Photographer
DDDDC Photos
Posts: 651
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
Anna Adrielle wrote: yes, you can . But then I want to be a unicorn! 10-4 over
Model
Jules NYC
Posts: 21617
New York, New York, US
Anna Adrielle wrote: yes, you can . But then I want to be a unicorn! Awesome, please be that
Model
retiredanddeleted
Posts: 3561
Azul, Buenos Aires, Argentina
DANACOLE wrote: She's definitely not fat, but she could use some toning up. good picture of her box like figure.
+1 I don't get why people praise her body so much. yes nice ass nice tits but no waist. She has no hourglass shape whatsoever. I mean she's drop dead gorgeous but her body doesn't have ''killer curves'' like everyone says
Model
Anna Adrielle
Posts: 18763
Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
MissLaurelle wrote: +1 I don't get why people praise her body so much. yes nice ass nice tits but no waist. She has no hourglass shape whatsoever. I mean she's drop dead gorgeous but her body doesn't have ''killer curves'' like everyone says a lot of people say "curvy" when they mean "booby". that explains it
Model
Jules NYC
Posts: 21617
New York, New York, US
Anna Adrielle wrote: a lot of people say "curvy" when they mean "booby". that explains it Bingo
Model
C A T H Y
Posts: 5464
Anaheim, California, US
She is NOT fat. She's just a little curvy.
Model
Jules NYC
Posts: 21617
New York, New York, US
To clarify the definition of 'fat', This is 'fat'.
Model
Bunny Bombshell
Posts: 11798
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
And there is still debate over this, *SMH*
Model
Jules NYC
Posts: 21617
New York, New York, US
On 'curvy' Until now, scientists (and apparently Western society) thought a curvy figure trumped other body shapes. The idea was based on results from medical studies that suggested a curvy waist-to-hip ratio of 0.7 or lower (meaning the waist is significantly narrower than the hips) is associated with higher fertility and lower rates of chronic disease. http://www.livescience.com/3098-female- … glass.html
Model
Anna Adrielle
Posts: 18763
Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
Jules NYC wrote: On 'curvy' Until now, scientists (and apparently Western society) thought a curvy figure trumped other body shapes. The idea was based on results from medical studies that suggested a curvy waist-to-hip ratio of 0.7 or lower (meaning the waist is significantly narrower than the hips) is associated with higher fertility and lower rates of chronic disease. http://www.livescience.com/3098-female- … glass.html I find it offensive that there apparantly is such a thing as a "best" body. Surely there is more to picking who is going to bare your children other than hip-waist ratio
Model
Jules NYC
Posts: 21617
New York, New York, US
Ms Selina K wrote: And there is still debate over this, *SMH* I know, right?
Model
Jules NYC
Posts: 21617
New York, New York, US
Anna Adrielle wrote: I find it offensive that there apparantly is such a thing as a "best" body. Surely there is more to picking who is going to bare your children other than hip-waist ratio Thank you! *why I posted it... Read the article
Model
D A N I
Posts: 4627
Little Rock, Arkansas, US
"fat" is subjective just like "curvy", "skinny", and "lean". What may not be fat to you may be HUGE to someone else
Model
Anna Adrielle
Posts: 18763
Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
Jules NYC wrote: Thank you! *why I posted it... Read the article I did . so, chubby waists... good to know :p
Model
Jules NYC
Posts: 21617
New York, New York, US
Anna Adrielle wrote: I did . so, chubby waists... good to know :p Ha ha I think there is research for everything and anything to side with any point when it comes down to it.
Model
K I C K H A M
Posts: 14689
Los Angeles, California, US
Jules NYC wrote: Thank you! *why I posted it... Read the article I like the last quote about how there are things important to women other than what when think about their bodies. Insane concept.
Model
Jules NYC
Posts: 21617
New York, New York, US
K I C K H A M wrote: I like the last quote about how there are things important to women other than what when think about their bodies. Insane concept. Big Smile Yes
Model
Fifi
Posts: 58134
Gainesville, Florida, US
My biggest issue with her is (and it's not really her per say), with her body type, I just can't understand why she's always styled so sloppily. I am a huge fan of boobs, but constantly putting her in tops that are three sizes too small just looks sloppy and not sexy. But, that's just my opinion. Also, when compared to other models out there (fashion, lingerie, swimwear, and even alt models), she's kind of boring to me. I guess she looks easily attainable, like the girl next door. But, I just don't get it.
