Forums >
Model Colloquy >
Posing on your knees???
I had a first the other day. In texting ideas about an upcoming shoot with a model, she said the location had a short background. She suggested a small stool to use, I said that could work or "on your knees" so as not to be taller than the background. In my mind a short stool is not very flattering to the model, the knees can be more flattering and would work with the theme we were going to shoot. Apparently this was a major issue. She cancelled the shoot 2 hrs. later not being able to wrap her head around my suggestion. I said "Uh ok, I only meant so as not to be taller than the bg, it's a common pose, take care". Respecting her decision I made no further contact. So my question is, Is being asked to pose on your knees that much of a problem? I've worked with many models over the last 30yrs and never had this issue. Did I do something wrong? Sep 01 23 10:47 pm Link You probably triggered her, maybe it was something her dad used to say to her idk. You asserted your patriarchal privilege and she wasn't going to be subjugated by a male lol Sep 01 23 11:36 pm Link neoracer wrote: This! "On your knees" can be taken in various ways not related to photography. Communication breakdown! Sep 04 23 03:42 pm Link she suggested a solution which she was comfortable with - why not change focal lengths, shoot 3/4 length images to make sure she's comfortable with the concept/theme? Sep 04 23 06:23 pm Link GSmithPhoto wrote: You are on to something! Two invisable tools I carry with me are (1) a sense of humor (2) being able to improvise. Having shot wedding for years, I have had to use both quite often. How is the OP so sure that a stool wont work? I've shot with chairs, and stools many times in the portrait studio with much success. Event photographers have to be able to think fast on their feet. Sep 04 23 07:32 pm Link UPoz4me wrote: You’ve probably answered your own question, but no, not necessarily. You didn’t accept the model’s suggestion of a short stool. The model didn’t accept your solution of kneeling. No harm, no foul. Carry on. Sep 05 23 04:22 am Link I'd love to see the actual screenshots of the conversation. The one who can't figure out what went wrong is the wrong person to summarize the issue. Sep 05 23 06:08 am Link What sort of a short background? Why does she want that background? I wouldn't make any suggestions until I saw the location. You certainly avoided a difficult individual. Sep 05 23 07:07 am Link UPoz4me wrote: From this statement, I come to the conclusion that the model is familiar with the location and knows about the drawbacks of the particular site. The background information about pattern, color, texture, etc. are rather irrelevant. There isn't a backstory of who started the text conversation or the precise site or location being discussed. UPoz4me wrote: The reason for the post has arrived, and is served with a side of brevity. In the first part of the statement, (the model) suggests a solution to the perceived issue, countered immediately by a dismissal of her solution, and a solution that only takes the interest of the photographer as important. UPoz4me wrote: Justification for why he texted what he did (in previous quote). Being that nowhere in the post did he mention a Catholic Church, a mosque or a synagogue, conclusions can be inferred re:theme. UPoz4me wrote: The call for photographers to light up their keyboards in fury that the model (who was professional and honest enough to cancel) had an issue with being in an enclosed space on her knees with some man who is shooting an erotic theme...followed on by the "respect" statement as if to distance himself and hold himself blameless for making her uncomfortable. UPoz4me wrote: Closing statement - trying to appear reasonable while making the model appear otherwise. Harkening back to historical times when any GWC willing to pay (or offer prints/publicity/publication/etc.) could often get a girl naked in compromising positions. Mark Salo wrote: Just curious why it matters? Is a short stool appropriate for cloth backgrounds, but not for wood? Mark Salo wrote: 404: Information not found. Nowhere does it state that she requests (whatever "Background") due to her familiarity with the location. Mark Salo wrote: IMHO, if given the opportunity and desire to work with this model, in this location, shooting the content, I'm sure I could come up with several creative alternatives which respect her as an individual, honor her goal of being comfortable, and provide me with the images/content I am looking for out of this shoot. Sep 06 23 12:31 am Link Model MoRina wrote: I would love to see the screenshots of the conversation too. Thank you for posting! So far you are the only model to comment. It's important to hear both sides of this story. Without know the words written between the two, we will never know. Sep 06 23 02:15 pm Link I shot in a home studio for many years and often resorted to some kneeling poses to deal with the shorter backdrop. I never had any complaints. In fact I found most models to be quite understanding and adaptable. I have however read posts and bios in which some models state they will only shoot in a professional setting. I simply pass on those. Given this has only happened to you once in decades, I’d just write it off to random and rare incompatibility and not spend time and energy on it. Focus on the models that are compatible, not the ones who aren’t: that’s my philosophy anyways. Sep 06 23 04:10 pm Link No, you did nothing wrong. Models are posed on knees all the time in glamour work. Indeed, a very common pose, in glamour is to flatten the feet while on the knees, and sit back on the feet. You will also find that in swimwear a lot. I for one, have avoided social media all this time, but I have decided to go on one of the photo media sites, and place my work there, as well as here. While I can show more variety of my work here, because there is a system for handling simple nudity, which you can't do on social media, I really think the broader exposure will make people more aware of my work, there. Rick Sep 06 23 04:14 pm Link MM never fails with all the interesting responses, and I thank you all for your insight. To try to answer a few questions and comments, It was the models location choice, the background was going to be dressed up for the set. It's really irrelevant as to what we we're shooting against, just it was too short for standing shots. We had to do this outdoors, no choice in the matter. It was to be her backyard, visible to neighbors and roommates so no nudity or anything erotic, sorry. Styling and set design was all to be done by her. The actual concept is nothing really original, I've had other models suggest it, and it's been done before by many so no big deal. Just something she wanted to try. She's a new plus size model, wanted to work on her portfolio, so we we're going to work together on this project. That's all nothing shocking there, just run of the mill stuff. I to have used stools, chairs, benches, beds, tables, boxes, dressers, cars, and anything else you can think of to put a model on to stand, sit, lay, kneel, so I wasn't in anyway dismissing her ideas. Every location has it's unique traits. When talking about a shoot I usually make suggestions they make suggestions, we can agree or disagree and we move on. I would post the screen shot of the conversation but posting photos never works for me, I don't know why. As far as talking on the phone, it's nearly impossible now a days. That's a whole other can of worms. But they do get my number so it's always an option. And yes I to am hard to get a hold of at times, so it can turn into phone tag. I know sometimes written communications can sometimes be misinterpreted, so I try to take what's written with an open mind, and ask for clarification if necessary. Social media will be the downfall of civilization... Again thanks for your input. I'm sure I missed a few points but that's the gist of the matter. No world ending events, except maybe the social media thing. Sep 06 23 09:47 pm Link |