Forums > Photography Talk > Astro Berlin 2000mm f10 lens

Photographer

JSouthworth

Posts: 1765

Kingston upon Hull, England, United Kingdom

There has been some controversy on the internet as to whether this lens actually exists, here's the proof that it does;

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/256188891228 … R_KFuMulYw


Some people have claimed that a photographic lens of this focal length would be impossible to make with the technology of the 1950s-1960s..

http://forum.mflenses.com/astro-berlin- … 68621.html

...but it seems they were mistaken. Here's another one;

https://www.flintsauctions.com/auction/ … 4&sd=1

Jan 21 24 07:57 am Link

Photographer

Chris Macan

Posts: 12965

HAVERTOWN, Pennsylvania, US

looks more like a telescope than a camera lens,
but interesting bit of history.

Jan 22 24 06:14 am Link

Photographer

JSouthworth

Posts: 1765

Kingston upon Hull, England, United Kingdom

Chris Macan wrote:
looks more like a telescope than a camera lens,
but interesting bit of history.

It does resemble a refractor telescope superficially but it is actually a telephoto lens, that is to say that it's physical length is less than the focal length. There are four elements as far as I can tell, three at the front and one further back.

The price of the 2000mm f10 was around $4800 in 1963.

Good Astro Berlin page here;

http://www.exaklaus.de/astro.htm

In the 1950s-1960s their products were apparently highly regarded by sports photographers particularly, Bob Gomel used them.

More here;

https://pravin73.wixsite.com/camera-sly … oto-lenses

Jan 22 24 06:40 am Link

Photographer

Bob Helm Photography

Posts: 18906

Cherry Hill, New Jersey, US

Nikon had a 2000mm reflex lens way back. Very expensive, the size of a small trash can and I never saw one other than in a Nikon FL comparison done by Nikon where they set up a model and photographers her from two miles away she on one side of the Golden Gate Bridge and the camera on the other with every FL Nikon offered.

When they got to the 2000 they could not get a sharp photo and they attributed it to the smog in the are so they went to AZ, same two miles and sharp as a tack.

Celestron also had a 2000mm Reflex lens sold as either a telescope or a T mount camera lens. Those I have seen and sold when I wa in retail

Jan 22 24 08:19 am Link

Photographer

JSouthworth

Posts: 1765

Kingston upon Hull, England, United Kingdom

Bob Helm Photography wrote:
Nikon had a 2000mm reflex lens way back. Very expensive, the size of a small trash can and I never saw one other than in a Nikon FL comparison done by Nikon where they set up a model and photographers her from two miles away she on one side of the Golden Gate Bridge and the camera on the other with every FL Nikon offered.

When they got to the 2000 they could not get a sharp photo and they attributed it to the smog in the are so they went to AZ, same two miles and sharp as a tack.

Celestron also had a 2000mm Reflex lens sold as either a telescope or a T mount camera lens. Those I have seen and sold when I wa in retail

A Nikon 2000mm lens was used effectively for a scene in a well known movie;

https://petapixel.com/2016/01/25/this-d … 00mm-lens/

Jan 24 24 04:39 am Link