Photographer
Nelia
Posts: 2166
San Francisco, California, US
Carl Roberts wrote:
So "Porn" is is the explicit portrayal of sexual subject matter for the purpose of sexual gratification
And a "Slut" is someone that has loose sexual morals or who is sexually promiscuous.
I still say if you are doing "Porn" then by definition you are a "Slut" This has to be the Dumbest comparison that i have ever read in my life!
Model
BeatnikDiva
Posts: 14859
Fayetteville, Arkansas, US
Michael Pandolfo wrote:
I am so disappointed. What's with all the Slut Hate? Sluts need love too. And food!
![https://static.neatoshop.com/images/product/26/2026/Soup-for-Sluts-Ramen_7847-l.jpg?v=7847]()
Photographer
Good Egg Productions
Posts: 16713
Orlando, Florida, US
mjda1st wrote:
I see that phrase repeated across the bios of so many female llamas. I'm like what the hell??? You're telling me THAT many photogs on MM, inbox llamas about shooting porn they actually have to post a disclaimer? Granted MM, does allow porn sluts to "model" here
Model
Mary Geraldine
Posts: 1697
Valdese, North Carolina, US
DivaEroticus wrote:
And food!
![https://static.neatoshop.com/images/product/26/2026/Soup-for-Sluts-Ramen_7847-l.jpg?v=7847]() Mmmmm slu... I mean soup.
Photographer
Rik Austin
Posts: 12164
Austin, Texas, US
I am moving this to OT. The Sewer is backed up.
Photographer
Merlinpix
Posts: 7118
Farmingdale, New York, US
Mmmm...porn sluts...such a gentleman.
Photographer
JimBobLc
Posts: 199
Martinsburg, West Virginia, US
I would think an advertisement would be about all the things one does, and not about the things one does not do. "Implied nudes only" or "tasteful nudes only" seems to get the message across in a less confrontational manner than "no porn" or even "no nudes", and casual mention of a boyfriend or husband (whether one exists or not) seems to be less confrontational than "don't even think about it". Imagine if you walked in Wal-Mart and the greeter's first words were "no shoplifting".
Photographer
Marc Damon
Posts: 6562
Biloxi, Mississippi, US
AVD AlphaDuctions wrote:
theres probably a cosmetic surgery procedure for loose sexual morals. check the yellow pages online. I have. I couldn't find it. Can anyone recommend a good surgeon?
 Mmmm Good thread!
Model
Damianne
Posts: 15978
Austin, Texas, US
Rik Austin wrote:
I am moving this to OT. The Sewer is backed up. Backed up by sluts, I'm sure.
Photographer
Andialu
Posts: 14029
San Pedro, California, US
DivaEroticus wrote:
And food!
![https://static.neatoshop.com/images/product/26/2026/Soup-for-Sluts-Ramen_7847-l.jpg?v=7847]() Cheap and delicious, just like sluts!
Photographer
Carl Roberts
Posts: 33090
Saint Petersburg, Florida, US
Carl Roberts wrote:
So "Porn" is is the explicit portrayal of sexual subject matter for the purpose of sexual gratification
And a "Slut" is someone that has loose sexual morals or who is sexually promiscuous.
I still say if you are doing "Porn" then by definition you are a "Slut" Damianne wrote:
Unless you're talking about pedophilia or rape, morals and sex don't actually have anything to do with one another.
"loose sexual morals" makes no sense, unless you actually mean they have poor morals in regards to sex, which would make them a sexual predator, a sex offender, or just a criminal, not a slut.
What a fucking stupid phrase. This is a cut and paste definition I got from Wikipedia
Not my definition, Wikipedia's
Photographer
PhotographybyT
Posts: 7947
Monterey, California, US
What say me? Damn those "porn slut" photographers! ...ruining it for us regular slut photographers.  /sarc
Photographer
Carl Roberts
Posts: 33090
Saint Petersburg, Florida, US
Carl Roberts wrote:
So "Porn" is is the explicit portrayal of sexual subject matter for the purpose of sexual gratification
And a "Slut" is someone that has loose sexual morals or who is sexually promiscuous.
I still say if you are doing "Porn" then by definition you are a "Slut" Nelia wrote:
This has to be the Dumbest comparison that i have ever read in my life! Really? The dumbest comparison you have EVER read in your life?
What about the comparison of Bruce Wayne and Donald Trump
I think that one is dumber
Model
Damianne
Posts: 15978
Austin, Texas, US
Carl Roberts wrote:
Carl Roberts wrote:
So "Porn" is is the explicit portrayal of sexual subject matter for the purpose of sexual gratification
And a "Slut" is someone that has loose sexual morals or who is sexually promiscuous.
I still say if you are doing "Porn" then by definition you are a "Slut" This is a cut and paste definition I got from Wikipedia
Not my definition, Wikipedia's Oh, well then, that makes it much less stupid.
Photographer
Carl Roberts
Posts: 33090
Saint Petersburg, Florida, US
Damianne wrote:
Oh, well then, that makes it much less stupid.
Lol
Model
Mary Geraldine
Posts: 1697
Valdese, North Carolina, US
Anybody else remember when Sinbad died?
Model
-Jen-
Posts: 46880
Howell, Michigan, US
Model
Koryn
Posts: 39496
Boston, Massachusetts, US
Shooting "porn" is a lot of fun.
Why you mad?