Model
Jules NYC
Posts: 21617
New York, New York, US
Fifi wrote: My biggest issue with her is (and it's not really her per say), with her body type, I just can't understand why she's always styled so sloppily. I am a huge fan of boobs, but constantly putting her in tops that are three sizes too small just looks sloppy and not sexy. But, that's just my opinion. Also, when compared to other llamas out there (fashion, lingerie, swimwear, and even alt llamas), she's kind of boring to me. I guess she looks easily attainable, like the girl next door. But, I just don't get it. Yes and her gifs make her look easily attainable too.
Photographer
udor
Posts: 25255
New York, New York, US
Garry k wrote: To each it's own... the fitness girl to the right has that kind of body that I am totally attracted to (I love brunettes as well)... and on a scale, from that fitness girl on one end to Kate Upton how she looks here on the other end... I find half way in between still very, very attractive. But this is just on a physical level... there are other things that could make a girl ("bigger") still attractive to me... but... again... that's just physical. If I'd be with a girl on the right... I'd be totally inspired to work out and get much leaner again myself... and to have lots of sex too... If I'd be with Kate... I'd be inspired to cuddle with her on a big sofa... having some beers, a take out pizza and chips, while watching a movie... and getting heavier and more sluggish by the day... EDIT: Just saw that Fifi posted here... she'd have totally that effect of that fitness girl on me...
Model
Jules NYC
Posts: 21617
New York, New York, US
Photographer
udor
Posts: 25255
New York, New York, US
Model
Jules NYC
Posts: 21617
New York, New York, US
udor wrote: I get nothing Julie! Just headlines, none related to anything... Can you check your links again, please! Try now:)
Photographer
udor
Posts: 25255
New York, New York, US
Jules NYC wrote: Try now:) Sorry... this is what I get: "Hernandez Captured by Own Cameras With 'Gun' After Shooting" Same thing... was Hernandez size 4 and what is the context??? My viacodin kicked in... maybe I am too slow (had emergency dental surgery yesterday, but because you hate FB, you don't know about it... )
Model
neeeep
Posts: 238
Los Angeles, California, US
IrisSwope wrote: Ok, I now know who she is. googled her, imgmodels.com says she has a 25" waist. Her waist is as big as mine, and it's 27" or 28" She looks bigger than Crystal Renn. She's hot, I won't deny that, but she's not model sized at all. And that first photo posted did make her look like a squishy brick. It was an excellent description. the great thing is there are all types of models. (:
Model
Jules NYC
Posts: 21617
New York, New York, US
udor wrote: Sorry... this is what I get: "Hernandez Captured by Own Cameras With 'Gun' After Shooting" Same thing... was Hernandez size 4 and what is the context??? My viacodin kicked in... maybe I am too slow (had emergency dental surgery yesterday, but because you hate FB, you don't know about it... ) Awww Sorry I didn't know... Vicodins, the Rolls Royce of pain killers... Hey, you could have told me. Hope you're hanging in there. I posted some Youtube links in my original message. Here's the deal... This cheerleader was called too chunky/fat ironically by a blogger who worked for some network who tried to be a cheerleader herself and didn't make the team. The cheerleader is a size 4, but in those micro outfits, well hey now. She gave a good rebuttal in her defense and exercises 4/5 hours a day to be in shape for the team. Damn, if I exercised that much I'd be a Cyborg. Anyhoo, the whole thing reminded me of this thread.
Photographer
Kincaid Blackwood
Posts: 23492
Los Angeles, California, US
You know… while she and I were cooking tonight's dinner (juicy hamburgers) Kate was just telling me about how she gives no fucks. Break it down for 'em, baby.
Photographer
Kincaid Blackwood
Posts: 23492
Los Angeles, California, US
Someone stop Kate Upton!! …from eating that entire hamburger.
Model
Fifi
Posts: 58134
Gainesville, Florida, US
Kincaid Blackwood wrote: You know… while she and I were cooking tonight's dinner (juicy hamburgers) Kate was just telling me about how she gives no fucks. Break it down for 'em, baby.
Model
Jules NYC
Posts: 21617
New York, New York, US
|