Forums > General Industry > Obsessive SELFIES!... a mental disorder?

Photographer

Worlds Of Water

Posts: 37732

Rancho Cucamonga, California, US

I wouldn't argue with that finding in the least.  House on fire?... cars crashing around ya?... code blue at the hospital?... work office gettin blasted in Hurricane?... bridge colapsing in Earthquake?... incoming gunfire?... Sorry... my selfies come first.. lol

I know some majorly narcisistic IG primadonnas who can't even put the cell down during paid shoots... yikes
Anyone else dealin with this?... hmm

https://www.dpreview.com/news/767768753 … l-disorder

Jan 01 18 08:20 pm Link

Photographer

Keith Moody

Posts: 548

Phoenix, Arizona, US

Select Models wrote:
Anyone else dealin with this?... hmm

Nope.  But then again, the people I hang out with are old and just barely figured out how to make phone calls.

Nice port.  Very kick ass!

Jan 01 18 08:44 pm Link

Photographer

Worlds Of Water

Posts: 37732

Rancho Cucamonga, California, US

Keith Moody wrote:

the people I hang out with are old and just barely figured out how to make phone calls.

Hmmmmm... OK... cool... so what's workin best for them?   Smoke signals?... Carrier Pigeons... Night-time spotlight SOS's?  Those were definitely big hits in the past few hundred years... borat

Jan 01 18 09:53 pm Link

Artist/Painter

Hunter GWPB

Posts: 8192

King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, US

Select Models wrote:

Hmmmmm... OK... cool... so what's workin best for them?   Smoke signals?... Carrier Pigeons... Night-time spotlight SOS's?  Those were definitely big hits in the past few hundred years... borat

I use US mail.

Jan 02 18 12:24 am Link

Photographer

Worlds Of Water

Posts: 37732

Rancho Cucamonga, California, US

Hunter  GWPB wrote:
I use US mail.

Cool... haven't heard of any self-mailing mental disorders associated with the USPS yet... I think you're safe... lol

Jan 02 18 02:05 am Link

Photographer

martin b

Posts: 2770

Manila, National Capital Region, Philippines

I couple of years back they declared Makati City in the Philippines the selfie capital.  I keep an old phone around for models to selfie to their hearts content.  They usually post they are on a shoot and having the time of their life.  That's cool with me.  I don't like being in the pics but I guess I've gotten used to it.  Free publicity.  I even do a little time-lapse of makeup transformation when I have a makeup artist with my old phone and I give it to the model afterwards.  I just give it a tittle and some credits.  More free publicity. 

I'm not a selfie person but it's part of life in 2018.

Jan 02 18 04:42 am Link

Photographer

SayCheeZ!

Posts: 20621

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

You wouldn't believe the amount of 'models' that try to become MM members with NOTHING but selfies... and really terrible ones at that... in their portfolio.

The MM rules state that not even one selfie is permitted.  It's amazing how so many of them will resubmit the same pictures after the profile is denied.

I guess they think that we'll be overcome by their intrinsic radiant beauty and make an exception and gladly allow them to enter the MM world.

My feeling:  "You're not a model unless someone else is taking the photo".

Jan 02 18 05:18 am Link

Photographer

FIFTYONE PHOTOGRAPHY

Posts: 6597

Uniontown, Pennsylvania, US

SayCheeZ!  wrote:
You wouldn't believe the amount of 'models' that try to become MM members with NOTHING but selfies... and really terrible ones at that... in their portfolio.

The MM rules state that not even one selfie is permitted.  It's amazing how so many of them will resubmit the same pictures after the profile is denied.

I guess they think that we'll be overcome by their intrinsic radiant beauty and make an exception and gladly allow them to enter the MM world.

My feeling:  "You're not a model unless someone else is taking the photo".

What's also amazing is how many of them get a pass. I won't mention the MUA & Hair Stylist profiles gaining access with a portfolio full of selfies.

Select Models wrote:
Obsessive SELFIES!... a mental disorder?

Something,  many models on fb seem to need a new profile image often and it surprises Me how many will replace a high quality image from a recent set with a new selfie.

Instagram?....well,

Jan 02 18 05:40 am Link

Photographer

Abbitt Photography

Posts: 13564

Washington, Utah, US

I haven’t yet run into models with a selfie obsession during shoots, but I’ve certainly seen it when traveling:  tourists who have traveled to incredible destinations half way around the globe only to hardly appreciate where they are being so obsessed with videoing themselves, constantly knocking others with their selfie sticks.

