Photographer

highStrangeness

Posts: 2485

Carmichael, California, US

Art Silva Photography wrote:

Yeah but these are Clearly Nude, nothing implied about it, just the naughty bits are hidden.

Lets not go down that "implied" definition road please, there is a thread floating around about that at the moment.

Agreed.  I don't care much for the definition of "implied" anyway.  To me it's fairly simple.

Sep 29 13 11:34 pm Link

Photographer

MesmerEyes Photography

Posts: 3102

Galveston, Texas, US

Art Silva Photography wrote:
Yeah but these are Clearly Nude, nothing implied about it, just the naughty bits are hidden.

Lets not go down that "implied" definition road please, there is a thread floating around about that at the moment.

I agree, but the I think the thread you are referring to was a thread about implied modeling not implied nudes. Some people just didn't understand or couldn't read the OP so it got moved to general industry from OT.

We know return you to your irregularly scheduled programmatic of bewbs.

Nicole, we still need to set those beautiful boobies free from that controlling and mean bra so they can dance and shake as much as they want to. wink

Sep 29 13 11:41 pm Link

Photographer

highStrangeness

Posts: 2485

Carmichael, California, US

MesmerEyes Photography wrote:
I agree, but the I think the thread you are referring to was a thread about implied modeling not implied nudes. Some people just didn't understand or couldn't read the OP so it got moved to general industry from OT.

Consider the source.  smile

Sep 29 13 11:57 pm Link

Photographer

Art Silva

Posts: 10064

Santa Barbara, California, US

MesmerEyes Photography wrote:

I agree, but the I think the thread you are referring to was a thread about implied modeling not implied nudes. Some people just didn't understand or couldn't read the OP so it got moved to general industry from OT.

We know return you to your irregularly scheduled programmatic of bewbs.

Nicole, we still need to set those beautiful boobies free from that controlling and mean bra so they can dance and shake as much as they want to. wink

Yeah that discussion got slightly derailed but I agree wink

As far as Nichole's newbies, keep on shaking 'em girl!

Sep 30 13 05:23 pm Link

Photographer

HO Photo

Posts: 575

Los Angeles, California, US

The post. The video. The OP. All of it. Delightful.

Sep 30 13 11:18 pm Link

Model

Nicole Nu

Posts: 3981

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Vintagevista wrote:
Pretty much "best legally possible avatar" 2013

*standing ovation*

lol

borat

Oct 01 13 04:25 pm Link

Model

Nicole Nu

Posts: 3981

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Because bewbs are needed on this page as well

https://cdn.makeagif.com/media/9-24-2013/WSrjTR.gif

Oct 01 13 04:27 pm Link

Model

Nicole Nu

Posts: 3981

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

You're welcome

https://cdn.makeagif.com/media/10-01-2013/Bpcrv7.gif

Oct 01 13 04:37 pm Link

Photographer

scrymettet

Posts: 33239

Quebec, Quebec, Canada

NicoleNudes wrote:
You're welcome

https://cdn.makeagif.com/media/10-01-2013/Bpcrv7.gif

everybody need a little gif of your bewbs as a gift to World peace

Oct 01 13 04:41 pm Link

Photographer

Vintagevista

Posts: 11804

Sun City, California, US

*faints away* smile

Oct 01 13 04:41 pm Link

Photographer

Art Silva

Posts: 10064

Santa Barbara, California, US

NicoleNudes wrote:
Because bewbs are needed on this page as well

https://cdn.makeagif.com/media/9-24-2013/WSrjTR.gif

NicoleNudes wrote:
You're welcome

https://cdn.makeagif.com/media/10-01-2013/Bpcrv7.gif

"They're Real and They're Spectacular"



~Terri Hatcher's character on Seinfeld

Oct 01 13 05:20 pm Link

Photographer

Lohkee

Posts: 14028

Maricopa, Arizona, US

NicoleNudes wrote:

borat

Nice boobs, but you should really have a belly dancer teach you how to do a shoulder shimmy.

Oct 01 13 05:23 pm Link

Model

Nicole Nu

Posts: 3981

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Lohkee wrote:

Nice boobs, but you should really have a belly dancer teach you how to do a shoulder shimmy.

Haha womp womp.

Way to find the one bad thing in a thread full of awesome.
Party pooper tongue

Oct 01 13 05:34 pm Link

Photographer

MesmerEyes Photography

Posts: 3102

Galveston, Texas, US

NicoleNudes wrote:

Haha womp womp.

