Forums >
Digital Art and Retouching >
Looking for product retouching tutorials.
I'm pretty set on beauty retouching as there's tons of resources out there that have helped me learn but I'm struggling with the correct way to retouch product/cosmetic still life shots. I thought I was doing alright until I saw this video from F-stoppers of a speed retouch on a Rolex. http://fstoppers.com/brilliant-time-lap … map=%5B%5D While I understand the basics of what is going on I'd love to see a slowed down version of what is being done. It's seems very much like the pen tool and simply airbrushing in areas is a large part, which is something I'd like to comprehend better. I know this is more a model photography site but I'm just curious if any knows any good resources/tutorials for product and still life work. Jan 17 14 08:38 am Link Ariadne Photography wrote: Product retouching goes like that Jan 17 14 08:41 am Link There are some retouch videos on retouch pro that go over jewelry retouching, i'm not sure if you're looking for product in general or jewelry specific, but since you mentioned the rolex video on Fstoppers I thought I would throw that out there for you. There is one on there that is retouching a watch in specific. I can't attest to how good these videos are as I haven't watched them yet, but after seeing some of there other videos I can't imagine they would be bad. Jan 17 14 09:07 am Link Natalia_Taffarel wrote: I'd love to see a product retouching video from you Natalia, it would be a good addition to the other tutorials you have out there right now. Jan 17 14 09:09 am Link JBHarris wrote: True! I forgot about those. Jan 17 14 09:10 am Link I haven't gotten around to watching them yet as I have a mentor I work with here in town that has done a lot of different retouching including product and car photography, so when I'm in need of advice I always give him a ring. I may just go ahead and rent them though, never hurts to have more than one persons knowledge in your brain, if anyone has seen them let me know what you think. Jan 17 14 09:16 am Link Natalia_Taffarel wrote: Oh I totally have the masking down now, I've been practicing a lot it's just the airbrushing that's a little strange to me still, I'm way more used to using the healing brush and D&B to clean up areas and make everything smooth as opposed to just painting them in completely, it seems so fake looking but I'm guessing making it look real is the trick. Jan 17 14 09:17 am Link JBHarris wrote: Honestly anything would help at this point really. And it doesn't have to be jewelry specific, the watch was just the only example I've ever seen of a speed retouch using , what seems to be, a rather professional technique compared to many other videos. Jan 17 14 09:25 am Link Here is a link for some jewelry ones on retouch pro, they don't have product other than jewelry on there, but if you can get the hang of jewelry you should be able to do other product as well. Jewelry is one of the tougher ones because of all the reflective surfaces and specularity of it. http://www.retouchpro.com/index.php?page=skrentals Jan 17 14 09:39 am Link JBHarris wrote: Thanks so much! Jan 17 14 10:13 am Link Bummersville, I actually bought and watched one of the jewelry retouching videos and found in pretty underwhelming, the really wasn't any information in there that I didn't already know, he just did basic clean up, sharpening, color correction, cleaning up the background; all basic stuff. No airbrushing or texturing, nothing like the watch video I posted above. It was a decent try since it is one of the few videos out there for product work it just doesn't cover any advanced techniques and I already know everything else. I might just be outta luck and have to either practice on my own or hope I get trained how to do it correctly in NYC. Jan 18 14 09:24 am Link Karl Taylor photography has a bit of product retouching in one of his videos. Maybe look him up and see if he has something with more detail... Jan 18 14 09:36 am Link Marin Photography NYC wrote: I have one of his dvd's and the retouching is very very basic, really not anything other than basic knowledge about brightening and contrast, and merging exposures. It's a good dvd overall, but not really in depth product retouching info, much more about the photography. Jan 18 14 12:45 pm Link Ariadne Photography wrote: which one did you purchase? Jan 18 14 12:45 pm Link Ok so I did some searching and I can't seem to find anything that is going to show more than clean up and color correction, nothing on the level of the Rolex retouch