Model
-Jen-
Posts: 46880
Howell, Michigan, US
Nelia wrote:
This has to be the Dumbest comparison that i have ever read in my life! ![https://i.imgur.com/RnD9h.gif]()
Model
Russian Katarina
Posts: 1413
London, England, United Kingdom
Damianne wrote:
Unless you're talking about pedophilia or rape, morals and sex don't actually have anything to do with one another.
"loose sexual morals" makes no sense, unless you actually mean they have poor morals in regards to sex, which would make them a sexual predator, a sex offender, or just a criminal, not a slut.
What a fucking stupid phrase. Did you expect any better from the same guys that thought it was a better idea to have priests fondle little kids than allowing them to have a normal sex life?
Photographer
Sophistocles
Posts: 21320
Seattle, Washington, US
-Jen- wrote:
![https://i.imgur.com/RnD9h.gif]() I just feel the need to point out that this scene is from The Trouble with Tribbles, at the end, when Scotty explains that he beamed all of the tribbles on to the Klingon ship.
I have to maintain my geek cred by demonstrating that I know that.
It is my hope that it gets me dates with some of these sluts.
Anyone?
Model
Damianne
Posts: 15978
Austin, Texas, US
Sophistocles wrote:
I just feel the need to point out that this scene is from The Trouble with Tribbles, at the end, when Scotty explains that he beamed all of the tribbles on to the Klingon ship.
I have to maintain my geek cred by demonstrating that I know that.
It is my hope that it gets me dates with some of these sluts.
Anyone? Do you have a Tribble from the Star Trek Experience before it closed?
Photographer
Brooks Ayola
Posts: 9754
Chatsworth, California, US
Photographer
Rik Austin
Posts: 12164
Austin, Texas, US
Damianne wrote:
Backed up by sluts, I'm sure.  I would so love to answer but then I'd have to brig myself.
Photographer
Marc Damon
Posts: 6562
Biloxi, Mississippi, US
Damianne wrote:
Do you have a Tribble from the Star Trek Experience before it closed? Don't you know Chris is The Supreme Super Geek? Of course he has the damn tribble! 
Model
Damianne
Posts: 15978
Austin, Texas, US
Rik Austin wrote:
I would so love to answer but then I'd have to brig myself. You'd punish yourself too harshly and we'd all appeal through proper channels.
You know, by making a thread in Site Related.
Photographer
Marc Damon
Posts: 6562
Biloxi, Mississippi, US
Damianne wrote:
You'd punish yourself too harshly and we'd all appeal through proper channels.
You know, by making a thread in Site Related. SR is for people who can't find the help button and for people who think emotion and not dollars will get IB to give a damn about their peeves. We couldn't help Rik in there.
Photographer
AVD AlphaDuctions
Posts: 10747
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Marc Damon wrote:
SR is for people who can't find the help button and for people who think emotion and not dollars will get IB to give a damn about their peeves. We couldn't help Rik in there. no thread jacking. start a separate thread about SR sluts
Photographer
SPRINGHEEL
Posts: 38224
Detroit, Michigan, US
Photographer
Cherrystone
Posts: 37171
Columbus, Ohio, US
Simply fooken lovely......
Carry on, I got my 3 minutes of cheap entertainment. I really hope a few of you continue to post, so I can get another minute or two later on.
Model
Nicole Nu
Posts: 3981
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Photographer
Carl Roberts
Posts: 33090
Saint Petersburg, Florida, US
-Jen- wrote:
![https://i.imgur.com/tHw0b.gif]() ![https://gifsoup.com/view/1025511/krunking-o.gif]()
Photographer
Jeffrey M Fletcher
Posts: 4861
Asheville, North Carolina, US
mjda1st wrote:
I see that phrase repeated across the bios of so many female models. I'm like what the hell??? You're telling me THAT many photogs on MM, inbox models about shooting porn they actually have to post a disclaimer? Granted MM, does allow porn sluts to "model" here & too many women have the hideous ''Camera phone in the bathroom mirror" shots in their profiles, but c'mon fellas, not every woman is THAT desperate for money. What say you? But surely in our modern age it's not only women. Op, are you a porn slut?
Model
Russian Katarina
Posts: 1413
London, England, United Kingdom
Sophistocles wrote:
I just feel the need to point out that this scene is from The Trouble with Tribbles, at the end, when Scotty explains that he beamed all of the tribbles on to the Klingon ship.
I have to maintain my geek cred by demonstrating that I know that.
It is my hope that it gets me dates with some of these sluts.
Anyone? The tribbles need to be in the next Trek movie.
JJ Abrams will probably just wipe them out with a drop of red goo, but to hell with continuity.
Makeup Artist
T
Posts: 53557
Washington, District of Columbia, US
Photographer
Carl Roberts
Posts: 33090
Saint Petersburg, Florida, US
Russian Katarina wrote:
The tribbles need to be in the next Trek movie.
JJ Abrams will probably just wipe them out with a drop of red goo, but to hell with continuity. Yes but the lens flare off of their eye when the light hits it will be epic
Photographer
Christopher Carter
Posts: 7777
Indianapolis, Indiana, US
You know it's a good thread when the mods join in the frivolity 
Makeup Artist
T
Posts: 53557
Washington, District of Columbia, US
Yes, just like old times. Trainwrecks galore!!!
|
Mmmm Good thread!
I would so love to answer but then I'd have to brig myself.
