Photographer
David Oscar Flores
Posts: 497
Los Angeles, California, US
PLEASE BOYCOT THE HORRIBLE 'HAND/ARM BRA' SHOTS!!!
Shoot me (WITH A GUN) if you see me with a model posing like that and fast!
Have ever seen Michelangelo master pieces with those poses? How about Picasso, Rembrandt, any of the masters? NO!
And certainly not Helmut Newton.
"Implied nudes are like implied food."
-Michael Helms
Photographer
Laura Ann Photography
Posts: 17921
Peoria, Arizona, US
Yes, they are old and tired, but so are the threads about them.
Photographer
Malameel
Posts: 1087
Dallas, Texas, US
Laura Ann Photography wrote:
Yes, they are old and tired, but so are the threads about them. LOL, you are so right...
M
Photographer
EL Perdido
Posts: 9401
TERLINGUA, Texas, US
David Oscar Flores wrote:
"Implied nudes are like implied food."
-Michael Helms Outstanding!
Photographer
sureshotstudios
Posts: 277
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, US
Laura Ann Photography wrote:
Yes, they are old and tired, but so are the threads about them. Bingo
Photographer
Sophistocles
Posts: 21320
Seattle, Washington, US
I am elated
That you bring this up again
As authority
(all posts today are in haiku. I invite everyone to do the same)
Photographer
Laura Ann Photography
Posts: 17921
Peoria, Arizona, US
I am bad with verse
But I will give it a try
Haiku hand bra day
Photographer
Angelo Lorenzo Photo
Posts: 2094
Simi Valley, California, US
I think they jumped the shark when Janet Jackson did it.
Photographer
GM Photography
Posts: 6322
Olympia, Washington, US
Hand bras are really stupid! I think that all photographers should also stop using cliche' shots with hair fans, models looking in mirrors, and basically anything that anyone else has already done.
Photographer
D-O-N-S-I-R
Posts: 1121
Norwalk, California, US
I'm neither rembrandt nor michaelangelo. Hand and arm bras away!!
What about rope bras?
Photographer
Topless New York
Posts: 1721
Brooklyn, New York, US
GM Photography wrote:
Hand bras are really stupid! I think that all photographers should also stop using cliche' shots with hair fans, models looking in mirrors, and basically anything that anyone else has already done. Yeah! Stop photographing all those, y'know, women and stuff - it's been done to death!
Photographer
M Pandolfo Photography
Posts: 12117
Tampa, Florida, US
Hand bras give us more
things to ruminate about
via stupid posts.
Viva La Haiku!
Photographer
Craig Thomson
Posts: 13462
Tacoma, Washington, US
David Oscar Flores wrote:
PLEASE BOYCOT THE HORRIBLE 'HAND/ARM BRA' SHOTS!!!
Shoot me (WITH A GUN) if you see me with a model posing like that and fast! don't like them, don't look.
Photographer
Eikona
Posts: 1405
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Body Painter
Eric Mayhem
Posts: 481
Seattle, Washington, US
Craig Thomson wrote:
don't like them, don't look. Yup.
Photographer
Aesthete Studios
Posts: 2088
Oakland, New Jersey, US
Handbra covering,
Her coveted mammaries,
I sigh yet again.
Photographer
Kenzphotos
Posts: 1868
Anaheim, California, US
David Oscar Flores wrote:
PLEASE BOYCOT THE HORRIBLE 'HAND/ARM BRA' SHOTS!!!
Shoot me (WITH A GUN) if you see me with a model posing like that and fast!
Have ever seen Michelangelo master pieces with those poses? How about Picasso, Rembrandt, any of the masters? NO!
And certainly not Helmut Newton.
"Implied nudes are like implied food."
-Michael Helms I love that last quote; Brilliant!
NO one will EVER find a 'hand bra' pose in my portfolio. I feel it is the worst possible pose of them all...what is a viewer to think of what the model is doing in an image like that? What is the model saying with their 'hand-bra' body language? - "Here I am holding my tits"! The pose is horrible (in my opinion).
Model
Playthings
Posts: 912
Montreal, Wisconsin, US
Ok,but there are always exceptions,hahahahaha. I love my avatar 
Photographer
M Pandolfo Photography
Posts: 12117
Tampa, Florida, US
Don Sir Photography wrote:
I'm neither rembrandt nor michaelangelo. Hand and arm bras away!!
What about rope bras? Is that kinda like a pearl necklace?
Model
Alisha King
Posts: 2491
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, US
GAAAAWWWWDDD....
I've only been on MM since March, and this is the thousandth time I've seen this exact same thread!!!!!!
If you don't like handbras, don't shoot them!!!!!!!!
Geez...
Photographer
Laura Ann Nudes
Posts: 3844
Peoria, Illinois, US
Aesthete Studios wrote:
Handbra covering,
Her coveted mammaries,
I sigh yet again. BHWAHAHAHAHA. Awesome!
Photographer
M Pandolfo Photography
Posts: 12117
Tampa, Florida, US
I propose an alternative to the hand bra.
The tongue panty or the finger tampon. Photographer's choice.
