Forums >
Photography Talk >
Back Button Focus
A couple of weeks ago, one of my daughters got married. The photographers they hired (husband and wife team) have been shooting weddings for 13 years. More importantly (to me), they shoot Nikon. They each carried two D750s with different lenses. I spoke to them at the wedding and warned them I was an "Uncle Bob" and would have my gear at the reception for some candid shots. I let them know I would try not to get in their way and would not be using any flash. At the reception, I had my D750 and D500, keeping one on the table, ready to shoot at a moment's notice. Throughout the night I spoke with them. One was shooting Sigma's 35mm f/1.4 Art, a lens I want to add to my arsenal. At the time, I had the Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art on the D500 and neither was familiar with the D500 and had been thinking about getting the 50mm Art. I gave the camera to the wife and told her to go play with it and see what she thought. After a little while, she mentioned she couldn't get any shots in focus. I explained I use back button focus and the shutter is set to release only. Neither she or her husband knew what I was talking about. After a quick tutorial, she went back out and got a few more shots before an important part of the reception was about to happen, so she had to get back to "work", so went back to using her gear. I was surprised they didn't use back button focus, or even heard of it. When I first learned the back button focus technique, it took a couple of days for muscle memory to take over and I've never looked back. What are your thoughts/experiences using back button focus? Jun 13 18 02:24 am Link I have used back button focus many times and it really does a great job! I too have a Nikon. Jun 13 18 04:20 am Link Personally, I find the back button focus is just a function they added because they could. I don't see the problem of half way pushing the shutter release button to lock focus. You talk about muscle memory, then teach your muscles not to push the button all the way down. I side with the wedding photographer on this one... and they don't need to know all the functions of all cameras especially the ones they have no intention of using. Jun 13 18 07:59 am Link portraiturebyBrent wrote: wedding, sports, action, wildlife photography are different from portrait photography. when you deal with constantly moving subjects, rear button focus is not necessarily an advantage. while a few sports photographers have used it, most action photographers do well with the normal focus operation by the shutter button. Jun 13 18 08:49 am Link Leonard Gee Photography wrote: I completly agree with this. I switch back and forth between these modes depending on the action. Jun 13 18 10:46 am Link Back button focus ? Why bother to use another finger to so the same thing when one (shutter release button) can do both? Events and action photography require that extra finger to perform additional task, such as changing aperture and shutter speed on fly. Oh, the focus point selection too. Jun 13 18 10:57 am Link I don't understand. What can be done with back button focus that can not be done with the normal shutter release button? Jun 13 18 11:34 am Link roger alan wrote: you pick where you want to focus and once focused, it doesn't change when you release the shutter. the camera won't decide to shift the focus point until you decide and press the rear af button again. for model work where the model is relatively stationary if prefer it. it is fast and easy - especially since being picky about where i am focused. it removes the focus function form the shutter button to the back af button. Jun 13 18 12:07 pm Link OK that makes sense. Thank you Mr Gee. Now I understand how it works Jun 13 18 12:17 pm Link BBF is my go to mode for all of my work, once you get the hang of it it really is superior for most paid gigs. It is also the natural place for my thumb to rest so it doesn't require anything special to make it work. Maybe sport shooters find it another step and awkward but nature shooters use BBF all the time for wildlife. Jun 13 18 12:32 pm Link To me the most important feature of BBF is not toggling between single focus and continuous focus. I shoot Nikon as well and use the 3D continuous focus mode with back button focus, I can therefore focus and release (focus), recompose and take my shot in essentially a single focus mode, or hold it and let the camera track a fast moving subject across the frame (continuous). I prefer some recomposing to having my thumb free for using the d-pad to move my focus point (I only use the 11-point mode w/wrapping so I can move the point across the frame with only a few clicks), or dealing with pesky focus mode adjustments if I go from a still life/portrait scenario to a moving subject. Bottom line, I think it gives me more control over focus. Between this and manual exposure with spot metering, the camera doesn't really make any decisions without me. Jun 13 18 12:57 pm Link BBF is overrated. I find it useless. I think someone wrote a blog about it and now all the newbies think that it is