Photographer
Quay Lude
Posts: 6386
Madison, Wisconsin, US
Model
Jules NYC
Posts: 21617
New York, New York, US
Photographer
IrisSwope
Posts: 14857
Dallas, Texas, US
She does not look like a model at all. She looks like average woman.
Model
MartaBrixton
Posts: 1022
London, England, United Kingdom
Omg how the hell is she fat? People are crazy. Her figure is great!
Photographer
IrisSwope
Posts: 14857
Dallas, Texas, US
Oh come on! I don't know who she is, but if she's a model, she's fat (in horrible shape, whatever). If she's some random person who people are making popular for the sake of being popular, then whatever. but that's fat for a model .
Photographer
normad
Posts: 11372
Saint Louis, Missouri, US
MartaBrixton wrote: Omg how the hell is she fat? People are crazy. Her figure is great! By comparing her to similar models in the same position?
Photographer
normad
Posts: 11372
Saint Louis, Missouri, US
IrisSwope wrote: Oh come on! I don't know who she is, but if she's a model, she's fat (in horrible shape, whatever). If she's some random person who people are making popular for the sake of being popular, then whatever. but that's fat for a model. 1
Photographer
Quay Lude
Posts: 6386
Madison, Wisconsin, US
IrisSwope wrote: Oh come on! I don't know who she is, but if she's a model, she's fat (in horrible shape, whatever). If she's some random person who people are making popular for the sake of being popular, then whatever. but that's fat for a model. You funny. http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012_s … ate-upton/
Wardrobe Stylist
Sara Macias Stylist
Posts: 51
El Paso, Texas, US
IMHO I think for a woman in whatever universe she's smoking hot. For a model, yeah she makes a good lingerie model maybe because she's curvy and has big boobs, but in her field I think she could use more toning but not all straight out anorexia, thats ridiculous.
Model
Paige Morgan
Posts: 4060
New York, New York, US
Kate Upton isn't high fashion, so I have no clue as to why people are so keen to compare her to fashion standards. Far as I can tell, she does lots of high end glam/lingerie/swimsuit/commercial stuff.....and those ladies do tend to be a bit curvier than the couture catwalk models.
Photographer
normad
Posts: 11372
Saint Louis, Missouri, US
Photographer
Quay Lude
Posts: 6386
Madison, Wisconsin, US
Paige Morgan wrote: Kate Upton isn't high fashion, so I have no clue as to why people are so keen to compare her to fashion standards. This.
Photographer
IrisSwope
Posts: 14857
Dallas, Texas, US
Cuica Cafezinho wrote: You funny. http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012_s … ate-upton/ Ok, I now know who she is. googled her, imgmodels.com says she has a 25" waist. Her waist is as big as mine, and it's 27" or 28" She looks bigger than Crystal Renn. She's hot, I won't deny that, but she's not model sized at all. And that first photo posted did make her look like a squishy brick. It was an excellent description.
Photographer
normad
Posts: 11372
Saint Louis, Missouri, US
EV Styling wrote: I don't get it, thats a photo of Marissa Miller I believe that's what I said, compared to models in similar positions/covers/blah, she's fat ... at least in the picture in the link in the OP ...
Photographer
IrisSwope
Posts: 14857
Dallas, Texas, US
Photographer
Awesometographer
Posts: 10973
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
Even as a fashion/glam (the fancier glam stuff) she's a bit on the chubby side compared to her peers.
Wardrobe Stylist
Sara Macias Stylist
Posts: 51
El Paso, Texas, US
Piscis Noctis wrote: that's what I said, compared to models in similar positions/covers/blah, she's fat ... at least in the picture in the link in the OP ... oh ok
Retoucher
BrunetteGrenade
Posts: 1474
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US
She has dangerous curves.. not fat!
Model
Laurie-Anne Foster
Posts: 143
Hamilton, Montana, US
IrisSwope wrote: Oh come on! I don't know who she is, but if she's a model, she's fat (in horrible shape, whatever). If she's some random person who people are making popular for the sake of being popular, then whatever. but that's fat for a model. When I first read your post, I actually thought you were joking. http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012_s … ate-upton/ If that's fat for a model, you must be Keanu Reeves and this forum...it must be the Matrix. And I'm Gandalf. What more do you want, to be able to see her spleen? Oh my god, look! She has a bicep! Ahh shit, she has breasts. I guess she doesn't look like a 6-foot tall 11-year-old. But in horrible shape? Oooookay. I guess something like this would be more your style: http://www.renderosity.com/mod/bcs/phot … 26805a.jpg
Photographer
Quay Lude
Posts: 6386
Madison, Wisconsin, US
I was repulsed by the community that attacked her with the "fat" nonsense. From the article... "So what, pray tell, is a “pro-ana” website? In an effort to “promote anorexia” (get it?), pro-ana sites often feature thinspiration but also endorse behaviors typically associated with eating disorders, sharing tips for starving, vomiting, or abusing laxatives. Some sites claim to provide a safe, non-judgmental haven for those suffering from eating disorders, while others seek to spin disordered behaviors into positive lifestyle choices." Fascinates me that a couple of you are calling Kate Upton fat. Not what I expected at all.
Photographer
IrisSwope
Posts: 14857
Dallas, Texas, US
Laurie-Anne Foster wrote: When I first read your post, I actually thought you were joking. http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012_s … ate-upton/ If that's fat for a model, you must be Keanu Reeves and this forum...it must be the Matrix. And I'm Gandalf. What more do you want, to be able to see her spleen? Oh my god, look! She has a bicep! Ahh shit, she has breasts. I guess she doesn't look like a 6-foot tall 11-year-old. But in horrible shape? Oooookay. I guess something like this would be more your style: http://www.renderosity.com/mod/bcs/phot … 26805a.jpg I generally expect swimsuit models to look more like this... rather than Like I said, she's hot, but she's not what I'd expect to see.
