Forums > Digital Art and Retouching > Photoshop CS5 - What would you want?

Photographer

Robert Randall

Posts: 13890

Chicago, Illinois, US

Noise scaling for airbrushes that allow blend modes at the edge of the brush.

Aug 10 09 01:35 pm Link

Retoucher

Kevin_Connery

Posts: 3307

Fullerton, California, US

Bruce Yonce wrote:
The ability to batch process raw files to jpegs. I've read you can do this in Lightroom but I don't have Lightroom so the ability to do so in PS would be most helpful.

You can do that since v7 if you had the Raw plug-in, by running a simple batch Action and it's been available via a script ("Image Processor") since CS (it's been included with Photoshop since CS2, but it was a free download for CS). The Raw converter itself permits batch conversion via Bridge as well in CS/2/3/4.

Was there some specific batch processing you wanted that isn't currently available?

Aug 10 09 04:08 pm Link

Digital Artist

Michael C Pearson

Posts: 1349

Agoura Hills, California, US

A "do not show again" checkbox for the save for web "this is too big" warning. God I hate that warning!

Aug 10 09 04:12 pm Link

Photographer

Bruce Yonce

Posts: 784

Hermitage, Tennessee, US

Kevin_Connery wrote:

You can do that since v7 if you had the Raw plug-in, by running a simple batch Action and it's been available via a script ("Image Processor") since CS (it's been included with Photoshop since CS2, but it was a free download for CS). The Raw converter itself permits batch conversion via Bridge as well in CS/2/3/4.

Was there some specific batch processing you wanted that isn't currently available?

I didn't realize you could do it in CS4. The book I have on CS 4 doesn't mention it. Thanks for the info, Kevin.

Aug 10 09 07:11 pm Link

Photographer

Sean Baker Photo

Posts: 8044

San Antonio, Texas, US

Thanks to Bob I'm also adding updating all (or at least more) filters to operate in 16bit mode.

Aug 10 09 07:14 pm Link

Photographer

M A R T I N

Posts: 3893

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Photons 2 Pixels Images wrote:

I'd like to be able to save the history into a sidecar file either manually or automatically. This is a nice idea. smile

that side car would be enormous

Aug 10 09 07:23 pm Link

Photographer

Robert Randall

Posts: 13890

Chicago, Illinois, US

Support for 128 bit processing.

Aug 10 09 07:26 pm Link

Photographer

M A R T I N

Posts: 3893

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Robert Randall wrote:
Support for 128 bit processing.

yikes! what are you running?

Aug 10 09 07:29 pm Link

Photographer

M A R T I N

Posts: 3893

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

I wish they would clean up the memory management, for starters purge the page file when the document is closed.

Aug 10 09 07:30 pm Link

Photographer

A Personal Travesty

Posts: 539

Hoover, Alabama, US

Easier access to channels in other blending modes (instead of having to duplicate an image, switch the the desired mode, copy a channel, and paste it back into your original channel's channel palette.

PS is, after all, a gray scale editor with lots of channels.  This shouldn't be such a pain.

Aug 10 09 07:36 pm Link

Photographer

Andy Pearlman

Posts: 3411

Los Angeles, California, US

Be able to delete one step in the history, without deleting everything done since that step. Also, memorize all the adjustments as a pre-set, without having to make each adjustment a layer (to keep the file small), so I can re-use the adjustments on similar frames. (Just figured out how to do that with RAW files, but I'm thinking PSD, JPG, etc.

Aug 10 09 07:36 pm Link

Photographer

Sean Baker Photo

Posts: 8044

San Antonio, Texas, US

Robert Randall wrote:
Support for 128 bit processing.

Making fun of we 16bit geeks, or related to that project you're working on?

Aug 10 09 07:42 pm Link

Photographer

Robert Randall

Posts: 13890

Chicago, Illinois, US

Sean Baker wrote:

Making fun of we 16bit geeks, or related to that project you're working on?

Never! After all, if they make Exabyte drives, shouldn't we have a use for them? And think of the fun you'll have while the computer works on resampling down to 8 bit for output.

Aug 10 09 08:03 pm Link

Photographer

Sean Baker Photo

Posts: 8044

San Antonio, Texas, US

Robert Randall wrote:

Never! After all, if they make Exabyte drives, shouldn't we have a use for them? And think of the fun you'll have while the computer works on resampling down to 8 bit for output.

lol Would you be happier if they just gave you back v. 4 and gave it compatibility with all the newer file formats? tongue

Aug 10 09 08:05 pm Link

Photographer

Robert Randall

Posts: 13890

Chicago, Illinois, US

Sean Baker wrote:

lol Would you be happier if they just gave you back v. 4 and gave it compatibility with all the newer file formats? tongue

I would be quite happy with Color Studio, if it were the de facto standard, I wouldn't have any competition.

