rfordphotos wrote: The sample is still a headshot weather its glamor or not. I've had three images deleted today which is not uncommon for this contest. Yet contestants simply dont follow rules. I feel that I have run this contest properly. Participation is, of course, optional. Thank you for your concern. Jun 17 14 06:51 pm Link John Carrasco wrote: John, that is certainly one way to look at it. Jun 18 14 11:40 am Link rfordphotos wrote: Out of courtesy, I'll respond for the last time. How difficult is to see a sample of what is acceptable or not. I'm not interested in resolving anything, the rules are THERE to follow. No complaints from the Head Honcha, either. If people don't want to participate, there are a gazzilion contests they can enter. And since you nor anyone is paying me to run my contests, I'll run them the way I feel is appropriate. Have an awesome day . Jun 18 14 12:59 pm Link John Carrasco wrote: Fine John--- Jun 18 14 01:08 pm Link John Carrasco wrote: But the rules DO NOT STATE "If I can place a Head or face double its size in an image .. " You have an example which looks to me to be from just above the arm pit. Which mine clearly was..... Jun 22 14 08:53 am Link rfordphotos wrote: *grins* Thank you rfordphotos Jun 22 14 08:56 am Link DaveDavis wrote: ** NOTE ** If I can place a Head or face double its size in an image .. IT's GONE. Jun 22 14 09:28 am Link John Carrasco wrote: DONE Jun 22 14 09:34 am Link John Carrasco wrote: Oh, but wait, I do comply 100% with Rule #1, even after you just edited and changed the rules... Oops!! Jun 22 14 10:14 am Link John Carrasco wrote: Have a nice weekend/vacation yourself!! Jun 22 14 10:15 am Link DaveDavis wrote: Much appreciated it Dave .. Will be online sporatically to help with the contests. Jun 22 14 10:51 am Link Jun 22 14 02:46 pm Link I would like some of more niche contests to have a continuing thread instead of a new thread with the date. and the fantasy/fairytale contests combined Jun 22 14 03:28 pm Link I think that there are only two contests that start a new thread each day. In the case of dark image of the day, votes for one day are accepted after the start time of the next days contest. As such, it would hurt voting to change the format to a single thread and I am reluctant to do this. Jun 22 14 04:40 pm Link Erin Koski wrote: I see no problem with it being in multiple threads it helps people being able to know if they are allowed to vote or enter that contest and then i am sure that people would find it easier again because you then post on that thread the winner for that days contest I love it keep up the good work. Yes some contests are better in single thread but just like you said Erin your contest allows voting to run into the next days contest to allow people from all parts of the world to vote which i think it marvelous It would be too confusing as a single post Jun 22 14 08:30 pm Link Motordrive Photography wrote: Fantasy and Fairytale are two different contests run by two different host with two different entrants requirements Jun 22 14 08:33 pm Link Motordrive Photography wrote: I have a new theme every other day for my contest and also it makes it easier and also gives the winner more than a day to shine , kind of like his or her own thread . Also yes they are two very different contests with there own very distinct rules . But thanks for your input . Jun 22 14 09:35 pm Link Patreshas Editing wrote: I agree with you . Jun 22 14 09:36 pm Link I wanna learn Digital Retouching. Please tell me what i do ? Jun 23 14 04:36 am Link Retouching Artist wrote: Do you mean Digital Art Darl Jun 23 14 04:47 am Link bump Mar 21 15 06:58 am Link Bump Jun 06 15 12:43 pm Link Reflections on the nature of "Fashion" especially as it relates to still photography... Primary revenue streams for the high end shooters has been for many years Magazines which showcase clothing... Publications such as ELLE, VOGUE, Allure, InStyle, W, and WWD (women's wear daily) which is considered by many as the "Trade Journal" of the industry... Bare in mind that male fashion makes up possibly 25% of the market, magazines such as GQ cater to this segment... Why? Male clothing is more akind to uniforms (think military here) and remains somewhat static over time... Best way to assess market share is to visit high end retail outlets such as Nordstrom, Macy's etc. and calculate the floor display area relegated to female verse male clothing... In my market (Washington DC) it has remained static at a 25% / 75% split... Publications typically have advertising copy and editorial copy... Photographers compete seriously for the advertising assignments while newly emerging talent hope to get noticed with editorial "Stories" which rarely if ever pay, only the credentials of being published have merit... The two styles are rather different... and shooting editorial is very low stress since there isn't a client in the mix... However advertising is highly stressful and demanding... here the (fashion) models are oft looking off camera axis (invisible persona) and asexual since attention needs to be on the clothing (merchandise)... Editorial however is generally about promoting a lifestyle a.k.a. persona that readers can identify with... The narratives are compelling, dramatic, and oft surreal... Is there cross over? absolutely... but it is the publication's editor that makes the call... rest assured they are heavily vested in their advertisers best interest... But what about fashion shows? They are theater... think circus here... pieces wore on the runway are not meant for the buying public... the off the shelf "ready wear" are dumbed down variants of the show pieces... Where does the line between Glamour and Fashion exist? It doesn't exist... it is totally about the context for which the image is targeted... Victoria Secret is not considered High Fashion, nor a luxury brand... VS marketing rely on glitz, glamour, smoke and mirrors... it's all about the model (VS Angels)... not so much about the garments... Is lingerie fashion? Again it's context specific... A catalog image for Jockey women's wear is indeed fashion... However the context is focused on selling the garment and is decidedly not about the model (who typically is looking off camera axis)... Working with fashion designers I've oft been told that the moment both elbows go above the shoulders then the line between fashion and glamour has been breached... canvass catalog work and high end advertising to verify this... and yes there are exceptions however best to keep in mind this will likely never find agreement nor closure... However those who shoot for advertising agencies know and understand exactly what there client(s) needs and expectations are... if they fail to respond appropriately there are a dozen more standing in line for job... Hope this helps more than confuses... Best advice? Shoot for a clothing designer... This is the fast track to comprehending precisely what works and what doesn't in the world of fashion... All the best on your journey... Jun 06 15 02:53 pm Link |