Forums > General Industry > "Old Hollywood" Glamour Nude Examples

Photographer

Blue Ash Film Group

Posts: 10343

Cincinnati, Ohio, US

I have had a model contacting me wanting some "old Hollywood" glamour nude photos taken. She wrote "think royalty meets sex with an old Hollywood feel". Of course I asked her for some examples and will discuss concepts with her, but internet searches on the topic haven't yielded very many good results yet. Do any of you have any suggestions on web sites to look at, or specific people to study to get some ideas?

Feb 11 13 01:07 pm Link

Photographer

Motordrive Photography

Posts: 7087

Lodi, California, US

I don't think this this is exactly what you are looking for, but I love
classic glamour and get inspiration from Hurrell
https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/18862720

Feb 11 13 01:19 pm Link

Photographer

Motordrive Photography

Posts: 7087

Lodi, California, US

when I shoot another in that style, I'l try to go with a silver B.D.
for a little harder light and more spectrality

Feb 11 13 01:23 pm Link

Photographer

Swank Photography

Posts: 19020

Key West, Florida, US

Blue Ash Film Group wrote:
I have had a model contacting me wanting some "old Hollywood" glamour nude photos taken. She wrote "think royalty meets sex with an old Hollywood feel". Of course I asked her for some examples and will discuss concepts with her, but internet searches on the topic haven't yielded very many good results yet. Do any of you have any suggestions on web sites to look at, or specific people to study to get some ideas?

Something like this maybe??? 18+ https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/1 … a003c4.jpg

Feb 11 13 01:30 pm Link

Photographer

testingphotography

Posts: 218

Seattle, Washington, US

Google "Peter Gowland" he was the "king" of Hollywood bathing suit/nude photography.

Feb 11 13 01:38 pm Link

Photographer

Rick Edwards

Posts: 6185

Wilmington, Delaware, US

Swank Photography wrote:

Something like this maybe??? 18+ https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/1 … a003c4.jpg

nice Bettie Page feel to it.

I was thinking Hurrell as well and Cecil Beaton, never seen any published nudes by either, definitely glamour

Feb 11 13 01:38 pm Link

Photographer

Sourcelight Photography

Posts: 284

BOISE, Idaho, US

David Reams Photography wrote:
Google "Peter Gowland" he was the "king" of Hollywood bathing suit/nude photography.

Have to agree.  Here's a link to Gowland's own site with all kinds of interesting information:

http://www.petergowland.com/default.htm

Specifically, here's a direct link to the best glamour page, complete with a few explanations about lighting setups:

http://www.petergowland.com/glamour5.html

Feb 11 13 02:05 pm Link

Photographer

Toto Photo

Posts: 3757

Belmont, California, US

Motordrive Photography wrote:
I don't think this this is exactly what you are looking for, but I love
classic glamour and get inspiration from Hurrell
https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/18862720

Old Hollywood means Hurrell to me too.

Feb 11 13 02:10 pm Link

Feb 11 13 02:10 pm Link

Feb 11 13 02:51 pm Link

Photographer

toesup

Posts: 1240

Grand Junction, Colorado, US

Earth Bound Art wrote:
Here you go...

Lovely shots!..

Feb 11 13 02:51 pm Link

Photographer

Rays Fine Art

Posts: 7504

New York, New York, US

Not nude, but definitely in the style: https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/110608/07/4def890dc273b_m.jpg

You might want to browse http://thepinupfiles.com/  I think you'll find some there.

Feb 11 13 03:08 pm Link

Photographer

Nor-Cal Photography

Posts: 3720

Walnut Creek, California, US

Earth Bound Art wrote:
Here you go...

https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/30474999
https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/30475044
https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/30974229

Nice!  Fits the thread topic!

