SCS Photography wrote:
.

UPDATE

I have found your third entry…
https://photos.modelmayhem.com/potd_18p … 20-big.jpg
It is sitting in the queue for tomorrow’s contest

But there is a problem. Your entry is a duplicate entry to that of the model’s entry
https://photos.modelmayhem.com/potd_18p … 18-big.jpg
that is also sitting in the queue for tomorrow’s contest.

In the case of a duplicate entry I allow the earliest entry and disqualify the latter entry. Since your entry came in after the model’s entry I will be disqualifying your entry in tomorrow’s contest.

BTW Was the model with you when she entered her image?

JoJo Suicide wrote:
UPDATE

I have found your third entry…
https://photos.modelmayhem.com/potd_18p … 20-big.jpg
It is sitting in the queue for tomorrow’s contest

But there is a problem. Your entry is a duplicate entry to that of the model’s entry
https://photos.modelmayhem.com/potd_18p … 18-big.jpg
that is also sitting in the queue for tomorrow’s contest.

In the case of a duplicate entry I allow the earliest entry and disqualify the latter entry. Since your entry came in after the model’s entry I will be disqualifying your entry in tomorrow’s contest.

BTW Was the model with you when she entered her image?

First those are not my images. those are by SRS photography.
My images now have Sully. as a watermark.

I have not entered a submission for tomorrow. I was not sure why the submissions for the last 3 days have not been included, and Wanted to learn if I was breaking a rule I did not know about, before submitting more images.

The only entries I submitted entries on Wednesday night 8pm
Thursday 11:am
Friday 1pm

OK JoJo thanks for the follow up.

Scott

SCS Photography wrote:

First those are not my images. those are by SRS photography.
My images now have Sully. as a watermark.

I have not entered a submission for tomorrow. I was not sure why the submissions for the last 3 days have not been included, and Wanted to learn if I was breaking a rule I did not know about, before submitting more images.

The only entries I submitted entries on Wednesday night 8pm
https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/1 … 01b285.jpg 18+
Thursday 11:am
https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/1 … aa5949.jpg 18+
Friday 1pm
https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/1 … 074595.jpg 18+

OK JoJo thanks for the follow up.

Scott

JoJo Suicide wrote:
UPDATE

I have found your third entry…
https://photos.modelmayhem.com/potd_18p … 20-big.jpg
It is sitting in the queue for tomorrow’s contest

But there is a problem. Your entry is a duplicate entry to that of the model’s entry
https://photos.modelmayhem.com/potd_18p … 18-big.jpg
that is also sitting in the queue for tomorrow’s contest.

In the case of a duplicate entry I allow the earliest entry and disqualify the latter entry. Since your entry came in after the model’s entry I will be disqualifying your entry in tomorrow’s contest.

BTW Was the model with you when she entered her image?

SCS Photography wrote:
First those are not my images. those are by SRS photography.
My images now have Sully. as a watermark.

I have not entered a submission for tomorrow. I was not sure why the submissions for the last 3 days have not been included, and Wanted to learn if I was breaking a rule I did not know about, before submitting more images.

The only entries I submitted entries on Wednesday night 8pm
Thursday 11:am
Friday 1pm

OK JoJo thanks for the follow up.

Scott

Sorry about that.
The script/font used in the SRS watermark looks deceptively like SCS from the thumbnail sized images I am viewing.
My error

I still can not find any record of your Feb 24 entry which should have been in the February 25 contest.

JoJo Suicide wrote:

JoJo Suicide wrote:
UPDATE

I have found your third entry…
https://photos.modelmayhem.com/potd_18p … 20-big.jpg
It is sitting in the queue for tomorrow’s contest

But there is a problem. Your entry is a duplicate entry to that of the model’s entry
https://photos.modelmayhem.com/potd_18p … 18-big.jpg
that is also sitting in the queue for tomorrow’s contest.

In the case of a duplicate entry I allow the earliest entry and disqualify the latter entry. Since your entry came in after the model’s entry I will be disqualifying your entry in tomorrow’s contest.

BTW Was the model with you when she entered her image?

Sorry about that.
The script/font used in the SRS watermark looks deceptively like SCS from the thumbnail sized images I am viewing.
My error

I still can not find any record of your Feb 24 entry which should have been in the February 25 contest.

np, so it was something to do with me downloading the image, and not because it was removed for a violation.

Thx JoJo.