Jan 02 18 07:33 am Link

Photographer

Andrew Bruce

Posts: 122

CLEARWATER BEACH, Florida, US

It'd say 99.9% of the models/friends I shoot with are taking selfies during our shoot. I don't care, it promotes my business by showing snapchat how awesome/fun it is and how good they look. ha.

Jan 02 18 08:49 am Link

Photographer

SayCheeZ!

Posts: 20621

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

FIFTYONE PHOTOGRAPHY wrote:
What's also amazing is how many of them get a pass. I won't mention the MUA & Hair Stylist profiles gaining access with a portfolio full of selfies.

None of 'em get a pass.  They can have a perfect portfolio with nothing but photos that appeared on the cover of Vogue, Glamour, Playboy, and Field & Stream but the whole profile will be rejected if there's one selfie in the mix.

Now, what happens AFTER they are approved is a different story, and yes, many of 'em add crappy selfies after they're approved.

Jan 02 18 09:50 am Link

Photographer

Randy Poe

Posts: 1638

Green Cove Springs, Florida, US

Rage porn article

Jan 02 18 10:48 am Link

Photographer

Looknsee Photography

Posts: 26342

Portland, Oregon, US

SayCheeZ!  wrote:
You wouldn't believe the amount of 'models' that try to become MM members with NOTHING but selfies... and really terrible ones at that... in their portfolio.  ...

My feeling:  "You're not a model unless someone else is taking the photo".

One of my favorite models started modeling when she turned 18.  Before then, she made self-portraits, most of which were nude.  Now, this was 15+ years ago, before smartphone photography was available, but with a tripod & a timer or a long cable release, she found a way.  So, when she started modeling for others, she was better prepared than most.

Lots of photographers, especially here on MM, treat selfies with disdain, but I feel a well-done selfie can be a work of art.  I would also point out that I've seen smartphone images that were more interesting than images made by a $10K camera.

I started learning photography back in the dark ages (i.e. before digital photography).  At my school, beginners learned the basics with a 35mm SLR and basic darkroom work.  Intermediate students used 4x5 view camera & The Zone System.  Advanced students were given a $5 all-plastic Diana camera, with a fixed focal length and maybe 4 exposure settings.  The thinking:  photography (especially "analog photography") is very technical, and students get caught up with all the technical controls they need to master.  But one typically evaluates the quality of an image on two scales -- the technical and the aesthetic.  "Serious" students focus too much on the technical, and by making them use the Diana camera, they need to focus more on the aesthetic.

So, show me good selfies -- I love them. 

Back to the thread topic -- yes, some people get overly obsessed with selfies, and yes, it can be unhealthy.

Jan 02 18 11:24 am Link

Photographer

SayCheeZ!

Posts: 20621

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

Select Models wrote:
I wouldn't argue with that finding in the least.  House on fire?... cars crashing around ya?... code blue at the hospital?... work office gettin blasted in Hurricane?... bridge colapsing in Earthquake?... incoming gunfire?... Sorry... my selfies come first.. lol

One of the things that I'm really upset about is the amount of "#Vegas Strong" and "#Pray for Vegas" selfies that appeared after the October 1st tragedy where 58 people were killed and hundreds injured by a man shooting automatic rifles from a hotel room across the street from a country music festival.

Most of the selfie's are just another "hey, look at me... I'm pretty" instead of honoring the dead and injured victims in one of the greatest tragedies seen in America... what the whole #Vegas Strong movement is about.

I find it disgusting to say the least.



It should be THIS:

https://kvvu.images.worldnow.com/images/15310897_G.jpg


NOT THIS:


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DLKGZxFVoAA8I4V.jpg

Jan 02 18 12:58 pm Link

Photographer

Worlds Of Water

Posts: 37732

Rancho Cucamonga, California, US

SayCheeZ!  wrote:
It should be THIS:

https://kvvu.images.worldnow.com/images/15310897_G.jpg


NOT THIS:


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DLKGZxFVoAA8I4V.jpg

Word up... VEGAS... land of a Trillion selfies... nothin feeds the selfie obsession quite like this video... borat

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuwfZGDWOio  "But First... Let Me Take A Selfie"

