Forums > Photography Talk > Another Grid question

Photographer

DeVaul Photography

Posts: 702

Chagrin Falls, Ohio, US

There was another grid topic where many of you posted examples.  It was mentioned how grids direct your light.  I have a Speedotron 22" beauty dish, and before I go out and spend $180 on the grid, I would like to ask...If I could make a simple snoot out of black poster board, and gaffer tape it around my BD, what would be the difference between that and the grid.  I also have a diffusion sock for my BD.  If I put this on along with the homemade snoot, how would this differ from the grid.  If there would be a definite fall-off in light "quality" I would definitely get the grid.

ps to Stephen Eastwood(hope you see this)- Stephen, you said you attached a mirror to the small center reflector of your Speedo BD.  Since the original is translucent, and you now have an opaque mirror, do you get a more intense light or softer on your subject.  I was thinking of crinkling up some tin foil and wrapping it where you put the mirror, have you ever tried this, and if so how did you like the effect.  Thanks,  Jon.

Jan 02 08 10:51 pm Link

Photographer

CW Foto

Posts: 238

Dallas, Texas, US

A grid will give you a gradated circle of light (with brighter center) where the snoot is going to give you a very hot circle of light with a hard outer edge.  Two different affects.

Jan 02 08 10:57 pm Link

Photographer

M_M_P

Posts: 3410

Seattle, Washington, US

The point of a 22inch beauty dish is to have a large light source. Making a snoot for it would be somewhat pointless in my mind. Let's say you want similar results to a 20 degree grid. An "equivalent" snoot would have to be 22 inches around, the same as the dish, and five feet long. A 10 degree equivalent would have to be 10 feet long. Even if you made one, you couldn't get the same effect because you would be so limited by how far away the light would be at it's very minimum. To me, what a beauty dish with a grid does that a snoot can't is keep the light at a specific spread without requiring a great distance between the light source and the subject thereby allowing you to achieve a softer shadow while maintaining control over the spread.

Jan 03 08 12:22 am Link

Photographer

Mike Wunder

Posts: 3

Flushing, New York, US

I have the same BD and the honey comb grid and its great, you wont get the same affect with a home made snoot so if you intend on creating images that require the "grid affect" you should invest and buy it.

Jan 03 08 12:44 am Link

Photographer

DeVaul Photography

Posts: 702

Chagrin Falls, Ohio, US

It looks like I'm ordering my grid tomorrow.  I suspected that the quality of light would suffer, and that is most important.  Thanks for the replies.

Jan 03 08 01:02 am Link

Photographer

Henri3

Posts: 7392

Minneapolis, Minnesota, US

I use the Speedo grid on my Hensel dish, a tight controlled beam, if that's what you're after.
There's no real alternative to a grid for a 22" dish. Think I paid around $150 from B&H for the grid 2-3 months ago. Maybe less.

Jan 03 08 01:35 am Link

Photographer

Rich Meade

Posts: 1302

Atlanta, Georgia, US

I use a speedotron grid on my AB dish... I rarely take it off!!!

(the grid that is....)

Jan 03 08 02:12 am Link

Photographer

digital Artform

Posts: 49326

Los Angeles, California, US

Rich Meade wrote:
I use a speedotron grid on my AB dish... I rarely take it off!!!

(the grid that is....)

How do you get it to fit on? I have to tape mine on

Jan 03 08 02:14 am Link

Photographer

OLJ studio

Posts: 1550

Winnetka, California, US

Rich Meade wrote:
I use a speedotron grid on my AB dish... I rarely take it off!!!

(the grid that is....)

Are you talking about this one?
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1 … id_35.html

I wonder where can I find something less then 35 degrees?

Jan 03 08 02:30 am Link

Photographer

Rich Meade

Posts: 1302

Atlanta, Georgia, US

It just snaps right over the top!  its got 2 clips on either side, just like a tupperwear bowl.  (well not exactly)

maybe they have re-designed it.. I just got mine like 3 months ago.

I think 35degrees is perfect  its actually tighter than you would expect, .. if I need anything tighter I just move it closer to the model. 

on this image, I had the dish around 10 feet from the model:
https://modelmayhm-9.vo.llnwd.net/d1/photos/071124/12/47485a650da13_m.jpg

Jan 03 08 02:36 am Link

Photographer

DeVaul Photography

Posts: 702

Chagrin Falls, Ohio, US

I ordered the 22" grid this afternoon.  Used my local professional camera store, and got it for $165.

Jan 03 08 05:38 pm Link

Photographer

slave to the lens

Posts: 9078

Woodland Hills, California, US

I don't have an image to post but I bought a grid for florescent lights ( about 24 x 48) at the home depot, cut it slightly larger than my beauty dish, painted it black ( it was silver) and attached it with velcro tabs on the edge. It directs the light beautifully and cost 15 bucks. grids are about 1/2" squares . If you wanted more directional, cut another piece and overlap the other squares slightly.

