Forums > Photography Talk > How to remedy a failed shoot?

Photographer

E Jay Photography

Posts: 19

Raleigh, North Carolina, US

Hello all!

I am very new to portrait photography.  I have been shooting people for a little over 2 months now.  I have done nature and other types of photography for about a year. I have been trying to build my portfolio on here and I feel that I am improving with each shoot as I go along.  However, I did recently have a shoot that didn't go as well as I had hoped.

It was shot in a forest, as the model did want a nature type of setting.  I did try to pose her with the best light, but looking at the raw images, most of the pictures had way too many shadows from the trees, despite how much I tried to turn her to get the best lighting.  I have seen some patches of trees that resemble forests, and now I wish that I had shot there instead of an actual forest to avoid the tree shadows on her face.

The model was great and I feel that this was my fault.  I could try to fix it with Photoshop, but part of me just wants to redo it entirely in a different location so that I can give her some pictures that she is proud of.  How do you go about contacting a model about this?  It was a tf shoot. Should I just try to fix any issues in post processing?  I feel like she deserves better for her portfolio, though.  Have you had to redo a tf shoot and how do you contact a model about this?  Thank you for any advice.

Mar 05 18 11:46 pm Link

Photographer

martin b

Posts: 2770

Manila, National Capital Region, Philippines

Part of the job of photographer is to suck it up and ask to redo the shoot.  I usually won't show the pictures that didn't come out because she won't be able to unsee the images once she sees it.  Good luck.

Mar 06 18 12:58 am Link

Photographer

Jerry Nemeth

Posts: 33355

Dearborn, Michigan, US

I use a flash to light the shadows.

Mar 06 18 03:14 am Link

Photographer

PhillipM

Posts: 8049

Nashville, Tennessee, US

Nothing you can do about the past shoot except to learn from it.

Before pulling the trigger on the camera, hold the camera down to your side, and LOOK and think about what your seeing. 

Is the model placed like you want posture wise? 
Is the models clothing and hair like you want?
It the model placed correctly relative to background info that's in the shot?
Is the lighting like you want?  If there are shadows that your seeing , not what you want, how will you correct that?
Is there any distracting background info in the shot?
Are you shooting at the focal distance you want, to achieve your desired effect?

If all of the above is YES, then take an image or two, then move on. 

If not, correct any of those items that aren't, and re-evaluate.
Slow down.  Think.  Look.  Think some more.  Make adjustments.  Look.  Think. Shoot.

Garbage in / Garbage out. Don't use your Photoshop to salvage poor photography.  Shoot it right in camera, and your golden.

Man up, tell the model you screwed the pooch, and would like a do over.

Simple stuff

Mar 06 18 05:00 am Link

Photographer

TMA Photo and Training

Posts: 1009

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, US

Hi Erin, 

You have a very nice diverse port.  I can see that  "natural light photography"  is being its  "ole self"  in some of your images already.  Its a pain we all go through!

Learning to see not only just the subject in the viewfinder... but also to " SEE the L I G H T " Separately on the subject will take you a long way to better managing.  Turning your subject into the diffused light, shooting at the edge of the shadowy area instead of inside of it, learning to fudge the light meter so the number it gives you is not just for the highlights alone...but for the middle tones in your image as well... are all things that can help.  Your problem here is what initially helped me become more of a master student of  "off camera remote flash" techniques... which is now almost my "Preferred Style" of making visual art. 

The Pain of Growing:  The pain of all this is to teach and motivate you how to never have this happen to you again!   This pain is part of a photographers journey toward competency, mastery, craftsmanship and artistry.  Its a long journey... with a lot of art and science to pick up along the way.  Each shoot teaches you something you wish you knew better.  Every shoot is a magical blend of success and failure chosen to motivate you on-ward in your craft and artistry.  How to avoid face shadows...and how to manage model relationships... yes... that's two things to be better at.  Go learn what this lesson means...  and how to fix this early lesson... you are well on your way to becoming a master craftsman and artist by getting help here in the forums. 

Photographer = Lifetime Learner.  Don't Fret.  There are "Other Models" in your future that you will do much better with... if you don't despair...  and Grow and Develop with this one-time, early, awkward incident.  Its all OK.  We are all new and developing at something!!  The model will forgive you... be humble and admit your learner status.  We all make these mistakes a few times.