"That's so RATCHET... "That girl is sucha FAKE model... she definitely bought all her Instagram followers"!     LMAO!   lol
(possible Vegas club action here)

Jan 02 18 01:17 pm Link

Photographer

Brooklyn Bridge Images

Posts: 13200

Brooklyn, New York, US

IMHO
A serious self portrait and a Selfie are 2 different animals

Jan 02 18 01:40 pm Link

Model

Liv Sage

Posts: 431

Seattle, Washington, US

Brooklyn Bridge Images wrote:
IMHO
A serious self portrait and a Selfie are 2 different animals

Thank you...as someone who does quite a bit of self portrait work and makes a decent amount selling it, I really dislike my photos being referred to as selfies. Especially when the camera is clear across the room anyway.

Sometimes I wonder if people just don't know this or if they're saying it to belittle self portrait work. I think the person above falls squarely in the former category though as he clearly seems to understand there are different quality levels.

I still hate when people tell me "nice selfies" about photos in my Model Society portfolio though.

Jan 02 18 02:12 pm Link

Photographer

Brooklyn Bridge Images

Posts: 13200

Brooklyn, New York, US

Liv Sage wrote:
Thank you...as someone who does quite a bit of self portrait work and makes a decent amount selling it, I really dislike my photos being referred to as selfies. Especially when the camera is clear across the room anyway.

Sometimes I wonder if people just don't know this or if they're saying it to belittle self portrait work. I think the person above falls squarely in the former category though as he clearly seems to understand there are different quality levels.

I still hate when people tell me "nice selfies" about photos in my Model Society portfolio though.

I can understand your frustration at people lumping in your serious work in the same category as selfies
I love this photographers Self portrait work
I attended an Artist talk she gave at School of Visual arts
About as far from "Selfie" as you can get
http://time.com/3802764/the-most-intima … otherhood/
https://www.lensculture.com/articles/el … still-love

Contrast this
https://i.cbc.ca/1.3299311.1446423769!/fileImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/16x9_620/476850159.jpg

Jan 02 18 04:09 pm Link

Model

Liv Sage

Posts: 431

Seattle, Washington, US

Her work is so nice - thank you for the links!

Jan 02 18 06:36 pm Link

Photographer

Worlds Of Water

Posts: 37732

Rancho Cucamonga, California, US

Liv Sage wrote:
Her work is so nice - thank you for the links!

+1

Jan 02 18 07:16 pm Link

Photographer

Shot By Adam

Posts: 8095

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

I've had models on set be more pre-occupied with selfies and IG on shoots from time to time but after a while, they eventually mellow out. I did have one model who just wouldn't stop and right as I was about to say something to her the client walked over to her, bitched her out, told her that if she couldn't put her phone down then was welcome to leave and I was laughing behind the camera for 10 minutes.

Jan 03 18 01:10 am Link

Photographer

Worlds Of Water

Posts: 37732

Rancho Cucamonga, California, US

Shot By Adam wrote:
I've had models on set be more pre-occupied with selfies and IG on shoots from time to time but after a while, they eventually mellow out. I did have one model who just wouldn't stop and right as I was about to say something to her the client walked over to her, bitched her out, told her that if she couldn't put her phone down then was welcome to leave and I was laughing behind the camera for 10 minutes.

Thanks for the imput... I've seen scenario's simular to this played out by models during paid 'one on one' shoots at SM events.  They refuse to put their phones down until 'that guy holding her paycheck' complains... wink

Jan 03 18 03:11 am Link

Model

Gelsen Aripia

Posts: 1407

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Select Models wrote:

Thanks for the imput... I've seen scenario's simular to this played out by models during paid 'one on one' shoots at SM events.  They refuse to put their phones down until 'that guy holding her paycheck' complains... wink

That is outrageous and I would never tolerate it as a photographer or as a model.  I would want it in writing beforehand that nobody at the shoot would abuse their phones during said shoot.  I just recently got my first ever cellphone (in June), and it is only for phone calls.  I've never sent or received a text in my life, and I don't even want to start.  I'm actually proud that I have no clue regarding that whole culture.  I have one self-portrait in my portfolio that I took with my Nikon D90, and I wouldn't want anyone calling it a "selfie".  That would be an insult.