Way to find the one bad thing in a thread full of awesome.
Party pooper tongue

There absolutely nothing wrong with anything in this thread. wink

Oct 01 13 06:09 pm Link

Photographer

highStrangeness

Posts: 2485

Carmichael, California, US

MesmerEyes Photography wrote:

There absolutely nothing wrong with anything in this thread. wink

At least one half of the human race is completely smitten by breasts.

The other half wouldn't know what to do without them. smile

Oct 01 13 06:18 pm Link

Photographer

Vintagevista

Posts: 11804

Sun City, California, US

Ya know - almost every forum has a thread to tow locked at the top - so everyone sees it.

SF - 2 does not have a thread at the top.

It Should - just saying.

Oct 01 13 06:19 pm Link

Photographer

highStrangeness

Posts: 2485

Carmichael, California, US

Vintagevista wrote:
Ya know - almost every forum has a thread to tow locked at the top - so everyone sees it.

SF - 2 does not have a thread at the top.

It Should - just saying.

I've noticed that... This thread deserves to be on the front forum page.

Oct 01 13 06:21 pm Link

Model

Nicole Nu

Posts: 3981

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

aspergianLens wrote:

I've noticed that... This thread deserves to be on the front forum page.

Hells yeah.

IMMORTALIZE MA BOOBIES!

borat

Oct 01 13 07:36 pm Link

Photographer

Cosplay Creatives

Posts: 10714

Syowa - permanent station of Japan, Sector claimed by Norway, Antarctica

I've stopped fapping so I could post. lol

*resumes fapping*

Oct 01 13 07:38 pm Link

Photographer

highStrangeness

Posts: 2485

Carmichael, California, US

NicoleNudes wrote:

Hells yeah.

IMMORTALIZE MA BOOBIES!

borat

I already think they're immoral... er, I mean... immortal. 

tongue

Oct 01 13 07:39 pm Link

Model

Nicole Nu

Posts: 3981

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

aspergianLens wrote:

I already think they're immoral... er, I mean... immortal. 

tongue

Balls, I totally spelt that wrong didn't I?

I sounded it out in my head and everything! mad

Oct 01 13 10:11 pm Link

Photographer

MesmerEyes Photography

Posts: 3102

Galveston, Texas, US

Vintagevista wrote:
Ya know - almost every forum has a thread to tow locked at the top - so everyone sees it.

SF - 2 does not have a thread at the top.

It Should - just saying.

You mean a sticky. I think this thread is pretty sticky already. wink

Oct 01 13 10:20 pm Link

Photographer

highStrangeness

Posts: 2485

Carmichael, California, US

NicoleNudes wrote:
Balls, I totally spelt that wrong didn't I?

I sounded it out in my head and everything! mad

Spelled what wrong? "Immortalize" is how it's spelled.

As for "immoral", I was just referring to the things that large breasts can do to men (and some women)...

smile

If you use them for evil instead of good, then it's definitely immoral.

Oct 01 13 10:21 pm Link

Photographer

MesmerEyes Photography

Posts: 3102

Galveston, Texas, US

Gryph wrote:
I've stopped fapping so I could post. lol

*resumes fapping*

Exhibit "A"

Oct 01 13 10:22 pm Link

Photographer

highStrangeness

Posts: 2485

Carmichael, California, US

MesmerEyes Photography wrote:

Exhibit "A"

Or "exhibitionist A".

Oct 01 13 10:27 pm Link

Photographer

MesmerEyes Photography

Posts: 3102

Galveston, Texas, US

aspergianLens wrote:

Or "exhibitionist A".

You mean "exhibitionist ehhh". smile

Oct 01 13 10:32 pm Link

Photographer

highStrangeness

Posts: 2485

Carmichael, California, US

MesmerEyes Photography wrote:

You mean "exhibitionist ehhh". smile

I don't want to know!

Gryph already got his ass banned on the "official" tinychat chat room.

And when I mean he got his ass banned I mean it literally : he showed his ass and got his video banned for a while.

Oct 01 13 10:34 pm Link

Photographer

MesmerEyes Photography

Posts: 3102

Galveston, Texas, US

aspergianLens wrote:

I don't want to know!

Gryph already got his ass banned on the "official" tinychat chat room.

And when I mean he got his ass banned I mean it literally : he showed his ass and got his video banned for a while.

