|
Someone say it's look like Newton pic, agree? 18 + https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/p … 3#29030143 Oct 15 12 10:44 am Link Oct 15 12 10:58 am Link The only resemblance to one of his images is that the girls have their arms up. KM Oct 15 12 11:01 am Link Oct 15 12 11:01 am Link r4u wrote: Those are all top fashion models . . . . they are styled and project attitudes . . . your's are just a couple of naked girls . . . big difference Oct 15 12 11:07 am Link r4u wrote: Nope..2 naked girls is about as close as it comes to his work. Color, flat, not high fashion model types. Any resemblance in the images is purely wishful thinking on your part. Oct 15 12 11:09 am Link the difference you don't see: no pubic hair  Oct 15 12 11:15 am Link r4u wrote: Someone must have been sniffing glue Oct 15 12 11:18 am Link Like U Tony? Oct 15 12 11:20 am Link r4u wrote: don't post a photo in serious critique and expect someone to praise you for shoddy work...especially if you try to compare your work to Newton. Oct 15 12 11:22 am Link no your image is far to technically insufficient to be mentioned in the same sentence as newtons work the only similarity is fully naked females feature in the image newton made and the one you have made by trying to copy the idea and framing had your main lighting not been through blinds and more controlled (way to distracting and causing light issues through out your image) had you set up fill lighting correctly instead of trying to rescue/add/adjust it far to much through post work (you can see it in the shadows, especially rear girls face and arms), had your thoughts been on a black and white lighting setup (color and black and white need different approaches) and focus on female form my opinion may have changed. sorry IMO it fails good effort but fails Oct 15 12 11:27 am Link It does not resemble Newton's work much in my opinion. While you may think that the important factor is the nude llamas, the main thing that differentiates your shot from Newton's work is the feel of the image. Newton's work portray's personality and depth beyond just what is visible. Your image lacks that. Oct 15 12 11:27 am Link In your example don't you see the eyes? Don't you see a clarity of message? I'm not seeing that in yours. Yours is nice, his is striking. Oct 15 12 11:32 am Link Its a great pic! haha and I love how the caption gives their age...lmfao but yeah, I love all of Newton's work. my version:  Oct 15 12 11:34 am Link r4u wrote: I am flattered thank you for liking me LOL. Oct 15 12 11:35 am Link Oct 15 12 12:07 pm Link **double post..glitch** I am flattered thank you for liking me LOL. In case you missed it..comparing that image to any work Helmut has done is an insulting as saying the VIrgin Mary would make a great stripper. (not that I have anything against strippers. Believe me I've tried) Putting the age of the models in the caption just makes it more creepy Oct 15 12 01:13 pm Link SoCo n Lime wrote: Oct 18 12 10:24 am Link r4u wrote: Like jackals drawn to death Oct 18 12 10:25 am Link Once again, I don't know why you even ask for a critique. Just because you take a photo of 2 naked girls standing there with side lighting doesn't make it a "Helmut Newton". While there are some flaws (as previously noted), overall, it IS a nice pic, just be happy with that. Oct 19 12 05:26 am Link Don't quote technique but artistic please I try to restraint quality there to be safe Nov 05 12 12:33 pm Link r4u wrote: the one thing I can see is that the newton girls had better hairstyles... Nov 09 12 01:00 pm Link A comment that says it has a similar look to Newton, I'd agree. Like the big nudes, or one part of the picture. Nice light, lots of depth, pretty girls too. It is not at all Newtonish in the respect of erotic implications or styling no. Nov 11 12 06:52 am Link |