Jan 03 08 08:48 pm Link

Photographer

StephenEastwood

Posts: 19585

Great Neck, New York, US

DeVaul Photography wrote:
There was another grid topic where many of you posted examples.  It was mentioned how grids direct your light.  I have a Speedotron 22" beauty dish, and before I go out and spend $180 on the grid, I would like to ask...If I could make a simple snoot out of black poster board, and gaffer tape it around my BD, what would be the difference between that and the grid.  I also have a diffusion sock for my BD.  If I put this on along with the homemade snoot, how would this differ from the grid.  If there would be a definite fall-off in light "quality" I would definitely get the grid.

ps to Stephen Eastwood(hope you see this)- Stephen, you said you attached a mirror to the small center reflector of your Speedo BD.  Since the original is translucent, and you now have an opaque mirror, do you get a more intense light or softer on your subject.  I was thinking of crinkling up some tin foil and wrapping it where you put the mirror, have you ever tried this, and if so how did you like the effect.  Thanks,  Jon.

the grid will be more directional and less spread and a slightly different effect to the light,  the grid is worth more than the dish and is priced becasue people know that. 

The mirror actually gives a softer overall look to the light but not by much, it does eliminate the hotspot that the diffused center imparted which I don't like at all, crinkle is fine its not real relevant, it could be black I chose a mirror for the maximum efficiency of light, not the quality, its just bouncing it back into the dish.

Stephen Eastwood
http://www.StephenEastwood.com

Jan 03 08 08:52 pm Link

Photographer

StephenEastwood

Posts: 19585

Great Neck, New York, US

Rich Meade wrote:
maybe they have re-designed it.. I just got mine like 3 months ago.

I do not think speedotron has ever redesigned anything ever. 

Stephen Eastwood
http://www.StephenEastwood.com

Jan 03 08 08:55 pm Link

Photographer

DeVaul Photography

Posts: 702

Chagrin Falls, Ohio, US

When I first got the BD.  I was testing it out on my son.  I kept getting that hot spot on his forehead.  I posted the shots on the Fred Miranda site and asked about the hot spot.  I was given all kinds of advice from PS to make-up(my son would never stand for that).  I thought about using a polarizer, but the mirror idea sounds great.

Jan 03 08 09:56 pm Link

Photographer

StephenEastwood

Posts: 19585

Great Neck, New York, US

DeVaul Photography wrote:
When I first got the BD.  I was testing it out on my son.  I kept getting that hot spot on his forehead.  I posted the shots on the Fred Miranda site and asked about the hot spot.  I was given all kinds of advice from PS to make-up(my son would never stand for that).  I thought about using a polarizer, but the mirror idea sounds great.

Luckily you did not get the use a softbox type of advice.  LOL

Some professionals are very not helpful and some very helpful people are so very not knowledgeable sad
Stephen Eastwood
http://www.StephenEastwood.com

Jan 03 08 09:58 pm Link

Photographer

Star

Posts: 17966

Los Angeles, California, US

What about using blackwrap to direct the light? And Stephen, how is the grid different than flagging?

Jan 03 08 10:01 pm Link

Photographer

Newcomb Photography

Posts: 728

Tampa, Florida, US

Star wrote:
What about using blackwrap to direct the light? And Stephen, how is the grid different than flagging?

I'm not Stephen, but the blackwrap idea is essentially the homemade poster board snoot, which as somebody pointed out is a different effect.  Flagging is simply blocking light from hitting something in frame.  The grid essentially turns a big light into a bunch of little lights to create a narrow beam.

Jan 03 08 10:05 pm Link

Photographer

StephenEastwood

Posts: 19585

Great Neck, New York, US

blackwrap would do nothing more than flagging,  to keep it more direct the grid actually redirects the lightwaves in a more directional way so its a tighter control and more directional wave,  the wrap would only keep the stray light from leaking out the edges but the light would still travel at angles outward from the dish making a different quality of light and much different spread.  The spread is controllable with enough flags either around the light or around the subject, but the quality of light is not the same,  you could all try this with any reflector and grid of any size you have to see the effects only smaller scale and see if its worth the money or not.  For me everything I own short of an umbrella, fresnel, lightstick, and the obscure globe or glowing object has a grid, octoboxes, octobanks, strips, lightbars, reflectors, softboxes, etc.  Personally I feel that a BD without a grid is nothing more than a umbrella in light quality and characteristic, only cost a lot more and weighs far more and dents much easier than an umbrealla.

Stephen Eastwood
http://www.StephenEastwood.com

Jan 03 08 10:10 pm Link