kickfight wrote:

Changing Attitude is a pretty awesome organization.

I couldn't open it but if it supports what this thread is about, great:)

kickfight wrote:
Changing Attitude is a pretty awesome organization.

Jules NYC wrote:
I couldn't open it but if it supports what this thread is about, great:)

It does!

Changing Attitude works for the full inclusion of gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people in the life of the Anglican Communion.

kickfight wrote:
It does!

Changing Attitude works for the full inclusion of gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people in the life of the Anglican Communion.

I think religion shouldn't be a part of who people love but if people are dead-set on bringing religion into the mix, great.

I've heard so many people preach about religion, the subject in its entirety makes me want to run for the hills.

Jules NYC wrote:
I think religion shouldn't be a part of who people love but if people are dead-set on bringing religion into the mix, great.

I agree that it shouldn't be a part of who people love, but for those who feel strongly about religion *and* also fellow humans, yes... this is great.

Jules NYC wrote:
I've heard so many people preach about religion, the subject in its entirety makes me want to run for the hills.

You're definitely not alone in that regard.

NothingIsRealButTheGirl wrote:

FlirtynFun Photography wrote:
and trolling seems to be applauded if you're liberal on this board.

Where "trolling" is defined as "celebrating a ruling of the Supreme Court of the United States"

no, where trolling is defined as nearly anything YOU post.

FlirtynFun Photography wrote:
examples of liberal "love and tolerance"  http://www.bizpacreview.com/2015/06/29/ … ade-219042 ?

The commenters come off like complete shit there. (big surprise)

I love how they throw their priest under the bus for feigning at least some degree of "Christ-like" behavior, even though he couldn't resist mentioning it on Twitter in the first place.

FlirtynFun Photography wrote:
no, where trolling is defined as nearly anything YOU post.

Funny how mine is actually plainly and factually accurate while yours could better be described as sleazy intellectual dishonesty.

FlirtynFun Photography wrote:

2016 isn't here yet...and the GOP has the House and Senate. Hopefully we can get this country back on track to focus on issues like national security and getting this country back to work.

Like when? Back to say 2001?

KungPaoChic wrote:

Like when? Back to say 2001?

2001 was right after 8 years of Democrat leadership.. so yea, we're there again, except a lot worse this time around. It's going to be exciting for sure!

FlirtynFun Photography wrote:
examples of liberal "love and tolerance"  http://www.bizpacreview.com/2015/06/29/ … ade-219042 ?

Makes me wonder:

Should the Christian institution of marriage be redefined so as to recognize Catholic "weddings?"

FlirtynFun Photography wrote:
examples of liberal "love and tolerance"  http://www.bizpacreview.com/2015/06/29/ … ade-219042 ?

so, the extent of 'liberal intolerance' is .. spitting?


examples of non-liberal "love and tolerance"..

Recent Investigative Successes Against Hate Crime Perpetrators

The investigation of hate crimes remains a top priority of the FBI’s civil rights program. We investigate hate crimes that fall under federal jurisdiction, can assist state and local authorities during their own investigations, and in some cases—with the U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division—monitor developing situations to determine if federal action is appropriate. Here are several examples of cases we’ve recently investigated:

- In November 2014, a Texas man was sentenced to 15 years in prison for luring a young gay man to his home and brutally assaulting him because of his sexual orientation. Details

- In September 2014, a former member of the Ku Klux Klan pleaded guilty for his role in a cross burning in front of an interracial family’s home in Tennessee. Details

- Also in September 2014, a Utah man pleaded guilty to interfering with the housing rights of three members of an interracial family by threatening to kill them if they did not make their African-American family member leave their home. Details

- In July 2014, four individuals were indicted for their alleged roles in a racially motivated crime spree targeting African-Americans in Jackson, Mississippi. Details

- In April 2014, a man was indicted on federal hate crime charges for making anti-Semitic threats against a Jewish businesswoman who owned an Albuquerque restaurant. Details

r T p wrote:

so, the extent of "liberal intolerance" is .. spitting?


examples of non-liberal "love and tolerance"..

I guess that makes it OK.

Jerry Nemeth wrote:
I guess that makes it OK.

what makes what OK?

stop guessing

DEP E510 wrote:
He doesn't speak for everyone.

The Bible condemns gluttony, fornication, and adultery.

But only homosexuality is considered an abomination.

The Bible considers homosexuality its own level of peversion.

People pretend that Christians should meekly accept the celebration of the Bruce/ Caitlyn Jenner, homosexual marriage legalization, effeminization of America.