But just one worthless opinion. smile

Feb 11 13 03:19 pm Link

Photographer

Daeda1us

Posts: 1067

Little Rock, Arkansas, US

Hollywood nudes always makes me think of Marilyn and the red velvet pics.

http://weheartvintage.co/2012/07/27/mar … t-session/

Feb 11 13 03:22 pm Link

Photographer

You Can Call Me Pierre

Posts: 800

Loma Linda, California, US

Bunny Yeager used ceiling bounce for Bettie Page.

Feb 11 13 03:23 pm Link

Photographer

Guss W

Posts: 10964

Clearwater, Florida, US

Nude old Hollywood doesn't really have much to pick from, since the studios didn't want to taint their prime stars.

Instead, you might do some searching on Ziegfeld Girls, who were sometimes photographed without their costumes.

https://www.google.com/search?q=ziegfel … 50&bih=879

Feb 11 13 03:27 pm Link

Photographer

Earth Bound Art

Posts: 1317

Lake Wylie, South Carolina, US

toesup wrote:
Lovely shots!..

Thank you!

Feb 11 13 04:57 pm Link

Photographer

Earth Bound Art

Posts: 1317

Lake Wylie, South Carolina, US

Nor-Cal Photography wrote:

Nice!  Fits the thread topic!

But just one worthless opinion. smile

Worthless opinion, never! Thanks

Feb 11 13 05:00 pm Link

Photographer

Philip of Dallas

Posts: 834

Dallas, Texas, US

I'm a big fan of Old Hollywood style and pinup. I don't think Hurrell did many nudes, but here's some relevant examples of his work.
http://www.shesmetoo.com/one-of-my-thre … e-hurrell/

I my mind, shooting an 'Old Hollywood style glamour nude' would include a combination of very focused lighting, nice shadow effects, and period makeup, along with Vargas type pinup poses . . . and of course a nude subject. smile

Feb 11 13 05:24 pm Link

Photographer

Zack Zoll

Posts: 6895

Glens Falls, New York, US

There were no soft boxes then, since the lights were all stupid hot.  Sometimes they would shoot through a silkscreen though.  Typically you would see screens, bounces, and a TON of barn doors/scrims/gobos/cookies/etc.  Basically, it was the same lighting they used for films, but with Vaseline smeared all over the lens.

Gowland was a good recommendation ... I think he shot the image of Rita Heyworth that ended up getting painting on all those bombers.  Also, google Kim Novak for a slightly modernized version.  You could be at that a while.  We'll wait smile


Since this was done mostly with video lights, I'd recommend watching some old movies.  Orson Welles was a big influence on how I used to light.

Feb 11 13 05:31 pm Link

Photographer

Barely StL

Posts: 1281

Saint Louis, Missouri, US

The Old Hollywood glamour style was the style employed by photographers who worked for the major US movie studios from roughly the 1920’s through the 1940’s. (Pick your dates.)

George Hurrell is the best known of these photographers. Bruno Bernard (Bernard of Hollywood) was also well-known for this style, and there were others. Because of the era and the clients, to my knowledge there are no examples of Old Hollywood glamour nudes from these photographers.

While he was an icon ca. the 1950's and 1960's, Gowland was more of a cheesecake glamour-style photographer.

The main elements of the style are lighting, poses and wardrobe. For your purposes, lighting and posing are the keys.

The lighting was high contrast, generally provided by thousands of watts of hot lights – mostly spotlights, although focusing floodlights (which don’t have a Fresnel lens but can still be focused to emulate a spotlight) such as some of the Mole-Richardson 2k lights.

