P I X I E wrote:

I don't think anyone here tried to prove other females wrong. But when you have men going on about how they could tell the model they worked with was aroused just because they saw a moist cunt, that's the issue at hand.

Do models ever get turned on at shoots? Possibly. No one is saying it never happens. However, I find it amusing that some men claim to know female biology better than anyone else.

Tell us you're horny or GTFO.

udor wrote:
Hi Danielle!

I don't follow this thread much... just cursory... but... from what I am getting out from it sofar, and I haven't read all posts... so I might be wrong... but, according to the posts of your female model colleagues... you are wrong about getting horny!

You must be misinterpreting your bodily reaction as sexual, when your vagina just tries to get rid of stuff!

Read the posts and you might learn what your body is really doing and how it functions...

Woosh. Maybe you should have read the thread before replying.

The whole argument that is going on here is women clarifying that wetness =/= horniness.

There is nothing WRONG with being horny, and no one is saying horniness or sexuality is wrong.

I'm not sure how people are interpreting shaming of sexuality from a couple of chicks telling dudes in this thread that a wet vagina does not auto equate to horniness.

So to be VERY clear...

Not bad: Sexuality and being sexual. Go for it. Feel how you want, sleep with who you want, do what you want.

Bad: Looking at a vagina and assuming you know exactly what is going on in a woman's brain because of how the vagina happens to look at that moment.

JadeDRed wrote:

Tell us you're horny or GTFO.

ALL THE TIME. Duh.

Mary Geraldine wrote:

Michelle Genevieve wrote:
Do models get turned on at shoots?

"Dear Penthouse, I always thought these stories were fake until something amazing happened to me on a photo shoot . . . "

Um, sure, I guess! Hasn't happened to me, though.

The biggest misinterpretation I see in this thread is the idea that if a model gets turned on during a shoot, then she must wanna fuck the photographer.  That's stupid.  If a model gets turned on, chances are it's the camera that's doing it, not the man behind the camera.  Considering what modeling is, it's not all that far-fetched to believe that a lot of them would have a bit of an exhibitionist streak in them, just as it's not far-fetched to believe that a lot of photographers have a bit of a voyeur in them.

Why openly admitting that is such a dirty dirty shame-shame is beyond me.

IDiivil wrote:

Woosh. Maybe you should have read the thread before replying.

The whole argument that is going on here is women clarifying that wetness =/= horniness.

There is nothing WRONG with being horny, and no one is saying horniness or sexuality is wrong.

I'm not sure how people are interpreting shaming of sexuality from a couple of chicks telling dudes in this thread that a wet vagina does not auto equate to horniness.

So to be VERY clear...

Not bad: Sexuality and being sexual. Go for it. Feel how you want, sleep with who you want, do what you want.

Bad: Looking at a vagina and assuming you know exactly what is going on in a woman's brain because of how the vagina happens to look at that moment.

You are so much more eloquent about it than I ever could be.

udor wrote:
Hi Danielle!

I don't follow this thread much... just cursory... but... from what I am getting out from it sofar, and I haven't read all posts... so I might be wrong...

IDiivil wrote:
Woosh. Maybe you should have read the thread before replying.

The whole argument that is going on here is women clarifying that wetness =/= horniness.

There is nothing WRONG with being horny, and no one is saying horniness or sexuality is wrong.
So to be VERY clear...

Not bad: Sexuality and being sexual. Go for it. Feel how you want, sleep with who you want, do what you want.

Bad: Looking at a vagina and assuming you know exactly what is going on in a woman's brain because of how the vagina happens to look at that moment.

Cool with me and I am in full agreement about your points!

Take it easy on me... I didn't read all the posts, because I am not the brightest bulb in the milk carton! 

udor wrote:

udor wrote:
Hi Danielle!

I don't follow this thread much... just cursory... but... from what I am getting out from it sofar, and I haven't read all posts... so I might be wrong...

Cool with me and I am in full agreement about your points!

Take it easy on me... I didn't read all the posts, because I am not the brightest bulb in the milk carton! 

*Offers hug*

Sorry - I'm just frustrated with the way things are being interpreted in the thread. I didn't mean to word my statement so strongly at you.