Every pendulum shifts.

A real Christian does not validate the values of this world, nor accepts them. A Christian is someone opposed to the World-- for the simple reason that according to the Bible, this world is ruled by Satan and his followers.

"The time for judging this world has come, when Satan, the ruler of this world, will be cast out."

John 12:31

While I very much enjoy seeing our illustrious leaders united by giving the devil's horns sign, why is Al Sharpton doing the Big Vagina sign?

r T p wrote:

what makes what OK?

stop guessing

He googled selected incidents.

Evan Hiltunen wrote:
While I very much enjoy seeing our illustrious leaders united by giving the devil's horns sign, why is Al Sharpton doing the Big Vagina sign?

to some .. vagina is the devil

Evan Hiltunen wrote:

While I very much enjoy seeing our illustrious leaders united by giving the devil's horns sign, why is Al Sharpton doing the Big Vagina sign?

Three of them are (perhaps accidentally) signing "I love you", not giving devil horns.

Jules NYC wrote:
It's the Illuminati sign.

Jerry Nemeth wrote:

I guess that makes it OK.

I don't think anyone said it was ok.

By comparison though I"ll take the phlegm was opposed to say being beaten to death or lynched.

KungPaoChic wrote:

I don't think anyone said it was ok.

By comparison though I"ll take the phlegm was opposed to say being beaten to death or lynched.

Bad incidents were googled and contrasted with the spitting to make it seem minor.  It was a trick.

Jerry Nemeth wrote:
Bad incidents were googled and contrasted with the spitting to make it seem minor.  It was a trick.

Why do we even know about this incident?

What did the priest hope to accomplish by tweeting it?

NothingIsRealButTheGirl wrote:

Why do we even know about this incident?

What did the priest hope to accomplish by tweeting it?

So what!  Obviously you don't want to know about it.   

r T p wrote:
so, the extent of 'liberal intolerance' is .. spitting?

Father Jonathan Morris already acknowledged that he doesn't think the people who did that to him were members of the gay community.

kickfight wrote:

Father Jonathan Morris already acknowledged that he doesn't think the people who did that to him were members of the gay community.

Great point

Jerry Nemeth wrote:
Bad incidents were googled and contrasted with the spitting to make it seem minor.  It was a trick.

the only trick here is .. figuring out your contribution to this thread


www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2014/december/ … t-released

Jerry Nemeth wrote:
So what!  Obviously you don't want to know about it.   

Did he turn and offer the other cheek?

Did he give them his coat?

Laura UnBound wrote:

Three of them are (perhaps accidentally) signing "I love you", not giving devil horns.

I thought this somehow tied into the "world belongs to Satan" thing and Al just didn't get the message.

r T p wrote:


the only trick here is .. figuring out your contribution to this thread


www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2014/december/ … t-released

Deflection.

NothingIsRealButTheGirl wrote:

Did he turn and offer the other cheek?

Did he give them his coat?

Don't get ridiculous!

NothingIsRealButTheGirl wrote:

Great point

It really doesn't matter.  The fact is that they did it.

Jerry Nemeth wrote:
Don't get ridiculous!

Oh. I thought he and you were Christians.

My mistake.

Jerry Nemeth wrote:
It really doesn't matter.  The fact is that they did it.

The fact is they did it? Even though the priest denies they did it?

r T p wrote:

the only trick here is .. figuring out your contribution to this thread


www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2014/december/ … t-released

Jerry Nemeth wrote:
Deflection.

delusion

kickfight wrote:
Father Jonathan Morris already acknowledged that he doesn't think the people who did that to him were members of the gay community.

NothingIsRealButTheGirl wrote:
Great point

Yep. It's the only thing that matters. The people who did that to him should be ashamed regardless. And the people exploiting it for profit and to make bogus speculative claims about it should be ashamed as well.

NothingIsRealButTheGirl wrote:
Did he turn and offer the other cheek?

Did he give them his coat?

Jerry Nemeth wrote:
Don't get ridiculous!

This is really key.

It's not like you guys try to be Christlike and fall short and feel bad about it.

You consider the very idea of following the example of Jesus to be "ridiculous"

Jerry Nemeth wrote:

Bad incidents were googled and contrasted with the spitting to make it seem minor.  It was a trick.

Morris shared that he doesn't think members of the gay community are the individuals who spat on him.

http://insider.foxnews.com/2015/06/29/f … ide-parade

So who actually spit on him? Sounds to me like it was somebody trying to spit on the people marching in the gay parade.

I wonder who would do something like that?