Aug 10 09 09:02 pm Link

Photographer

MisterC

Posts: 15162

Portland, Oregon, US

Robert Randall wrote:
Noise scaling for airbrushes that allow blend modes at the edge of the brush.

Hahaha... I wouldn't even have thought of that, but how great would that be.

Aug 10 09 09:09 pm Link

Photographer

790763

Posts: 2747

San Francisco, California, US

Have Adobe buy Lucisart and let's see the images when every CS5 user has access to Lucis Art!

That would be interesting. =P

Is it funny? I try.

On a serious note, I'd like to see them improve on the Image-Aware Content Resizing.

Another good idea is have Mr. Rick Miller who is directly affiliated Adobe check this thread out and pass it over to Adobe.

Aug 10 09 10:45 pm Link

Retoucher

Kevin_Connery

Posts: 3307

Fullerton, California, US

Andy Pearlman wrote:
Also, memorize all the adjustments as a pre-set, without having to make each adjustment a layer (to keep the file small), so I can re-use the adjustments on similar frames.

Almost all image Adjustments (the stuff via the Image > Adjust menu) permit saving the adjustments, and the most recent setting can be brought up if you re-invoke the command with Alt or Option held down. (For example: make a Curves change (Command/Control-M), and click on OK. If you re-invoke Curves with Command/Control-M, it brings up the default Curve. If you reinvoke it with Command-Option-M or Control-Alt-M, it'll bring up your previous setting for that adjustment.)

It's very handy for quick sets of adjustments where you don't need to save multiple settings; for that, saving and loading the settings is more effective. For some reason, Color Balance and Brightness/Contrast don't offer saving settings, but Curves, Levels, and many of the others do. Some via a minimenu next to the presets, and some as regular save/load buttons.
https://www.kevinconnery.com/photos/screenshots/ps_savesetting-20090810-233253.jpg

Aug 10 09 11:33 pm Link

Photographer

Jeff Cohn

Posts: 3850

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US

Ive found myself using Lightroom more and more for lighting, vignettes, split toning and I LOVE the fact that it remembers every decision I make even if it crashes... considering Adobe makes both programs, it seems silly that one does all this stuff perfectly/effortlessly and the one designed for fixing photos doesn't.

Aug 10 09 11:37 pm Link

Photographer

Ruben Vasquez

Posts: 3117

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

Some things I'd like:

- ACR curves to have access to individual color channels,
- The Patch Tool to work on blank layers,
- To change from color space to color space without the need to flatten or convert all layers to smart objects (though I imagine it would be just as ram intensive as converting to smart objects),
- I like the idea of the Apply Image and Calculations commands having access to other channels without the need for a duplicate,
- Mid tone blend if sliders would be great!

Aug 11 09 12:06 am Link

Photographer

Paul Bryson Photography

Posts: 48041

Hollywood, Florida, US

Sean Baker wrote:
Photoshop CS5 - What would you want?

The ability for undo/redo after you've saved/closed a file and re-opened it.

Aug 11 09 12:49 am Link

Photographer

Photons 2 Pixels Images

Posts: 17011

Berwick, Pennsylvania, US

There might already be a way for this, but I haven't found it yet...

Allow linking an adjustment layer to only one layer or a group of layers similar to how a mask can link to a layer/group and only affect that layer/group.

Example: If I have a few different layers and I pull a masked layer out of the base layer to run some curves adjustments on certain portions, I can do that. But, if I then want to go back and tweak the adjustments to that curve, I can't. If I set the curve up as an adjustment layer, it affects all layers below that one. If I change the layer to a smart object, I can't run a curves adjustment on it.

I'm not making any sense. But I know what I mean. smile

Aug 11 09 03:44 pm Link

Photographer

Studio 144

Posts: 394

Mayfield, Kentucky, US

I would be happy if they just fixed the bugs in CS4.

Aug 11 09 03:50 pm Link

Photographer

790763

Posts: 2747

San Francisco, California, US

Nobody likes the funny statement I made earlier? :-(

Aug 11 09 04:04 pm Link

Photographer

Sean Baker Photo

Posts: 8044

San Antonio, Texas, US

ronald n. tan wrote:
Nobody likes the funny statement I made earlier? :-(

I laughed, but then cried realizing that it'll never happen wink.

Aug 11 09 04:23 pm Link

Photographer

M A R T I N

Posts: 3893

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

ronald n. tan wrote:
Nobody likes the funny statement I made earlier? :-(

sorry it wasn't as funny as you wearing crocs tongue

Aug 11 09 05:36 pm Link

Photographer

Justin Foto

Posts: 3622

Alberschwende, Vorarlberg, Austria

Ni Anluain wrote:

+1! Forgot about that! Like in MS word! autosaves every 5 mins...

