Forums >
General Industry >
Obsessive SELFIES!... a mental disorder?
I wouldn't argue with that finding in the least. House on fire?... cars crashing around ya?... code blue at the hospital?... work office gettin blasted in Hurricane?... bridge colapsing in Earthquake?... incoming gunfire?... Sorry... my selfies come first.. I know some majorly narcisistic IG primadonnas who can't even put the cell down during paid shoots... Anyone else dealin with this?... https://www.dpreview.com/news/767768753 … l-disorder Jan 01 18 08:20 pm Link Select Models wrote: Nope. But then again, the people I hang out with are old and just barely figured out how to make phone calls. Jan 01 18 08:44 pm Link Keith Moody wrote: Hmmmmm... OK... cool... so what's workin best for them? Smoke signals?... Carrier Pigeons... Night-time spotlight SOS's? Those were definitely big hits in the past few hundred years... Jan 01 18 09:53 pm Link Select Models wrote: I use US mail. Jan 02 18 12:24 am Link Hunter GWPB wrote: Cool... haven't heard of any self-mailing mental disorders associated with the USPS yet... I think you're safe... Jan 02 18 02:05 am Link I couple of years back they declared Makati City in the Philippines the selfie capital. I keep an old phone around for models to selfie to their hearts content. They usually post they are on a shoot and having the time of their life. That's cool with me. I don't like being in the pics but I guess I've gotten used to it. Free publicity. I even do a little time-lapse of makeup transformation when I have a makeup artist with my old phone and I give it to the model afterwards. I just give it a tittle and some credits. More free publicity. I'm not a selfie person but it's part of life in 2018. Jan 02 18 04:42 am Link You wouldn't believe the amount of 'models' that try to become MM members with NOTHING but selfies... and really terrible ones at that... in their portfolio. The MM rules state that not even one selfie is permitted. It's amazing how so many of them will resubmit the same pictures after the profile is denied. I guess they think that we'll be overcome by their intrinsic radiant beauty and make an exception and gladly allow them to enter the MM world. My feeling: "You're not a model unless someone else is taking the photo". Jan 02 18 05:18 am Link SayCheeZ! wrote: What's also amazing is how many of them get a pass. I won't mention the MUA & Hair Stylist profiles gaining access with a portfolio full of selfies. Select Models wrote: Something, many models on fb seem to need a new profile image often and it surprises Me how many will replace a high quality image from a recent set with a new selfie. Jan 02 18 05:40 am Link I haven’t yet run into models with a selfie obsession during shoots, but I’ve certainly seen it when traveling: tourists who have traveled to incredible destinations half way around the globe only to hardly appreciate where they are being so obsessed with videoing themselves, constantly knocking others with their selfie sticks. Jan 02 18 07:33 am Link It'd say 99.9% of the models/friends I shoot with are taking selfies during our shoot. I don't care, it promotes my business by showing snapchat how awesome/fun it is and how good they look. ha. Jan 02 18 08:49 am Link FIFTYONE PHOTOGRAPHY wrote: None of 'em get a pass. They can have a perfect portfolio with nothing but photos that appeared on the cover of Vogue, Glamour, Playboy, and Field & Stream but the whole profile will be rejected if there's one selfie in the mix. Jan 02 18 09:50 am Link Rage porn article Jan 02 18 10:48 am Link SayCheeZ! wrote: One of my favorite models started modeling when she turned 18. Before then, she made self-portraits, most of which were nude. Now, this was 15+ years ago, before smartphone photography was available, but with a tripod & a timer or a long cable release, she found a way. So, when she started modeling for others, she was better prepared than most. Jan 02 18 11:24 am Link Select Models wrote: One of the things that I'm really upset about is the amount of "#Vegas Strong" and "#Pray for Vegas" selfies that appeared after the October 1st tragedy where 58 people were killed and hundreds injured by a man shooting automatic rifles from a hotel room across the street from a country music festival. Jan 02 18 12:58 pm Link SayCheeZ! wrote: Word up... VEGAS... land of a Trillion selfies... nothin feeds the selfie obsession quite like this video... Jan 02 18 01:17 pm Link IMHO A serious self portrait and a Selfie are 2 different animals Jan 02 18 01:40 pm Link Brooklyn Bridge Images wrote: Thank you...as someone who does quite a bit of self portrait work and makes a decent amount selling it, I really dislike my photos being referred to as selfies. Especially when the camera is clear across the room anyway. Jan 02 18 02:12 pm Link Liv Sage wrote: I can understand your frustration at people lumping in your serious work in the same category as selfies Jan 02 18 04:09 pm Link Her work is so nice - thank you for the links! Jan 02 18 06:36 pm Link Liv Sage wrote: +1 Jan 02 18 07:16 pm Link I've had models on set be more pre-occupied with selfies and IG on shoots from time to time but after a while, they eventually mellow out. I did have one model who just wouldn't stop and right as I was about to say something to her the client walked over to her, bitched her out, told her that if she couldn't put her phone down then was welcome to leave and I was laughing behind the camera for 10 minutes. Jan 03 18 01:10 am Link Shot By Adam wrote: Thanks for the imput... I've seen scenario's simular to this