Model
Alisha King
Posts: 2491
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, US
David Oscar Flores wrote:
PLEASE BOYCOT THE HORRIBLE 'HAND/ARM BRA' SHOTS!!!
Shoot me (WITH A GUN) if you see me with a model posing like that and fast!
Have ever seen Michelangelo master pieces with those poses? How about Picasso, Rembrandt, any of the masters? NO!
And certainly not Helmut Newton.
"Implied nudes are like implied food."
-Michael Helms And you know what else I hate?
I hate all you photographers that keep shooting models!!...
Why do so many of you use models in your images?????
Soooooo cliche....
Photographer
Rob Gillespie
Posts: 813
Bedford, England, United Kingdom
If you don't want to
Get them out for the lads, just
Wear some nice clothing.
Artist/Painter
ken daugherty
Posts: 226
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, US
the reason this keeps coming up is people keep shooting them and they look stupider every time
Photographer
Laura Ann Nudes
Posts: 3844
Peoria, Illinois, US
David Oscar Flores wrote:
PLEASE BOYCOT THE HORRIBLE 'HAND/ARM BRA' SHOTS!!!
Shoot me (WITH A GUN) if you see me with a model posing like that and fast!
Have ever seen Michelangelo master pieces with those poses? How about Picasso, Rembrandt, any of the masters? NO!
And certainly not Helmut Newton.
"Implied nudes are like implied food."
-Michael Helms Oh, and I should say, I don't mind implied nudes, as long as they don't look intentional. Hand bras and such are clearly there to cover.
I much prefer shots where it doesn't look intentional.
![https://i134.photobucket.com/albums/q82/ChicagoNix/Brooke3web.jpg]()
Photographer
M Pandolfo Photography
Posts: 12117
Tampa, Florida, US
Alisha King wrote:
GAAAAWWWWDDD....
I've only been on MM since March, and this is the thousandth time I've seen this exact same thread!!!!!!
If you don't like handbras, don't shoot them!!!!!!!!
Geez... Alisha, this is no time for logic 
Photographer
Aesthete Studios
Posts: 2088
Oakland, New Jersey, US
Areola masked
Her digits held like a claw
What does this imply?
Model
Alisha King
Posts: 2491
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, US
Michael Pandolfo wrote:
I propose an alternative to the hand bra.
The tongue panty or the finger tampon. Photographer's choice. 
I like the crotchbra .... Where a model's bewbs are being covered by anotehr models crotch.... strattling her chest....
Photographer
Aesthete Studios
Posts: 2088
Oakland, New Jersey, US
Digital support
For her gravity-strained breasts
Handbra eases pain.
Photographer
M Pandolfo Photography
Posts: 12117
Tampa, Florida, US
QOL wrote:
I think Paolo Roversi and a few others would disagree. Appropriate response would be "ok, then nevermind" or "yeah well um...look at that model."
Photographer
GM Photography
Posts: 6322
Olympia, Washington, US
Ssiimonaa wrote:
Ok,but there are always exceptions,hahahahaha.
I love my avatar I love your avatar
Photographer
Aesthete Studios
Posts: 2088
Oakland, New Jersey, US
She wore a handbra
And her love wore a hand-jock
They longed to hold hands.
Photographer
GM Photography
Posts: 6322
Olympia, Washington, US
Kenzphotos wrote:
NO one will EVER find a 'hand bra' pose in my portfolio. I feel it is the worst possible pose of them all...what is a viewer to think of what the model is doing in an image like that? What is the model saying with their 'hand-bra' body language? - "Here I am holding my tits"! The pose is horrible (in my opinion). Am I missing something? Or were you also speaking tongue in cheek?
https://www.modelmayhem.com/pic.php?pid=5513879 (18+?)
Photographer
M Pandolfo Photography
Posts: 12117
Tampa, Florida, US
Alisha King wrote:
I like the crotchbra .... Where a model's bewbs are being covered by anotehr models crotch.... strattling her chest.... If one female model is covering another female models boobs by holding a strap-on dildo across them, would it be considered a Strapless Bra? Or would I just have way too much free time on my hands?
Photographer
Curt McClain
Posts: 179
New Orleans, Louisiana, US
Don't you guys have anything better to do than pick on women who are ashamed of their nipples? (And the photographers that pander to them?)
Photographer
Laura Ann Nudes
Posts: 3844
Peoria, Illinois, US
GM Photography wrote:
Am I missing something? Or were you also speaking tongue in cheek?
![https://modelmayhm-7.vo.llnwd.net/d1/photos/080204/15/47a7736ca2ca4_m.jpg]() That's not a handbra. I see nipple behind the white paint.
Photographer
jac3950
Posts: 1179
Freedom, New Hampshire, US
Alisha King wrote:
And you know what else I hate?
I hate all you photographers that keep shooting models!!...
Why do so many of you use models in your images?????
Soooooo cliche.... I set up a shoot with a sea shell (pg 5) but its escort kept pestering the hell of me.
Photographer
M Pandolfo Photography
Posts: 12117
Tampa, Florida, US
Laura Ann Nudes wrote:
That's not a handbra. I see nipple behind the white paint. alright VINE. Be that way.
|