Jan 03 18 12:48 pm Link

Photographer

Worlds Of Water

Posts: 37732

Rancho Cucamonga, California, US

Eugenya wrote:
I just recently got my first ever cellphone (in June), and it is only for phone calls.  I've never sent or received a text in my life,

This is 2018... and this is blowing me away.  If you were to make such a statement within a group of photographers and models in Southern California, their jaws would HIT THE FLOOR!... yikes

Jan 03 18 02:08 pm Link

Model

Gelsen Aripia

Posts: 1407

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Select Models wrote:

This is 2018... and this is blowing me away.  If you were to make such a statement within a group of photographers and models in Southern California, their jaws would HIT THE FLOOR!... yikes

That would make my year, to be honest.  I would take myself out for dinner if that happened to me.

Jan 03 18 02:12 pm Link

Photographer

Worlds Of Water

Posts: 37732

Rancho Cucamonga, California, US

Eugenya wrote:

That would make my year, to be honest.  I would take myself out for dinner if that happened to me.

OMG... LOL... well tell this story at any 'Taco Tuesday' here in SoCal... and half a dozen photographers will buy dinner for ya... lol

Jan 03 18 02:16 pm Link

Artist/Painter

Hunter GWPB

Posts: 8192

King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, US

Eugenya wrote:

That is outrageous and I would never tolerate it as a photographer or as a model.  I would want it in writing beforehand that nobody at the shoot would abuse their phones during said shoot.  I just recently got my first ever cellphone (in June), and it is only for phone calls.  I've never sent or received a text in my life, and I don't even want to start.  I'm actually proud that I have no clue regarding that whole culture.  I have one self-portrait in my portfolio that I took with my Nikon D90, and I wouldn't want anyone calling it a "selfie".  That would be an insult.

I can't tell by looking which is your self portrait.  I didn't check the credits because that would be irrelevant if I can't tell by looking.  I would hope people would understand the difference between a self portrait and a selfie, however, I suspect that it is a distinction that will disappear for the masses.

Jan 03 18 02:20 pm Link

Model

Laura UnBound

Posts: 28745

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

the "pray for vegas" things weren't really selfies though, not in the sense that someone took a new selfie in order to exhibit extreme vanity during some tragedy..theres websites that take your profile photo off places like Facebook and throw a filter overtop in order to show support for something, so whatever your profile photo is (probably a selfie, because your profile photo is an appropriate place for one of those) is going to be used. There was a pink filter for "stand with planned parenthood", there was the Je Suis Charlie one, there was a Pulse Nightclub one, theres rainbow filters for pride month...

Jan 03 18 02:51 pm Link

Model

Gelsen Aripia

Posts: 1407

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Hunter  GWPB wrote:

I can't tell by looking which is your self portrait.  I didn't check the credits because that would be irrelevant if I can't tell by looking.  I would hope people would understand the difference between a self portrait and a selfie, however, I suspect that it is a distinction that will disappear for the masses.

It's the first photo on the second row.  For me, a "selfie" is a shot that is taken more casually and quickly with a cellphone camera, and is more of an "in the moment" sort of activity.  A self-portrait is a shot that a lot more thought and effort goes into and reveals part of the inner self in an artistic way.

Jan 03 18 03:18 pm Link

Photographer

TomFRohwer

Posts: 1601

Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

In 2000 years archeologists will puzzle over a weird phenomenon.

In the years after ~ 2012 A.D. a mysterious desease spread all over the planet. More and more people got extremely big noses as myriads of publications show. There never had been, scientists will say, an explanation whether this desease was caused by viruses or bacteria or other effects.
But in any case this desease, scientists will say, must have been regarded as very important by the people of those times if the sheer amount of publication of photographs of this desease is considered...

Jan 03 18 03:22 pm Link

Photographer

Worlds Of Water

Posts: 37732

Rancho Cucamonga, California, US

TomFRohwer wrote:
In 2000 years archeologists will puzzle over a weird phenomenon.

That's quite a stretch.  I'm quite sure that in 2000 years... computers will be solving all the puzzles and archeologists will be non-existant... wink

Jan 03 18 03:32 pm Link

Photographer

Looknsee Photography

Posts: 26342

Portland, Oregon, US

Eugenya wrote:
I just recently got my first ever cellphone (in June), and it is only for phone calls.  I've never sent or received a text in my life,

Select Models wrote:
This is 2018... and this is blowing me away.  If you were to make such a statement within a group of photographers and models in Southern California, their jaws would HIT THE FLOOR!... yikes

Well, I used to be on the cutting edge of technology.  I was on the Internet around 1978, before it was called the "Internet".  I was a beta tester for Quicken.  I remember how folks said that Microsoft Excel would never replace Lotus 1-2-3.  I also was a beta tester for "palmtop PC" back in the early 1990s, used for calendar, contacts, 1-2-3, notes, etc.

