Forums > Digital Art and Retouching > How to achieve this look

Photographer

joana adam mcgee

Posts: 2

Manila, National Capital Region, Philippines

I have tried over and over but I cannot get the color/tone of this photo.

http://lookbook.nu/look/2738217-112311

please help

thank you

Dec 01 11 08:39 pm Link

Photographer

PK Digital Imaging

Posts: 3084

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Soft lighting and a whole lot of Photoshop blur.

-PKD

Dec 01 11 08:43 pm Link

Photographer

MKanji

Posts: 422

Los Angeles, California, US

looks like just some desaturation applied to the image in post.

Dec 01 11 08:46 pm Link

Digital Artist

Koray

Posts: 6720

Ankara, Ankara, Turkey

hi...welcome to Model Mayhem...enjoy your first post.

Dec 01 11 08:50 pm Link

Model

Mika

Posts: 1542

Miami, Florida, US

PK Digital Imaging wrote:
Soft lighting and a whole lot of Photoshop blur.

-PKD

He needed help in regards to the color tone... not how to terrorize a poor photo. tongue

Try desaturation, as well as a low opacity layer of similar color tones in different blends. That's off the top of my head, I couldn't tell you directly unless I was in Photoshop myself.

I hope that helps!

Dec 01 11 08:50 pm Link

Photographer

joana adam mcgee

Posts: 2

Manila, National Capital Region, Philippines

Mika wrote:

He needed help in regards to the color tone... not how to terrorize a poor photo. tongue

Try desaturation, as well as a low opacity layer of similar color tones in different blends. That's off the top of my head, I couldn't tell you directly unless I was in Photoshop myself.

I hope that helps!

Thank you very much smile i found this very helpful.

Dec 01 11 10:26 pm Link

Retoucher

Peano

Posts: 4106

Lynchburg, Virginia, US

Looks like cross-processing to me. Original is on the left, target on the far right.

https://img577.imageshack.us/img577/971/crossprocess.jpg

Settings:
https://img401.imageshack.us/img401/3670/crossprocess2.jpg

Dec 02 11 06:39 am Link

Retoucher

PJKPostproductions

Posts: 352

Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

Peano wrote:
Looks like cross-processing to me. Original is on the left, target on the far right.

https://img577.imageshack.us/img577/971/crossprocess.jpg

Settings:
https://img401.imageshack.us/img401/3670/crossprocess2.jpg

+1

Dec 02 11 09:42 am Link

Photographer

Alluring Exposures

Posts: 11400

Casa Grande, Arizona, US

joana adam mcgee wrote:
I have tried over and over but I cannot get the color/tone of this photo.

http://lookbook.nu/look/2738217-112311

please help

thank you

Have you tried a layer copy, diffuse glow with a soft color cast, and then adjust transparency and levels of copy and color saturation and shadow levels of original layer?
I'm on my laptop and not at home, otherwise I would have chosen a more similar image.
https://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a142/AlluringExposures/090816-708.jpg

Dec 02 11 10:05 am Link

Photographer

Under the Gun

Posts: 74

Huntsville, Alabama, US

The main image on the link wouldnt load but the others did. One thing I noticed was well exposed models with a lot of backlight that was blown out. This is a look I get a lot when shooting heavy backlight if I dont use fill and balance. Try easing up your exposure in LR or Camera RAW as a starting place. Let the clipping begin, just stop it before the shin highlights get blown out. You might even try bumping your ev compensation a stop when shooting but I really think it's more of an exposure and light thing than strictly post production.

Dec 02 11 10:14 am Link

Photographer

Pelle Piano

Posts: 2312

Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden

[edit] Oooops, much to late. Sorry. ( had a example but Peanos was so much easier and better )

Dec 02 11 10:46 am Link

Retoucher

The Invisible Touch

Posts: 862

Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain

Alluring Exposures wrote:

Have you tried a layer copy, diffuse glow with a soft color cast, and then adjust transparency and levels of copy and color saturation and shadow levels of original layer?
I'm on my laptop and not at home, otherwise I would have chosen a more similar image.
https://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a142/AlluringExposures/090816-708.jpg

Really?? I don't think that by using blending modes you are going to achieve this final look!! Is definitely a matter of cross processing and curves for that is your best friend..

Pellepiano agree with you 100%

Dec 02 11 12:10 pm Link

Photographer

Hipgnosis Dreams

Posts: 8943

Dallas, Texas, US

One way to get the skin looking smooth would be to simply copy the R (from the RGB channels) and set the layer mode to Luminosity.  Mask out the areas you don't like the look in and feel free to clip a Curves layer to it for some more control over the tones.  Drop on your straw colored solid fill layer and play with blending modes until you get a look you like.

