Model
Lumen Sky
Posts: 1802
Center Moriches, New York, US
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=My2FRPA3Gf8 look who directed it at the end of the song. I actually like the song, and the video could have been done in a different manner and had power to it, it almost does, minus the trashiness. Im not really one to talk about this stuff, but considering this was a new video, I wanted to see what was up. She has to be doing something right to get even ME to look! ha!. What do you guys think? I know most of you have much more important things to do or think about, but most of you also come on here to talk, so here ya go. I dont want this to become some big bashing thing, but I have some time on my hands right now and figured I would ask.
Photographer
Aspect By Allanah
Posts: 2110
Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
Got bored after the first half minute.
How can this seriously be the hot topic of world conversation.
Oh look, a young adult exploring his/her sexuality. wooptyfuckindoo
Photographer
kickfight
Posts: 35054
Portland, Oregon, US
Model
Lumen Sky
Posts: 1802
Center Moriches, New York, US
Model
Lumen Sky
Posts: 1802
Center Moriches, New York, US
S K E L E T O N K E Y wrote:
Got bored after the first half minute.
How can this seriously be the hot topic of world conversation.
Oh look, a young adult exploring his/her sexuality. wooptyfuckindoo I kind of liked the song. I think she has beauty as well. Would have been nice to see this video done in a different manner. Perhaps minus the red lipstick and with some clothes on. not all, but some more. She could have "helped" her image along a bit. the whole hammer licking was a bit unnecessary and some of her ass shots were a bit Terry like. I wonder who had more of the vision going into this.
Photographer
T Brown
Posts: 2460
Traverse City, Michigan, US
kickfight wrote:
Yawn. That whole riding-a-wrecking-ball bit is soooo 1984.  Now, thats more my speed....
Model
Magic Forests
Posts: 530
New York, New York, US
I thought the video was kind of ick and confusing. Her lipstick is grossish.
Photographer
Art Silva
Posts: 10064
Santa Barbara, California, US
Photographer
Erlinda
Posts: 7286
London, England, United Kingdom
I like it, the song and video….. (I would prefer if she wasn't liking anything in the video but meh) 
Model
Lumen Sky
Posts: 1802
Center Moriches, New York, US
Erlinda wrote:
I like it, the song and video….. (I would prefer if she wasn't liking anything in the video but meh) I quite like the song and parts of the video.
Photographer
Naughty Ties
Posts: 3445
Riverview, Florida, US
Hot girl in either next to nothing or completely naked? Yep, works for me!
Photographer
Jim Ball
Posts: 17632
Frontenac, Kansas, US
I thought her titties were bigger... 
Photographer
Edge of the Moon
Posts: 431
New York, New York, US
The song and video are are OK for me. She's a bit odd but she's got a great figure though. She can sit on my wrecking ball any day. 
Photographer
Art Silva
Posts: 10064
Santa Barbara, California, US
Seeing her on that ball, well lets just say I'd do her... after a few shots and a bag over her face and ear plugs in my ears. Ohhhh Dayyyummm! 
Model
Emil T
Posts: 337
Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Miley, Gaga, Britney, Rihanna - YOU ARE NOT MADONNA!
Some kid licking a hummer in a music video - how low is that... But, well, scandal sells...
Model
Anna Adrielle
Posts: 18763
Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
Emil T wrote:
- Miley, Gaga, Britney, Rihanna - YOU ARE NOT MADONNA!
Some kid licking a hummer in a music video - how low is that... But, well, scandal sells... when did they ever claim that they are madonna?
Photographer
T Brown
Posts: 2460
Traverse City, Michigan, US
Model
Lumen Sky
Posts: 1802
Center Moriches, New York, US
T Brown wrote:
![https://img198.imageshack.us/img198/5153/gze0.jpg]() great for mm
Model
Jules NYC
Posts: 21617
New York, New York, US
Emil T wrote:
- Miley, Gaga, Britney, Rihanna - YOU ARE NOT MADONNA!
Some kid licking a hummer in a music video - how low is that... But, well, scandal sells... Yes and yes.
Photographer
Skydancer Photos
Posts: 22196
Santa Cruz, California, US
As pop videos go, this is one is pretty good.
Not much to say beyond that.
Model
Jules NYC
Posts: 21617
New York, New York, US
The video would be SO much better if it wasn't so literal.
... and that in itself makes the entire visual lame.