Mar 06 18 05:06 am Link

Photographer

Worlds Of Water

Posts: 37732

Rancho Cucamonga, California, US

Yeah forest shoots can be tricky.  I recommend using reflectors and bumping up your ISO to avoid that amateur looking 'snapshottie' on camera flash appearance.  Here's a complete folder of 'mountain forest' images... wink

https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/2 … l#/A338941

Mar 06 18 06:00 am Link

Photographer

Jerry Nemeth

Posts: 33355

Dearborn, Michigan, US

Select Models wrote:
Yeah forest shoots can be tricky.  I recommend using reflectors and bumping up your ISO to avoid that amateur looking 'snapshottie' on camera flash appearance.  Here's a complete folder of 'mountain forest' images... wink

https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/2 … l#/A338941

My flash communicates with the camera and balances the natural light with the flash.

Mar 06 18 08:38 am Link

Photographer

Znude!

Posts: 3317

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, US

It's not really a failed shoot. It's an opportunity to learn from what happened. Shoot it over and make use of the new knowledge.

Mar 06 18 09:05 am Link

Photographer

FIFTYONE PHOTOGRAPHY

Posts: 6597

Uniontown, Pennsylvania, US

Cheating Light wrote:
It's not really a failed shoot. It's an opportunity to learn from what happened. Shoot it over and make use of the new knowledge.

This sums it up.

Ask the Model to re-shoot the set.

Mar 06 18 09:52 am Link

Photographer

Wandering Eyebubble

Posts: 323

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

E Jay Photography wrote:
I did try to pose her with the best light, but looking at the raw images, most of the pictures had way too many shadows from the trees, despite how much I tried to turn her to get the best lighting.

Not being privy to the photos makes it difficult to say whether anything is salvageable or not (notwithstanding the fact that "salvageable" is subjective). That being said, sometimes you can embrace the shadows and shift the entire tone of at least some of the images you already have. It may even lead you to deliberately explore such style in the future (particularly since natural light is so mercurial and on the day of the shoot you have to work with what you have).
https://www.reimeika.ca/page/portfolio? … pg&all
https://www.reimeika.ca/page/portfolio? … pg&all

Mar 06 18 10:58 am Link

Photographer

E Jay Photography

Posts: 19

Raleigh, North Carolina, US

Thank you to everyone that replied!  Yes, I will ask if she would like to do a re-shoot.  This was a learning experience and I felt bad that they didn't turn out as well as I had hoped.  I will take all of the advice given here with me to the next shoot.

Mar 06 18 11:18 am Link

Photographer

Worlds Of Water

Posts: 37732

Rancho Cucamonga, California, US

Jerry Nemeth wrote:

My flash communicates with the camera and balances the natural light with the flash.

I made no direct reference to your post.  The 'appearance' that on camera flash provides makes no difference on whether or not the flash is commuicating with the camera.  A correct balance between strobe and natural light can be accomplished without said communication.

Mar 06 18 11:23 am Link

Photographer

Jerry Nemeth

Posts: 33355

Dearborn, Michigan, US

Select Models wrote:

I made no direct reference to your post.  The 'appearance' that on camera flash provides makes no difference on whether or not the flash is commuicating with the camera.  A correct balance between strobe and natural light can be accomplished without said communication.

You are right but it is easier if the camera and flash communicate.

Mar 06 18 01:18 pm Link

Photographer

PhillipM

Posts: 8049

Nashville, Tennessee, US

Jerry Nemeth wrote:
You are right but it is easier if the camera and flash communicate.

Maybe for a newb.  Yes, but there is nothing better than off camera flash. 

Don't want to get into a whole Potaaato -vs- Potato thing...

IMHO

Mar 06 18 01:58 pm Link

Photographer

Jerry Nemeth

Posts: 33355

Dearborn, Michigan, US

PhillipM wrote:

Maybe for a newb.  Yes, but there is nothing better than off camera flash. 

Don't want to get into a whole Potaaato -vs- Potato thing...

IMHO

I've shot outdoors for years and it works well.

Mar 06 18 02:22 pm Link

Photographer

E Thompson Photography

Posts: 719

Hyattsville, Maryland, US

Jerry Nemeth wrote:

I've shot outdoors for years and it works well.

In your opinion, for others, with a different aesthetic, maybe not so much.

Mar 06 18 03:40 pm Link

Photographer

Fleming Design

Posts: 1380

East Hartford, Connecticut, US

Jerry Nemeth wrote:
I've shot outdoors for years and it works well.

It seems to help that you aren't easily embarrassed.

Mar 06 18 04:12 pm Link

Photographer

Worlds Of Water

Posts: 37732

Rancho Cucamonga, California, US

E Thompson Photography wrote:

In your opinion, for others, with a different aesthetic, maybe not so much.

