Forums > Photography Talk > Color Calibration devices......

Photographer

Sagelike Photography

Posts: 852

QUEENS VILLAGE, New York, US

Best and cheapest?

Sep 06 07 04:05 pm Link

Photographer

former_mm_user

Posts: 5521

New York, New York, US

i use the gretag eye-one display.  about $200, and very highly regarded.  i've read many mixed things about anything cheaper.  monaco optix generally gets high marks as well.

Sep 06 07 04:34 pm Link

Photographer

aduro visum

Posts: 220

Sacramento, California, US

Second on the Eye-One.

I've used quite a few other models, and in that price range it's the only one that actually calibrates reliably.

Sep 06 07 04:37 pm Link

Photographer

Chris Photography

Posts: 1070

Valrico, Florida, US

I've got a huey,  it's really inexpensive and does a reasonable good job.

Sep 06 07 04:39 pm Link

Photographer

5th Floor Photography

Posts: 745

New York, New York, US

good and cheap=huey

Sep 06 07 05:00 pm Link

Photographer

WIP

Posts: 15973

Cheltenham, England, United Kingdom

i1 and Spyder2.

Sep 06 07 05:02 pm Link

Photographer

Ken Rieves Photography

Posts: 934

Avon Lake, Ohio, US

Gretag/Macbeth Eye One Display2. Does a great job. I run it every 2 weeks to keep things tweaked.

Sep 06 07 06:06 pm Link

Photographer

ChristerArt

Posts: 2861

Cambridge, England, United Kingdom

Depends - as everything else - what you NEED - and where you want to spend your money...

Do you only want to calibrate your monitor? or do you have a printer - or several you want to be able to calibrate as well? What about paper - want to be able to calibrate every paper you use and every batch you buy? Are you a pro or an amateur?

You can spend from less than $100 to the tens of thousands...=*^)

here is a list from one of the best suppliers on the web;

http://www.itsupplies.com/cgi-bin/itsup … talog/1820

Christer

Sep 06 07 06:21 pm Link

Photographer

former_mm_user

Posts: 5521

New York, New York, US

remember that  "ok" calibration is like "kinda pregnant".  it's either correct or it's not.  don't buy a bottom of the line model just because it's cheap because you're throwing away money.

Sep 06 07 06:24 pm Link

Photographer

Loss Vegas

Posts: 675

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

Sep 06 07 06:26 pm Link

Photographer

190608

Posts: 2383

Los Angeles, California, US

I am using Spyder2PRO. Don't forget that you have to have a decent if not a **good** monitor for the colorimeter to fully optimize its functions.

For more information, I highly recommend you google this topic up--it will truly be beneficial to you.

I second the insight aforementioned RE: "going with the colorimeter that fits your needs and budget."

--Ron

Sep 06 07 06:26 pm Link

Photographer

lll

Posts: 12295

Seattle, Washington, US

- Eye-One Display 2
- Eye-One Display 2
https://ak.buy.com/db_assets/prod_images/792/202220792.jpg
- Eye-One Display LT
https://ak.buy.com/db_assets/prod_images/637/202220637.jpg

There is no "cheapest and best".  The best wouldn't be the cheapest, and the cheapest can't be the "best".

The LT would be the lowest I would ever go.  They Huey is, like CBush said, kinda pregnant.

Sep 06 07 06:47 pm Link

Photographer

RFPhotography

Posts: 67

Oshawa, Ontario, Canada

Spyder2Pro here.  Tried the Huey in the shop and didn't like it.  Not overly accurate.

Sep 06 07 08:36 pm Link

Photographer

CULTURE IMAGE

Posts: 125

Chicago, Illinois, US

Huey Pro Not A Bad Way To Go!

Hey that rhymes...seriously I'm having a good experience with this thing. I was skeptical at first. I like the auto level adjustment to my studio light level.

Sep 06 07 08:46 pm Link

Photographer

VPro

Posts: 241

Franklin, Arkansas, US

I use Huey.  I think it has improved my calibration a lot.

Sep 06 07 10:23 pm Link

Photographer

Legacys 7

Posts: 33899

San Francisco, California, US

I use one called Baby Huey.

Sep 06 07 10:34 pm Link

Photographer

byebyemm222

Posts: 1458

ADAK, Alaska, US

I have a Huey and would say that it works well with decent quality monitors, but has a difficult time with lower quality LCD screens (even very new ones). The "kinda pregnant" comment is not relevant in my mind though. If it gets a photographer that would otherwise not spend anything on calibration to, say, 95% of what the best calibrator will do for monitor calibration, then it is still a significant improvement to that person's work flow. We'd all love to have $300-$500 to spend on a calibration tool, but the reality is that many of us can only afford $100 or less. The Huey is not the best, but it is a more than reasonable compromise for most of the photographers on this site and can be found for around $80.