Photographer
Chris Rifkin
Posts: 25581
Tampa, Florida, US
kickfight wrote:
Yawn. That whole riding-a-wrecking-ball bit is soooo 1984. And this is much better
Model
Jules NYC
Posts: 21617
New York, New York, US
Chris Rifkin wrote:
And this is much better Not even comparable.
Photographer
Skydancer Photos
Posts: 22196
Santa Cruz, California, US
kickfight wrote:
Yawn. That whole riding-a-wrecking-ball bit is soooo 1984. Chris Rifkin wrote:
And this is much better Are you serious?
Model
Jules NYC
Posts: 21617
New York, New York, US
Skydancer Photos wrote:
kickfight wrote:
Yawn. That whole riding-a-wrecking-ball bit is soooo 1984. Are you serious? I am.
Photographer
Click Hamilton
Posts: 36555
San Diego, California, US
Miley should hire Emily Ratajkowski to play the part of the sexy girl in her music videos.
Model
Anna Adrielle
Posts: 18763
Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
Jules NYC wrote:
The video would be SO much better if it wasn't so literal.
... and that in itself makes the entire visual lame. it would be SO much better if she didn't try to be a sexkitten in a song that is supposed to be quite strong and emotional. Somehow screaming and crying and pulling your hair in close up, and grinding on a ball and licking a hammer doesn't quite match up... all the deliberately sexy parts just felt so forced and awkward to me.
Then again, I think the parts where she wasn't *trying* to be sexy but just walking around in her undies, she's incredibly sexy.
Also, the person who did her make up should not be allowed to do make up, ever again. horrible job on the lipstick front...
![https://whatspoppininpopculture.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/miley-cyrus-wreaking-ball-face.jpg?w=566]()
Photographer
Chicchowmein
Posts: 14585
Palm Beach, Florida, US
Anna Adrielle wrote:
it would be SO much better if she didn't try to be a sexkitten in a song that is supposed to be quite strong and emotional. Somehow screaming and crying and pulling your hair in close up, and grinding on a ball and licking a hammer doesn't quite match up... all the deliberately sexy parts just felt so forced and awkward to me.
Then again, I think the parts where she wasn't *trying* to be sexy but just walking around in her undies, she's incredibly sexy.
Also, the person who did her make up should not be allowed to do make up, ever again. horrible job on the lipstick front...
![https://whatspoppininpopculture.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/miley-cyrus-wreaking-ball-face.jpg?w=566]() I was mesmerized by the horrible job on the lipstick -- Noticed it right away and fixated on it and couldn't get beyond it.
Though the song was yawn. the video was yawn and I can see why she hypes so damn hard -- and while I think Miley Cyrus is a cute girl, I don't find her sexy.
Didn't do it for me. I did force myself to watch the entire video but I would of normally clicked out after 10 seconds.
Model
Jules NYC
Posts: 21617
New York, New York, US
Anna Adrielle wrote:
it would be SO much better if she didn't try to be a sexkitten in a song that is supposed to be quite strong and emotional. Somehow screaming and crying and pulling your hair in close up, and grinding on a ball and licking a hammer doesn't quite match up... all the deliberately sexy parts just felt so forced and awkward to me.
Then again, I think the parts where she wasn't *trying* to be sexy but just walking around in her undies, she's incredibly sexy.
Also, the person who did her make up should not be allowed to do make up, ever again. horrible job on the lipstick front... I didn't find her sexy in any part of the video and I actually like some of her photographs.
Licking a hammer, pseudo-humping the wrecking ball, lol!
I could have thought of so many images/scenes that would have been better for an emotional song.
Plus, Miley doesn't have a face that I want to see THAT up close. When she smiles all I see are gums. When shes 'crying' boo hoo!, I see a vacant kid that's doesn't move me at all and doesn't have the physical beauty to go 'Wow'.
If she played off the song like Avril Lavigne, that would have been cool.
... but she's NOT Avril Lavigne, she's a cutsey girl trying to grow up and tell the world she has menstruated.
I like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMbIipvQL0c
It is convincing, the emotion that is and she looks sexy without tryin'. For that age range, ha.
Photographer
Christopher Hartman
Posts: 54196
Buena Park, California, US
Anna Adrielle wrote:
it would be SO much better if she didn't try to be a sexkitten in a song that is supposed to be quite strong and emotional. Somehow screaming and crying and pulling your hair in close up, and grinding on a ball and licking a hammer doesn't quite match up... all the deliberately sexy parts just felt so forced and awkward to me.