the only way to go Jun 13 18 02:07 pm Link Voy wrote: Newbie's? Ha! Jun 13 18 04:19 pm Link Depends on the subject matter. For relatively still subjects, like a speaker at a podium in a dark room, I love it. Once I acquire focus I can recompose and the focus won't start searching again. For shooting basketball, runners, things in motion. I use the shutter button focus. Jun 13 18 05:26 pm Link I tried it for a full day once shooting a volleyball tournament. Yeah, didn't like it. Missed many action plays because you have to do 2 steps (thumb + finger) to acquire and fire. But, I do a hybrid version of it from time to time. If the subject isn't moving a lot, I'll acquire focus normally then switch to manual focus with my thumb. From there, recompose as necessary and fire several frames without re-focusing. In the end, using the focus points + recompose is much more efficient for me. Jun 13 18 05:51 pm Link BBF is not well suited for moving subjects. However, it's great when shooting a static subject where a very precise focus point is critical and you will be recomposing before pushing the trigger. Holding the trigger half way down and recomposing is ok but if I'm shooting multiple shots I don't always have to refocus if I've locked on with BBF. If shooting with a fast prime wide open where the focus point falls within a very narrow area I find it to be necessary. If you just shoot at apertures where most of the frame is in focus even if your camera moves the focus point a bit then it's no big deal to use the shutter release for focus. I personally like to decide exactly what area will be in sharpest focus. I've tried the Nikon auto focus with face recognition and such but it's just not as accurate. Maybe some other cameras are although the tests I've seen don't seem to bear that out. They are getting closer though. But really it's personal preference. Shoot with whatever focus method works best for you. Jun 13 18 06:24 pm Link I am primarily a college sports photographer, ten years. I couldn't function as a sports photographer without back button focusing. I want my camera to focus when I tell it to, not every time I touch the shutter button. Now I use back button focusing for everything. Sports, portrait, event... I don't want to shoot the other way anymore. Jun 13 18 07:40 pm Link Being that you wrote all of this... portraiturebyBrent wrote: Just to ask this simple question: What are your thoughts/experiences using back button focus? I'm going to be the bad guy here and ask you, WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU???? Who brings two camera bodies to their daughter's wedding when they already had two photographers shooting the event? I hear stories like this and I scratch my head in disbelief that anyone would have the gal to do this but to hear someone actually take glee in knowing they did it defies all logic. If I had a family member show up to my wedding with two camera bodies when I already hired a two-person photography team, I would ask them nicely to put them away immediately and if they didn't, those camera bodies would have wound up in the trash by the end of the night. Unreal. Jun 14 18 08:30 am Link Back button focus is great because it gives you all the advantages of both single focus and continuous focus. You set your camera to continuous focus all the time and set the focus to be triggered ONLY by the back button and disable focusing on the shutter release. If you have a stationary subject, the focus will lock on using the back button and you can take the shot the way you normally would. if you have a moving subject you can use the back button to track the focus on the moving subject. it really is the best of both worlds. Try it. If you don't like it, go back to the usual way of focusing, but recognize that an awful lot of professional photographers have been using the back button focusing technique for a long time and for good reason. If you ask a convention of Nat Geo wildlife photographers which focus method they use, I bet it would be 100% back button focus. (I've asked a bunch of them, and that has always been the answer because it works great for both stationary and moving subjects and allows them to get shots they otherwise would have missed.) If you only shoot stationary subjects, you may not find it of much value. Jun 14 18 11:51 am Link Shot By Adam wrote: I appreciate the subtlety in how you phrased your question. Jun 14 18 01:09 pm Link I use BBF for everything, from still life to weddings. I do understand some people being put off by it. It takes a little while to get used to it, but once you are comfortable using it, you never want to go back to focusing with the shutter button. Someone mentioned about using 3D tracking on Nikon bodies, that's exactly how I use it. 11 active focus points to move quickly across the screen, focus wrapping, single focus point with 3D tracking. The D750 also remembers your last focus point when you switch from vertical to horizontal and viceversa, that is very handy on fast paced events and motor sports. That might not work for everyone but personally, I would not choose to got back to