Some kind of new, efficient way of storing data would be good. A large PS file can take a while to save, so an auto save could have a serious time impact. I'm pretty sure that the PS files could be broken up into smaller pieces in a database structure. If you could do that, then save only the changes and additions, then an auto save makes sense.

Aug 11 09 05:46 pm Link

Photographer

790763

Posts: 2747

San Francisco, California, US

Ugh! =P

At least when I get old, I won't have back problems!

Myshkin wrote:

sorry it wasn't as funny as you wearing crocs tongue

Aug 11 09 06:18 pm Link

Photographer

Lumigraphics

Posts: 32780

Detroit, Michigan, US

Photons 2 Pixels Images wrote:
There might already be a way for this, but I haven't found it yet...

Allow linking an adjustment layer to only one layer or a group of layers similar to how a mask can link to a layer/group and only affect that layer/group.

Example: If I have a few different layers and I pull a masked layer out of the base layer to run some curves adjustments on certain portions, I can do that. But, if I then want to go back and tweak the adjustments to that curve, I can't. If I set the curve up as an adjustment layer, it affects all layers below that one. If I change the layer to a smart object, I can't run a curves adjustment on it.

I'm not making any sense. But I know what I mean. smile

You can already do that. It’s a clipping group.

Aug 11 09 08:33 pm Link

Photographer

M A R T I N

Posts: 3893

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

I for one don't want an auto-save. I'm perfectly capable of fucking up on my own by saving a 800px psd after resizing for output tongue Now that undo-after-close would be sweet!

Aug 11 09 09:27 pm Link

Photographer

Duncan Hall

Posts: 3104

San Francisco, California, US

A button that makes pictures look nice so when people say "that's just photoshop" I don't get so angry.

No.. a clarity slider.

Jeff Cohn::X-Pose.net:: wrote:
Ive found myself using Lightroom more and more for lighting, vignettes, split toning and I LOVE the fact that it remembers every decision I make even if it crashes... considering Adobe makes both programs, it seems silly that one does all this stuff perfectly/effortlessly and the one designed for fixing photos doesn't.

I've actually never seen CS4 crash. I assumed those eggheads did something special to it to make it extra stable. Lightroom crashes like it's going out of style, and I've lost plenty of adjustments because of it.

Aug 11 09 09:34 pm Link

Photographer

William Kious

Posts: 8842

Delphos, Ohio, US

This is kind of a silly thing... and there's probably a way to do it that I'm not aware of... but I want a brush that, when I paint at 20% opacity, it stays at 20% (even if I overlap an area or do some other silly thing.)

Yeah, I know I could do it with a mask... but I'm picky.

Aug 11 09 09:47 pm Link

Retoucher

Gustavo Brigante

Posts: 37

Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

One thing i would really like is the smooth tool to work around vector masks, like it works on AI

Aug 12 09 02:21 am Link

Photographer

Photons 2 Pixels Images

Posts: 17011

Berwick, Pennsylvania, US

Lumigraphics wrote:

You can already do that. It’s a clipping group.

Thanks! This works great. I knew about clipping groups but never really used them or realized they worked on adjustment layers as well. It seems to only work on the bottom layer in the linked group and not all layers, though. Or, if I put the adjustment layer on the bottom of the linked group, it adjusts all but the linked layers.

But I can work with that I think.

Thanks again! smile

Aug 12 09 05:59 am Link

Photographer

Lumigraphics

Posts: 32780

Detroit, Michigan, US

Duncan Hall wrote:
A button that makes pictures look nice so when people say "that's just photoshop" I don't get so angry.

No.. a clarity slider.


I've actually never seen CS4 crash. I assumed those eggheads did something special to it to make it extra stable. Lightroom crashes like it's going out of style, and I've lost plenty of adjustments because of it.

CS3 will reliably crash if you try as Save As to a full drive.

Aug 12 09 09:43 am Link

Photographer

Erotisme

Posts: 145

New York, New York, US

While working with multiple layers the file sizes become humongous and will crash any PC. They should have a way to keep file sizes from exploding, without flattening of layers.

Aug 12 09 09:50 am Link

Photographer

Lumigraphics

Posts: 32780

Detroit, Michigan, US

Erotisme wrote:
While working with multiple layers the file sizes become humongous and will crash any PC. They should have a way to keep file sizes from exploding, without flattening of layers.

Hmm I have never had a crash from sheer file size, and I've worked on layered files over a GB.

Aug 12 09 10:06 am Link

Photographer

M A R T I N

Posts: 3893

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

how hard would it be to have scaling grids in the crop tool? like they put into photoshop.com.

Aug 14 09 08:25 pm Link

Photographer

Leroy Dickson

Posts: 8239

Flint, Michigan, US

A Linux port!!!!

Aug 14 09 08:35 pm Link

Photographer

Guss W

Posts: 10964

Clearwater, Florida, US

A heavy-duty Extract tool.

Aug 16 09 07:56 pm Link