Then again, I think the parts where she wasn't *trying* to be sexy but just walking around in her undies, she's incredibly sexy.
Also, the person who did her make up should not be allowed to do make up, ever again. horrible job on the lipstick front...
![https://whatspoppininpopculture.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/miley-cyrus-wreaking-ball-face.jpg?w=566]() Isn't this a break up song? should her makeup be perfect?
Model
Jules NYC
Posts: 21617
New York, New York, US
Christopher Hartman wrote:
Isn't this a break up song? should her makeup be perfect? Where is the bleeding mascara? When you cry, that happens man; not supposed to look pristine. Would have looked cool too imperfect but you know it's imperfect.
Photographer
Chicchowmein
Posts: 14585
Palm Beach, Florida, US
Christopher Hartman wrote:
Isn't this a break up song? should her makeup be perfect? Eye makeup maybe but the lipstick in the corner of her mouth is just poorly done
It doesn't look like the makeup of someone that has been crying -- it looks like makeup that has been sloppily applied.
The look is still really a " Clean" Look but the lipstick application is shite.
Model
Anna Adrielle
Posts: 18763
Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
Christopher Hartman wrote:
Isn't this a break up song? should her makeup be perfect? hm no, it's quite clear from the rest of the styling, the lighting, the rest of the video, the rest of her face... that is was supposed to be a clean, "edgy" look.
Model
Anna Adrielle
Posts: 18763
Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
Chicchowmein wrote:
Eye makeup maybe but the lipstick in the corner of her mouth is just poorly done
It doesn't look like the makeup of someone that has been crying -- it looks like makeup that has been sloppily applied.
The look is still really a " Clean" Look but the lipstick application is shite. and what is up with her eyelashes??
Model
Anna Adrielle
Posts: 18763
Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
Jules NYC wrote:
I didn't find her sexy in any part of the video and I actually like some of her photographs.
Licking a hammer, pseudo-humping the wrecking ball, lol!
I could have thought of so many images/scenes that would have been better for an emotional song.
Plus, Miley doesn't have a face that I want to see THAT up close. When she smiles all I see are gums. When shes 'crying' boo hoo!, I see a vacant kid that's doesn't move me at all and doesn't have the physical beauty to go 'Wow'.
If she played off the song like Avril Lavigne, that would have been cool.
... but she's NOT Avril Lavigne, she's a cutsey girl trying to grow up and tell the world she has menstruated.
I like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMbIipvQL0c
It is convincing, the emotion that is and she looks sexy without tryin'. For that age range, ha. yeah okay. She's not my type (not that I think she's ugly), I think she has a bit of a babyface, you know? Very sweet and childlike, not this raw woman. I do think another look (instead of the emphasis on the lips) suits her a bit better (all my personal taste, of course). I like her better like this:
![https://wac.450f.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/popcrush.com/files/2013/09/miley-cyrus1.jpg]()
Photographer
Chicchowmein
Posts: 14585
Palm Beach, Florida, US
Anna Adrielle wrote:
and what is up with her eyelashes?? Yeah I saw that but I just couldn't get beyond how awful the lips were.
Bloody awful
Photographer
Christopher Hartman
Posts: 54196
Buena Park, California, US
Anna Adrielle wrote:
yeah okay. She's not my type (not that I think she's ugly), I think she has a bit of a babyface, you know? Very sweet and childlike, not this raw woman. I do think another look (instead of the emphasis on the lips) suits her a bit better (all my personal taste, of course). I like her better like this:
![https://wac.450f.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/popcrush.com/files/2013/09/miley-cyrus1.jpg]() She's looking like Justin Bieber...or he's looking like her.
Model
Jules NYC
Posts: 21617
New York, New York, US
Anna Adrielle wrote:
yeah okay. She's not my type (not that I think she's ugly), I think she has a bit of a babyface, you know? Very sweet and childlike, not this raw woman. I do think another look (instead of the emphasis on the lips) suits her a bit better (all my personal taste, of course). I like her better like this:
![https://wac.450f.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/popcrush.com/files/2013/09/miley-cyrus1.jpg]() Well, we're both not lesbians here LOL but eh.
I just think she's an averagely cute girl/young woman that can photograph very well with the right photographer.
Not an age thing; I just don't find her um, 'all that'.
... but I'm not trying to date her so I could care less what she does/how she behaves/what she looks like.
She has more money than me!
Photographer
T Brown
Posts: 2460
Traverse City, Michigan, US
|