FBF. Jun 17 18 07:21 pm Link A few years ago I was at a sports photography workshop and there was a long discussion on the subject and the NPS tech rep pointed out that is popularity started with Canon shooters and with Nikon systems was not recommended. Then he polled the instructors ( all Nikon shooters) of the ten they were pretty evenly divided over BBF and using the AF as designed. Of those using BBF ALL of them started using Canon and switched to Nikon well on into highly successful careers. The others all started with Nikon. Personally I only use BBF with Studio portraits and use Group AF and 3D for sports depending on the body. Back with the D50 I used to prefocus on spots on the track (motorsports), now with the D500 and 4S it is almost all Group AF for sports and most things. In reading questions on forums I find that most beginners have lots of problems with BBF but believe the hype that it is Better and they often find the AF works best as designed. Nikon puts lots of variables that are adjustable to tailor it to what you are shooting and your style but that does present a learning curve. Personally whatever works for you is great. Jun 17 18 08:22 pm Link I shoot Canon. I tried BBF and found it fairly useless for me. When I went FF with the 5DM3, I started to use BBI - Back Button ISO; I now use it on the 5DM4. With evening/night sports (soccer and marching band), I shoot manual and stick with my shutter and aperture settings. ISO is how I adjust for the fading light. When using BBI, the SET button and Main Dial allow me to change ISO on the fly. When the camera is gripped, it's easy to use BBI in either orientation. The alternatives to BBI is to either go through many steps to change ISO, or use Auto ISO. The former means I'll lose shots in the fading light. The latter means I'll probably lose even more shots as the metering on a football field at night is likely to be off. At least for me, the half and full press shutter button is the best for me. Camera AF settings allow for the conditions in which I'm shooting. I get the shots I want. (For completeness, I don't use continuous shooting.) Jun 17 18 09:51 pm Link Leonard Gee Photography wrote: 100% Jun 17 18 10:04 pm Link Back button for me always. Ability to focus, then recompose and shoot multi shots with the camera thinking the dog on the bridge above us is the new target... Jun 22 18 01:56 am Link I think that using BBF is useless if you are shooting with Nikon. Why? Because Nikon has AF-C 3D Tracking. Does Canon have something similar? Correct me if I am wrong. Jun 22 18 10:28 am Link If it works for you and you like it great, if it doesn't and you don't also great. What I hate is the assumption that you must do it or you aren't a pro. Jun 23 18 03:26 pm Link What about depth of field? Just asking questions and trying to understand... Those of you who use back button focus, are you typically shooting with smaller aperture, or at greater distances? What about with large aperture and/or short distance from lens to a non-stationary (human) subject, wouldn't normal AF (on each exposure) be preferable to BBF those situations? Jun 23 18 06:15 pm Link roger alan wrote: Back button focusing has nothing to do with depth of field or aperture, it is simply a manner of controlling when your camera starts to focus. I am a sports photographer. During a game, I am always tracking action, tracking players. I don't want my camera constantly trying to focus in this chaos. Back button focusing allows me to keep a finger on the shutter but not start the focus process until I decide when to start. Jun 23 18 06:56 pm Link @Keith Moody In the situation you describe, you are not focusing until you are ready to shoot? You are just using BBF instead of the shutter release button, and capturing a single exposure then re-focusing for the next? But in some of the posts above there were references to focusing with the back button, then capturing multiple exposures without re-focusing. Those multiple exposures with out refocusing are what I am wondering about. If the depth of field is very thin, and the subject moves a little.. EDIT: seeing that you have added to your post...that player on the other side of the net will be moving nearer or further from your lens...so your depth of field is great enough (your distance + small-ish aperture) to allow for that movement and still have decent focus. But it seems to me that not every shooting situation will have a depth of field great enough to allow for movement of a subject and retain focus. I am not trying to argue against BBF in situations where either method would work. Jun 23 18 07:07 pm Link roger alan wrote: When I am shooting sports I am always in CONTINUOUS FOCUS MODE. As long as I am holding the back button to focus, the camera will continue to track focus through multiple exposures just as it does in shutter activated focusing. Sometimes I am zone focusing, as in shooting action just beyond the net. I am focused for a single distance. However, most of time time I am tracking moving subjects. The camera will readjust focus as long as I track the subject. Jun 23 18 07:21 pm Link |