Yono wrote:
I posted an image several days ago that was on the border of 600kb (603) but, it uploaded and was displayed. It disappeared and was not shown in the voting. I then resized it (less than 200kb) and resubmitted which it again desplayed but, once again it disappeared.
I have not received any notice of why. It was not pornographic and certainly didn't violate any rules (I mean come on. You had a nude black man being mounted by a nude white woman as a winner and two nude women cuddling in a sensual (and sexual) manner as a runner up so obviously there are few barriers)
I want to know why the image was removed or /disqualified or if this is a glitch.
Yono
Photographer

You have entered the same image on 2 separate occasions, February 24 and February 27.  Both times the image was disqualified as the tongue is making contact with the nipple.

Why have you not received a disqualification notice?
To do all the required steps of an RCAM and properly document it takes about 5 minutes to complete. Multiply this by the 100 to 150 disqualifications I make every night and I would be spending another 8 to 12 hours on top of the 4 to 5 hours I already spend each night working on the contests.

JoJo Suicide wrote:
You have entered the same image on 2 separate occasions, February 24 and February 27.  Both times the image was disqualified as the tongue is making contact with the nipple.

Why have you not received a disqualification notice?
To do all the required steps of an RCAM and properly document it takes about 5 minutes to complete. Multiply this by the 100 to 150 disqualifications I make every night and I would be spending another 8 to 12 hours on top of the 4 to 5 hours I already spend each night working on the contests.

Thank you for the reply. Without a reply I would'nt understand what happened or that a man's nude genitals can be mounted by a nude female and not be disqualified.
DUH!

Yono wrote:
Thank you for the reply. Without a reply I would'nt understand what happened or that a man's nude genitals can be mounted by a nude female and not be disqualified.
DUH!

Here are the rules: https://www.modelmayhem.com/info/rules/images

I did not make them. My job is to enforce them.

If you feel that any contest entry (not an image in the queue) breaks any of the rules please send a CAM (https://www.modelmayhem.com/contactamod.php) including the URL of the image and I will explain why that image was allowed or disqualified.

I will NOT discuss the work of others with you in this forum.

JoJo Suicide wrote:

Here are the rules: https://www.modelmayhem.com/info/rules/images

I did not make them. My job is to enforce them.

If you feel that any contest entry (not an image in the queue) breaks any of the rules please send a CAM (https://www.modelmayhem.com/contactamod.php) including the URL of the image and I will explain why that image was allowed or disqualified.

I will NOT discuss the work of others with you in this forum.

Don't discuss them with me at all. I didn't ask for a rude or sarcastic answer. Having a meaningful discussion with a moron is a waste of time.

JoJo Suicide wrote:
Here are the rules: https://www.modelmayhem.com/info/rules/images

I did not make them. My job is to enforce them.

If you feel that any contest entry (not an image in the queue) breaks any of the rules please send a CAM (https://www.modelmayhem.com/contactamod.php) including the URL of the image and I will explain why that image was allowed or disqualified.

I will NOT discuss the work of others with you in this forum.

Yono wrote:
Don't discuss them with me at all. I didn't ask for a rude or sarcastic answer. Having a meaningful discussion with a moron is a waste of time.

Yono wrote:
I posted an image several days ago that was on the border of 600kb (603) but, it uploaded and was displayed. It disappeared and was not shown in the voting. I then resized it (less than 200kb) and resubmitted which it again desplayed but, once again it disappeared.
I have not received any notice of why. It was not pornographic and certainly didn't violate any rules (I mean come on. You had a nude black man being mounted by a nude white woman as a winner and two nude women cuddling in a sensual (and sexual) manner as a runner up so obviously there are few barriers)
I want to know why the image was removed or /disqualified or if this is a glitch.
Yono
Photographer

Yono wrote:
Don't discuss them with me at all. I didn't ask for a rude or sarcastic answer. Having a meaningful discussion with a moron is a waste of time.

What the hell does the race of the models have to do with the site rules??

SMFH!!

Do the site rules still say that MM reserves the right to ban any member for any --or no-- reason?

Stephen Markman wrote:

Yono wrote:
I posted an image several days ago that was on the border of 600kb (603) but, it uploaded and was displayed. It disappeared and was not shown in the voting. I then resized it (less than 200kb) and resubmitted which it again desplayed but, once again it disappeared.
I have not received any notice of why. It was not pornographic and certainly didn't violate any rules (I mean come on. You had a nude black man being mounted by a nude white woman as a winner and two nude women cuddling in a sensual (and sexual) manner as a runner up so obviously there are few barriers)
I want to know why the image was removed or /disqualified or if this is a glitch.
Yono
Photographer

What the hell does the race of the models have to do with the site rules??

