Forums > Photography Talk > Models underage...

Photographer

CGI Images

Posts: 4989

Wichita, Kansas, US

Joe WoW Photos wrote:
Only for senior or school pics.  never as a "model" and never in a sexy manner.  I leave that for the pediphiles and their list of reasons it's OK.

Underage implies under "18" do to 2256, so that means a 17yr old would be "underage".  You consider people that shoot pictures of 17yr olds "pedophiles"?

Jun 22 08 01:01 pm Link

Photographer

CGI Images

Posts: 4989

Wichita, Kansas, US

CarlMaiorinoPhotography wrote:
So you think shooting a model who is 16 is for peodphiles?  Is that what you are saying?  You have some serious issues...

Oh, you beat me too it.  I responded before seeing you already said the same thing.  Not to mention he should probably look up the word pedophile and get the actual definition of it. 

FYI... Pedophile refers to PRE-pubescent, the correct term for POST pubescent would be Hebophile, and STILL has nothing to do with taking pictures appropriately of people under the age of 18.

Jun 22 08 01:04 pm Link

Photographer

Doug Lester

Posts: 10591

Atlanta, Georgia, US

Before I retired, when I was still running my studio, I used to love photographers who refused to work with an under 18 model. Aside from the good laugh the model and I got, it was good continuing income for my studio, guess who they came back to after turning 18.

I kept it age appropriate and unless a release was to be signed, did not require a parent to be present. I encouraged it but did not require it. Because they already knew me, trusted me and liked my work, some returned after turning 18 to pose nude.

This young lady was 16 with a parent present.

https://www.distinctiveimages.com/mod_port/m29.jpg

This one was 17 and with no parent.

https://www.distinctiveimages.com/mod_port/shay84.jpg

Jun 22 08 01:19 pm Link

Retoucher

Kevin_Connery

Posts: 3307

Fullerton, California, US

Joe WoW Photos wrote:
Only for senior or school pics.  never as a "model" and never in a sexy manner.  I leave that for the pediphiles and their list of reasons it's OK.

You mean the "pedophiles" like Toys'R'Us, Target, Sears, JCPenney, GAP, Christian Life Ministry, costume shops, McDonalds, Pizza Hut...

https://trus.imageg.net/graphics/product_images/pTRU1-3583916reg.jpg https://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51AERWB0NQL._SS260_.jpg https://cache.jcpenney.com//images/Seasonal/X2_C6_052008_327_052008_422.jpg https://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:A2jjeYNvB8BlvM:http://christianlifeag.nextmeta.com/images/library/Kids1.jpg https://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:C_N-z2JRuwqtZM:http://www.hauntingfx.com/catalog/images/Kids%2520Costume.jpg https://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:Hh42l8n6RNCkoM:http://francisanderson.files.wordpress.com/2007/12/ronald-mcdonalds.jpg https://static.sky.com/images/pictures/1600568.jpg

Or were you projecting?

Jun 22 08 01:50 pm Link

Photographer

CGI Images

Posts: 4989

Wichita, Kansas, US

Kevin_Connery wrote:

You mean the "pedophiles" like Toys'R'Us, Target, Sears, JCPenney, GAP, Christian Life Ministry, costume shops, McDonalds, Pizza Hut...

https://trus.imageg.net/graphics/product_images/pTRU1-3583916reg.jpg https://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51AERWB0NQL._SS260_.jpg https://cache.jcpenney.com//images/Seasonal/X2_C6_052008_327_052008_422.jpg https://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:A2jjeYNvB8BlvM:http://christianlifeag.nextmeta.com/images/library/Kids1.jpg https://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:C_N-z2JRuwqtZM:http://www.hauntingfx.com/catalog/images/Kids%2520Costume.jpg https://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:Hh42l8n6RNCkoM:http://francisanderson.files.wordpress.com/2007/12/ronald-mcdonalds.jpg https://static.sky.com/images/pictures/1600568.jpg

Or were you projecting?

Kevin,  That would be ......nail......head!

Jun 22 08 02:02 pm Link