anyways. I think our best bet is for Natalia to graciously make one for us Jan 18 14 01:06 pm Link JBHarris wrote: I got the top one because it seemed to have the biggest before and after difference, but when you watch the video it's mostly that it's two different pictures with completely different lighting (they just used this uglier image to bring out a small part of the final, better shot, image). I might watch the watch one but I'm super low on money so after spending $15 and not getting anything out of it I'm a little grumpy and hesitant to buy another one. I wish they said what kind of techniques the would go over in the film or a short preview at least so I could decide if it's something that would help Jan 18 14 01:40 pm Link JBHarris wrote: Yeah I donno why there's no resources for that type of retouching, it's such a huge part of actually working as a retoucher, at least it seems that way. Hopefully, at least in my case, the company that hired me will be willing to show me either some good resources or train me. They looked all the full PSD files of my product retouching so they know what I can and can't do (and I even told them I've never retouched product stuff) so hopefully they know a good solution to have me learn and maybe after that I'll just make my own training video for everyone Jan 18 14 01:48 pm Link Ariadne Photography wrote: http://www.happyfinish.co.uk/ Jan 18 14 04:04 pm Link The Something Guy wrote: the ability to create 3D product shots has been around for awhile, but I don't see it fully replacing actual product photography any time soon, from what i've seen it is normally used on products when the client doesn't actually have the product made yet. Jan 18 14 06:44 pm Link How about the Guinness and Jack Daniel's CGI images on the product page or the automotive page. It's so much easier if you have a product created as CGI image taking the measurements of the designers (CAD) drawings. All the beauty retouching high pass and blur is becoming a thing of the past and those retouchers (beauty) will become dinosaurs... learn CGI. http://keyshot.com/what-is-keyshot/ Jan 19 14 03:48 am Link JBHarris wrote: Both have its place. Jan 19 14 05:56 am Link The Something Guy wrote: 3D is definitely here to stay, and has replaced some photography of still objects, especially in car photography of the actual car in still images, but again I don't see it completely eliminating all product photography any time soon. It certainly could one day, and learning a bit of 3D isn't a bad idea. Like Natalia said they each have their place. Also I've never seen a 3D product shot that hasn't been brought into photoshop for work afterwards, it still goes there and gets retouched. I had a friend who did a mock up of an add for Jack Daniel's Tennessee honey whiskey, with a bee in it that had a Jack Daniel's bottle as the body of the bee. He spent more time in photoshop working it up than he did in 3D. Jan 19 14 09:58 am Link JBHarris wrote: Don´t over think it, Chris is a bit bitter lately and ranting against retouching for some reason Jan 19 14 10:26 am Link Natalia_Taffarel wrote: It's a bit like all the film users who ranted about digital.... and looked what's has happened to film. Jan 19 14 10:42 am Link The Something Guy wrote: It´s still used? Jan 19 14 10:46 am Link Natalia_Taffarel wrote: Film about as rare as rocking horse s**t. Jan 19 14 10:50 am Link The Something Guy wrote: Im just having fun with you, I think the market is big enough for everyone. Jan 19 14 11:02 am Link You should really check out the happy finish video series they made for photographers, all about how using 3D in conjunction WITH photography is the future. It's very interesting Jan 19 14 03:41 pm Link JBHarris wrote: People have been touting 3D since I was a kid saying it's the future and will replace this and that and the other and it still hasn't caught on. I'm still in disbelief that it ever will... Jan 19 14 03:50 pm Link JBHarris wrote: Who made these videos? Jan 19 14 03:58 pm Link Photigy.com provides several resources for photographing and retouching product. Some of their stuff is free but a lot of it you do need to pay for. http://www.photigy.com/studio-photography-books/ Also, CreativeLive.com also has a 3-day long course that goes over the ins and outs of commercial photography which includes retouching lessons on the 3d day. http://www.creativelive.com/courses/how … -rob-grimm Jan 19 14 04:13 pm Link Marin Photography NYC wrote: I think you're living in the past it already has taken over a huge amount of photography. Jan 19 14 05:00 