SMFH!!

Do the site rules still say that MM reserves the right to ban any member for any --or no-- reason?

This comment caught my eye as well
I would like the poster spell out what he means but Im not here to stir up trouble.
I will draw my own conclusion and it isn't good.

Greg Christensen wrote:
I was wondering if my of image of Leanne for Saturday's contest was taken down and if so why - if it meet requirements of 18+ would it be OK for POD contest

thanks
Greg

I see you managed to find your entry in the contest

JoJo Suicide wrote:
So here it is, as promised, a PotD18+ Discussion thread.

Got a PotD18+ question? Ask it.
Got a PotD18+ problem? Let’s get it solved here.

One thing I ask – let’s keep things civil.

Oh, and just in case no one has mentioned it before, if you’re going to include a URL to an 18+ image you must include ‘18+’ before the URL.
(and it goes without saying – no posting 18+ images)

Have fun

JoJo

i was looking for  the POTD  18+  contest of the day,  is there one?  i cannot find it.  help please?

mia vaughn wrote:
i was looking for  the POTD  18+  contest of the day,  is there one?  i cannot find it.  help please?

Damn, the secret is out...
https://www.modelmayhem.com/potd_18plus.php

PhotomanDC wrote:
I got a note that one of my images had been removed... yet, it was allowed into the POTD 18+ contests at least 3 times...  and there are many more questionable images (and graphic) than mine every day. What gives?!

After checking the RCAMs that you have been sent I see that an image(s) in your portfolio was considered to be outside of the acceptable limits of MM.

I also note that you have not responded to this RCAM.
If you feel that the image was removed without just cause then state your case in your reply.

Just because I allow an image into the PotD18+ does not mean that another MOD can not take issue with that image. This appears to be what has happened here.

A little hint to assist you in composing your appeal:
Never, never, NEVER say, “and there are many more questionable images (and graphic) than mine every day”
That’s just like saying to the traffic cop ‘why did you pull ME over for speeding? There are other speeders too”
The cop will respond “when you go fishing do you catch ALL the fish?”

PhotomanDC wrote:
Sorry... but what's an RCAM?  Was just disappointed, because it was my most listed image, and most favorable comments. I also beg to differ if someone thinks the model was aroused... it was just his position. It just seems very subjective, and if the image has been on my profile for a year with no issues, why pull it now???  Thanks.

You are pleading your case to the wrong person – I’m the person that allowed your image into the PotD18+ on 2 separate occasions.

An RCAM is a Reverse CAM – it’s a message sent from a MOD to a member.

I have resurrected the original RCAM from Moderator 8 so you may more easily reply.

SCS Photography wrote:
np, so it was something to do with me downloading the image, and not because it was removed for a violation.

Thx JoJo.

OK I tried this again, and The Image was removed from the contest this time? might I ask why?

The Image was my avatar, and while it is not a openly nude image. the contest does not state that Implied would be removed? 

Scott

SCS Photography wrote:
Please see FULL quote near top of page please?
OK I tried this again, and The Image was removed from the contest this time? might I ask why?

The Image was my avatar, and while it is not a openly nude image. the contest does not state that Implied would be removed? 

Scott

JoJo Suicide Feb 27 10 01:38 pm wrote:
Here is your entry in the PotD18+ for February 26
https://photos.modelmayhem.com/potd_18p … 09-big.jpg
It was disqualified because it is not an 18+ image

You have entered this image in the PotD18+ multiple times and each time it has been disqualified.

You are using this image as your avatar. An avatar can not be an 18+ image.
This image is not 18+.
This image does not qualify for the PotD18+.

Cams Camera wrote:
Not sure whom I should contact..but this Retouch person is reposting same image.
Link on the 13th
https://www.modelmayhem.com/potd_previe … _id=172356

https://www.modelmayhem.com/potd_q.php?day=100312

Picture today..not playing by the rules!

Thanks!

You have reported in the correct place.

The image in question has been disqualified

JoJo Suicide wrote:

SCS Photography wrote:
Please see FULL quote near top of page please?
OK I tried this again, and The Image was removed from the contest this time? might I ask why?

The Image was my avatar, and while it is not a openly nude image. the contest does not state that Implied would be removed? 

Scott

You have entered this image in the PotD18+ multiple times and each time it has been disqualified.

You are using this image as your avatar. An avatar can not be an 18+ image.
This image is not 18+.
This image does not qualify for the PotD18+.