Broncolor and other strobe manufacturers used to make spotlight heads as part of their pack-and-head systems. I don't now of any manufacturer who makes them now. However, if you use Photogenic or PCB strobes, you can use these to temporarily convert your strobes to spotlights:

http://www.tallyns.com/tpp/amazing/item … =turbospot

Books of Hurrell’s photos will give you a feel for the genre. These are the best sources I’ve found on using Old Hollywood-style lighting.

http://www.amazon.com/Hollywood-Style-L … B001VXQ8HE

http://www.amazon.com/Hollywood-Portrai … d+lighting



Here’s an Old Hollywood-style photo from my other MM portfolio. It was made using about 4,000 watts of hot lights – a Mole-Richardson 2k focusing flood and three spotlights. A 2x3-foot wooden cookie (cuculoris, cucaloris, cucoloris – I don’t think anyone knows which is the correct spelling these days) was used over the 2k.

https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/120115/22/4f13bfe0bcd6f_m.jpg

Feb 11 13 05:47 pm Link

Photographer

Brooklyn Bridge Images

Posts: 13200

Brooklyn, New York, US

Model should supply examples since whatever you find may not be what she has in mind

Feb 11 13 05:53 pm Link

Photographer

Cherrystone

Posts: 37171

Columbus, Ohio, US

Hurrell
Hands down, the master.

IF you wish to go early early, Google Alfred Cheney Johnston

Feb 11 13 05:54 pm Link

Photographer

Blue Ash Film Group

Posts: 10343

Cincinnati, Ohio, US

Thank you for all the great replies so far. Hurrell was also the first person I thought of, and reading this thread has reminded me that I own a Gowland book that is stored away somewhere. I also appreciate the technique advice some have offered.

Feb 11 13 09:25 pm Link

Photographer

Philip of Dallas

Posts: 834

Dallas, Texas, US

Here's some very interesting photos of Hurrell in his studio, shooting Jane Russell. Check out the lighting setup.
http://www.picturechina.com.cn/bbs/wate … QwMi5qcGc=

Feb 11 13 09:45 pm Link

Photographer

You Can Call Me Pierre

Posts: 800

Loma Linda, California, US

Those Baby Solarpots are awfully close.  She would be melting if they are fitted with 1000-watt bulbs.

Feb 11 13 10:46 pm Link

Photographer

Photos by Lorrin

Posts: 7026

Eugene, Oregon, US

Maybe Ruth Bernard.

She did nudes during that era but no Hollywood people that I know of.

Karsh is another name from that era - I know of no nudes he shot.

Willam Mortensen (sp) did fairly elaborate Hollywood type sets. (saw them years ago.) Did a lot of photoshopping before there were even computers.  Known for "Monsters and Madonnas" book.  I think he did nudes.

Feb 12 13 01:26 am Link

Photographer

Camerosity

Posts: 5805

Saint Louis, Missouri, US

Ruth Berhnard (no relation to Bruno Bernard - different spellings) was a very accomplished photographer of that era. While you may want to look at Bernhard's work, I wouldn't classify it as Old Hollywood-style.

Imo, Yousuf Karsh was the finest portrait photographer ever. He shot every US president from Hoover to Clinton and, if I'm not mistaken, did the official portaits of every president from Hoover to the first President Bush.

President Clinton wanted to be photographed by Karsh, who was in failing health by Clinton's presidency. Karsh was summoned from Canada (his studio was in Ottawa for most if not all of his career, although he traveled the world photographing the rich, influential and famous) to photograph Clinton in New York. If my memory is correct, the shoot took place in Gramercy Park. The photos of Clinton were the last ones that Karsh took.

Karsh photographed heads of state, military leaders, famous authors and musicians, playwrights and composers, captains of industry and actors and actresses by the dozens. Time studying Karsh's work would be well-spent, but I wouldn't classify Karsh's style as Old Hollywood either.

Karsh's style was his own. Low-key lighting, for the most part, with rich tones in black-and-white until late in his career (when color film became available). Not only was he very skilled technically, but he had tremendous ability to make photos that provided insight into his subjects.

As far as I'm concerned, Karsh was one of the four best photographers of all time - along with Ansel Adams, Richard Avedon and Alfred Eisenstaedt.

Mortensen was an educator and prolific photographer and author of numerous books on photography, several of which I've owned at one time or another. I'm sure I haven't seen all of his work, and I don't recall his Hollywood-style photos.