pm Link 3D for something like watches, jewelry and furniture, yes please http://www.theverge.com/2012/8/23/32622 … rs-catalog as for the humans, animals, face expressions and very complex or subtle body language - photographs, matte-painting and the combination of photographs and 3D. you can totally create very realistic woman in 3D (still robotic somewhat, but in the future she gonna be totally real) -- but it's just faster, cheaper and more creative to do this in natural way, isn't it? otherwise, the robots would be the best actors soon, and replace humans in real life. right?! it's just cheaper to create many elements of the final composite using a camera. some rendering tasks last for thousand hours, even using supercomputer farms, and still end up too GRAINY, too sharp and need post-processing in photoshop anyways. Ok, you can use DOF and blur in 3D, but it's really costly -- and it's just faster to post-process them in Photoshop or After Effects. plus, you can parse the photographs to convert them into final 3D image. it's much faster than dealing with subsurface scattering, global illumination, textures, procedures, etc. the most realistic textures and other elements are processed in photoshop anyways. I see that 3D photography and 3D scanners can be more widespread in the future. photoshop has some basic elements for 3D processing already. it gonna be integration. 3D itself will NEVER replace photography. almost any render (pure 3D) ends up in photoshop, for post-processing. painting always gonna be superior. just "brushes" change. photographers paint with light by cameras, retouchers and 3D artists (matte painting etc) - by electronic brushes. there is no clear differentiation. you cross the borders in one form or another. IMHO Jan 19 14 06:03 pm Link http://www.shockblast.net/audrey-hepbur … ommercial/ Originally they started with Audrey Hepburn look alike then decided to go full cgi... very convincing. Jan 20 14 04:26 am Link ^ Have been seeing that comercial a lot lately and was wondering how it was done. Jan 20 14 08:19 am Link Here is a link to one of the videos happy finish has out there about using 3D with photography. Interestingly enough the company used as an example about how photography and retouching is going away in favor of 3D put on this series entitled "photography isn't dead". http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__EHt0J_8bc Jan 20 14 09:26 am Link Thanks. Jan 20 14 01:27 pm Link I can't think of anyone in the world that is more successful than Mark Laita, when it comes to product photography. http://www.marklaita.com/ I have no idea what anyone is thinking when they ask about tutorials geared toward product retouch, so I can't think of any to recommend. To me the question is more telling about the perception many of you have about retouch, in that so many of you seem to categorize the work as if there's a difference between retouching a beauty image, and retouching a bottle of Scotch. There is basically no difference. You need art skills and creative vision, and you need software knowledge. I can't categorically tell anyone that a highlight on a bottle needs to look a specific way. Highlights on glass can conceivably all look different, just like highlights on hair and skin can look different. I suggest a good course of action would be to study what you see on Mr. Laita's and try to duplicate his work. At the very least, you'll be working from images made by one of the most sought after commercial product shooters that ever lived, which I think is a far cry from the tutorials you might run into. Jan 21 14 09:42 am Link Robert Randall wrote: I think part of the reason I want a video (or any kind of before and after) is to see what exactly they're correcting and where. Sure I might think some part of some bottle looks fine just like someone might think some model's hair looks fine but to a pro it needs work and a specific type of work to get the job done quickly and effectively. I don't think it's a question of not being able to retouch something it's about learning to do it in the proper way and ending up with the proper result. I really think sometimes you can't tell unless you see someone doing it in front of you, which I'm guessing is why this company wants me to come train for a few days with them. Jan 21 14 10:04 am Link Hey Ariadne, dunno if you're already in the group or, but maybe ask something in the retouching facebook group? They are a very talented bunch, maybe someone has some tutorials. https://www.facebook.com/groups/RetouchingAcademy/ Jan 21 14 10:19 am Link |