I understand the image has not been in the contest, but when I contacted you last week? you said there was no disqualification on this image.
I have no problems if it was disqualified, because it was not considered 18+ thank you for the clarification

Brooklyn Bridge Images wrote:
This comment caught my eye as well
I would like the poster spell out what he means but Im not here to stir up trouble.
I will draw my own conclusion and it isn't good.

OK, so I only visit here occassionally as work is more important than play but, I fail to see the reasoning behind your high school style suspension. What are we 11? I didn't appreciate the tone of the reply I received but, was that person "suspended"? Or are frustrated moderators ammune? And what personal attacks? Who did I attack. I had some other of your members sending me messages complaining. I don't know what's going on but, I'm not impressed with your attitude or childish reprisal.
As for the "race" question I was mearly using it to specifically identify the image. It's that she was mounted nude on a nude man. That's NOT suggestive?? Where do you think their genitals are?

Chuckarelei wrote:

They dont have the staff to send messages to all the images that dont comply with the rules.
There almost 100+ disqualifications every day and right now only 1 person is doing all the work.
Complain to IB that more staff is needed ??

Brooklyn Bridge Images wrote:
They dont have the staff to send messages to all the images that dont comply with the rules.
There almost 100+ disqualifications every day and right now only 1 person is doing all the work.
Complain to IB that more staff is needed ??

It doesn't take much longer to type a few words. Base on what I read here, it takes way more time to explain with quotes and links here.

I mean how hard can it be?
eg:

-duplicate
-+18
-spread eagle now allowed
-copyright violation


???

Otherwise, without knowing what happen, I just resubmit the same image. And then, it MIGHT take the mod the time to going thru an extra image and remove, and eventually still have to explain it here.

???

Brooklyn Bridge Images wrote:
They dont have the staff to send messages to all the images that dont comply with the rules.
There almost 100+ disqualifications every day and right now only 1 person is doing all the work.
Complain to IB that more staff is needed ??

Chuckarelei wrote:
It doesn't take much longer to type a few words. Base on what I read here, it takes way more time to explain with quotes and links here.

I mean how hard can it be?
eg:

-duplicate
-+18
-spread eagle now allowed
-copyright violation


???

Otherwise, without knowing what happen, I just resubmit the same image. And then, it MIGHT take the mod the time to going thru an extra image and remove, and eventually still have to explain it here.

???

You are correct, it wouldn’t take all that long to shoot off a simple explanation to a disqualified submitter – maybe 3 or 4 minutes start to finish.

Problem: 150+ RCAMs at 3 minutes each would total just another 7½ hours of work added to my day.

Have you got an extra 7½ hours of time you can shoot in my direction on a daily basis?

JoJo Suicide wrote:
You are correct, it wouldn’t take all that long to shoot off a simple explanation to a disqualified submitter – maybe 3 or 4 minutes start to finish.
Problem: 150+ RCAMs at 3 minutes each would total just another 7½ hours of work added to my day.
Have you got an extra 7½ hours of time you can shoot in my direction on a daily basis?

If it is so frequent, then it should be a script written for. as soon as a photo is removed, then an automated message is generated. just type in a reason in a few words. takes no than 15 seconds.


still, no one would tell me why my image was removed?!

and it got removed again for the 18th, and no one says a word. what's this? the united states congress?

Chuckarelei wrote:
If it is so frequent, then it should be a script written for. as soon as a photo is removed, then an automated message is generated. just type in a reason in a few words. takes no than 15 seconds.


still, no one would tell me why my image was removed?!

and it got removed again for the 18th, and no one says a word. what's this? the united states congress?

You entered the image twice yesterday and it was disqualified twice yesterday.

You entered it 3 times today and it has been disqualified 3 times today.

The image is NOT 18+

JoJo Suicide wrote:
You entered the image twice yesterday and it was disqualified twice yesterday.
You entered it 3 times today and it has been disqualified 3 times today.
The image is NOT 18+

Well, according to the new MM rules. Now that all thongs and g-string with a bare butt are considered 18+. Am I wrong on that? Unless the rules have been changed again?

Now I entered it to the regular POTD, I hope I won't get removed because of 'should've been in the 18+' section?

MalePortfolios wrote:
Interested to know why this image was disqualified from the contest on Saturday:
18+ Image
https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/16904776

The model it totally flaccid. I have links to comparative photos of semi-aroused and totally erect of the same model to show the difference.

Thanks for your help, JoJo.

The model may well be totally flaccid but he does not appear to me to be totally flaccid in the image you submitted.

This is why I disqualified your entry.