Feb 12 13 03:06 am Link

Photographer

devpics

Posts: 839

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Great link Guss !

Feb 12 13 03:52 am Link

Photographer

devpics

Posts: 839

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

I should try looking under images for famous Golden Age actresses and then duplicate the lighting style & soft focus for your Nude shots

Feb 12 13 03:54 am Link

Photographer

Blue Ash Film Group

Posts: 10343

Cincinnati, Ohio, US

Thanks! There is a lot of good information to look at here.

Feb 12 13 04:11 pm Link

Photographer

River Art

Posts: 75

Kansas City, Kansas, US

I think this a friend captured may be what you're looking for:

https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/31499049  18+

This one is more implied from my other port:

https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/27735797

Feb 13 13 09:02 am Link

Photographer

Cinema Photography

Posts: 4488

Boulder, Colorado, US

Since old Hollywood/hurrell is a specialty of mine, have a look in my port and on my website if ya like

Feb 13 13 09:09 am Link

Photographer

Cinema Photography

Posts: 4488

Boulder, Colorado, US

dp bug

Feb 13 13 09:10 am Link

Photographer

Barely StL

Posts: 1281

Saint Louis, Missouri, US

River Art wrote:
I think this a friend captured may be what you're looking for:

https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/31499049  18+

This one is more implied from my other port:

https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/27735797

The top photo is very close to what I've had in mind. The contrast is lower than most Old Hollywood shots - but it just about has to be. I seriously doubt the lighting ratios used by Hurrell, Bernard, et. al., on 8x10 b&w film would fit within the range of today's CCD's. Plus very high contrast ratios generally don't look good in color photos of people.

One feature of the original Old Hollywood look that I neglected to mention is bold geometrical shapes, often in dark shadows on light backgrounds.

Feb 13 13 09:55 am Link

Photographer

Cinema Photography

Posts: 4488

Boulder, Colorado, US

Barely StL wrote:
The top photo is very close to what I've had in mind. The contrast is lower than most Old Hollywood shots - but it just about has to be. I seriously doubt the lighting ratios used by Hurrell, Bernard, et. al., on 8x10 b&w film would fit within the range of today's CCD's. Plus very high contrast ratios generally don't look good in color photos of people.

One feature of the original Old Hollywood look that I neglected to mention is bold geometrical shapes, often in dark shadows on light backgrounds.

it's ALL about lighting, pose, makeup and what the model wears. That will make or break a shot in this genre.

Feb 13 13 09:59 am Link

Photographer

Silver Mirage

Posts: 1585

Plainview, Texas, US

I'd look at Hurrell, Bull and the rest of the classics, then re-imagine that sort of looks without clothes.

What I think of as Hollywood glamor was usually done under close supervision by the studios and nudes were mostly off limits. I've seen a few of Harlow, but can't think of any others offhand.

As a technical tip, those photographers were typically using relatively hard, high-contrast lighting with low-contrast, flair-prone lenses - pretty much the opposite of what most of us use today. A beauty dish is a good place to start.

Feb 13 13 10:18 am Link

Photographer

Silver Mirage

Posts: 1585

Plainview, Texas, US

Another thought: Do an image search for Ziegfeld Follies or Ziegfeld girl.

These are a little earlier than the prime Hollywood era and maybe predate the style, but Flo Ziegfeld didn't have any problem with his girls posing nude.

Feb 13 13 10:24 am Link

Photographer

John Wishard

Posts: 1896

Fallbrook, California, US

Wow a lot of good references and good advice here! I'm enjoying this thread and the insights...

Here is my amateurish attempt at a vintage nude(18+) https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/11591650

Feb 13 13 11:38 am Link

Photographer

WIP

Posts: 15973

Cheltenham, England, United Kingdom

The Hollywood glamour / stars photographers has lenses especially made up which were very slightly' out of' in regards to focus giving that soft effect.

Feb 13 13 01:02 pm Link