I still don't own a smartphone.  I'm landline all the way.

But to be honest, I'm thinking about getting a cheap one, just for Lyft / Uber and GPS directions.  I would set it up so that incoming calls (except Lyft / Uber) would go to trash.  Don't want one.

I'll still carry around my point & shoot camera, however.

Jan 03 18 04:43 pm Link

Photographer

Worlds Of Water

Posts: 37732

Rancho Cucamonga, California, US

As witnessed from some messages above... 'old school' still works for a few of the folks out there.  Whatever floats your boat is perfectly OK by me.  Many out there experience are experiencing 'techno overload' in this fast paced world... not necessarily a good thing... wink

Jan 03 18 07:32 pm Link

Photographer

Worlds Of Water

Posts: 37732

Rancho Cucamonga, California, US

Laura UnBound wrote:
someone took a new selfie in order to exhibit extreme vanity during some tragedy.

Oh that happened on a few instances IM SURE.  Some of the instagram's biggest attention whores have no shame... wink

Jan 04 18 01:28 am Link

Photographer

FIFTYONE PHOTOGRAPHY

Posts: 6597

Uniontown, Pennsylvania, US

SayCheeZ!  wrote:
None of 'em get a pass.

roll


I think We both know better than that, at least I do.  I'm on the gate daily.

Jan 04 18 03:23 am Link

Photographer

TomFRohwer

Posts: 1601

Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

Select Models wrote:

That's quite a stretch.  I'm quite sure that in 2000 years... computers will be solving all the puzzles and archeologists will be non-existant... wink

Especially computers will not be able to understand this very special desease...

Jan 04 18 04:38 am Link

Photographer

Worlds Of Water

Posts: 37732

Rancho Cucamonga, California, US

TomFRohwer wrote:
Especially computers will not be able to understand this very special desease...

Not only will they be able to understand it... but they will also be able to spell DISEASE correctly... lol

Jan 04 18 10:00 am Link

Photographer

John Silva Photography

Posts: 590

Fairfield, California, US

Select Models wrote:
I wouldn't argue with that finding in the least.  House on fire?... cars crashing around ya?... code blue at the hospital?... work office gettin blasted in Hurricane?... bridge colapsing in Earthquake?... incoming gunfire?... Sorry... my selfies come first.. lol

I know some majorly narcisistic IG primadonnas who can't even put the cell down during paid shoots... yikes
Anyone else dealin with this?... hmm

https://www.dpreview.com/news/767768753 … l-disorder

I'm pretty new still and have only worked with about a hundred models, so no, haven't had that problem yet.
BUT, all my Models have been TF, so that's probably the culprit right there! When I start doing paid shoots, I'm sure the problem will start!
On the rare occasion that a model brings a friend, the friend will usually take a few cell snaps though!
It's probably just movie star syndrome in your area...., not to many movie stars here, just waitresses!!!  LoL
John

Jan 05 18 02:29 am Link

Photographer

Worlds Of Water

Posts: 37732

Rancho Cucamonga, California, US

John Silva Photography wrote:
It's probably just movie star syndrome in your area...., not to many movie stars here, just waitresses!

Hate to be the bearer of bad news to ya... but this 'movie star syndrome' you speak of is rapidly taking over PLANET EARTH... not just 'my area'.  It's a teenage girl 'mindset and mentality' running rampant thru-out every high school and junior college AROUND THE WORLD... and THIS BAND has king-pinned the movement.... wink

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuwfZGDWOio

Jan 05 18 11:15 am Link

Photographer

3 Leaves Left Imaging

Posts: 139

Hoboken, New Jersey, US

I was at a workshop last year and one of the models spent 10 minutes of the participants   time setting up her phone so she could record the shoot, any change of location and the same thing would happen.

I had one model last year ask me to hold her phone and film her on set (my time) I let it go for a few minutes and then I cleared my throat to get her attention and to signal that we needed to shoot. I will be less accommodating next time.

Jan 05 18 04:58 pm Link