BINGO!... wink

Mar 06 18 04:37 pm Link

Photographer

Mark Salo

Posts: 11724

Olney, Maryland, US

E Jay Photography wrote:
I did try to pose her with the best light, but looking at the raw images, most of the pictures had way too many shadows from the trees, despite how much I tried to turn her to get the best lighting.

Try posing the model at the edge of the forest so that the ambient light from behind you acts as a large softbox.

"Lighting & Design for Portrait Photography" by Neil van Niekerk has some interesting examples for outdoor photography.

Mar 06 18 05:39 pm Link

Photographer

Jerry Nemeth

Posts: 33355

Dearborn, Michigan, US

E Thompson Photography wrote:

In your opinion, for others, with a different aesthetic, maybe not so much.

I detect condescension.

Mar 06 18 07:06 pm Link

Photographer

TerrysPhotocountry

Posts: 4649

Rochester, New York, US

#1 Sounds like you failed to  use a light meter and a flash of some kind.? Next time that you go into the woods.Take them both with you. Match the day light and set the flash to the same f/stop. Take one with the flash and another with out the flash. PRACTICE Good luck

Mar 06 18 08:49 pm Link

Photographer

Motordrive Photography

Posts: 7087

Lodi, California, US

PhillipM wrote:
Nothing you can do about the past shoot except to learn from it.

two kinds of photographers, those that have had a shoot go sour, and
the ones that lie about never scrubbing a shoot.

Mar 06 18 09:33 pm Link

Photographer

E Thompson Photography

Posts: 719

Hyattsville, Maryland, US

Jerry Nemeth wrote:

I detect condescension.

Just a different aesthetic.

Mar 06 18 10:54 pm Link

Photographer

Tony Lawrence

Posts: 21526

Chicago, Illinois, US

Going to disagree with a member about NOT showing the images.   That's not fair.   Show them and explain that you'd like a do-over and why.   Going forward a few tips.   If your camera does not support Wi-Fi and you don't use Eye-Fi or wireless SD in your camera bring a laptop.   A cheap Windows laptop can be found on Ebay for $60.00.   Its great if you can tether to your camera but even if you can't its good to see a large view of your images.   Something like this is cool:   https://www.ebay.com/itm/Dell-Latitude- … Sw0ZJajzxc    but you can buy one even cheaper.   Place the SD in the reader and you can not only transfer the image to the hard drive but you can review the image.   


This may help avoid problems.   Plus if you somehow damage the card, etc. the images are on the drive.   Being able to review images as you shoot helps you and the model.   Some locations just don't work and its hard to always know without seeing the images on a computer screen.   I really like one of your models and I encourage you to shoot her as much as possible.   She's your avatar.   I would look for some cool African themed outfits.  If you have any questions about how to tether or buying a cheap laptop hit me up and good shots.

Mar 06 18 11:35 pm Link

Photographer

Vector One Photography

Posts: 3722

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, US

Just be honest.  Tell her you didn't get the results you were proud of and would like to re-do the shoot.  If she's understanding and has the time she'll give you another chance. If she isn't or doesn't have the time then take it as a learning experience and don't repeat the same mistakes.  Fixing it in Photoshop would probably take a Photoshop expert and many hours. I think re-doing it is a better learning experience than learning you can fix problems in Photoshop.

Afterthought..... if she won't re-shoot THEN try the Photoshop repair.

Mar 07 18 07:50 am Link

Photographer

E Jay Photography

Posts: 19

Raleigh, North Carolina, US

Wow!  I didn't expect to get so many responses!  I did find a few that were pretty good, and a couple that I thought were salvageable.  I did 5 edits, but I usually give between 10-20 edited images.

I thanked the model and showed her the ones that I thought were good and very politely asked to do a reshoot, if she was willing.  She was very nice about it and said that she did like the pictures that I sent her, but would do another shoot if I wanted to.  I think the biggest thing that I was worried about is that the model would feel like she didn't do a good job, when it was in fact my fault.  I'm glad that she didn't seem to take it that way.

Thanks for all the tips and encouragement for future shoots!

martin b wrote:
Part of the job of photographer is to suck it up and ask to redo the shoot.  I usually won't show the pictures that didn't come out because she won't be able to unsee the images once she sees it.  Good luck.

Thanks for the tip on not showing bad images.  I made the mistake of showing a model all of the unedited images except for test shots on the first shoot I did so she could pick the ones that she wanted me to edit.  It was unintentional, but I think it made her be a little more critical of herself.  Now I only share photos that are flattering to the model.

Jerry Nemeth wrote:
I use a flash to light the shadows.