But that's just another option.  Peano's example, while not being a perfect match, is pretty close.

Dec 02 11 03:30 pm Link

Photographer

robertXC

Posts: 1243

Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

split toning is the way to go. Either via individual RGB channels on the Curves adj layer or by tweaking Selective Color Adj Layer

Good luck
R

Dec 02 11 10:55 pm Link

Photographer

Alluring Exposures

Posts: 11400

Casa Grande, Arizona, US

The Invisible Touch wrote:

Really?? I don't think that by using blending modes you are going to achieve this final look!! Is definitely a matter of cross processing and curves for that is your best friend..

Pellepiano agree with you 100%

That's exactly how I did this in the sample I posted to illustrate.

Dec 03 11 01:42 am Link

Retoucher

The Invisible Touch

Posts: 862

Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain

Alluring Exposures wrote:

That's exactly how I did this in the sample I posted to illustrate.

Carlos, that's exactly what I mean, in my opinion your sample doesn't have any resemblance to the OP question! What the OP is asking is achieve by cross processing :-)

Dec 03 11 04:08 am Link

Photographer

Alluring Exposures

Posts: 11400

Casa Grande, Arizona, US

The Invisible Touch wrote:

Carlos, that's exactly what I mean, in my opinion your sample doesn't have any resemblance to the OP question! What the OP is asking is achieve by cross processing :-)

It's an image that was shot differently, lit differently. But what I did brought it close to the feeling in the original image form the OP.
I did state that it's not the right image to do this to but wabted to illustrate that you CAN get that look and feel with what I described.

Dec 03 11 01:41 pm Link

Photographer

mathieu drut

Posts: 404

Santa Clara, California, US

Alluring Exposures wrote:
It's an image that was shot differently, lit differently. But what I did brought it close to the feeling in the original image form the OP.
I did state that it's not the right image to do this to but wabted to illustrate that you CAN get that look and feel with what I described.

Sorry but I'm with Invisible Touch... it looks nothing like the look/feel the OP is after.

Dec 03 11 02:50 pm Link

Photographer

Matt Schmidt Photo

Posts: 3709

Charlotte, North Carolina, US

Peano wrote:
Looks like cross-processing to me. Original is on the left, target on the far right.

https://img577.imageshack.us/img577/971/crossprocess.jpg

Settings:
https://img401.imageshack.us/img401/3670/crossprocess2.jpg

Brilliant!

Dec 03 11 02:54 pm Link

Photographer

wynnesome

Posts: 5453

Long Beach, California, US

One thing I notice about a lot of posts like this is that the image someone is trying to make 'look like' the desired result often contains significantly different subject matter in terms of tonality and contrast.  I'm not singling out the OP here, who did not specify what photos he's trying to get that particular look and failing on, but just bringing it up in general.

What I notice about the example image is that the colors are all within a very limited palette, very pastel, and not a lot of vivid color, or contrasting colors, between model's skin, hair, clothing, and background.  Whatever filtering is being done, the relationship between those colors and tones is the biggest part of why the final result looks the way it does.

If you apply that same technique to an image with vivid colors, or even contrasting pastel colors, or with more dramatic highlighting and shadowing, you could do exactly the same thing and never get that same 'feel' in the result.

Same thing goes with black and white conversion settings, along with many other color processing styles. Most photographers who have a 'signature' look to the color tones of their images also have a particular way they shoot - and they've developed (no pun intended) their post processing techniques to suit their shooting styles. So it's image + post work coming together to create a cohesive result.  Use a different style of image with the same post work/filtering, and the results will most likely be completely different.  That could be awesome, or it could be not-so-awesome, but either way, it won't replicate the look/feel of the original example.

Just something to keep in mind with the 'how did they do that' kinds of questions - even if there is significant post-processing involved, part of the answer usually still lies in how the photo was shot to begin with.

Dec 03 11 03:02 pm Link

Retoucher

Peano

Posts: 4106

Lynchburg, Virginia, US

wynnesome wrote:
One thing I notice about a lot of posts like this is that the image someone is trying to make 'look like' the desired result often contains significantly different subject matter in terms of tonality and contrast.  I'm not singling out the OP here, who did not specify what photos he's trying to get that particular look and failing on, but just bringing it up in general.

Good point. When I raised it here, all it got was a stupid reply. So don't expect much.

Dec 03 11 04:24 pm Link