played out by models during paid 'one on one' shoots at SM events. They refuse to put their phones down until 'that guy holding her paycheck' complains... Jan 03 18 03:11 am Link Select Models wrote: That is outrageous and I would never tolerate it as a photographer or as a model. I would want it in writing beforehand that nobody at the shoot would abuse their phones during said shoot. I just recently got my first ever cellphone (in June), and it is only for phone calls. I've never sent or received a text in my life, and I don't even want to start. I'm actually proud that I have no clue regarding that whole culture. I have one self-portrait in my portfolio that I took with my Nikon D90, and I wouldn't want anyone calling it a "selfie". That would be an insult. Jan 03 18 12:48 pm Link Eugenya wrote: This is 2018... and this is blowing me away. If you were to make such a statement within a group of photographers and models in Southern California, their jaws would HIT THE FLOOR!... Jan 03 18 02:08 pm Link Select Models wrote: That would make my year, to be honest. I would take myself out for dinner if that happened to me. Jan 03 18 02:12 pm Link Eugenya wrote: OMG... LOL... well tell this story at any 'Taco Tuesday' here in SoCal... and half a dozen photographers will buy dinner for ya... Jan 03 18 02:16 pm Link Eugenya wrote: I can't tell by looking which is your self portrait. I didn't check the credits because that would be irrelevant if I can't tell by looking. I would hope people would understand the difference between a self portrait and a selfie, however, I suspect that it is a distinction that will disappear for the masses. Jan 03 18 02:20 pm Link the "pray for vegas" things weren't really selfies though, not in the sense that someone took a new selfie in order to exhibit extreme vanity during some tragedy..theres websites that take your profile photo off places like Facebook and throw a filter overtop in order to show support for something, so whatever your profile photo is (probably a selfie, because your profile photo is an appropriate place for one of those) is going to be used. There was a pink filter for "stand with planned parenthood", there was the Je Suis Charlie one, there was a Pulse Nightclub one, theres rainbow filters for pride month... Jan 03 18 02:51 pm Link Hunter GWPB wrote: It's the first photo on the second row. For me, a "selfie" is a shot that is taken more casually and quickly with a cellphone camera, and is more of an "in the moment" sort of activity. A self-portrait is a shot that a lot more thought and effort goes into and reveals part of the inner self in an artistic way. Jan 03 18 03:18 pm Link In 2000 years archeologists will puzzle over a weird phenomenon. In the years after ~ 2012 A.D. a mysterious desease spread all over the planet. More and more people got extremely big noses as myriads of publications show. There never had been, scientists will say, an explanation whether this desease was caused by viruses or bacteria or other effects. But in any case this desease, scientists will say, must have been regarded as very important by the people of those times if the sheer amount of publication of photographs of this desease is considered... Jan 03 18 03:22 pm Link TomFRohwer wrote: That's quite a stretch. I'm quite sure that in 2000 years... computers will be solving all the puzzles and archeologists will be non-existant... Jan 03 18 03:32 pm Link Eugenya wrote: Select Models wrote: Well, I used to be on the cutting edge of technology. I was on the Internet around 1978, before it was called the "Internet". I was a beta tester for Quicken. I remember how folks said that Microsoft Excel would never replace Lotus 1-2-3. I also was a beta tester for "palmtop PC" back in the early 1990s, used for calendar, contacts, 1-2-3, notes, etc. Jan 03 18 04:43 pm Link As witnessed from some messages above... 'old school' still works for a few of the folks out there. Whatever floats your boat is perfectly OK by me. Many out there experience are experiencing 'techno overload' in this fast paced world... not necessarily a good thing... Jan 03 18 07:32 pm Link Laura UnBound wrote: Oh that happened on a few instances IM SURE. Some of the instagram's biggest attention whores have no shame... Jan 04 18 01:28 am Link SayCheeZ! wrote: Jan 04 18 03:23 am Link Select Models wrote: Especially computers will not be able to understand this very special desease... Jan 04 18 04:38 am Link TomFRohwer wrote: Not only will they be able to understand it... but they will also be able to spell DISEASE correctly... Jan 04 18 10:00 am Link Select Models wrote: I'm pretty new still and have only worked with about a hundred models, so no, haven't had that problem yet. Jan 05 18 02:29 am Link John Silva Photography wrote: Hate to be the bearer of bad news to ya... but this 'movie star syndrome' you speak of is rapidly taking over PLANET EARTH... not just 'my area'. It's a teenage girl 'mindset and mentality' running rampant thru-out every high school and junior college AROUND THE WORLD... and THIS BAND has king-pinned the movement.... Jan 05 18 11:15 am Link I was at a workshop last year and one of the models spent 10 minutes of the participants time setting up her phone so she could record the shoot, any change of location and the same thing would happen. I had one model last year ask me to hold her phone and film her on set (my time) I let it go for a few minutes and then I cleared my throat to get her attention and to signal that we needed to shoot. I will be less accommodating next time. Jan 05 18 04:58 pm Link |