Forums > Critique > Feedback of each of my Photography work

Photographer

Javed Ahmed Photography

Posts: 16

London, England, United Kingdom

Any feedback of my Photography work?

Jul 06 14 01:29 am Link

Photographer

Rik Williams

Posts: 4005

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

It looks as though someone else is claiming credit for your hard work.


**** ***** has been given credit for this one and your watermark has been laboriously removed.

https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/061108/23/4552b9f89f8e8.jpg
https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/130301/08/5130daefbc50a.jpg

page link to folio; https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/1651142



And this naughty lady has also removed your watermark and gives no credit to you either.

https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/110127/12/4d41da2d29864.jpg
https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/120222/04/4f44de2fb7f1f.jpg

page link to folio; https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/21257709

And one more where someone has mysteriously gone to the trouble of removing your rather bold, watermark and then given someone else credit for your work!
https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/100524/14/4bfaeaa9e642e.jpg
https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/130805/09/51ffcc33b90ef.jpg

page link; https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/17826458

Gee I'd definitely do something about this, you should at least CAM the false credits, copyright abuse is such a low act.



But as for the rest of your work... I don't like it, blurry, low resolution snaps hold zero appeal in my books.

Jul 06 14 05:25 am Link

Photographer

Buyu

Posts: 87

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

It just seems terribly inconsistent - especially since you have only been shooting for a few years and some of your images seem much older.

Good luck,
Buyu

Jul 06 14 08:38 am Link

Photographer

Doug Bolton Photography

Posts: 784

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Here's the Meta Data from the image:
https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/100524/14/4bfaeaa9e642e_m.jpg
Note the Date Created - May 7, 2010


Camera:    Fujifilm FinePix S100FS
Lens:    24.8 mm
(Max aperture f/2.8)
Exposure:    Auto exposure, Program AE, 1/450 sec, f/3.8, ISO 100, Compensation: -2
Flash:    Off, Did not fire
File Comment:    File written with CompuPic(R) - Photodex Corporation (http://www.photodex.com)
Date:    May 7, 2010   2:28:16PM (timezone not specified)
(4 years, 1 month, 29 days, 19 hours, 3 minutes, 48 seconds ago, assuming image timezone of US Pacific)
File:    1,024 × 768 JPEG


Can you possible explain all of these inconsistencies??

EDIT
https://www.flickr.com/photos/guardian_ … otostream/

Jul 06 14 09:37 am Link

Photographer

Buyu

Posts: 87

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

The OP has left - maybe he read some of the replies. Hopefully some of his 'clients' did.

Buyu

Jul 06 14 10:53 am Link