveston, Texas, US
aspergianLens wrote: I don't want to know! Gryph already got his ass banned on the "official" tinychat chat room. And when I mean he got his ass banned I mean it literally : he showed his ass and got his video banned for a while. Didn't need to know that. :scrolls back up the page to get that image out of my head.:
Photographer
Vintagevista
Posts: 11804
Sun City, California, US
NicoleNudes wrote: You're welcome
I was all mad about the motorcycle thread - and then I came back here and after a few moments - I feel - - -better You are a true
Photographer
highStrangeness
Posts: 2485
Carmichael, California, US
She needs to do that without the shirt, and put it on Vimeo. Hah.....
Photographer
Cosplay Creatives
Posts: 10714
Syowa - permanent station of Japan, Sector claimed by Norway, Antarctica
Model
Nicole Nu
Posts: 3981
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Model
Nicole Nu
Posts: 3981
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
aspergianLens wrote: I don't want to know! Gryph already got his ass banned on the "official" tinychat chat room. And when I mean he got his ass banned I mean it literally : he showed his ass and got his video banned for a while.
Model
Nicole Nu
Posts: 3981
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
aspergianLens wrote: Spelled what wrong? "Immortalize" is how it's spelled. As for "immoral", I was just referring to the things that large breasts can do to men (and some women)... If you use them for evil instead of good, then it's definitely immoral. oh. derp.
Photographer
highStrangeness
Posts: 2485
Carmichael, California, US
Gryph wrote: Something oddly curious about this statement. https://www.modelmayhem.com/po.php?thre … st18511525 "Many women, especially the very attractive ones have always gotten everything they wanted their whole lives by guys who let them walk over them. These women are used to always getting their way. Not sure why your so surprised that would expect you as well to bend over backwards for them by giving them the prints even though you told them it may be awhile..." Misogynistic or not, I think the statement has some truth to it. There is such a thing, called the "Beautiful Woman Syndrome." http://www.bwsyndrome.com/ It is basically the lack of character development in unusually attractive women -- the kind of women that rely on their looks to get by in life, and that often have poor or immature personalities. I'm not suggesting (most of) the models here "suffer" from this "condition", but I believe it really occurs. Note that modeling is not what would consider using one's looks to get by on. Also most of the models I have met, have had very pleasant personalities. I've never had any hint of underdeveloped personal character in the female models I've worked with.
Photographer
Cosplay Creatives
Posts: 10714
Syowa - permanent station of Japan, Sector claimed by Norway, Antarctica
Model
Nicole Nu
Posts: 3981
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
aspergianLens wrote: Misogynistic or not, I think the statement has some truth to it. There is such a thing, called the "Beautiful Woman Syndrome." http://www.bwsyndrome.com/ It is basically the lack of character development in unusually attractive women -- the kind of women that rely on their looks to get by in life, and that often have poor or immature personalities. I'm not suggesting (most of) the models here "suffer" from this "condition", but I believe it really occurs. Note that modeling is not what would consider using one's looks to get by on. Also most of the models I have met, have had very pleasant personalities. I've never had any hint of underdeveloped personal character in the female models I've worked with. Oh, I believe it too. Good thing I have good looks AND a brain
Photographer
DougBPhoto
Posts: 39248
Portland, Oregon, US
like Okay, did I do that right?
Photographer
highStrangeness
Posts: 2485
Carmichael, California, US
NicoleNudes wrote: Oh, I believe it too. Good thing I have good looks AND a brain I've heard it said that it's a woman's looks attract a man, and her personality/intellect that keep him around.
|