Select Models wrote:
Yeah forest shoots can be tricky.  I recommend using reflectors and bumping up your ISO

Thanks for these tips!

Mar 07 18 08:13 am Link

Photographer

E Jay Photography

Posts: 19

Raleigh, North Carolina, US

PhillipM wrote:
Nothing you can do about the past shoot except to learn from it.

Thank you for the advice.  I know sometimes I try to think of everything, then I view the image and realize that the dress was laying funny or I cutoff a finger in the shot.  I know that when film was used photographers didn't have the luxury of seeing the image until after it was developed, so they had to get it right the first time.  I will definitely remember to ask myself these questions on the next shoot.

TMA Photo and Training wrote:
Photographer = Lifetime Learner.  Don't Fret.  There are "Other Models" in your future that you will do much better with... if you don't despair...  and Grow and Develop with this one-time, early, awkward incident.  Its all OK.  We are all new and developing at something!!  The model will forgive you... be humble and admit your learner status.  We all make these mistakes a few times.

Thank you for your encouraging words. I will take it as a learning experience and thank you for the tips on lighting smile!

Cheating Light wrote:
It's not really a failed shoot. It's an opportunity to learn from what happened. Shoot it over and make use of the new knowledge.

Yes, I agree.  I probably should have used a different word, but each shoot is a learning experience.

Wandering Eyebubble wrote:
Not being privy to the photos makes it difficult to say whether anything is salvageable or not (notwithstanding the fact that "salvageable" is subjective). That being said, sometimes you can embrace the shadows and shift the entire tone of at least some of the images you already have. It may even lead you to deliberately explore such style in the future (particularly since natural light is so mercurial and on the day of the shoot you have to work with what you have).

Thank you for the tips.  I actually did end up playing with the shadows a little for one of the images after seeing this and it did work with one of them, so thank you!

Mar 07 18 08:22 am Link

Photographer

E Jay Photography

Posts: 19

Raleigh, North Carolina, US

Mark Salo wrote:
Try posing the model at the edge of the forest so that the ambient light from behind you acts as a large softbox.

"Lighting & Design for Portrait Photography" by Neil van Niekerk has some interesting examples for outdoor photography.

This is an excellent tip, thank you!  I will definitely check that book out.  I am always wanting to learn new things. 

TerrysPhotocountry wrote:
#1 Sounds like you failed to  use a light meter and a flash of some kind.? Next time that you go into the woods.Take them both with you. Match the day light and set the flash to the same f/stop. Take one with the flash and another with out the flash. PRACTICE Good luck

You know I didn't really think to use a flash for an outdoor shoot.  I might give it a try and see how I like the results.  Right now I work mostly with natural light until I can afford more equipment.  I'm currently a student in math and statistics, so I do this as a hobby so I have some relief from sitting at a desk and computer all day.  I do have a flash that I have not utilized much.  Maybe I can find some creative ways to use it when natural light is not ideal. Thank you!

Tony Lawrence wrote:
Going forward a few tips.   If your camera does not support Wi-Fi and you don't use Eye-Fi or wireless SD in your camera bring a laptop.

This is actually a great tip!  Sometimes I see an image on the viewfinder and it looks perfect, but when I pull it up on my laptop, I see issues with it that take some creative editing to fix. If I pull it up on the laptop at the shoot, at least I can go through and decide if I need to take more and what I need to focus on to get the images that I was going for. Thank you.

The model that you were talking about is fantastic.  She is a genuinely sweet person and incredibly intelligent.  I do hope to do more shoots with her in the future.

Vector One Photography wrote:
Afterthought..... if she won't re-shoot THEN try the Photoshop repair.

Thank you for the advice smile! I did discuss a reshoot with her and she didn't seem to have any problems with it, so thank you again.

Mar 07 18 08:36 am Link

Photographer

NewBoldPhoto

Posts: 5216

PORT MURRAY, New Jersey, US

E Jay Photography wrote:
You know I didn't really think to use a flash for an outdoor shoot.  I might give it a try and see how I like the results.  Right now I work mostly with natural light until I can afford more equipment.  I'm currently a student in math and statistics, so I do this as a hobby so I have some relief from sitting at a desk and computer all day.  I do have a flash that I have not utilized much.  Maybe I can find some creative ways to use it when natural light is not ideal. Thank you!

http://strobist.blogspot.com

Mar 07 18 09:51 am Link

Photographer

rmcapturing

Posts: 4859

San Francisco, California, US

I'm late, but if you can't fight the shadows, embrace them. Making them more prominent could make them be more of a creative tool than a mistake.

Mar 08 18 12:12 am Link