Retoucher
Michael A Broughton
Posts: 1194
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
some people just need to get over themselves.
Model
MelissaAnn
Posts: 3971
Seattle, Washington, US
I don't think she looks fat, but she doesn't look at all toned or in shape either- looks like she really needs to hit the gym. Definitely not even close to one of the better figures as far as models go (IMO).
Photographer
Quay Lude
Posts: 6386
Madison, Wisconsin, US
IrisSwope wrote: I generally expect swimsuit models to look more like this... rather than Like I said, she's hot, but she's not what I'd expect to see. You're comparing a SI cover shot to a runway snap shot? You're a photographer.... right???
Photographer
IrisSwope
Posts: 14857
Dallas, Texas, US
Michael A Broughton wrote: some people just need to get over themselves. It has nothing to do with ourselves, we're not models.
Photographer
Awesometographer
Posts: 10973
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
MelissaAnn wrote: I don't think she looks fat, but she doesn't look at all toned or in shape either- looks like she really needs to hit the gym. Definitely not even close to one of the better figures as far as models go (IMO). +1 I'd hit it for sure... but then I'd think "i could have done better" ... alessandra ambrosio on the other hand... wouldn't have gotten the caveat.
Photographer
PhotographybyT
Posts: 7947
Monterey, California, US
Michael A Broughton wrote: some people just need to get over themselves. Definitely hot and she has a cute dance! (lol) Not even close to 'fat' in the general sense.
Model
Jules NYC
Posts: 21617
New York, New York, US
I honestly think she looks AWESOME!
Photographer
Cherrystone
Posts: 37171
Columbus, Ohio, US
IrisSwope wrote: Oh come on! I don't know who she is, but if she's a model, she's fat (in horrible shape, whatever). If she's some random person who people are making popular for the sake of being popular, then whatever. but that's fat for a model. My green gieger counter is going wild here....
Photographer
IrisSwope
Posts: 14857
Dallas, Texas, US
Cuica Cafezinho wrote: You're comparing a SI cover shot to a runway snap shot? You're a photographer.... right??? Nope, I'm comparing their middles. Have you seen a runway snapshot of a regular runway model? because they're still that size whether or not it's a snapshot or a magazine cover. She's regular girl size though.... if most fashion models walked into their agency that size, they'd be sent home, and told to go make the gym their second home. (and the animated gif posted more than once, is locking up my computer, so I have to get out of here.)
Photographer
Quay Lude
Posts: 6386
Madison, Wisconsin, US
IrisSwope wrote: Nope, I'm comparing their middles. Have you seen a runway snapshot of a regular runway model? because they're still that size whether or not it's a snapshot or a magazine cover. She's regular girl size though.... if most fashion models walked into their agency that size, they'd be sent home, and told to go make the gym their second home. (and the animated gif posted more than once, is locking up my computer, so I have to get out of here.) I'll just refer you to Paige Morgan's post earlier in the thread. And, I wish you the best of luck in figuring out the difference. Cheers!
Photographer
Orca Bay Images
Posts: 33877
Arcata, California, US
Astounding. There have been MMer models who are grossly obese and some so homely they've been mistaken for men, yet they get the "You go, girl! You're beautiful!" treatment. Yet Kate gets treated like a no-name pig. I wish someone could explain it to me.
Photographer
Art Silva
Posts: 10064
Santa Barbara, California, US
Hell, I'd do her!
Retoucher
BorderlineBunny
Posts: 2201
Tulsa, Oklahoma, US
Cuica Cafezinho wrote: You funny. http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012_s … ate-upton/ Anyone else going to note that she looks slimmed via Photoshop there? Majorly? At least her arm mostly. But I can see where they may have slimmed her thighs and legs and tucked the tummy too.
Photographer
DMW Shoots
Posts: 1604
Miami, Florida, US
I am officially a chubby chaser if that's fat.
Photographer
Mr Banner
Posts: 85322
Hayward, California, US
Paige Morgan wrote: Kate Upton isn't high fashion, so I have no clue as to why people are so keen to compare her to fashion standards. Far as I can tell, she does lots of high end glam/lingerie/swimsuit/commercial stuff.....and those ladies do tend to be a bit curvier than the couture catwalk models. +
Photographer
Quay Lude
Posts: 6386
Madison, Wisconsin, US
BorderlineBunny wrote: Anyone else going to note that she looks slimmed via Photoshop there? Majorly? At least her arm mostly. But I can see where they may have slimmed her thighs and legs and tucked the tummy too. That would be unheard of. SI would never do that. But thanks for bringing it to our attention. LOL You're a clever one Mr.
Photographer
Mr Banner
Posts: 85322
Hayward, California, US
DMW Shoots wrote: I am officially a chubby chaser if that's fat. ditto plus I have a chubby
Photographer
Mr Banner
Posts: 85322
Hayward, California, US
Orca Bay Images wrote: Astounding. There have been MMer models who are grossly obese and some so homely they've been mistaken for men, yet they get the "You go, girl! You're beautiful!" treatment. Yet Kate gets treated like a no-name pig. I wish someone could explain it to me. it's not jealousy. because if you suggest that a MM model is somehow jealous of a well known model, well, you just don't understand!
|