Forums >
Digital Art and Retouching >
Retouching HAIR - crossing strands?
No, I don't have the answer to this, but I'm looking for it. I've seen a few retouchers on here who are able to do it, but the rest of us are in the dark. Anyone willing to let us in on the secret? I'm talking about flawless perfectly straight, no strands crossing hair, not just tidying hair up. Thanks in advance if anyone's willing to share... Sep 04 09 09:43 pm Link It's primarily copying and pasting adjacent areas, carefully masking them in to cover up the stray piece. It can take many copied sections to cover one strand. Often, other selections of hair are pulled in from one of the other shots, and specific hair reference photos are taken for the super-elaborate pieces. Don't look at my avatar for good hair work. It was originally just a post in a "how to do a doll retouch" thread - I wasn't expecting it to be so popular. Now even though I cringe when I see that horrible blurry curl, I don't want to delete it... Sep 04 09 10:05 pm Link mikedimples wrote: Thanks! you really did get good smooth results with that and I will use it for my images since most don't require that obviously retouched but oh so smooth hair lol Your way is a good way to achieve natural.... BUT I still don't think its how they achieve that hyper-real hair. I've included a few pictures: Sep 04 09 10:11 pm Link I think you misunderstood me - I'm not proud of my crappy job. Believe it or not, I do think that those hyper-realistic hair ads come from basic cloning to remove the strays outside the model's silhouette, then going through painstakingly copying nice, perfectly combed areas and pasting the straight strands over the strands that go in another direction. I'd wager that the shots you posted have had many perfect sections from other shots from that shoot composited in. It's slow work, but I don't think there's some secret technique involved. Sep 04 09 10:23 pm Link mikedimples wrote: That's exactly how it is done. There's no other way around it, except for burning in hair where you need it and taking it out where you don't. Sep 04 09 10:28 pm Link mikedimples wrote: Lol its not a crappy job! Although I hope you're not right...its very plausible though. I've experimented with flattening the hair and adding a texture layer and it hasn't looked right, so maybe you are correct about it being composites from other shots. Sep 04 09 10:30 pm Link mikedimples wrote: Could you post a link to that thread, please? I can't find it. Sep 04 09 10:37 pm Link Aphoristic Precise wrote: +1 Sep 04 09 11:10 pm Link Lea Halliwell wrote: I probably should have mentioned the threads from RetouchPRO.com. Here's the link, but you have to register to see the images. You'll also get to see the very early version of the doll retouch, back when she had teeth! Sep 05 09 01:16 am Link It takes forever - as Mike said there's no shortcut to it - it's a very long process, often strand by strand and composites of colmbed hair. In one of my recent shoots we did the same thing - we took shots of perfectly combed hair - and then began shooting after that. We were able to combine the perfect hair pieces with the perfect pose to create the perfect composite. Sep 05 09 01:50 am Link x Sep 05 09 01:55 am Link I'm going to be blind from hair in about 2days :X Sep 07 09 12:00 am Link Michael Donovan Rulezz wrote: Rofl about to pull another fast one on retouching? Sep 07 09 12:11 am Link Solstice Retouch wrote: +1 Sep 07 09 06:22 am Link |