Didn't need to know that. hmm
:scrolls back up the page to get that image out of my head.:

Oct 01 13 10:45 pm Link

Photographer

Vintagevista

Posts: 11804

Sun City, California, US

NicoleNudes wrote:
You're welcome

https://cdn.makeagif.com/media/10-01-2013/Bpcrv7.gif

I was all mad about the motorcycle thread - and then I came back here and after a few moments - I feel  - - -better

You are a true
https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/100824/16/4c74576225b05.jpg

Oct 01 13 10:52 pm Link

Photographer

highStrangeness

Posts: 2485

Carmichael, California, US

She needs to do that without the shirt, and put it on Vimeo.

Hah.....

Oct 01 13 10:55 pm Link

Photographer

Cosplay Creatives

Posts: 10714

Syowa - permanent station of Japan, Sector claimed by Norway, Antarctica

MesmerEyes Photography wrote:
Exhibit "A"

Something oddly curious about this statement.

https://www.modelmayhem.com/po.php?thre … st18511525

Oct 01 13 10:58 pm Link

Photographer

MesmerEyes Photography

Posts: 3102

Galveston, Texas, US

Gryph wrote:

Something oddly curious about this statement.

https://www.modelmayhem.com/po.php?thre … st18511525

Thought about that after I posted but then it was to late.

Oct 01 13 11:09 pm Link

Model

Nicole Nu

Posts: 3981

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Gryph wrote:

Something oddly curious about this statement.

https://www.modelmayhem.com/po.php?thre … st18511525

Now now, don't go dirtying up my thread with all that bs now.

Let's resume the boob shaking.

Oct 01 13 11:12 pm Link

Model

Nicole Nu

Posts: 3981

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

aspergianLens wrote:

I don't want to know!

Gryph already got his ass banned on the "official" tinychat chat room.

And when I mean he got his ass banned I mean it literally : he showed his ass and got his video banned for a while.

lollollol

Oct 01 13 11:12 pm Link

Model

Nicole Nu

Posts: 3981

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

aspergianLens wrote:

Spelled what wrong? "Immortalize" is how it's spelled.

As for "immoral", I was just referring to the things that large breasts can do to men (and some women)...

smile

If you use them for evil instead of good, then it's definitely immoral.

oh. derp.

Oct 01 13 11:13 pm Link

Photographer

highStrangeness

Posts: 2485

Carmichael, California, US

Gryph wrote:

Something oddly curious about this statement.

https://www.modelmayhem.com/po.php?thre … st18511525

"Many women, especially the very attractive ones have always gotten everything they wanted their whole lives by guys who let them walk over them.  These women are used to always getting their way.  Not sure why your so surprised that would expect you as well to bend over backwards for them by giving them the prints even though you told them it may be
awhile..."

Misogynistic or not, I think the statement has some truth to it.

There is such a thing, called the "Beautiful Woman Syndrome." 

http://www.bwsyndrome.com/

It is basically the lack of character development in unusually attractive women -- the kind of women that rely on their looks to get by in life, and that often have poor or immature personalities.

I'm not suggesting (most of) the models here "suffer" from this "condition", but I believe it really occurs.  Note that modeling is not what would consider using one's looks to get by on. 

Also most of the models I have met, have had very pleasant personalities.  I've never had any hint of underdeveloped personal character in the female models I've worked with.

Oct 01 13 11:14 pm Link

Photographer

Cosplay Creatives

Posts: 10714

Syowa - permanent station of Japan, Sector claimed by Norway, Antarctica

NicoleNudes wrote:
lollollol

I admit, this is true. lol  My webcam feed was banned.

Oct 01 13 11:19 pm Link

Model

Nicole Nu

Posts: 3981

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

aspergianLens wrote:

Misogynistic or not, I think the statement has some truth to it.

There is such a thing, called the "Beautiful Woman Syndrome." 

http://www.bwsyndrome.com/

It is basically the lack of character development in unusually attractive women -- the kind of women that rely on their looks to get by in life, and that often have poor or immature personalities.

I'm not suggesting (most of) the models here "suffer" from this "condition", but I believe it really occurs.  Note that modeling is not what would consider using one's looks to get by on. 

Also most of the models I have met, have had very pleasant personalities.  I've never had any hint of underdeveloped personal character in the female models I've worked with.

Oh, I believe it too.

Good thing I have good looks AND a brain wink

Oct 01 13 11:48 pm Link

Photographer

DougBPhoto

Posts: 39248

Portland, Oregon, US

like borat


Okay, did I do that right?

Oct 01 13 11:49 pm Link

Photographer

highStrangeness

Posts: 2485

Carmichael, California, US

NicoleNudes wrote:

Oh, I believe it too.

Good thing I have good looks AND a brain wink

I've heard it said that it's a woman's looks attract a man, and her personality/intellect that keep him around.

Oct 01 13 11:55 pm Link