Edit: Comparing the before and after of the Heuy calibration is shows that it is far better to be with it than without if you can't afford more.

Sep 06 07 11:26 pm Link

Photographer

brothertheo

Posts: 552

Kenosha, Wisconsin, US

I agree that the Huey may not be the best thing out there since sliced bread, but its head and shoulders over doing it by eye.

I had been using Adobe's gamma loader for visual calibration, and after sending off a number of prints and getting them back way too light for my liking, I went out and bought a Huey. After calibration and loading up the files again I could see why. Readjusted, sent the files back out, and the prints came back spot on.

I've heard that it has problems with a number of LCD panels, but its been great on my CRT screens. As much as I'd like to get a spiffy new 22 inch widescreen flat panel display, I'm not about to give up my Nanao/Eizo CRT.

Sep 07 07 02:58 am Link

Photographer

Wayver

Posts: 778

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Spyder2 pro

Sep 09 07 11:57 pm Link

Photographer

Lewis Lam Photography

Posts: 72

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

I've i one 2, and I think is better than spider ;  )

Sep 10 07 01:15 am Link

Photographer

JoshuaBerardi

Posts: 654

Davenport, Iowa, US

Sagelike Photography wrote:
Best and cheapest?

I use the "Datacolor Spyder" and happy with it. They have 3 models from $75 to..something more than $75 smile

-joshua

Sep 10 07 01:53 am Link

Photographer

Wayver

Posts: 778

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

ExposureBits wrote:
i1 display 2

http://www.shootsmarter.com/infocenter/wc026a.htm

This is a old review, somewhere in 2004.

Sep 10 07 10:17 am Link

Photographer

Ryan Colford Studios

Posts: 2286

Brooklyn, New York, US

What if you are using 2 monitors? How does that affect the calibration devices?

Mar 03 08 04:10 pm Link

Photographer

Ken Rieves Photography

Posts: 934

Avon Lake, Ohio, US

Ryan Colford Studios wrote:
What if you are using 2 monitors? How does that affect the calibration devices?

Depends on your video card. If you have two monitor connections on the card, you  might be able to use separate profiles for each monitor. I have a splitter coming out of my card and am forced to use one profile for both monitors.

I set my calibration for my left monitor since this is where I always view my Photoshop images. My right monitor is where I place my tools and palates so correct colors are not important.

Mar 03 08 04:29 pm Link

Photographer

Ryan Colford Studios

Posts: 2286

Brooklyn, New York, US

thanks Ken. I have 2 connections on my card.  Do the calibration tools work for both monitors then?

Mar 03 08 04:35 pm Link

Photographer

Klaus Bjarner Photo

Posts: 57

Zug, Zug, Switzerland

Ryan Colford Studios wrote:
thanks Ken. I have 2 connections on my card.  Do the calibration tools work for both monitors then?

The new datacolor Spyder3Pro and Spyder3Elite handles multi monitor setup without problems. It automatically detects the number of displays you have attached, and asks you which you would like to calibrate, so you can make individual calibration of all the monitors in your setup.

If your have just one graphics card with two connectors, then you need to make sure, that the card has two LUT's (look up table). If it only has one, then you can not have individually profiles for each monitor, which is needed. Most cards today have the same amount of LUT's as they have connectors. It is sometimes a problem on older (and low-end windows) notebooks with external moniors, but if you use macbook or macbook pro there are no problems, because they ofcause have the amount of LUT's needed, since they are aimed at the graphical industry. Need I say I am a mac guy? ;-)

--Klaus

Mar 03 08 04:44 pm Link

Photographer

Ryan Colford Studios

Posts: 2286

Brooklyn, New York, US

Thanks! What do you think of the Spyder then?

Mar 03 08 04:54 pm Link

Photographer

RS Livingston

Posts: 2086

Grand Rapids, Michigan, US

Klaus Bjarner Photo wrote:

The new datacolor Spyder3Pro and Spyder3Elite handles multi monitor setup without problems. It automatically detects the number of displays you have attached, and asks you which you would like to calibrate, so you can make individual calibration of all the monitors in your setup.

If your have just one graphics card with two connectors, then you need to make sure, that the card has two LUT's (look up table). If it only has one, then you can not have individually profiles for each monitor, which is needed. Most cards today have the same amount of LUT's as they have connectors. It is sometimes a problem on older (and low-end windows) notebooks with external moniors, but if you use macbook or macbook pro there are no problems, because they ofcause have the amount of LUT's needed, since they are aimed at the graphical industry. Need I say I am a mac guy? ;-)

--Klaus

Thanks Klaus,
I have the spyder2 and was looking to go to the spyder3. The 2 has done a great job over the last couple of years keeping five work stations and two MBP under control. I just read some good things about the improvements in accuracy of the spyder3 and plan to jump to it.

Mar 03 08 05:11 pm Link